Relationship Details

This document is a Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 25, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denied Maxwell's requests to immediately disclose the identities of three alleged victims and to order the Bureau of Prisons to release her into the general population, deeming the former premature and the latter unnecessary given current accommodations. However, the Court ordered the Government to provide written status updates every 90 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials and ability to communicate with counsel.

A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. The order sets deadlines for responses and replies regarding motions in limine filed on October 18, requiring parties to file omnibus (single document) responses. It also establishes a protocol and deadline (October 29, 2021) for filing redacted briefs and a joint letter justifying those redactions.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues for the entry of its proposed protective order regarding discovery materials, specifically opposing the defendant's request to publicly name victims who have previously spoken to the media and opposing restrictions on the Government's use of its own investigative materials. The document includes the full text of the proposed protective order, detailing how 'Confidential' and 'Highly Confidential' information (including sexualized imagery) must be handled by the defense.

Court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 3, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court approves the defendant's proposed redactions for letters dated November 25 and 30 regarding a renewed bail motion, citing the privacy interests of individuals mentioned in the letters. The court denies the request for an in camera conference but allows written submissions with tailored redactions and orders the parties to schedule briefing for the renewed bail motion.

This is a court order filed on December 3, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a request by Maxwell's defense counsel to seal letters related to a renewed motion for bail. The court approves the defense's proposed redactions, noting that the Government does not oppose them, based on legal standards regarding judicial documents and privacy interests.

This is a court order filed on February 18, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses proposed redactions to the Defendant's motion for a new trial, rejecting specific redaction requests because the information constitutes legal arguments or is widely reported in the press. The document specifically lists page and line numbers in the Defense Brief where redactions were denied.

This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the Supreme Court case No. 24-1073, Ghislaine Maxwell v. United States of America, dated July 14, 2025. It certifies that the Solicitor General, D. John Sauer, served the 'Brief for the United States in Opposition' to Maxwell's attorneys, Sara Kropf and David Oscar Markus. The document also includes administrative instructions regarding mail delays at the DOJ and contact information for case management.

This document is a court order titled 'Public Access Findings' filed on July 2, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Andrea K. Johnstone rules that the initial appearance and removal hearing will be conducted via video and telephone conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The order justifies this 'partial closure' of the court as necessary to protect public health while maintaining public access through telephonic means.

This document is a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, distinguishing between standard, 'Confidential', and 'Highly Confidential' information (which includes sexualized imagery), and limiting access to the Defendant, Defense Counsel, and specific authorized persons. The order specifically mandates that highly confidential materials containing sexualized images must not be copied or possessed by the defendant outside the presence of counsel.

This document is a formal order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021. It affirms previous District Court orders from December 2020 and March 2021 that denied Ghislaine Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The court also addresses a complaint made during oral arguments regarding Maxwell's sleep deprivation while incarcerated, directing her counsel to address those specific concerns to the District Court.

This document is a legal stipulation in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed in the Southern District of New York. It states as an agreed-upon fact that a witness, referred to as "Kate," and her counsel met with government prosecutors on September 3, 2021. During this meeting, Kate's counsel provided a partially completed U-Visa application and discussed her visa status with the prosecutors.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 22, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, details the legal teams for both the prosecution (SDNY) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), and notes the presence of FBI agent Amanda Young and NYPD officer Paul Byrne. The document was filed on August 10, 2022, bearing the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00014679.

This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 1, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 21-770/21-58). Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by attorney David Oscar Markus, is appealing a decision by Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York, requesting reasonable bail or an evidentiary hearing. The motion is opposed by the United States of America, represented by AUSA Won S. Shin.

This document is a draft verdict sheet from the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated December 18, 2021. It lists three counts against Maxwell related to the conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of minors for illegal sexual activity. The sheet provides spaces for a jury to indicate a verdict of 'Guilty' or 'Not Guilty' for each count.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives in the courtroom.

This legal document is a response filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The defense opposes the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts, arguing that since Maxwell is alive and actively litigating her case (which is pending before the Supreme Court), releasing the transcripts would violate her due process rights. The defense also claims they cannot take an informed position as the Court has denied their request to review the materials themselves.

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of Colorado to be admitted 'pro hac vice', allowing him to represent the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.

This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-00330-AJN). The appeal is directed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and challenges the District Court's order from March 22, 2021, which denied her third motion for release on bail. The document lists Maxwell's counsel as David Oscar Markus and the Assistant U.S. Attorneys as Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.

This document is a Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The appeal challenges a court order from March 22, 2021, which denied her 'Third Motion for Release on Bail'. The document identifies Maxwell's attorney, David Oscar Markus, and the prosecuting Assistant U.S. Attorneys.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically 'Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for Pretrial Release', submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. The motion is part of an appeal from a case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in the matter of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing was made by attorney David Oscar Markus of the Miami-based law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.

This is a court order filed on February 11, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Judge denies the defendant's motion to seal all documents related to her motion for a new trial in their entirety, ruling that sealing must be narrowly tailored. The document also references a motion to intervene by 'Juror 50' and mentions that media organizations have requested the unsealing of documents.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically 'Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for a New Trial', submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 11, 2022. The case is identified as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document lists the names and contact information for Maxwell's legal counsel from three different law firms.

This is a proposed court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of U.S. vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorney David Oscar Markus of Florida to be admitted 'pro hac vice', allowing him to serve as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in this specific case.

This is a Motion Information Statement filed on January 12, 2023, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 22-1426). Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, John M. Leventhal, is requesting an unopposed extension of time to file her appellate brief, moving the deadline from January 30, 2023, to February 28, 2023, citing unforeseen circumstances.

This is a court document filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). It serves as a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript regarding a conference held on December 6, 2021. The notice outlines the deadlines and procedures for parties to request redactions of sensitive personal data from the transcript before it becomes publicly available.

This document is the final signature page (Page 19 of 19) of an indictment filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the charges under 18 U.S.C. codes (including conspiracy, perjury, and sex trafficking statutes) and bears the name of Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and the signature of the Grand Jury Foreperson.

This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to exclude evidence based on Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the precedent set by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and requests a hearing on the matter. The document lists the names and contact information for Maxwell's attorneys from three different law firms.

This document is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 26, 2023, by the U.S. government in the appeal of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The government requests permission to file an oversized brief of up to 20,000 words and a 30-day extension of time to file it, proposing a new deadline of June 29, 2023. This would consequently extend the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell's reply brief to July 27, 2023. The motion is noted as being unopposed by Maxwell's counsel.

This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The motion, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, seeks to preclude the introduction of specific government exhibits (251, 288, 294, 313, and 606) in her trial. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Appendix to the Motion for Pretrial Release', dated April 1, 2021. The filing is part of an appeal (No. 21-770 & 21-58) in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, originating from a case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The parties are the United States of America (Appellee) and Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant), who is represented by attorney David Oscar Markus of MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.

This is a Motion Information Statement filed on September 24, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Adam Mueller, is requesting permission to file several documents under seal, including an unredacted brief and Appendix Volume 2, arguing they contain confidential material. The motion states that the opposing counsel for the United States, Maurene Comey, does not oppose this request.

This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 28, 2021. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (led by US Attorney Damian Williams) and the defense team (including attorneys from Haddon Morgan and Foreman and Cohen & Gresser). Also noted as present are representatives from the FBI and NYPD.

This document is the title page of the Sentencing Memorandum filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 15, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell, including attorneys from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser LLP, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00010447.