Relationship Details

This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering dates from November 30, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding the protection of witness identities (pseudonyms) and cross-examination limitations, and correspondence regarding specific witnesses including 'Witness Jane', 'Witness-3', and Michael Dawson. The document also includes administrative orders such as the payment of juror transportation invoices.

This document is a subpoena from the US District Court (SDNY) in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, issued to Jordana Feldman of the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program (EVCP). The defense (Maxwell's legal team) is demanding the production of all claim forms, communications, payment records, and releases related to four specific (redacted) accusers who submitted claims to the EVCP. The deadline for production was set for November 29, 2021.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, denying his request to use discovery materials from her criminal case in a separate civil lawsuit. The Government argues that the materials are related to an ongoing grand jury investigation and are subject to a Protective Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, which explicitly restricts their use to the criminal defense only. The letter suggests that if Pagliuca seeks these records for civil litigation, he must utilize FOIA or a Touhy request.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, requesting the suppression of evidence obtained from a government subpoena to Boies Schiller and dismissal of counts five and six. It includes a Table of Contents, Table of Authorities citing various legal cases and rules, and a Table of Exhibits detailing communications and notes related to the case from 2016 to 2021, many involving AUSAs and individuals like Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, Brad Edwards, and Sigrid McCawley. The memorandum argues that the government misled the court and that the evidence should be suppressed due to due process violations.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on March 15, 2021, supporting a motion to dismiss counts one through four of her indictment as time-barred. The defense argues that the 2003 Amendment to 18 U.S.C. § 3283, which extended the statute of limitations, cannot be applied retroactively because Congress explicitly rejected a retroactivity provision. Additionally, the defense contends that the Mann Act offenses charged (enticement to travel and transportation of a minor) do not 'necessarily entail' the sexual abuse of a child, and thus the extended statute of limitations under § 3283 does not apply.

This document is a court docket sheet (Page 14 of 208) from the SDNY regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from July 14, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell pleading Not Guilty to multiple counts, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and the Judge issuing orders regarding discovery schedules and prohibiting extrajudicial statements. The document also details procedural motions filed by defense attorneys Pagliuca and Everdell, and responses from prosecutor Alison Moe.

This document is the signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 13, 2021. The text requests the Court to grant individual sequestered voir dire due to the sensitive nature of the charges and pervasive pretrial publicity. The document is signed by attorneys Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is the cover page for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing, titled 'GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION', lists the defendant's legal counsel from three different law firms. It serves as the formal introduction to a request for the court to exclude certain identification evidence from the trial.

This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between May 14 and May 21, 2021. It details legal maneuvering regarding redactions to protect third parties and victims, as well as defense motions to suppress evidence obtained via subpoena and to strike surplusage from the indictment. Notably, it includes a judge's order admonishing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to ensure Maxwell's security protocols are necessary and neutral, and urging them to reduce sleep disruption.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The proceedings took place on December 18, 2021, at 9:10 a.m. in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorneys including Maurene Comey) and the defense (including Jeffrey Pagliuca and Christian Everdell).

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426, referring to earlier 2020 district court proceedings) detailing legal filings in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between August 10 and August 24, 2020. The entries track a series of motions regarding discovery disclosure, protective orders, and sealing requests, involving defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and government prosecutors (Rossmiller, Comey, Pomerantz). Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders setting deadlines for responses and replies regarding these disputes.

This document is a subpoena issued by the defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20CR330) to an undisclosed recipient (likely an administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program). The subpoena demands the production of materials submitted by accusers to the EVCP, including claim forms, communications, payment records, and releases. Attached to the subpoena is the 'Independent Epstein Victims' Compensation Program Protocol' (dated May 29, 2020), which details the rules, eligibility requirements, and procedures for victims seeking compensation from the Epstein Estate, noting that the program is voluntary, independent, and confidential.

This document is a signature page from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated February 24, 2022. It lists the legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York. The document is electronically signed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.

This document is a proposed court order filed on June 29, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida, granting attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca permission to appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The order relates to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards in connection with the underlying case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It also establishes electronic filing notifications for Pagliuca and his legal assistant, Nicole Simmons, at the firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.

This document is a motion filed on June 29, 2016, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file specific exhibits (A, G, H, I, and N) under seal because they were designated as confidential in the underlying case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) in the Southern District of New York. The document includes a certificate of service indicating the motion was served electronically to attorney Jack Scarola representing Bradley J. Edwards.

This document is a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed on June 29, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. Attorney Denise D. Riley requests that attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the Colorado firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman be admitted to represent Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in matters related to a subpoena issued to Bradley J. Edwards. The document includes contact information for the attorneys involved and a certificate of service to opposing counsel Jack Scarola.

This document is a motion filed on December 16, 2016, by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file 'Exhibit B' under seal, noting that the exhibit is a sealed order from the Southern District of New York in the underlying 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case. The document lists legal counsel for Maxwell and for Bradley J. Edwards, who is the subject of a subpoena in this miscellaneous action.

This document is a Civil Docket Report for Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 13, 2016. The case involves Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards filing a motion to quash a subpoena against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The docket records various motions, including requests to seal exhibits and appear Pro Hac Vice, culminating in an order on December 22, 2016, to transfer the motion to the Southern District of New York to be handled as part of the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-RWS). The case was terminated in the Florida court on December 23, 2016.

This document is the signature page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated September 4, 2020. It identifies Laura A. Menninger and Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. as the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell. The document includes the law firm's address in Denver, CO, and contact information for the attorneys.

This page contains the conclusion and signature block of a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document requests that the court vacate Maxwell's conviction and enter a judgment of acquittal. It lists the contact information for her legal defense team, including Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from December 9 and 10, 2021. It details legal arguments over the admission of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), involving witness Juan Alessi, where Judge Nathan overruled defense objections. It also records minute entries for the jury trial proceedings on those dates and the filing of transcripts.

This document is a docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell covering October 13-15, 2021. It details procedural motions regarding juror selection (voir dire), the attendance of alleged victims at the trial, and disputes over the delivery speed of Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. The document also references filings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (the 'Rape Shield Law') and includes orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

A letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Jeffrey Pagliuca, denying a request to use criminal discovery materials in a separate civil lawsuit. The Government cites a Protective Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan which restricts the use of such materials solely to the defense of the criminal case to protect an ongoing investigation. The letter suggests counsel use FOIA or Touhy requests if seeking records for civil litigation purposes.

This document is the signature page (page 65 of 66) of a legal filing (Document 642) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. It lists the defense counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Bobbi Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.

This document is a Reply Memorandum filed on March 15, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The defense argues that Counts 1 and 3 of the Superseding Indictment are multiplicitous (charging the same crime twice based on identical facts) and requests the Court order the government to elect one count to prosecute and dismiss the other prior to trial to avoid jury prejudice. The filing contends that the government has failed to prove the existence of two distinct conspiracies.

Defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca writes to Judge Alison Nathan arguing against the government's request to defer ruling on Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence until after the trial on non-perjury counts. The defense contends that an evidentiary hearing is necessary immediately because the government's alleged misconduct (misleading a judge to obtain a subpoena) constitutes a due process violation that could suppress all 90,000 pages of evidence and any derivatives ('fruit of the poisonous tree'). Furthermore, the defense argues that Maxwell cannot knowingly decide whether to testify without knowing the admissibility of this evidence, as the government has only promised not to use it in its case-in-chief but reserved rights for impeachment.

This document is the cover page for a 'Motion in Limine' filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The motion seeks to exclude evidence allegedly seized during a search of 358 El Brillo Way (Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach residence) that occurred on October 20, 2005. It lists the legal defense team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

Court order from the Southern District of New York (Case 20-CR-330) signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order grants the motion for attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger of Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C. to withdraw as co-counsel for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The document is dated August 7, 2025.

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) of a legal filing (Document 119) from case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on January 25, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is page 2 of a legal letter filed on March 2, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The defense attorneys request that Maxwell's lawyers be present for an upcoming proceeding and ask for a continuance until May. The letter is signed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and lists co-counsel Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the signature page (page 36 of 37) of a legal filing from February 11, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense team, including attorneys Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger, and Sternheim, is requesting the court to vacate Maxwell's conviction, dismiss the S2 Indictment, and enter a judgment of acquittal under Rule 29 based on insufficient government proof.

This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The defense team, consisting of attorneys from three separate law firms, formally requests a severance and separate trial for Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment. The filing includes the attorneys' contact information and signatures.

This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 16 to April 19, 2021. It details various motions to dismiss and suppress evidence filed by Maxwell's defense team, orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan setting an arraignment date for April 23, 2021, and procedural orders regarding the severance of perjury counts and the handling of redacted documents. The document highlights the legal maneuvering regarding the S2 Superseding Indictment and disputes over evidence obtained via subpoena.

This document is a page from a court docket sheet regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from May 3 to May 7, 2021. Key entries include Judge Nathan granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 to allow the defense to prepare for new charges, orders ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives at the MDC, and various correspondences regarding subpoena requests and 'flashlight security checks' at the detention center. It also notes a deleted document that was filed incorrectly.

This legal document, filed on March 2, 2022, is a request from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys, led by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, ask the Court to postpone an important proceeding until a convenient date in May. The reason for the request is to ensure that Ms. Maxwell's lawyers can be present for the matter.

This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Document 394) from the court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the names and contact information for the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell from three law firms: Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, P.C.; Cohen & Gresser LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document is electronically signed by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca.

This document is the final page of a legal filing (Document 544) from December 13, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell assert her constitutional right to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman as witnesses. The page includes the contact information for her legal counsel from three different law firms.

This document is a page from a court docket sheet (Case 21-58) covering dates from July 8 to July 13, 2020, regarding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details administrative motions for attorney appearances (Pagliuca, Cohen, Everdell), the filing of a superseding indictment, and specific logistical orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020, including COVID-19 protocols and public access via telephone.

This document is a court docket sheet page from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It details procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also lists a series of letters between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a Brady disclosure order signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This document is a page from the court docket in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering a period in August 2020. It details a judicial order denying a broad defense request regarding witness privacy and discovery materials, followed by a log of subsequent legal filings (motions, affidavits, and endorsements) between the defense team (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the prosecution (Rossmiller) regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders.

This document is the signature page (page 10 of 11) of a legal filing in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated October 18, 2021, and filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text concludes a legal argument regarding hearsay evidence, asserting that a specific record does not meet the business records exception. It lists the defense legal team representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman, Cohen & Gresser, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions,' filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell: Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010267.

This is the cover page for a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The document is a Reply Memorandum supporting Maxwell's third motion for bail, filed on March 22, 2021. It lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from firms in New York and Denver.

This document is a court docket log from May 2021 regarding the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including granting a trial continuance to Fall 2021 and ensuring Maxwell's access to discovery hard drives and attorney-client communications at the MDC. The log also records various letters filed by both the prosecution (USA) regarding subpoenas and prison conditions (flashlights), and the defense regarding witness disclosures.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) detailing legal proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between July and August 2020. It includes a judicial order rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders to safeguard witness privacy, followed by a log of subsequent letter motions and responses regarding discovery disclosure filed by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and government attorney Alex Rossmiller. The document tracks the procedural back-and-forth regarding the handling of sensitive discovery materials and protective orders.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically a memorandum submitted on behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on July 10, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the document outlines Maxwell's opposition to the government's motion for her detention. The filing lists her legal counsel from the law firms COHEN & GRESSER LLP and HADDON, MORGAN & FORMAN P.C.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion to dismiss a superseding indictment based on alleged Sixth Amendment violations. The page lists the defense attorneys from three different law firms representing Maxwell.

This document is a court docket page from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58). It details legal maneuvers regarding discovery disclosure and protective orders between July and August 2020, including a ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan denying a defense request deemed 'unprecedented' and 'too broad' regarding witness privacy. The docket lists filings by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition by Assistant US Attorney Alex Rossmiller.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58) covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It details the transmission of appeal notices, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim, and a series of letters between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding disclosure delays and investigative files. The log concludes with Judge Nathan issuing an order confirming the government's Brady disclosure obligations pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act.

This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a Memorandum of Law, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 13, 2021. It is filed by the legal team for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The motion seeks an individual and sequestered jury selection process (voir dire) to be partially conducted by the defense counsel.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.

This document is a signature page (page 22 of 23) from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from November 2 to November 4, 2021. It details pre-trial motions regarding trial length, juror anonymity, release on bond, and evidentiary hearings (Rule 412 and Daubert). Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a hearing for November 10, 2021, and directed the government to address issues regarding Maxwell's transportation and access to legal mail at the MDC.

This document is the title page of a court transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman).

This document is the first page of a court record for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the appearances for the trial held on December 1, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, listing the presiding judge, legal teams for both the prosecution and defense, and other law enforcement and paralegal personnel present.

Cover page of the official transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), dated December 7, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. The document lists Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding, along with the appearances of the prosecution team (US Attorneys) and the defense team (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is a court docket summary from Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing numerous filings that occurred on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan and a series of letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense. The filings cover procedural matters such as proposed redactions, motions to quash subpoenas, admissibility of witness testimony (Witness-3), and evidence related to specific exhibits and accusers (Accuser-3).

This document is a court docket page (Page 31 of 92) listing entries from April 16 to April 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details several filings by Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca) including motions to dismiss counts of the superseding indictment and suppress evidence. Key orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan schedule an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment for April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, sever perjury counts for a separate trial, and request government intent regarding the use of disputed subpoenaed documents.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-58), covering filings between September 8, 2020, and November 5, 2020. It records procedural events including the transmission of appeal records, the placement of sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim. The docket also details a back-and-forth correspondence between the Prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and Defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding the delay of disclosure of materials and the review of investigative files, culminating in a Rule 5(f) order by Judge Nathan confirming Brady disclosure obligations.

This is a page from a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The attorneys argue that a redacted individual's identification of Maxwell should be suppressed because the individual never previously identified Maxwell as an abuser in interviews or under oath. The document asserts that the identification procedure was suggestive and occurred too long after the alleged events.

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing dated January 25, 2021, submitted by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the indictment lacks the necessary specificity for Maxwell to prepare an adequate defense for Counts One through Four, violating her Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. They request that the court either dismiss these counts or compel the government to provide a Bill of Particulars and further discovery.

This document is a page from a court docket log for Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022. It details a series of legal filings that occurred primarily on November 22, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan and various letter motions from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense concerning evidence (birth certificates, Exhibit 52), witnesses (Witness-3, Accuser-3), subpoenas, and proposed redactions to court documents.

This document is the title page of a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It represents Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a severance and separate trial regarding Counts Five and Six of the superseding indictment. The document lists the legal defense teams representing Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the final signature page (page 39 of the brief, page 45 of the PDF filing) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text concludes an argument requesting the Court order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the defense counsel team from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a legal letter dated October 25, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca informs the court that the defense has filed an Omnibus Response to the Government's Motions in Limine under seal to allow time to review for necessary redactions, with a public filing and justification letter to follow by October 29, 2021.

This legal document, dated January 25, 2021, is a memorandum filed in support of a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding alleged 'grooming' acts, violating her constitutional rights, and requests either the dismissal of certain counts or that the government provide more detailed information for her defense. The document is signed by several attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for Case 22-1426, involving the USA vs. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details a series of legal filings, primarily letters and motions, entered on July 12, 2022, from both the prosecution (USA) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The filings, dated from late 2021, cover various pre-trial issues such as witness testimony, expert disclosures, and jury instructions, and the log also notes the deletion of a sealed document that was filed in error.

This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 121 in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), dated January 25, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, CO, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, both in New York, NY.

This legal document, dated January 5, 2022, is a filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It indicates that Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell) suggests examining deliberating jurors to evaluate their conduct and is in the process of drafting a Rule 33 motion. The document lists several attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell.

Cover page for the official court transcript of the Jury Trial in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330) held on December 21, 2021, before Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists appearances by the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Bobbi Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is a court docket log (SDNY CM/ECF) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between April 22 and April 23, 2021. It details procedural exchanges regarding electronic devices in the courtroom (denied), suppression motions, adjournment requests, and proposed redactions to protect third-party privacy (granted). The document lists key legal teams for both the defense (Boies Schiller Flexner) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach), and includes Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on these procedural matters.

This document is the cover page for a Motion in Limine filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The motion, submitted by Maxwell's defense team, seeks to preclude the prosecution from referring to accusers as 'victims' or 'minor victims' during the trial. It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell from three different law firms.

This document is the title page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 CR 330), held on December 8, 2021, in the Southern District of New York before Judge Alison J. Nathan. It lists the appearances of the prosecution team (led by Damian Williams) and the defense team (representing Maxwell), as well as the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This is a Notice of Motion filed on October 13, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense attorneys for Maxwell are formally notifying the court and prosecution of their intent to request a specific jury selection process, namely 'individual sequestered juror voir dire and limited counsel-conducted voir dire'. The motion is to be brought before Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This document is a docket sheet from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case covering October 13-15, 2021. It details various procedural orders, including arrangements for victim attendance at trial, overflow rooms for public access, and deadlines for motions under Federal Rule of Evidence 412. Additionally, there is a significant dispute recorded regarding delays in the delivery of legal mail to Maxwell at the MDC, resulting in a court order expressing the expectation that mail be delivered within one business day.

This is the signature page (page 31 of 32) of a legal filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated February 9, 2022, and filed on March 11, 2022. The text concludes a motion requesting a new trial or an evidentiary hearing to examine jurors. It lists the defense counsel team (Pagliuca, Menninger, Everdell, and Sternheim) representing Maxwell.

This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 5 to December 9, 2021. It details daily jury trial proceedings, legal correspondence regarding evidence and witness testimony (specifically regarding 'Witness-3' and alleged sexual activity), and administrative orders such as juror reimbursement. The document lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from August 25, 2020, to October 6, 2020. It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests regarding victim identities, prison conditions, and modifications to a protective order. The docket also records Maxwell's subsequent appeal, the sealing of various documents, and the appearance of new defense counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the signature page (Page 11 of 12) of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that the Government failed to comply with Rule 404(b) notice deadlines (originally May 28, extended to October 11), depriving Maxwell of the chance to litigate properly, and they request the Court exclude this belated evidence. The document lists the contact information for defense attorneys from three different law firms.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-58) detailing proceedings in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell between July 30, 2020, and August 18, 2020. It includes a detailed ruling by Judge Alison J. Nathan rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders and privacy of witnesses, citing it as 'unprecedented' and 'too broad.' The docket entries list various filings, including motions for discovery disclosure by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and opposition responses from the Government (Alex Rossmiller).

This document is the signature page (page 2 of 2) for a legal filing submitted on January 25, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It lists the legal defense team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., Cohen & Gresser LLP, and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002299.

This document is the cover page of a legal memorandum filed on February 4, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It is a filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team supporting a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures. The document lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the conclusion page (page 18 of the specific filing, page 24 of the PDF) of a legal motion filed on February 4, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). In this document, dated January 25, 2021, Maxwell's legal team (Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and Bobbi C. Sternheim) formally requests that the Court dismiss the indictment against her. The page lists the contact information for all defense attorneys involved.

This document is a court docket sheet from Case 22-1426, detailing a series of legal filings and orders from August 10 to August 24, 2020. The entries pertain to the case of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell and involve motions and responses between her legal team and the prosecution (USA) concerning discovery, protective orders, and requests to file documents under seal or in excess of page limits. The proceedings are overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan, who issues orders and sets deadlines for the parties involved.

This document is a court docket sheet (Page 19 of 19) from September 2020 detailing procedural events in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records Judge Alison J. Nathan's denial of Maxwell's requests to be released into the general prison population, to obtain victim identities immediately, and to modify a protective order to use discovery materials in civil cases. The document concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal regarding these denials and the transmission of the record to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

This document is a court docket sheet from August and September 2020 detailing proceedings in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the denial of defense motions seeking the disclosure of victim identities, Maxwell's release into the general prison population, and modifications to a protective order to allow the use of discovery materials in civil cases. The document concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals regarding the denial of the protective order modification.

This document is a legal letter dated December 5, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense objects to the government's attempt to introduce the '900 series' of photographs of Jeffrey Epstein's New York apartment taken in 2019, arguing they have not been authenticated as accurately representing the apartment during the relevant timeframe of 1994-1996. The letter urges the court to reaffirm its previous ruling from December 3 excluding the photos based on Rules 401 and 403.

This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York, filed on July 8, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330-AJN). The order grants the motion for Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the Colorado law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to appear and practice pro hac vice as counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists Pagliuca's contact information and confirms his good standing with the Colorado bar.

This document is a letter dated October 27, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding sexual behavior evidence) under seal. It also outlines the defense's plan to serve redacted copies of this motion to the counsel of the specific alleged victims whose behavior is discussed in the motion.

This document is the signature page from a court filing (Document 133) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists the legal counsel representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from the law firms HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.; COHEN & GRESSER LLP; and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 12 to December 16, 2021. It details various legal filings including letters regarding witness lists, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions for witness anonymity and setting deadlines for responses regarding witnesses Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton. The document also references the placement of sealed documents in a vault.

This document is a signature page (Page 3 of 4) from a court filing (Document 357) dated October 18, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense legal team submitting the document, including Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information.

This document is a court docket sheet from April 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records her arraignment where she pleaded not guilty to a superseding indictment, various motions regarding subpoenas and trial scheduling, and a specific incident where Maxwell's defense claimed MDC guards wrongfully seized her confidential legal documents. Judge Nathan issued scheduling orders for pretrial motions and ordered MDC counsel to explain the seizure of documents.

This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is an omnibus memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her post-trial motions. The document lists the names and contact information for her attorneys from three different law firms.

This legal document, dated August 6, 2025, is a declaration from the law firm HMF (represented by attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca and Laura A. Menninger) regarding their withdrawal as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The document confirms that Maxwell has retained new counsel, David Markus and Melissa Madrigal of Markus Moss PLLC, to handle a government motion to unseal grand jury transcripts. It also states that Maxwell consents to HMF's withdrawal and that HMF will share its case files with the new firm.

This document is a docket sheet from the Southern District of New York for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court activities from October 12 to October 14, 2021. It records a series of procedural filings and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan, including motions from the defense regarding jury selection (voir dire) and legal mail delivery, and letters from the prosecution (USA) concerning trial length and juror questionnaires. The docket also includes an order addressing trial access for alleged victims and the public.

This document is the conclusion of a legal filing submitted on October 18, 2021, by the attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys request that the court issue an order preventing all trial participants from referring to the accusers as "victims" or "minor victims." They argue that using such terms would violate Ms. Maxwell's presumption of innocence and lessen the government's burden of proof.

This document is a signature page from a legal filing submitted by attorneys Laura A. Menninger and Jeffrey S. Pagliuca of the firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The page contains two overlapping header stamps indicating it relates to Case 1:20-cv-00330-AJN (filed Sep 4, 2020) and Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP (filed Oct 23, 2020). It includes contact information for the attorneys and a DOJ Bates stamp number App.122 / DOJ-OGR-00019581.

This document is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal filing dated December 15, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the contact information and signatures of Maxwell's defense attorneys: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the signature page for a legal filing (Document 122) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, dated January 25, 2021. It identifies the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys from three separate law firms: HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. in Denver, and COHEN & GRESSER LLP and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim in New York.

This is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The document is a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team to dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment on the grounds that they are multiplicitous. The page lists the defendant's legal representation from three different law firms.

This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings from November 24, 2021, to November 30, 2021. It details the start of the jury trial on November 29, 2021, various filings regarding jury instructions and expert testimony (Dr. Ryan Hall), and orders related to materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The document also notes a court order granting a government request to seal filings to protect the privacy of anticipated witnesses.

This document is a page from the docket report for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between October 20, 2020, and November 18, 2020. It details procedural exchanges including letters between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Pagliuca), orders regarding Brady disclosure obligations, and a mandate from the Second Circuit dismissing an appeal. The document also includes Judge Nathan's endorsements extending discovery deadlines and addressing requests to delay the disclosure of certain materials.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists Maxwell's defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser, the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman. The filing supports Maxwell's objections to the Presentence Investigation Report.

This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates December 5-9, 2021. It details daily minute entries for the ongoing jury trial, filings regarding witness testimony (specifically 'Witness-3' and alleged sexual activity), and administrative orders including juror reimbursement. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from October 27 to October 29, 2021. It details numerous 'motions in limine' filed by Maxwell's defense team (Pagliuca, Everdell) attempting to exclude specific evidence, including items seized from Epstein's Palm Beach home (358 El Brillo Way) in 2005, evidence related to 'Accuser-3', and an alleged flight. The document also records an order from Judge Nathan scheduling an in-person pretrial conference for November 1, 2021.

This document is the cover page of a legal motion filed on March 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Reply in Support of Her Motion for a New Trial" for the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her legal counsel from three different law firms.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript from the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 16, 2021. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman; Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives.

This document is the signature page from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated October 29, 2021. It lists the attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also provides the names and addresses of their respective law firms in Denver and New York.

This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case as United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.

A letter dated December 13, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court of the defense's intention to question attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman and argues that these questions do not violate attorney-client privilege. The document cites legal precedents regarding the burden of proof for privilege claims.

This document is the final signature page (page 39) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The text explicitly requests the Court to order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the contact information and signatures for her defense team, consisting of attorneys from Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.

This document is the third and final page of a legal filing (Document 553) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated December 15, 2021, and filed on December 17, 2021. It serves as the signature page for a letter or motion addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan from the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also indicates that a copy was sent via email to the counsel of record.

This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated December 18, 2020. It lists the attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP, who signed the document.

This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering April 16-19, 2021. It details various filings including defense motions to dismiss indictments and suppress evidence (specifically mentioning 'Martindell' issues and protective orders), and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment for the S2 Superseding Indictment. The document also notes the scheduling of separate trials for perjury and non-perjury counts.

This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from July 30, 2020, to August 18, 2020. It details legal arguments regarding a protective order for discovery materials, specifically concerning witness privacy and the defense's ability to reference individuals. The log tracks the filing of motions, affidavits, and responses by defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the government (Rossmiller), as well as orders issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The document lists the defense legal team, including Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger.