Relationship Details

This document is a court order dated December 1, 2020, from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order directs the Government to respond by December 2, 2020, to Maxwell's previous letter requests regarding sealed filings and proposed redactions. It also states that the letters in question will remain temporarily sealed while the court resolves the redaction request.

This document is a Court Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated May 14, 2021, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify the frequency of flashlight safety checks during the night at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The defense argued the checks occurred every 15 minutes and disrupted sleep, while the Government maintained the checks were necessary for safety due to Maxwell being housed alone and the high-profile nature of the case. The Court ruled the request unsubstantiated but urged the MDC to consider ways to reduce sleep disruption for pre-trial detainees.

Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated August 25, 2020, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's requests to immediately disclose the identities of three alleged victims and to be released into the general prison population. The court ruled the request for victim identities was premature as discovery had just begun, and found that the Bureau of Prisons was already providing sufficient access to legal materials (13 hours a day). The court ordered the Government to provide status updates on Maxwell's confinement conditions every 90 days.

A Protective Order issued on November 24, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order mandates that materials produced from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund be treated as 'Confidential Information' or 'Highly Confidential' to protect privacy and prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity.

This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.

A court order filed on June 2, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a detailed schedule for pre-trial disclosures, including deadlines for victim identification, witness lists, Jencks Act materials, and motions in limine, spanning from September to November 2021.

This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering proceedings from December 18 to December 20, 2021. It records minute entries for the jury trial, various letters exchanged regarding jury charges and closing argument logistics, and judicial orders concerning the public release of exhibits and presentation slides. The document highlights the court's instruction to ensure public access to materials while maintaining necessary redactions for witness anonymity.

This document is a letter from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated January 25, 2021. The letter requests the court vacate a previous order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement, arguing that the facility provides her with significant access to discovery materials (13 hours/day via laptop) and legal counsel (3 hours/day), which the facility claims exceeds the time allotted to other inmates.

This document is a letter dated October 14, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, confirming November 15, 2021, as the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 concerning the admissibility of evidence of an alleged victim's sexual behavior, clarifying its distinction from a motion in limine and its specific procedural requirements.

This document is a Protective Order filed on November 24, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that materials produced from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund be treated as 'Confidential Information' or 'Highly Confidential' to protect the privacy of individuals and prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity.

This document is the first page of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury, and summarizes the procedural history of her previous bail denials due to flight risk. The order sets up a discussion regarding Maxwell's third motion for release on bail, filed in February 2021.

This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-58 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from September 8, 2020, to November 5, 2020. It logs the transmission of appeal records to the USCA, the placement of several sealed documents in a vault, and the appearance of attorney Bobbi Sternheim for the defense. The docket details a series of legal correspondence between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Everdell, Pagliuca) regarding requests to delay disclosure and investigative files, culminating in a judge's order regarding Brady disclosure obligations.

This document is a court docket log (Case 21-58) covering entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020, regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of transcripts, a renewed motion for bail by Maxwell's defense (Christian Everdell), and the Court's order (Judge Alison Nathan) approving specific redactions to protect privacy interests and law enforcement integrity. The document also notes the Government's opposition to the bail application and the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the USA.

This document consists of a Docketing Notice from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dated July 8, 2022, for the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), and a Notice of Appeal and Criminal Docket from the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed July 7, 2022. It details Maxwell's conviction and sentencing, including multi-year imprisonment terms and a $750,000 fine for charges related to conspiracy to entice minors for illegal sex acts, transport minors for sexual activity, and sex trafficking, with some counts dismissed or deemed multiplicitous.

This document is a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering March 22-24, 2021. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Maxwell's third motion for bail and Maxwell subsequently filing a Notice of Appeal. Additionally, a significant order was issued regarding a defense subpoena directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, setting protocols for victim notification and filing objections to the subpoena.

This document is a court docket report from December 2020 regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details Judge Alison J. Nathan's orders allowing redacted filings to protect privacy interests, denying an in-camera conference, and setting a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion. The docket entries list sealed documents, letters from defense counsel Christian Everdell regarding sealing and schedules, and a specific letter regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 1 to December 3, 2020. It details communications regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and a significant order by Judge Alison Nathan denying a request for an in-camera conference while setting a schedule for a renewed bail motion. The document also notes the sealing of specific documents to protect the privacy interests of individuals referenced in defense letters.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated February 4, 2021, providing a status update on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government reports that Maxwell receives 13 hours of discovery review time daily (more than any other inmate), has access to both desktop and laptop computers, and maintains regular video-teleconference contact with her attorneys despite the suspension of in-person visits due to COVID-19.

This document is a Criminal Notice of Appeal filed on March 24, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. Ghislaine Maxwell, represented by David Oscar Markus, is appealing the court's March 22, 2021 'Order on Third Motion for Release on Bail' to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The document confirms Maxwell's status as committed (incarcerated) and lists the Assistant U.S. Attorneys prosecuting the case.

This is a court order filed on March 22, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines the charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. It summarizes the procedural history of her bail applications, noting that she was twice denied bail in 2020 due to being a flight risk, and references a third motion for bail filed on February 23, 2021.

This document is a court docket log from July 6-7, 2020, detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It records the transfer of documents from New Hampshire and contains orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020. The orders heavily reference COVID-19 protocols, including the use of remote video conferencing for the defendant (held at the Metropolitan Detention Center) and strict entry requirements for the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse.

This document is a page from the SDNY court docket for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 12, 2021. It details orders regarding strict COVID-19 protocols for an upcoming in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021, including the use of overflow courtrooms for the public. Additionally, it includes an order addressing a Government motion, where the Judge rules that limiting cross-examination of pseudonymous witnesses regarding their careers would violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment rights, though specific employer names cannot be elicited.

This document is page 3 of a court filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024, detailing the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction. Written by Circuit Judge José A. Cabranes, it lists the legal counsel for both sides and summarizes Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy, including her sentencing of concurrent prison terms totaling 240 months (20 years).

This document is page 2 of an appellate court opinion affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the charges she was convicted of (sex trafficking, conspiracy), her sentence (concurrent terms up to 240 months), and rejects five specific arguments raised on appeal, including the applicability of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and claims of jury bias. The court concludes by affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022 judgment.

This document is a court docket sheet from the SDNY regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 2021. It details a pretrial conference where Maxwell appeared via telephone and sets forth a comprehensive order regarding jury selection protocols, including the use of questionnaires, anonymized juror numbers, and schedules for voir dire in November 2021. The Judge explicitly denied a request to seal the proposed jury questionnaires, citing the First Amendment right to public access despite the case's significant media attention.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. It states that Maxwell receives 13 hours of discovery review time daily (more than any other inmate) with access to both a laptop and desktop. A footnote addresses complaints about missing emails, clarifying that an MDC investigation found Maxwell deleted them herself or archived them, rather than staff deleting them.

This legal letter, sent by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, formally complains about Maxwell's harsh and restrictive conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The letter refutes a previous communication from MDC staff, detailing issues such as significant weight loss, isolation, constant surveillance, and a recent quarantine that hindered her defense preparation. Sternheim renews the request for the MDC Warden, Heriberto Tellez, to respond directly to the Court and justify these conditions.

This page is from an appellate court decision affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her sentence (concurrent terms totaling 240 months) for sex trafficking and conspiracy charges. The court rejects her five grounds for appeal, which included arguments about Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and jury impartiality.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It details entries from November 15, 2021, including logistics for public/press access to the courtroom, the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a dispute regarding the late receipt of government disclosures at the MDC. It concludes with a minute entry for a pretrial conference where Maxwell was present with her defense team and the government prosecutors.

This is a court order filed on May 14, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document addresses complaints from Maxwell's defense counsel regarding sleep deprivation caused by guards shining flashlights into her cell every 15 minutes. The Government responded that these checks are routine safety measures, though Maxwell receives more frequent checks due to being housed alone and the nature of her charges.

This is a Criminal Notice of Appeal (Form A) filed on July 7, 2022, in the Southern District of New York for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Maxwell is appealing her conviction and sentence (judgment entered June 29, 2022) to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals following a guilty verdict at trial. The document identifies Bobbi C. Sternheim as her counsel for the filing of this notice only, noting she is not retained for the appeal itself, and identifies Maurene Comey as the Assistant U.S. Attorney.

This document is a letter dated February 1, 2021, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues against the Metropolitan Detention Center's (MDC) objection to allowing Maxwell laptop access on weekends and holidays to review millions of pages of discovery documents. The letter asserts that the MDC's proposed alternative, a prison computer, is inadequate for the task and that the MDC has failed to provide a valid security or staffing reason for restricting laptop access, thereby impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense.

This document is Page 2 of an appellate court decision filed on December 2, 2024, affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court rejected Maxwell's five arguments on appeal, including her claim that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida protected her from prosecution in New York. The court affirmed the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.