Relationship Details

This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The filing is a Court Order dated December 8, 2020, in which Judge Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to testify regarding her conditions of confinement. The order mandates that the Government provide written updates on Maxwell's conditions, specifically regarding legal access, every 60 days.

This document contains an email chain forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) regarding the case USA v. Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The NEF details a court order by Judge J. Nathan dated December 8, 2020, which denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to testify about her confinement conditions. However, the order mandates that the Government submit written updates every 60 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials and ability to communicate with counsel.

This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 1, 2021, addressed to defense counsel (Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim, Everdell) and prosecutors (USANYS) in the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves to distribute an attached Order issued by the Judge which was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated November 12, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government seeks clarification on two pretrial matters: limiting cross-examination regarding the specific genres of witnesses' acting careers (e.g., action vs. soap opera) to protect their identities, and ensuring the ban on courtroom sketch artists drawing the likenesses of pseudonymized witnesses.

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The government requests clarification on two points: limiting cross-examination details about witnesses' specific acting roles (e.g., genre of movies) to prevent identification, and barring courtroom sketch artists from drawing exact likenesses of witnesses testifying under pseudonyms.

This document is an email thread from October 2021 regarding the 'US v. Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell). The correspondence is between the Judge's chambers (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), Defense Counsel (Bobbi C. Sternheim), and the US Attorney's Office. The discussion concerns the filing of a Joint Proposed Juror Questionnaire, requests to seal documents, and the Court's request for copies of Jencks Act material (evidence regarding government witnesses).

This document is an email dated October 31, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel (including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) and prosecutors (USANYS) regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email serves to transmit an attached Order issued by Judge Nathan that was scheduled to be docketed the following morning.

An email correspondence dated November 24, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to counsel involved in the US v. Maxwell case (20cr330). The email serves to distribute two attached orders regarding protective orders and subpoenas. Recipients include attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger, as well as representatives from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).

This document is an email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 1, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email informs counsel of an attached court order and schedules a discussion for the following day to determine if there is a basis to seal the order.

This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on April 26, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a schedule for pretrial disclosures and motions, including deadlines for expert witnesses, victim disclosures, and filings related to the S2 indictment. It sets a presumed trial commencement date of July 12, 2021, pending resolution of a defense request for a continuance.

This document is a letter motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Christian Everdell, on April 30, 2021, requesting Judge Alison Nathan to order the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to accept two hard drives containing discovery materials for Maxwell's review. The defense argues the current format of 2.2 million pages is difficult to navigate, and they have reorganized the files to be more user-friendly. Judge Nathan granted the order on May 3, 2021, with a stipulation allowing MDC counsel to submit objections by May 4, 2021.

Court Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 22, 2021, outlining the procedures for jury selection in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes dates for screening questionnaires (Nov 4, 5, 12) and voir dire (Nov 16-19), mandates the use of juror numbers for anonymity, and denies a request to seal proposed questionnaires. The Judge cites significant case publicity and COVID-19 protocols as factors in these procedural decisions.

A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 11, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan approves the parties' proposed redactions and sealing requests to protect the privacy of victims and witnesses, ordering the redacted documents to be filed by November 12, 2021.

This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the legal case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The correspondence involves Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers distributing a court order to counsel and subsequent discussion among counsel regarding the docketing of motions in limine and filing an opening brief.

This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings between December 11 and December 15, 2021. It details various filings including letters regarding witness orders, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as a significant Memorandum Opinion denying a defense motion to allow witnesses to testify anonymously. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense, along with Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings during this trial period.

This document is a Court Order filed on October 27, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses logistics regarding jury questionnaires and voir dire, scheduling the release of juror names to counsel for November 16 and anticipating opening statements to begin on November 29 following peremptory strikes.

This document is a Protective Order filed on July 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, defining categories for 'Confidential' and 'Highly Confidential' information, with the latter specifically including sexualized images. The order mandates that such materials be kept secure, reviewed only in the presence of counsel (or via BOP systems), and strictly prohibits the dissemination of victim identities or posting discovery materials on the internet.

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York dated April 29, 2021, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses an incident on April 24, 2021, where MDC staff seized Maxwell's legal materials. Judge Nathan orders the MDC legal counsel to provide an inventory of seized items to the defense and to file a representation with the Court regarding potential duplication of materials and steps taken to ensure the confidentiality of attorney-client communications.

A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 25, 2022. The order requires the parties to submit their positions regarding a motion filed by Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein (Dkt. No. 675) by 10:00 a.m. the following day.

This document contains an email chain from October 2021 regarding the case *US v. Maxwell*. The correspondence involves the submission of a joint proposed juror questionnaire and voir dire questions, with Judge Nathan's chambers requesting Word document versions. Additionally, the Assistant United States Attorney confirms the production of Jencks Act material and exhibits to the defense.

Court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on November 8, 2021, in the case of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules a conference for November 10 to address evidentiary motions (Rule 412 and Rule 702) and mandates that parties confirm by November 9 that alleged victims referenced in the Rule 412 motion have been notified of the hearing and their right to attend.

This document is an email thread from November 19, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It originates from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan, distributing a sealed Memorandum Opinion & Order (Dkt. No. 477) to defense counsel (including Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The top email forwards this order with the comment 'Sealed opinion on MV-3.'

A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 8, 2020. The Judge denies Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to answer questions about her confinement conditions. However, the Court orders the Government to provide written status updates every 60 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials, counsel, and the frequency of searches conducted on her.

This document is an email notification of a court filing (Document 577) in the case USA v. Maxwell, dated January 14, 2022. It contains the text of a court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing for June 28, 2022, and deferring proceedings on severed perjury counts. It also sets a deadline of January 18, 2022, for a joint letter regarding Speedy Trial Act time exclusions.

A court order from the Southern District of New York signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on November 28, 2021. The order grants permission for redacted attorneys to bring HP laptops into Courtroom 318 for the trial of United States vs. Ghislaine Maxwell between November 29, 2021, and January 15, 2022.

This document is a court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 18, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that courtroom sketch artists are prohibited from drawing exact likenesses of 'Protected Witnesses' (those testifying under pseudonyms or first names) to protect their identities. The word 'PROPOSED' in the title is struck through, indicating the judge adopted this as a final order.

This document is a docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell covering October 13-15, 2021. It details procedural motions regarding juror selection (voir dire), the attendance of alleged victims at the trial, and disputes over the delivery speed of Maxwell's legal mail at the MDC. The document also references filings related to Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (the 'Rape Shield Law') and includes orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

A formal letter from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison Nathan requesting the vacating of a court order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The MDC argues that Maxwell already has significant access to discovery materials (via a dedicated laptop provided in Nov 2020) and extensive communication with her legal counsel, exceeding that of other inmates. The letter refutes defense claims that her confinement conditions are limiting her ability to prepare for trial.

A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated July 15, 2020. Judge Alison J. Nathan sets the schedule for discovery deadlines, motion filings, and establishes a trial date of July 12, 2021.

This document is an email thread from November 24, 2021, related to the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). It involves correspondence between the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan and legal counsel (including Brian Burns, Patrick Smith, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger) regarding the issuance of protective orders. An Assistant United States Attorney subsequently follows up with counsel to coordinate the transfer of materials via file sharing or thumb drive.

A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330). The order states that the trial for severed perjury counts will be scheduled after the non-perjury trial is completed and defers resolution on pending motions to suppress until that time. A deadline for objections is set for April 22, 2021.

This document is a table of contents page (Page ii) from a court filing appendix related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 22-1426), dated February 28, 2023. It lists legal orders, memoranda, and exhibits related to the post-trial controversy surrounding 'Juror 50,' including media articles published in January 2022 and a hearing transcript from March 2022. The document tracks the judicial process overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the motion for a new trial based on juror disclosures.

Defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca writes to Judge Alison Nathan arguing against the government's request to defer ruling on Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence until after the trial on non-perjury counts. The defense contends that an evidentiary hearing is necessary immediately because the government's alleged misconduct (misleading a judge to obtain a subpoena) constitutes a due process violation that could suppress all 90,000 pages of evidence and any derivatives ('fruit of the poisonous tree'). Furthermore, the defense argues that Maxwell cannot knowingly decide whether to testify without knowing the admissibility of this evidence, as the government has only promised not to use it in its case-in-chief but reserved rights for impeachment.

This document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330), dated November 28, 2021. The order grants the Government's request to file a letter motion under seal to protect the privacy of anticipated witnesses regarding cross-examination limitations. It also orders the Defendant to respond to the motion by 2:00 p.m. on the same day.

This document is the first page of an Opinion & Order filed on April 1, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses the defendant's motion for a new trial based on the allegation that 'Juror 50' provided inaccurate information regarding a history of sexual abuse during jury selection. The text outlines the legal standards for impartial juries and notes that an uncommon post-trial hearing was conducted to investigate the juror's conduct.

This document is an email from the chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 28, 2020, addressed to counsel involved in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves to distribute an Opinion & Order regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, noting that the document is temporarily sealed to allow parties to propose redactions by December 30, 2020.

A court order filed on October 22, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330). The document outlines procedures for jury selection, including the administration of screening questionnaires in early November and the anonymization of jurors using assigned numbers. It mandates that the prosecution and defense confer to categorize prospective jurors into four lists regarding their eligibility for voir dire or excusal.

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York dated November 3, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules a hearing for November 10, 2021, to address motions regarding Federal Rules of Evidence 412 and 702 (Daubert). The order also sets briefing deadlines for issues concerning anticipated witness testimony and instructions for docketing redacted exhibits.

This is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 28) dated July 27, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues for a specific provision in a protective order regarding victim/witness identities. Maxwell's defense contends that they should be permitted to reference alleged victims who have already voluntarily disclosed their identities in public records or media, arguing that the government's proposed restrictions are overly broad and hinder the defense's ability to investigate and advocate.

A letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter raises concerns about Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC, specifically sleep deprivation caused by guards checking her with flashlights every 15 minutes. It also reports a recent incident where Maxwell developed a 'black eye' of unknown origin, leading to threats of punishment (SHU) by MDC staff if she did not explain the injury.

This document is a court docket log from December 2020 regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records correspondence between the US Government (AUSAs Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the MDC and requests to seal certain documents. Key events include the Judge ordering MDC counsel to submit information, denying a request for an in-camera conference, approving redactions to protect privacy interests, and ordering the parties to schedule a renewed bail motion.

This document is a court order filed on October 5, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes the trial schedule, noting that jury selection will conclude by November 19 and opening statements will begin on November 29. The Judge orders both parties to submit a joint letter by October 12, 2021, estimating the length of the trial to determine if proceedings will need to continue through the Christmas and New Year holidays.

This document is a page from a court docket (SDNY) covering proceedings between June 25, 2021, and July 1, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include Judge Alison J. Nathan denying Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained from a law firm involved in her previous civil litigation (Giuffre v. Maxwell) and ordering the unsealing of related documents. The judge also granted a request to limit updates on Maxwell's confinement conditions only to material changes.

This is a court order filed on July 9, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330), issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The order sets the logistics for a remote arraignment, initial conference, and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. It provides specific dial-in instructions for the press, public, and international callers, and instructs the US Attorney's Office to coordinate the participation of alleged victims who wish to be heard.

This is a letter filed on December 19, 2021, from the parties (Prosecution and Defense) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter proposes a method for providing public access to closing argument materials, specifically suggesting that public versions of slides be released after the trial day concludes, ensuring sealed materials remain protected. The document emphasizes balancing public interest with the protection of victims and the efficiency of the trial.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 21-770) detailing legal proceedings in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell between July and August 2020. It includes a judicial order rejecting a defense request regarding protective orders to safeguard witness privacy, followed by a log of subsequent letter motions and responses regarding discovery disclosure filed by defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Jeffrey Pagliuca, and government attorney Alex Rossmiller. The document tracks the procedural back-and-forth regarding the handling of sensitive discovery materials and protective orders.

This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 16, 2021. The order approves redactions proposed by Maxwell regarding a Government update on her confinement conditions and orders the Government to publicly file the redacted version by June 17, 2021.

A letter motion dated December 31, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension for pretrial motions. The request cites a large volume of discovery and difficulties conferring with Maxwell due to her 14-day quarantine and the suspension of legal visits at the MDC caused by COVID-19. Judge Nathan signed and ordered the new schedule on January 5, 2021.

Defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan on May 10, 2022, requesting a two-day extension for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing submission due to a pre-existing travel commitment. Although the government consented to the request, Judge Nathan explicitly denied the extension via an order stamped on the document dated May 11, 2022. The sentencing remained scheduled for June 28, 2022.

In this court order dated July 23, 2020, Judge Alison J. Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to explicitly prohibit the Government and witness counsel from making extrajudicial statements. The Court deems a specific order unnecessary at this time, citing the expectation that all parties will comply with existing Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding professional responsibility. However, the Judge issues a stern warning that the Court will take appropriate action if these rules are violated to safeguard the defendant's right to a fair trial.

This document is the first page of an Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York. It outlines the charges against Ghislaine Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice and transport minors for illegal sex acts and perjury. The order addresses and seemingly denies a renewed motion for bail, reinforcing the court's previous conclusion from July 2020 that Maxwell poses a significant flight risk.

This is a court order filed on October 19, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules a telephone conference for October 21, 2021, to discuss jury selection, providing public dial-in numbers while noting a separate line for involved parties (counsel, defendant, victims, family). It also explicitly warns against recording or rebroadcasting the proceedings.

This document is a legal letter dated October 25, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Pagliuca informs the court that the defense has filed an Omnibus Response to the Government's Motions in Limine under seal to allow time to review for necessary redactions, with a public filing and justification letter to follow by October 29, 2021.

This document is a letter dated February 21, 2022, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim explains that attached documents concerning a Motion for a New Trial contain proposed redactions to protect the integrity of an inquiry into 'Juror 50's conduct' and to protect the privacy of other jurors involved in the voir dire process.

This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 25, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan sets deadlines for omnibus response briefs (due Oct 25) and reply briefs (due Oct 27) regarding motions in limine. The order also mandates that by October 29, 2021, the parties must file public versions of these briefs with proposed redactions and submit a joint letter justifying those redactions based on Second Circuit legal standards.

This document contains a court docket log from November 9, 2021, related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426 on appeal). It details orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding jury selection (voir dire) questions, the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and preparations for an in-person hearing on November 10 regarding Rule 412 (victim privacy evidence). It also notes correspondence from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding bond release and from prosecutors regarding victim notification.

This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated March 9, 2021, opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The Government argues that the Court lacks jurisdiction due to a pending appeal with the Second Circuit and reiterates that Maxwell poses an extreme flight risk that no conditions can mitigate. The letter references previous denials of bail on July 14, 2020, and December 28, 2020.

This document is a legal letter filed on April 5, 2021, by Laura A. Menninger, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests a one-week continuance for the arraignment on the S2 Indictment, moving it from April 16 to April 23, 2021, due to a scheduling conflict in Colorado and ongoing evidence review. The letter notes that the government does not oppose the request and mentions that the delay would allow Maxwell's family time to arrange travel to attend.

This is page 2 of a court order by Judge Alison J. Nathan dated May 14, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's request to override BOP security check protocols, stating the request is unsubstantiated, but urges the MDC to consider reducing sleep disruption and admonishes them to ensure protocols are neutral and necessary. The document references previous letters from defense counsel regarding detention conditions.

This document is a page from a court docket (Case 22-1426) detailing filings and orders between April 20 and April 21, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Key entries include Judge Nathan questioning the defense on whether they are seeking to adjourn the July 12th trial date, potentially until January 2022, and demanding a specific justification if so. The docket also covers disputes over redactions involving Boies Schiller Flexner LLP and motions to dismiss the indictment based on a Non-Prosecution Agreement.

A court order filed on July 6, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing, proposing remote proceedings due to COVID-19 safety concerns. It outlines specific time slots available for video appearances from the Metropolitan Detention Center (July 9 or July 14) and orders counsel to confer and file a joint letter by 9:00 p.m. that night.

This document is a docket sheet from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case covering October 13-15, 2021. It details various procedural orders, including arrangements for victim attendance at trial, overflow rooms for public access, and deadlines for motions under Federal Rule of Evidence 412. Additionally, there is a significant dispute recorded regarding delays in the delivery of legal mail to Maxwell at the MDC, resulting in a court order expressing the expectation that mail be delivered within one business day.

This document is page 1 of a Court Order from the Southern District of New York, filed on March 22, 2021, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text outlines the charges against Maxwell (including sex trafficking of minors and perjury) and summarizes the procedural history of her multiple denied attempts to secure bail due to being deemed a flight risk. The document serves as an introduction to a ruling on her third motion for release filed in February 2021.

This document is the final page (page 22) of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan denied Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail (Dkt. No. 97). The document cites United States v. Raniere as legal precedent regarding the evaluation of the motion.

This document is a court docket sheet (Page 91 of 91) covering the final judgment and sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in June and July 2022. It details her sentence of 240 months (20 years) imprisonment, a $750,000 fine, and the dismissal of specific counts, as well as her subsequent filing of a Notice of Appeal. The document also includes administrative orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the docketing of previous correspondence and expert witness opinions.

This document is the first page of a [Proposed] Protective Order filed on July 28, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the document, which outlines the Government's intent to produce discovery materials to the defendant while restricting their dissemination to protect privacy, ongoing investigations, and prevent prejudicial pretrial publicity due to the sensitive nature of the information.

This is a court order dated October 14, 2021, from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan acknowledges receipt of a letter from the defendant regarding a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 and orders the Government to respond by 5:00 p.m. on October 15, 2021.

A legal letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter refutes the government's claims about Maxwell's detention conditions, arguing they are overly restrictive and punitive. It details unsanitary conditions at the MDC, specifically a recent incident involving a severe sewage stench, overflowing toilets from the floor above, and plumbing issues in Maxwell's isolation cell.

This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 26, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that redactions on a letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP be removed unless the Government objects by March 29, 2021. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release.

A court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on October 20, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order sets the agenda for a telephone conference scheduled for the following day to discuss jury selection logistics and an unopposed request to seal the joint proposed juror questionnaire. The Judge also notes that the Court's draft questionnaire will be emailed to the parties immediately for discussion during the conference.

This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from November 13 to November 15, 2021. It details procedural orders regarding jury questionnaires and voir dire logistics (including COVID protocols), the filing of transcripts for previous conferences, and a sealed document. It also lists correspondence from both the prosecution (regarding exhibits) and the defense (regarding late disclosures to the MDC).

This document is a court docket sheet from August and September 2020 detailing proceedings in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the denial of defense motions seeking the disclosure of victim identities, Maxwell's release into the general prison population, and modifications to a protective order to allow the use of discovery materials in civil cases. The document concludes with Maxwell filing a Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals regarding the denial of the protective order modification.

This document is a legal letter dated October 26, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense accepts the Court's draft preliminary remarks for jurors but strongly objects to the government's request to delay providing the names of prospective jurors until the start of oral voir dire on November 16, 2021. Sternheim argues that the Court previously determined names would be provided with questionnaires and requests the Court deny the government's attempt to delay disclosure.

This document is a letter dated October 27, 2021, from defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter informs the court that the defense is filing a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (regarding sexual behavior evidence) under seal. It also outlines the defense's plan to serve redacted copies of this motion to the counsel of the specific alleged victims whose behavior is discussed in the motion.

This document is a section of a court docket from the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from April 7, 2021, to April 16, 2021. It details procedural events including the rescheduling of an arraignment on a superseding indictment, the denial of a request regarding materials in courthouse cellblocks due to US Marshal policy, and a motion to continue the trial date. The document also includes judicial orders regarding redactions and the unsealing of specific legal memorandums.

A letter filed on December 19, 2021, by the parties in the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell case to Judge Alison J. Nathan proposing logistics for public access to closing argument visuals. Judge Nathan endorsed the letter with a handwritten order approving the proposal, requiring redacted versions of closing argument slides to be made public within two hours of the arguments' completion to protect witness anonymity.

A letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to use discovery materials from her criminal case in unrelated civil litigation. The Government notes it has produced over 165,000 pages of evidence and argues that the materials in question are appropriately designated as confidential because they relate to an ongoing criminal investigation and grand jury proceedings.

This document is a legal letter dated April 15, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim requests a continuance of the July 12th trial, arguing that a new superseding indictment significantly expands the scope of the case from a four-year period in the 1990s to an eleven-year period (1994-2004). The letter claims the government is responsible for the delay by filing late charges based on a witness known to them since the Florida investigation.

This document is a court docket page from July 2020 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the formal appearance of her defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a remote arraignment and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. The document also outlines logistics for public access to the hearing via telephone and addresses victim rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on December 7, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order sets a briefing schedule for a renewed bail motion, establishes page limits for filings (40 pages for motion/response), and grants permission for the Government to file submissions under seal with redactions.

A letter motion dated December 31, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Christian R. Everdell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a two-week extension for pretrial motions. The request cites a large volume of discovery and difficulties conferring with Maxwell due to her 14-day quarantine and the suspension of legal visits at the MDC caused by COVID-19. Judge Nathan signed and ordered the new schedule on January 5, 2021.

This document is a Court Order filed on January 5, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a briefing schedule for the Defense's motion for a new trial and addresses the appointment of counsel for a juror regarding potential inquiries into juror conduct. The document also notes that the court will not adjourn post-trial briefing on other issues.

A letter dated October 14, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting a court order to compel the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to deliver legal mail to Ghislaine Maxwell within 24 hours of receipt. Sternheim details specific incidents of delay, including a hard drive withheld for two days and legal mail deposited on October 2 that was not discovered until October 7. The letter also alleges potential evidence tampering, noting a 'questionable bar code sticker' found on legal mail that the MDC Unit Manager eventually returned to counsel.

This document is a court order filed on December 17, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order attaches a draft jury charge and verdict sheet and instructs counsel to be prepared to provide suggestions for changes at a charging conference scheduled for the following day, December 18, 2021.

This document is a page from the docket report for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between October 20, 2020, and November 18, 2020. It details procedural exchanges including letters between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) and the defense (Pagliuca), orders regarding Brady disclosure obligations, and a mandate from the Second Circuit dismissing an appeal. The document also includes Judge Nathan's endorsements extending discovery deadlines and addressing requests to delay the disclosure of certain materials.

A legal letter dated January 25, 2021, from the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter lists 12 specific pretrial motions being filed by the defense, including motions to dismiss various counts of the indictment, suppress evidence, and separate trials. Two of the motions (items 3 and 11) contain redactions regarding the target of a government subpoena.

This document is a page from the court docket for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), listing entries from December 10 to December 18, 2020. It records the filing of transcripts from a July 2020 conference, an order by Judge Alison J. Nathan approving redactions for Maxwell's sealed bail application based on privacy interests and judicial efficiency, and the submission of Maxwell's renewed bail motion with numerous exhibits. Additionally, it notes the appearance of attorney Andrew Rohrbach for the government and the government's subsequent opposition to the bail application.

This document is page 1 of an Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York. The document denies Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, reiterating that she poses a significant flight risk and that arguments presented were largely addressed in the previous July 14, 2020 hearing. It lists the specific federal charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury.

This document is a court docket sheet dated February 4, 2021, listing numerous filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes an order from Judge Alison J. Nathan requiring the docketing of redacted documents, followed by a series of defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss various counts of the superseding indictment based on arguments including due process, perjury, pre-indictment delay, and breach of a non-prosecution agreement. The filings identify Maxwell's attorneys as Jeffrey Pagliuca and Mark Cohen.

This document is a court docket sheet covering the period from May 25, 2021, to June 15, 2021, detailing legal proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders setting trial disclosure schedules (including victim identities and Jencks Act material), a denial of a subpoena motion, and a mandate from the US Court of Appeals affirming the denial of Maxwell's bail and addressing complaints about sleep deprivation in custody. The document also references correspondence between defense attorneys (Everdell, Sternheim) and Judge Nathan regarding pretrial motions and confinement conditions at the MDC.