HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
2.36 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
13
Organizations
4
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document (federal supplement court opinion page)
File Size:
2.36 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a court opinion discussing allegations against Prince Mohamed regarding the financing of terrorism through financial institutions like Al Shamal Islamic Bank and various charities. The text details claims by plaintiffs that Prince Mohamed provided material support to al Qaeda and questions whether the court has personal jurisdiction over him based on his contacts with the United States.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Prince Turki | ||
| Prince Mohamed | ||
| Osama bin Laden | ||
| Jamal Ahmed Al Fadl | ||
| Muhammed Zouaydi |
Timeline (4 events)
Motion to dismiss denied for lack of personal jurisdiction for Prince Turki
Allegations of terrorist financing by Prince Mohamed
Interviews in New York (1978)
Speech at Harvard (1999)
Locations (4)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (4)
→
→
→
→
→
→
to
→
→
Key Quotes (3)
"Prince Mohamed knew or should have known that each of these financial institutions 'acted as an aider and abettor and material sponsor of al Qaeda, Bin Laden, and international terrorism.'"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
Quote #1
"The Ashton Plaintiffs claim that Prince Mohamed is 'heavily involved in the sponsorship of terror through Faisal Islamic Bank–Sudan,' since at some point al Qaeda allegedly had an account there."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
Quote #2
"Jurisdictional discovery is not appropriate with respect to Prince Turki because Plaintiffs have not identified any genuine issue of jurisdictional fact."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017879.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document