046.pdf

2.27 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

19
People
11
Organizations
8
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing / discovery correspondence
File Size: 2.27 MB
Summary

This document is a legal filing from Plaintiff Jane Doe 1000's counsel requesting a pre-motion conference to compel Defendants (Epstein's executors Indyke and Kahn) to produce discovery documents and answer interrogatories. The filing includes exhibits of the discovery requests, which seek detailed information on Epstein's flight logs, financial transactions, communications with high-profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz), and the structure of his alleged sex-trafficking operation. The Defendants have objected to almost all requests, claiming they are overbroad or that they lack knowledge because Epstein is deceased, prompting the Plaintiff to seek court intervention. Note: While flight logs are requested, no actual flight data is contained in this document.

People (19)

Name Role Context
Jane Doe 1000 Plaintiff
Victim/Survivor suing Epstein's estate
Darren K. Indyke Defendant / Co-Executor
Epstein's longtime lawyer and co-executor of his estate
Richard D. Kahn Defendant / Co-Executor
Epstein's longtime accountant and co-executor of his estate
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased / Alleged Trafficker
The central figure in the sex-trafficking scheme allegations
Sigrid S. McCawley Plaintiff's Attorney
Partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
Bennet J. Moskowitz Defendants' Attorney
Attorney at Troutman Sanders LLP
Ghislaine Maxwell Alleged Co-Conspirator
Mentioned in discovery requests and as a recipient of payments/loans
Sarah Kellen Alleged Co-Conspirator / Employee
Mentioned in discovery requests regarding recruitment and scheduling
Andrew Albert Christian Edward (Duke of York / Prince Andrew) Person of Interest
Subject of Interrogatory No. 9 and RFP No. 70 regarding his presence at Epstein's residences
Alan Dershowitz Person of Interest
Subject of Interrogatory No. 10 and RFPs 54-58 regarding his presence at Epstein's residences and communications
William 'Bill' J. Clinton Person of Interest
Subject of Interrogatory No. 11 and RFP No. 62 regarding his presence at Epstein's residences/planes
Leslie Wexner Person of Interest
Subject of RFPs 64-66 regarding business transactions and relationships
Abigail Wexner Person of Interest
Subject of RFPs 64-65
Lesley Groff Employee/Associate
Mentioned in RFP No. 20 regarding payments
Nadia Marcinkova Employee/Associate
Mentioned in RFP No. 20 regarding payments
Adriana Ross Employee/Associate
Mentioned in RFP No. 20 regarding payments
Cecilia Steen Employee/Associate
Mentioned in RFP No. 23 regarding employment
Jean-Luc Brunel Associate
Mentioned in RFP No. 23 and 61 regarding modeling
Alexander Acosta Government Official
Mentioned in RFP No. 74 regarding communications with US Attorney's Office

Timeline (3 events)

April 27, 2020
Meet and confer telephone call regarding discovery deficiencies
Telephone
August 10, 2019
Death of Jeffrey Epstein
New York
July 6, 2019
Arrest of Jeffrey Epstein
New York

Relationships (3)

Darren K. Indyke Lawyer / Co-Executor Jeffrey Epstein
Described as Epstein's longtime lawyer and co-executor of his estate
Richard D. Kahn Accountant / Co-Executor Jeffrey Epstein
Described as Epstein's longtime accountant and co-executor of his estate
Ghislaine Maxwell Alleged Co-Conspirator Jeffrey Epstein
Mentioned as co-conspirator and subject of discovery requests regarding recruitment

Key Quotes (4)

"Yet by failing to comply with their clear and unequivocal discovery obligations, including not producing a single document to date, Defendants are attempting to grant themselves a de facto stay of discovery."
Source
046.pdf
Quote #1
"Plaintiff alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators operated a decades-long sex-trafficking scheme by which they recruited young women for sexual abuse."
Source
046.pdf
Quote #2
"Defendants have refused, without providing any legal basis for doing so, to produce any document that does not directly reference Plaintiff, regardless of the year."
Source
046.pdf
Quote #3
"Defendants stated that they do not have responsive information because Epstein is dead and Defendants do not know where to look for responsive information."
Source
046.pdf
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document