Mr. Weinberg
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Filip
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Your Honor (The Court)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
your Honor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
registrant
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Client (Epstein)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. WEINGARTEN
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Fernich
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Proposed trial | Mr. Weinberg requests the court set a preliminary trial date for immediately after Labor Day. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2020-03-12 | Oral argument | The court scheduled an oral argument for 10 a.m. | Court | View |
| 2020-02-24 | Briefing deadline | A date by which substantive motions are to be fully briefed before the court. | Court | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-09-03 | N/A | Court Hearing for Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein) | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-08-06 | N/A | Court hearing regarding case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (Jeffrey Epstein case). Discussion focuses on sett... | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2019-08-06 | N/A | Court hearing/status conference filing date. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-08-06 | Court hearing | A hearing to discuss and set a trial date in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-08-06 | N/A | Court hearing regarding trial scheduling in United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-08-06 | N/A | Court hearing regarding trial scheduling in Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing regarding Mr. Epstein's bail conditions. | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing (Filing date of document). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A legal argument took place in court concerning Rule 29, the scope of a statute, and the conditio... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where Mr. Weinberg and the Court discuss the impact of publicity and wealth on... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A discussion in court regarding the financial summary and potential bond for Mr. Epstein. | Court | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where Mr. Weinberg is presenting arguments to the Court regarding pretrial con... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing where Mr. Weinberg and The Court discuss a registrant's compliance with monitorin... | Southern District Court (im... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court proceeding where Mr. Weinberg and The Court are discussing Mr. Epstein's legal history an... | Courtroom | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing for case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB where counsel and the judge discussed whether trustees... | Court in the Southern District | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding bail and detention for Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) regarding bail and remand. | Southern District (implied ... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Court hearing regarding Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A legal proceeding where the government presented arguments against the defendant's legal claims ... | A courtroom in an unspecifi... | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing where Mr. Weinberg and The Court discuss the relevance of a 14-year period of goo... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-24 | Court hearing | A court hearing where the judge and a counsel (Mr. Weinberg) discuss Mr. Epstein's compliance wit... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
DOJ-OGR-00000540.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 24, 2019, capturing a dialogue between an attorney, Mr. Weinberg, and the presiding judge. Mr. Weinberg argues that his client's case is not a typical trafficking case and that the legal presumption for detention is rebuttable. The discussion focuses on the two prongs for rebuttal—danger to the community and flight risk—and the different legal standards of proof required for each.
DOJ-OGR-00000539.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. The text captures a dialogue between the Court and defense attorney Mr. Weinberg. The Court lists various crimes involving minors that carry a presumption of remand. Mr. Weinberg acknowledges the gravity of the allegations against Jeffrey Epstein but argues that his case does not fit the typical profile ('heartland') of commercial sex trafficking statutes (1591) which usually involve servitude, enslavement, and pimps.
DOJ-OGR-00000536.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal proceeding transcript dated July 24, 2019, discussing a case involving federal interest and an indictment against Mr. Epstein. Mr. Weinberg, identified as Deputy Attorney General, explains his approval in May or June 2008 for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the federal government's involvement, including urging Florida to bring additional charges against Mr. Epstein. The discussion also touches upon the roles of Mr. Sloman and Mr. Filip within the Department of Justice and the scope of the U.S. Attorney's Office in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00000534.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 24, 2019, related to the Jeffrey Epstein case (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). Attorneys Weinberg and Rossmiller discuss the history of the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Court, specifically referencing a March 2008 meeting in Washington between the defense and the DOJ's Criminal Division/Child Exploitation Unit. The discussion highlights that the defense argued the case lacked interstate elements needed for federal prosecution, and the DOJ subsequently issued a letter in May 2008 endorsing prosecutorial discretion due to the 'unusual' facts of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000533.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. Attorney Mr. Weinberg argues that the timing of Epstein's arrest was suspicious relative to a CVRA filing in Florida. He asserts that high-level DOJ officials, specifically Alice Fisher (then Head of the Criminal Division) and Sigal Mandelker (currently Undersecretary of the Treasury), were directly involved in approving the controversial 2007 non-prosecution agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00000531.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A representative for the government argues against the defendant's legal claims, stating a non-prosecution agreement is not applicable and that the case will proceed, and urges the court to order the defendant's detention. Following the government's statement, a lawyer named Mr. Weinberg begins to address the court.
DOJ-OGR-00000401.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) dated July 16, 2019. The text details a discussion between the Judge (The Court), defense attorneys (Weingarten and Weinberg), and the prosecutor (Rossmiller) regarding the scheduling of a bail application hearing, moving it from Thursday to the following Monday at 10:00 AM. The prosecutor, Mr. Rossmiller, requests a moment to confer with the defense and subsequently states that the government will rely on its initial submission.
DOJ-OGR-00000397.jpg
This is page 11 of a court transcript filed on July 16, 2019. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues to The Court that the discussion should concern the scope of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), not its legality. He references a filing by Northern District of Georgia prosecutors (acting for Southern District of Florida) before Judge Marrah that supported the NPA's constitutionality and asserted Epstein fulfilled his obligations.
DOJ-OGR-00000395.jpg
This document is page 9 of a court transcript from July 16, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein (SDNY). The prosecution argues that the Southern District of New York is not bound by the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg counters that the NPA provided Epstein with immunity for the conduct currently being prosecuted, including interstate travel and communications, and asserts that Epstein fulfilled the terms of that agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016426.jpg
This document is Page 3 of a legal affirmation detailing procedural history regarding a motion by 'The Post' to unseal appellate briefs related to the Epstein case. It chronicles communications between the Post's legal counsel, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office (specifically Karen Friedman Agnifilo), and Epstein's counsel (Mr. Weinberg) between December 2018 and January 2019. Key points include the DA's opposition to the motion, the suggestion to notify Florida prosecutors, and Mr. Weinberg formally stating that Epstein took no position on the unsealing.
Prison Conditions and Medical Examiner Conclusions
Oral argument regarding the horrific conditions at the MCC/SHU and disputing the medical examiner's findings.
Trial Scheduling
Discussion regarding the scheduling of the trial for either June or September 2020.
Trial Scheduling and Discovery
Weinberg argues for a trial date of Labor Day 2020 due to the volume of discovery (1 million pages) and complex legal issues surrounding the NPA.
Trial Scheduling
Weinberg argues that the defense needs 13 months to prepare due to sealed files, the NPA, and jail conditions.
Bail Hearing Arguments
Discussion regarding the right to counsel, fairness relative to other defendants, and the complexity of the current case involving 'a million pages of discovery'.
Bail Hearing / Applicability of Statute 1591
Weinberg argues that while the allegations are grave, Epstein's case differs from the 'heartland' of commercial sex trafficking involving servitude and pimps.
Bail Hearing Argument
Discussion regarding the confidentiality of financial records submitted for bail determination.
Compliance with registration and travel notification
Argument regarding the defendant's compliance with sex offender registration and lack of violation notices.
DOJ involvement in 2007 NPA
Discussion regarding the timing of Epstein's arrest relative to CVRA filings and the identification of DOJ officials involved in the 2007 non-prosecution agreement.
Mr. Epstein's compliance with New York sex offender regis...
Mr. Weinberg acknowledges seeing the story and states that nobody from the "New York side" has ever informed Mr. Epstein that he was in violation.
Defense of Mr. Epstein's character and flight risk status
Mr. Weinberg argues that Mr. Epstein is not an out-of-control offender or a flight risk, citing past intensive investigations and the high level of publicity surrounding him. The Court questions the basis for Mr. Weinberg's assessment of his client's character.
Response to the Court
Mr. Weinberg thanks the judge and begins to provide context for the case before responding to the Court's questions.
Registrant's compliance and travel monitoring
A discussion between Mr. Weinberg and the Court about a registrant's obligations, travel, and history of compliance.
Publicity and its effect on the case against Mr. Epstein
Mr. Weinberg argues that the high level of publicity and Mr. Epstein's wealth make him an attractive defendant and would motivate any potential victims to come forward with allegations.
Bail conditions for Mr. Epstein
Mr. Weinberg argues for the reconsideration of bail conditions for his client, Mr. Epstein. He contrasts Epstein with another defendant who had foreign passports and lied to pretrial services, and proposes appointing a credible trustee to live at Epstein's home to ensure compliance.
Legal arguments regarding a case
Mr. Weinberg argues that the current case is not one of 'quintessential commercial sex trafficking' and that the presumption for detention is rebuttable, wishing to address the 'danger' and 'flight' prongs separately.
Arguments against monetary bail conditions
Mr. Weinberg argues against monetary bail conditions, citing the complexity of pretrial preparation, a movement in Massachusetts, the federal Bail Reform Act of 1984, and a broader societal reaction against the overcriminalization of the 1980s.
Position on Unsealing
Stated they take no position on behalf of Mr. Epstein regarding the unsealing.
Position on unsealing
Stated 'we take no position on behalf of Mr. Epstein' regarding the unsealing request.
Position on unsealing briefs
Stating that after consideration, they take no position on behalf of Mr. Epstein regarding the unsealing request.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity