United States
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DiGiacomo
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Korfant
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Chandler
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Conway
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Kidd
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Raniere
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Khashoggi
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
Midland Asphalt Corp.
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
location
Taiwan
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
location
France
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
Iran
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Giglio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Petitioners
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Salameh
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Villa
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Macchia
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Havens
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Vilar
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Georgiou
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Madoff
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Williams
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Young
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Vickers
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Pena
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Modification of the Non-Prosecution Agreement | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of the Syrian situation, including the legitimacy of Mr. Assad, international response... | Global political context, U... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Clarification of provisions in paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement regarding the selecti... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Assignment of Independent Third-Party | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement (NPA) intended for broad, complete resolution of matters, including Eps... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | War with Iran / U.S.-led attack | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation and execution of a plea agreement | Eleventh Circuit | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cold War | Global | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement execution | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agrees to plea deal (NPA) for 18 months imprisonment. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential Iranian nuclear targeting of US logistics hubs. | Middle East / Bahrain | View |
| N/A | N/A | Selection of attorney representative for victims | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Public protests and Mubarak's time of need | Cairo, Egypt | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | US shipment of battery-operated TV sets to Pacific islands. | Pacific Ocean islands | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hypothetical conflict/coalition warfare between US and Iran | Middle East | View |
| N/A | N/A | Potential U.S. attack on Iran | Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Suspension of federal Grand Jury investigation | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed peace conference to address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | U.S. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Palestinian bid for full U.N. membership. | United Nations | View |
| N/A | N/A | United States' decision to pursue warmer ties with Tehran. | International | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Non-prosecution agreement | Epstein agreed to a sentence of eighteen months' imprisonment on two charges, and in return, the ... | N/A | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016545.jpg
This document is page 36 of 42 from a legal filing or research file belonging to David Schoen (attorney), specifically an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103, p. 844). The text consists of footnotes (163-177) discussing federal jurisdiction (Travel Act, honest services fraud), discrepancies in sexual assault reporting statistics between the FBI and CDC, and criticism of law enforcement clearance rates for sexual crimes, including specific references to the LAPD and LA Sheriff's Department. The document appears to be part of a larger collection produced to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016544.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), specifically the conclusion of an article discussing prosecutorial discretion, victim rights, and federalism/state jurisdiction. It appears to be an exhibit submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely to support legal arguments regarding the handling of the Epstein case, specifically concerning the non-prosecution agreement or federal/state jurisdiction issues. The text analyzes the differences between U.S. and foreign legal systems regarding the ability of victims to challenge decisions not to prosecute.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016542.jpg
A page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The document contains an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the politics of prosecutorial discretion, specifically regarding underenforcement in cases of domestic violence and sexual assault. It also includes footnotes citing various federal statutes related to sex trafficking of minors (18 U.S.C. § 1591), public corruption, and bribery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016539.jpg
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol 103) discussing the complexities of federal versus state jurisdiction in cases of police violence and 'excessive use of force.' It analyzes the high 'mens rea' standard required for federal prosecution and compares the US system to those of Germany, Canada, and Australia. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional inquiry, possibly related to arguments about federal jurisdiction or deaths in custody.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016537.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) discussing the systemic underenforcement of sexual assault laws in the United States and the failure of state criminal justice systems to adequately address the issue. It includes extensive footnotes citing legal precedents and state statutes regarding prosecutorial discretion and victim rights. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016534.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016532.jpg
This page from the Minnesota Law Review discusses the pros and cons of federalism-based enforcement redundancy in criminal law, specifically comparing it to private prosecution and administrative review. It argues that while federalism offers a check on state underenforcement, it relies heavily on the discretion of federal prosecutors rather than private victims. The text is heavily footnoted with references to UK and Canadian case law regarding prosecutorial oversight.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016529.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) produced by attorney David Schoen for the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016529). The text discusses the legal theory of 'Federalism Safeguards on Prosecutorial Discretion,' specifically analyzing how the U.S. system allows federal prosecutors to override or 'second-guess' state prosecutors' decisions not to prosecute (declination decisions), contrasting this with models in Canada, Germany, and Australia. The footnotes discuss historical racial inequities in the U.S. justice system and EU directives on crime victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), submitted as an exhibit to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The text discusses legal theories regarding the judicial and administrative review of decisions *not* to charge (prosecutorial discretion), contrasting the lack of such mechanisms in the U.S. with their prevalence in the E.U. and England. This legal argument is relevant to the controversy surrounding the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case and the rights of his victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016522.jpg
This page from a law review article discusses the historical evolution of public versus private prosecution in the United States compared to England. It notes that while private prosecution has largely vanished in the U.S. in favor of public prosecutors, some states like Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire retain vestiges of it. The footnotes provide legal citations regarding victims' rights statutes and case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016521.jpg
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol. 103, circa 2019) discussing the legal theory and international differences regarding private prosecutions versus public prosecutors. It specifically highlights the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the footnotes. The document appears to be from the files of David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer), as indicated by the footer, and was submitted to the House Oversight Committee as part of an investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016521).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016520.jpg
This page is an extract from a legal brief or filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (likely related to the Epstein investigation). It cites a Minnesota Law Review article discussing the limitations of victims' rights in the U.S. compared to other jurisdictions, specifically noting that U.S. victims generally lack the power to challenge prosecutorial discretion (decisions not to prosecute). The document includes extensive footnotes citing various examples of enforcement discretion and budget limitations in contexts like tax law and marijuana enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016519.jpg
This document is a page from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing mechanisms of prosecutorial accountability and the impact of resource constraints on charging decisions. It details three models for checking underenforcement: private prosecution authority, independent review of non-prosecution, and multiple public prosecution agencies, noting the U.S. preference for the third model. The page also includes extensive footnotes citing various legal scholars, articles, and cases related to prosecution failures and police bias.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016517.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes legal underenforcement and systemic bias, specifically regarding police misconduct, sexual assault, and crimes against marginalized groups (sex workers, undocumented immigrants, LGBT individuals). It argues that professional relationships between prosecutors and police create conflicts of interest that prevent fair adjudication, citing various legal standards and academic works.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515.jpg
This document is a page from a legal academic article (Minnesota Law Review) discussing the concept of 'underenforcement' in the criminal justice system, particularly regarding sexual assaults and corruption. It argues that underenforcement often stems from bias or favoritism and undermines the legitimacy of legal institutions. The document bears the name of David Schoen (one of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, likely to argue points regarding prosecutorial discretion or failure to prosecute.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016514.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of criminal prosecution jurisdiction between state and federal levels, particularly regarding police misconduct and sexual assault. It argues that federal oversight is an imperfect backstop due to higher legal standards and political shifts, and highlights the lack of safeguards against unjustified decisions not to prosecute compared to the robust protections against improper charging. The text includes extensive footnotes citing legal cases, statutes, and articles related to police violence and civil rights enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016513.jpg
This page from a legal article discusses the concept of "enforcement redundancy" as a tool to combat criminal law underenforcement, particularly in cases of police violence and sexual assault. It analyzes the U.S. approach of federalism-based redundancy compared to other mechanisms like private prosecution or judicial review used internationally. The text argues that while federal intervention helps with public corruption and some civil rights violations, it has a mixed record on police violence and has failed to adequately address sexual assault underenforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016512.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) submitted as an exhibit, marked with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016512 and the name David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer). The text is an academic legal analysis discussing 'enforcement redundancy,' 'underenforcement,' and the interplay between federal and state jurisdiction, as well as the Department of Justice's internal review processes. It appears to be part of a legal argument regarding prosecutorial discretion or jurisdiction, likely relevant to the double jeopardy or dual sovereignty issues in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016511.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing structural responses to underenforcement in criminal justice systems, particularly through "redundant charging authority" and overlapping jurisdictions. It introduces the concept of creating distinct enforcement agencies with duplicative jurisdiction, such as in transnational law or U.S. federalism, to ensure laws are enforced even if one entity declines to act. The page includes extensive footnotes citing relevant U.S. Supreme Court cases and legal scholarship.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016510.jpg
This document is a page from a 2018 Minnesota Law Review article by Darryl K. Brown titled 'Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute.' The text discusses the legal theory behind underenforcement of criminal law, specifically citing failures to prosecute sexual assaults and racially motivated crimes. While the text does not mention Epstein, the document bears the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN' (an attorney associated with Epstein) and a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016510', indicating it was part of an evidentiary production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as legal research regarding the controversial non-prosecution agreement Epstein received.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012095.jpg
This document is a 'Market Review' newsletter dated November 1, 2017, published by Rockefeller Asset Management and authored by Jimmy Chang. It analyzes the unusually low market volatility in October 2017, the performance of FANG stocks, and global economic political events involving the US, Europe, and China. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of an evidence production to the House Oversight Committee, likely incidental to a broader financial investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012086.jpg
This document is page 8 of a 'Global Foresight' financial report from the Third Quarter of 2017. It analyzes the Chinese economy, comparing the 'Li Keqiang Index' against reported GDP growth and property prices, noting strong growth in early 2017 driven by infrastructure and property. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into financial institutions (such as Deutsche Bank or JPMorgan) that serviced Epstein, though Epstein is not mentioned on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012084.jpg
This article by Jimmy C. Chang draws parallels between the economic philosophies of 1776 and modern China's state-led growth. It discusses how China's economic rise, driven by government planning rather than free-market capitalism, has reshaped the global economy, particularly following the massive stimulus enacted after the 2008 financial crisis.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012083.jpg
This document is page 5 of a 'Global Foresight' report from the Third Quarter of 2017, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It analyzes global political risks (Brexit, Italian elections) and market trends, specifically focusing on the dominance of 'FANG' stocks (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, Google) and the aging US bull market that began in 2009. It includes a demographic chart regarding India's population distribution in 2015.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012082.jpg
This document is page 4 of a 'Global Foresight' financial report from the Third Quarter of 2017. It analyzes global demographics and their impact on economic growth, specifically focusing on China's population distribution, Japan's recovery under Prime Minister Abe, and the positive market sentiment in Europe following Emmanuel Macron's victory in France. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012082' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the U.S. House Oversight Committee.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity