MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Exploitative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Co conspirators |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Groomer victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Adversarial defendant victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
RRA
|
Professional affiliation |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
inmates at the MDC
|
Professional tutor student |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Groomer victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Natalya
|
Professional criminal enterprise |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Ransome
|
Victim perpetrator |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Groomer victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
Groomer victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Exploitative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed speaker
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Annie
|
Involved in incident |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Facilitator |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Employees
|
Employee |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Conspiratorial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Unspecified |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Martindell
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Guiffre
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co conspirators alleged |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Recruiter victim |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-01 | N/A | Prior ruling cited (Maxwell, 2021 WL 3591801) | Court Record | View |
| 2020-12-28 | Legal ruling | Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's bail application in a written order. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-28 | N/A | Opinion & Order in case 20cr330 (referenced in attachment filename) | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-28 | N/A | Activity/Order in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell | Court (implied) | View |
| 2020-12-21 | Legal filing deadline | Deadline for Maxwell's pretrial motions to be filed. | United States District Court | View |
| 2020-12-20 | Legal decision | A decision was made in the case of US v Maxwell, as noted in the watermark. | Court | View |
| 2020-12-20 | Legal decision | The case 'US v Maxwell' was decided, as noted in the document's watermark. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-18 | N/A | Trial of Ghislaine Maxwell | Court | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Legal proceeding | Maxwell renewed her request for bail, presenting a revised bail package. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-08 | Legal proceeding | Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's renewed application for bail. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-25 | Legal ruling | A ruling in the case Giuffre v. Maxwell, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 221599, at *16 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 25, ... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-11-18 | N/A | Memo Endorsement in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN USA v. Maxwell | Court (implied) | View |
| 2020-11-09 | Court ruling | The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxw... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2020-10-26 | N/A | Call with GA USAO re Maxwell | Unknown (Remote/Phone) | View |
| 2020-10-23 | N/A | Discovery Review | MDC | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The court dismissed the appeal of Defendant-Appellant Maxwell and denied the motion to consolidat... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Preparation of 5th Production discovery materials for distribution to defense counsel and Ghislai... | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-10-19 | Court ruling | The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied... | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court denial of Maxwell's request for a writ of mandamus. | Court of Appeals | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court denial of Maxwell's motion to consolidate her criminal appeal with the civil appeal Guiffre... | Court of Appeals | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court dismissal of Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. | Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Court dismissal of Maxwell's appeal regarding a protective order modification. | Court of Appeals | View |
| 2020-10-02 | N/A | Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order | District Court | View |
| 2020-10-02 | N/A | Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061 | Court | View |
| 2020-10-02 | N/A | Rule 16 Discovery | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017540.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Jane provides testimony under direct examination. She describes being led by a man (contextually Epstein) to a pool house where he sexually assaulted her by masturbating on her. Jane explains her reaction was to freeze in fear and that she did not tell anyone because she was terrified and ashamed, but confirms she continued spending time with Maxwell and Epstein in Palm Beach after the incident.
DOJ-OGR-00017536.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Jane. Jane testifies that an unnamed male (implied to be Epstein) provided financial support to her and her mother, paying for items like voice lessons and clothes. She also recounts a disturbing conversation with Maxwell, who advised her that once she had a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, they were 'grandfathered in,' implying she could always resume it.
DOJ-OGR-00014506.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, is delivering a summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger systematically attacks the credibility of a key witness by highlighting numerous instances where the witness claims she cannot remember crucial details of her alleged encounters with Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney argues that the witness's lack of memory regarding being touched, kissed, or seeing Maxwell present during sexual acts contradicts the government's case and makes her testimony unreliable.
DOJ-OGR-00011596.jpg
This document is a personal statement from a victim detailing over a decade of severe emotional and physical suffering, including a diagnosis of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), following abuse. The speaker explains that the arrests of Epstein in 2019 and Maxwell in 2020 were pivotal, providing the validation needed to finally disclose the abuse to others and begin a path toward closure.
DOJ-OGR-00011595.jpg
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing the profound and lasting trauma inflicted by Epstein and Maxwell. The speaker describes being terrified and threatened with death, and how her attempts to escape by moving were futile as they always found her. This involvement led to a decade of severe mental and physical health issues, including over two dozen hospitalizations, and left her unable to hold a job or care for herself.
DOJ-OGR-00011589.jpg
This document is a victim's testimony from a legal case, detailing horrific sexual abuse perpetrated by Epstein and Maxwell over seven to eight months. The victim describes being manipulated and abused daily at Epstein's New York mansion and private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, culminating in an escape attempt. The testimony highlights the methods of control and psychological torment used by Epstein and Maxwell to ensnare their victims.
DOJ-OGR-00011588.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 22, 2022. It captures a portion of a victim impact statement hearing, where the court acknowledges written submissions from Ms. Bryant, Ms. Maria Farmer, and Ms. Helm before hearing live testimony from Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome begins her testimony by describing the lasting trauma from a "hideous trap set by Epstein, Maxwell and other co-conspirators" and recounts how she was approached by an "Epstein-Maxwell recruiter" named Natalya after moving to New York at age 22.
DOJ-OGR-00011576.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing a statement, likely a closing argument or sentencing memo, regarding the defendant, Maxwell. The text details the defendant's predatory behavior, describing how she manipulated and trafficked young girls for sex to serve a middle-aged man.
DOJ-OGR-00011552.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, where attorneys debate whether Maxwell had a supervisory or leadership role over Sarah Kellen. One attorney argues against this, citing testimony from Larry Visoski and Cimberly Espinosa that Kellen was Epstein's assistant, not Maxwell's. In response, another attorney, Ms. Moe, references testimony from a witness named Carolyn who recalled Kellen scheduling massages while Maxwell was present at the Palm Beach residence, implying a connection.
DOJ-OGR-00011550.jpg
This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing arguments in a criminal case. The prosecution, represented by Ms. Moe, asserts that the defendant held a leadership role over Sarah Kellen, citing flight records showing they both traveled on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet during the same period. The defense, represented by Mr. Everdell, begins to challenge the prosecution's legal interpretation regarding the need to prove supervision of another criminal participant.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019297.jpg
A legal letter dated February 7, 2018, from the law firm Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, representing intervenor Alan Dershowitz in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case. The letter is addressed to attorneys J. Stanley Pottinger, Paul G. Cassell, Sigrid S. McCawley, and Laura A. Menninger. The correspondence begins an allegation that the plaintiff's counsel improperly leaked submissions from a pending disciplinary proceeding to the Washington Post.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017821.jpg
This document is a court filing (Page 4 of 6) from April 16, 2019, discussing various allegations related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details claims by 'Ransome' about being recruited as a masseuse, held against her will, and forced into sex by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, leading to a civil lawsuit. The document also describes Epstein's plea deal, which quashed an FBI investigation, and includes a photograph of Virginia Roberts with Prince Andrew, with Ghislaine Maxwell in the background, where Roberts claims she was a sex slave and had sex with the prince.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027556.jpg
This document is a digital communication log from December 6, 2018, marked as House Oversight evidence. It details a conversation between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The discussion involves confirmation that 'Chomsky' is 'all in,' followed by an inquiry regarding 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine), with the redacted sender noting she has a 'jealous' boyfriend, to which the jeeitunes account responds dismissively ('So what').
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022994.jpg
This document is a printed email chain from May 2016 ending with Darren Indyke forwarding a message to Jeffrey Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com). The subject line references 'Maxwell' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The body of Indyke's email is redacted as privileged. The forwarded message is from Miles Alexander (Operations Manager) stating 'Answer to questions asked' and 'No response received'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015539.jpg
This page is from a legal complaint (Case 1:15-cv-07433) filed on September 21, 2015. It outlines allegations of libel against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating she and her agent Gow made false statements with 'actual and deliberate malice' to discredit the plaintiff, Giuffre. The document asserts that these statements damaged Giuffre's professional reputation as the president of a sex trafficking non-profit and falsely accused her of lying about being recruited by Maxwell and abused by Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015257.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a narrative work or report (marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp) discussing conspiracy mentality. It features a quote from 'Maxwell' recounting a salacious anecdote about the Queen Mother having a secret boyfriend who allegedly broke into Buckingham Palace. The text then pivots to a quote from conspiracy theorist David Icke regarding the British Royal Family and allegations of shapeshifting rituals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029885.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP) and Jacquie Johnson. The conversation concerns the 'Jane Doe' case and specifically inquires about the status of serving a subpoena to 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell). The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021908.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview. The speaker discusses suspicions regarding flight logs provided by Bruce Rinehart, a former AUSA who went to work near and allegedly for Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker notes that the logs showed approximately ten flights involving Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Epstein, and suggests the term 'one female' in the logs may have been a code word for an underage girl.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Scheduling massages and scheme operations
Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.
Scheduling massages with Jeffrey Epstein
Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Maxwell's personal life, relationships, and her boyfriend...
Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.
Minor Victim-3's life and family
MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Scheduling an appointment to massage Epstein
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Instruction to undress
She told me to get undressed.
Small talk during massage
making small talk
Legal Review
Review of discovery materials
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Interaction with Epstein
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Appointments
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Mr. Epstein's status
Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity