Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MAXWELL

Person
Mentions
1792
Relationships
402
Events
856
Documents
868
Also known as:
mother of the Maxwell siblings
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
402 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Epstein
Alleged co conspirators
6
1
View
organization UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Jane
Victim perpetrator alleged
6
1
View
person TODD BLANCHE
Professional
6
1
View
person Jane
Association
6
2
View
person CAROLYN
Exploitative
6
2
View
person Kellen
Employee
6
1
View
person Epstein
Professional conspiratorial
6
2
View
person victims
Criminal
6
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Co conspirators
6
2
View
person Kate
Perpetrator victim
6
2
View
person JANE
Denied association
6
1
View
person Epstein
Alleged co conspirators
6
2
View
person Epstein
Co conspirator potential
6
2
View
person Scotty
Juror defendant
6
2
View
organization USAO-SDNY
Legal representative
6
2
View
person A. Farmer
Business associate
6
2
View
person Annie
Groomer victim
6
2
View
person Ms. Farmer
Victim perpetrator
6
1
View
person Epstein
Professional criminal
6
1
View
person Epstein
Subjects of investigation
6
1
View
person Epstein
Criminal association
6
2
View
person Epstein
Co conspirators alleged
6
2
View
person Kate
Groomer victim
6
2
View
person Guiffre
Legal representative
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Maxwell's motion denied by District Court without an evidentiary hearing. N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell argues Counts Three and Four of the Indictment are untimely. N/A View
N/A N/A Court declines Maxwell's motion to strike surplusage at this juncture. N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell moves to strike surplusage from the S1 superseding indictment, specifically allegations r... N/A View
N/A N/A Court agrees that some of Maxwell's concerns are overstated but acknowledges defamation action re... N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell's motion for a new trial denied by District Court. N/A View
N/A N/A Massage incident New Mexico Ranch View
N/A N/A Jury instruction on Count Four, requiring finding that Maxwell transported Jane for sexual activity. N/A View
N/A N/A Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of the District Court's response. District Court View
N/A N/A Maxwell appealed the District Court's denial. N/A View
N/A N/A Court found that nothing in the NPA or its negotiation history suggested it precluded USAO-SDNY f... N/A View
N/A N/A Cancellation of Maria's trip to New Mexico New Mexico (intended destin... View
N/A N/A Denial of motion to compel immediate disclosure of Minor Victim-4's prior statements. Court View
N/A N/A Rule 33 Motion Ruling District Court View
N/A N/A Dismissal of lawsuit against Maxwell Court View
N/A N/A Offenses committed by Maxwell that were subject to motions to dismiss. N/A View
N/A N/A Denial of temporary release Court View
N/A N/A Flashlight checks performed on Maxwell every 15 minutes due to enhanced security schedule. MDC View
N/A N/A Maxwell's appeal/contention regarding the application of the NPA to her prosecution in SDNY. Second Circuit Court of App... View
N/A N/A Judge Nathan declined to modify protective order Court View
N/A N/A Defamation Action Unknown View
N/A N/A Massage incident where Maxwell instructed Farmer to undress, performed a massage, exposed Farmer'... The room where Farmer was s... View
N/A N/A Travel with Epstein and Maxwell Various (Travel) View
N/A N/A District Court denied Maxwell's motion for reconsideration. District Court View
N/A N/A MAXWELL arranged for Minor Victim-1 to be transported multiple times from Florida to New York for... Florida to New York View

EFTA00020540.pdf

This document is an internal email thread between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated October 17, 2018. The correspondence circulates a legal opinion by Judge Sweet regarding the 'Right of Public Access Judicial Document' in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, which the sender noted reading about in the New York Law Journal (NYLJ).

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00020493.pdf

An FBI Intake report dated August 20, 2020, detailing a call from a male source in Essex, NY, who claims to have worked with Leslie Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein and was pardoned by a U.S. President. The caller reported contacting a female victim in Manhattan who is writing a book and is in touch with hundreds of other victims. The caller alleged the existence of films recording prominent men, specifically naming Epstein, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump, as well as Maxwell, and inquired about who hired Epstein at 'Bear' (likely Bear Stearns).

Fbi intake report
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00020392.pdf

This document is an email dated July 10, 2020, sent to an individual at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email attaches a scheduling order for Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming detention/bail hearing and discusses logistics, specifically noting that the order contains dial-in information for public audio access which can be provided to victims if requested.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00020102.pdf

This document is an internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated October 11, 2021. The email transmits draft letters addressed to the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) regarding 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell), as indicated by the attachment filenames. The email includes the sender's signature block with the SDNY office address.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019928.pdf

This document is an email dated December 2, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Maxwell' case. The email discusses an attached order from Judge Nathan which requires the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) legal team to file a letter with the court by the following Friday. The sender requests a call to discuss the matter.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019914.pdf

This document is an email dated June 19, 2021, between personnel at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the management of legal files. The sender requests a contractor to save attached PDF 'prep notes' related to testifying witnesses into specific '3500 folders' (referring to Jencks Act material) on the 'Epstein share drive' in preparation for the Maxwell trial.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019193.pdf

This document is an email header dated October 10, 2021, transmitting a document titled 'Maxwell Jury Questionnaire'. The attachment appears to be a legal draft coordinating jury selection questions between the Defense and the Government (prosecution), likely for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.

Email header / transmission record
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019043.pdf

This document is an email dated October 8, 2021, concerning the preparation of jury questionnaires and voir dire questions, likely for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial as indicated by the attachment filename. The sender discusses difficulties in combining drafts from opposing legal teams and schedules a conferral for that afternoon to discuss the documents further.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00018707.pdf

This document is a heavily redacted email from February 22, 2021, exchanged between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line 'Opposition to Maxwell GJ Motion' indicates the correspondence concerns legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically regarding a Grand Jury motion. The email includes an embedded message file with the same subject.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00018658.pdf

An email chain from December 30, 2020, in which a DOJ Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Paris forwards a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) request from French authorities. The request relates to the investigation of an individual (name redacted) who was recently arrested in Paris. The sender notes they are already in contact with the recipients regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00018005.pdf

An internal email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated September 22, 2021. The email discusses the review of evidence files including FBI files and FedEx records, mentions the discovery of 'Maxwell phone records,' and attaches a 'Household Manual' dated 2005 in preparation for an upcoming interview with the manual's source.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016829.pdf

An email dated January 24, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to recipients labeled as 'TROOPERS'. The email requests the service of a subpoena to Expedia regarding travel records for 'Maxwell' (presumably Ghislaine Maxwell).

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016792.pdf

An email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) dated December 18, 2020, notifying the recipient (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel) that a CD containing a 'small corrected production of discovery' regarding Maxwell has been sent via FedEx.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016392.pdf

An email dated June 29, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding a 'Corrected Maxwell Arrest Warrant'. The sender apologizes for a date error in a previous warrant and asks if Judge Smith can sign the attached corrected version.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016313.pdf

An email from an Assistant United States Attorney at the SDNY to FBI agents dated June 12, 2020, requesting a follow-up call regarding the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. The email specifically seeks information on Maxwell's active financial accounts, credit cards, a connection to UMB Bank, the status of returns from a subpoena issued on September 25, 2019, and recent SAR/CTR (Suspicious Activity Report) checks.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015971.pdf

This document is an email dated December 21, 2020, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The subject is 'interlocutory appeals' and it contains an attachment titled 'Maxwell_Brief_re_Interlocutory_Appeals.pdf', indicating it relates to the legal proceedings against Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015835.pdf

An email dated August 22, 2021, discussing a draft letter to Judge 'AJN' (likely Alison J. Nathan) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints about VTC (Video Teleconference) access at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center). The sender notes a deadline of the following day and mentions coordinating with MDC legal counsel for review.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015203.pdf

An email thread from June 30, 2020, involving Deputy US Attorney Audrey Strauss (SDNY). The correspondence concerns a '3:30 Q and A prep' session and includes an attachment titled 'Maxwell_possible_QA_v2.docx', suggesting preparations for a press event or legal proceeding regarding Ghislaine Maxwell (who was arrested shortly after, on July 2, 2020).

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015174.pdf

An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated October 7, 2021. The email discusses a draft '3500 Cover Letter' (referring to Jencks Act material) and an attachment named 'Maxwell_Cover_Letter', likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The sender asks for review regarding language about a redacted individual.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014713.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 23, 2021. It contains a forwarded message from journalist Aaron Katersky inquiring about the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Katersky notes for a 'preview piece' that Maxwell's 'most prominent public accuser' (name redacted) and another individual (name redacted) are not on the government's witness list and asks if there are any issues with this assessment.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014709.pdf

An email sent by an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York on November 23, 2021. The email transmits an attachment containing Ghislaine Maxwell's response to motions to quash a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The document is heavily redacted regarding personal identifiers.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014506.pdf

A formal notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated July 18, 2017, announcing a change in the assigned case manager for docket 16-3945cv ([Redacted] v. Maxwell). The document lists Robert A. Katzmann as Chief Judge and references the underlying District Court case (15-cv-7433) presided over by Judge Sweet.

Court notice
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014499.pdf

An email dated January 3, 2019, from Stan Pottinger of Edwards Pottinger LLC regarding a confidentiality order in a legal case against Maxwell presided over by Judge Sweet. The email forwards three PDF attachments identified as a Sealed Opinion, a Protective Order, and a notice of Case Manager Assignment, with the body text noting that 'These documents are public.'

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00013300.pdf

This document is an email chain from April 29, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It discusses an order issued by Judge Nathan directing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to take specific actions by April 30, 2021. The emails coordinate the filing and transmission of this order to the Judge's chambers.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00013270.pdf

An internal email from January 8, 2021, between USANYS officials regarding 'Writeups'. The email includes an attachment related to Public Corruption updates for January 2021. The body text mentions a requested write-up on 'Maxwell' followed by redacted bullet points and the word 'obstruction'.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$18,300,000.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$1,750,000.00
3 transactions
Net Flow
$16,550,000.00
5 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Paid MAXWELL Court/Government $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
N/A Paid MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2022-06-29 Paid MAXWELL Court/Government $750,000.00 Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. View
1999-10-19 Received Financial Trust C... MAXWELL $18,300,000.00 Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... View
1999-10-19 Received Financial Trust C... MAXWELL $0.00 Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
4
Total
58

Culture of silence

From: MAXWELL
To: Employees

Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.

Directive
N/A
Communication Source

Mr. Epstein's status

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell would inform Carolyn upon her arrival that Mr. Epstein was out for a jog but would be back any moment, and that Carolyn could go upstairs and set up.

In-person conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Epstein's whereabouts

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Minor Victim-3's life and family

From: MAXWELL
To: Minor Victim-3

MAXWELL discussed Minor Victim-3's life and family with her as part of the grooming process.

Discussion
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling massages with Jeffrey Epstein

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Carolyn"]

Carolyn named Maxwell as one of two people who would call her to schedule massages with Jeffrey Epstein.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Civil Case Testimony

From: MAXWELL
To: litigants

Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).

Deposition
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling massages

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.

Call
N/A
Communication Source

Instruction to undress

From: MAXWELL
To: A. Farmer

She told me to get undressed.

Verbal instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Spending time vs Communicating

From: Kate
To: MAXWELL

Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Review

From: attorneys
To: MAXWELL

Review of discovery materials

Video-teleconference
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling massages and scheme operations

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Kellen"]

Maxwell instructed Kellen on how to schedule massages and manage a part of the criminal scheme that Maxwell had previously handled.

Instruction
N/A
Communication Source

Reconsideration of response

From: MAXWELL
To: U.S. District Court fo...

Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)

From: MAXWELL
To: ["unspecified"]

The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Reply brief

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Court"]

A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence

From: MAXWELL
To: ["staff"]

A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.

Household manual
N/A
Communication Source

Interaction with Epstein

From: MAXWELL
To: ["Juan Alessi"]

Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.

Verbal directive
N/A
Communication Source

Advice about boyfriends

From: MAXWELL
To: Jane

Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.

In-person conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Appointments

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling sexualized massages

From: MAXWELL
To: CAROLYN

Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Small talk during massage

From: MAXWELL
To: A. Farmer

making small talk

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling an appointment to massage Epstein

From: MAXWELL
To: a victim

Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Scheduling appointments

From: MAXWELL
To: Epstein's Palm Beach m...

Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.

Phone call
N/A
Communication Source

Request to question Juror 50

From: MAXWELL
To: U.S. District Court fo...

Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Maxwell's personal life, relationships, and her boyfriend...

From: MAXWELL
To: Kate

Maxwell told Kate 'amazing things' about her boyfriend, describing him as a philanthropist who liked to help young people, and suggested it would be wonderful for Kate to meet him.

Conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Culture of silence

From: MAXWELL
To: Employees

Maxwell directed employees at Epstein's households to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing' regarding the sexual abuse that occurred.

Directive
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search