MAXWELL
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Judge Sweet
|
Defendant judge |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Co named on evidence |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court denies Maxwell's motion for a new trial. | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's indictment was denied, trial proceeded, and she is serving a 20-year sentence. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Court's findings and application of sentencing guidelines, including a four-level leader... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Relocation of victims from Palm Beach to other places in the U.S. (including Southern District of... | Palm Beach, other places in... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell moved for rehearing en banc, which was denied. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to compel discovery from the Government, including Jencks Act, Brady, Giglio mat... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's ruling on Maxwell's discovery requests, concluding she is not entitled to expedited disco... | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion is being considered by the Court. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court's consideration of categories of questions Maxwell argues are ambiguous. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Argument by Maxwell that perjury counts should be dismissed due to immateriality of statements. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Government's intention to produce 'Materials' to the defendant (Maxwell) under a protective order... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | S2 superseding indictment moots Maxwell's grand jury challenge | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of expedited discovery timeline | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's motion to dismiss perjury counts from a civil case deposition. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell contends that the NPA bars her prosecution as a co-conspirator of Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss Mann Act counts for lack of specificity or to compel Government to s... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's sentencing to concurrent terms of imprisonment (60, 120, 240 months) followed by superv... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment due to alleged actual prejudice from Government's delay i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Legal arguments by Maxwell to dismiss indictment | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell's attempt to dismiss indictment based on fabricated stories and perjurious conspiracy by ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks writ of mandamus to direct District Court to modify protective order. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell seeks to consolidate her criminal appeal with civil appeal Guiffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-241... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court denies Maxwell's motions to consolidate as moot. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Maxwell appeals denial of motion to modify a protective order. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018391.jpg
This document is a transcript of court testimony from a witness named Kate. She describes Maxwell's role as managing properties for Jeffrey and ensuring they met his standards. Kate testifies that Maxwell claimed to own houses in London and New York City, with the latter being a gift from Jeffrey, and also claimed to be friends with prominent figures like Prince Andrew and Donald Trump.
DOJ-OGR-00018388.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of a witness named Kate under direct examination. Kate testifies about her communications with Maxwell, stating they spoke by phone about general life topics and invitations to visit. She clarifies that sexual topics were only brought up in person, where Maxwell discussed male anatomy and asked Kate if she knew anyone who could perform a sex act for a 'demanding' man named Jeffrey.
DOJ-OGR-00018387.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on the frequency of her encounters with Epstein and Maxwell at Maxwell's house in London over several years, beginning when she was 17. This followed an incident where Epstein allegedly engaged in sex acts with her during massages at the same location.
DOJ-OGR-00018386.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a witness named Kate under direct examination, filed on August 10, 2022. Kate testifies about seeing a seventeen-year-old girl having tea with Ghislaine Maxwell at her London townhouse. The questioning also establishes that Kate saw Epstein at the same location on three separate occasions and probes what Maxwell may have said regarding Epstein's potential opinion of the girl.
DOJ-OGR-00018384.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell invited her by phone to her house, complimented her on a previous 'job', and stated that 'He' (implied to be Epstein) wanted her to return. Maxwell then led Kate to a room, opened the door to reveal Jeffrey Epstein standing naked, and told Kate to 'Have a good time.'
DOJ-OGR-00018381.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. During a direct examination, a witness named Kate testifies that Maxwell told her Jeffrey Epstein "needed massages all the time" and that it was "very difficult to keep up." Immediately following this conversation, Kate states that Maxwell led her upstairs to a room containing a massage table.
DOJ-OGR-00018376.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of a witness named Kate. In her testimony, Kate recounts conversations with Maxwell, who described her boyfriend (Epstein) as a philanthropist who helps young people. Maxwell told Kate that Epstein would 'love' her and that she was the kind of person he would want to help, which Kate, being 17 and lonely, found appealing.
DOJ-OGR-00018375.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Kate provides testimony about her first meeting with a person named Maxwell at Maxwell's townhouse, describing her feelings of finding a special and meaningful new friendship. Kate recounts sharing personal details with Maxwell, including her difficult home life with an unwell mother and her plans to study law at Oxford University, which Maxwell had also attended.
DOJ-OGR-00018373.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Kate testifies about visiting Ghislaine Maxwell's house for tea. Kate explains she was excited to befriend Maxwell, who was friends with a man Kate was dating. She describes the house's exterior and identifies a photograph of it, marked as Government Exhibit 702, which is then offered into evidence without objection.
DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a legal argument by an attorney, Ms. Moe, regarding the authentication of an exhibit related to 'Maxwell and Epstein'. The Court sustains an objection made by Ms. Comey, instructs the jury to disregard certain testimony, and reserves its final decision on admitting the exhibit until after hearing from a witness referred to as 'employee one'.
DOJ-OGR-00018047.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Alessi, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Ms. Comey presents Government Exhibit 52, which Mr. Alessi identifies as a directory belonging to Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein. The witness confirms he had reviewed the directory the previous night.
DOJ-OGR-00018013.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of Mr. Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. An unnamed questioner asks Alessi about a booklet he received from Ms. Maxwell, focusing on whether specific items listed on pages 29-31 of a document were in it. Alessi denies receiving a specific 'list of shopping' but confirms he received a booklet from Maxwell and remembers some items from it, such as liquor.
DOJ-OGR-00017804.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the redirect examination of a witness named Jane, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning clarifies that Jane moved residences in the spring of 1995, that her international travel in high school was for family trips unrelated to Maxwell and Epstein, and confirms she was previously questioned about making a statement to a tabloid regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00017709.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on a discrepancy in her prior statements to the government regarding a trip to New York with Maxwell and Epstein at age 14, specifically about seeing the Broadway show 'The Lion King,' which did not premiere until she was 17. The transcript reveals communications between the government and Jane occurred through her legal representatives, including a Mr. Glassman.
DOJ-OGR-00017705.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies in her prior statements to the government about a trip to New York with Epstein and Maxwell, specifically a trip to see 'The Lion King'. The witness's attorney, Ms. Moe, objects to the line of questioning, which is overruled by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017700.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane' by attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony focuses on clarifying Jane's memory regarding statements made to the FBI and the government in November 2019 and April 2020. Specifically, Jane confirms reporting that she was abused '90 percent of the time' she traveled with Epstein and Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00017699.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney questions Jane about incidents in New York involving Ghislaine Maxwell, and despite objections from another attorney, Jane confirms that she did tell the government about at least one such incident.
DOJ-OGR-00017678.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner challenges Jane's memory and consistency regarding her prior statements to the government about encounters involving herself, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Epstein. The questioning focuses on whether Jane was ever alone with the two and whether Maxwell ever touched her, with Jane repeatedly stating she does not recall specific details but denying the assertion that she doesn't recall being touched.
DOJ-OGR-00017677.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney attempts to impeach the witness's credibility by highlighting inconsistencies between her current testimony, a statement given in December 2019 (where she had no specific memory), and a statement from February 2020 (where she recalled two other girls being present). The witness claims the government's written record of her statement contains a 'typo' or incorrect wording.
DOJ-OGR-00017659.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning attorney confirms Jane's prior statement to the government that Maxwell and Epstein visited her house before an instance of abuse. The transcript also explores Jane's past relationship with Ghislaine, whom she once viewed as a "big sister", and confirms details about her own family, including two older sisters.
DOJ-OGR-00017652.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on a visit Jane and her mother made to Epstein's house in Palm Beach, confirming they were the only people there for tea by the pool. The witness states she does not recall if Ghislaine Maxwell was present and is also questioned about a conversation she had with the government in October 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00015150.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against unsealing the grand jury transcripts from the Maxwell case. It asserts that nearly all the information presented to the grand juries is already public record from Maxwell's trial, and the remaining non-public information is minimal and inconsequential. The document concludes that a member of the public familiar with the trial would learn nothing new from the unsealed materials, which do not identify new individuals, clients, or methods related to Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00015141.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 11, 2025, details a motion by the Deputy Attorney General to unseal grand jury materials from the Maxwell and Epstein cases. The motion is justified by significant public interest and a directive from the President, following a July 6, 2025, DOJ/FBI memorandum on the Epstein investigation. In response, the court has requested additional information from the government to rule on the motion.
DOJ-OGR-00015138.jpg
This legal document outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's ongoing appeals process, including a denied petition at the Second Circuit and a pending petition before the Supreme Court as of July 2025, which argues her prosecution was barred by Jeffrey Epstein's prior non-prosecution agreement. The document also details a February 27, 2025, Department of Justice press release announcing the declassification and public release of files related to Epstein's crimes. The release features quotes from Attorney General Pamela Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, who both promise transparency and accountability.
DOJ-OGR-00015137.jpg
This legal document details the sentencing and subsequent appeal of a defendant named Maxwell. Judge Nathan imposed a 240-month prison sentence, citing Maxwell's direct and prolonged participation with Jeffrey Epstein in a sex trafficking scheme involving underage girls, and also sentenced her to a $750,000 fine. The document notes that on February 28, 2023, the Second Circuit court affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence, upholding the lower court's rulings on several key issues.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $250,000.00 | Fine imposed on each count. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Total fine imposed. | View |
| 2022-06-29 | Paid | MAXWELL | Court/Government | $750,000.00 | Criminal fine imposed at sentencing. | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $18,300,000.00 | Transfer sourced from the sale of JP Morgan Ins... | View |
| 1999-10-19 | Received | Financial Trust C... | MAXWELL | $0.00 | Transfer to Maxwell discussed in email; investi... | View |
Scheduling an appointment to massage Epstein
Maxwell, acting as one of Epstein's employees, would call victims to schedule appointments for them to massage Epstein at his Palm Beach Residence.
Interaction with Epstein
Maxwell directed Juan Alessi to speak to Epstein only when spoken to and not to look him in the eyes.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Carolyn testified that Maxwell called her to schedule sexualized massages.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Reply to Government's Opposition
A reply brief cited as "Maxwell Reply at 18" where the Defendant asserts the government failed to prove its case.
Scheduling sexualized massages
Maxwell called Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages while Maxwell was in New York.
Reconsideration of response to jury note
Maxwell filed a letter seeking reconsideration of Judge Nathan's response to the jury's note and raised issues of constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Appointments
Maxwell has been on record since 2009 calling Carolyn for appointments.
Taking over the house
Maxwell told Juan Alessi that she was taking over the house right away when she arrived.
Staff rules and operation of the Palm Beach residence
A household manual dictated the operation of the Palm Beach residence and included rules for staff, such as to 'see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing'.
Epstein's whereabouts
Maxwell informing Carolyn that Epstein was on a jog or would be back soon and that she could go upstairs to set up.
Massages
Maxwell asked Annie if she had ever received a massage and told her she would have the opportunity to have one, describing how enjoyable it would be.
Scheduling massages
Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule sexualized massages when Maxwell was in New York.
Spending time vs Communicating
Witness clarifies distinction between spending physical time vs communicating. States she stopped spending time around age 24.
Reconsideration of response
Seeking reconsideration claiming constructive amendment or prejudicial variance.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell would call Carolyn to ask if she was available for an appointment, sometimes mentioning that she and Mr. Epstein would be out of town and flying in.
Rule 29 Motion for Acquittal
A brief cited as "Maxwell Br. at 30" where the Defendant requests a judgment of acquittal on all counts.
Instruction to undress
She told me to get undressed.
Small talk during massage
making small talk
Legal Review
Review of discovery materials
Request to question Juror 50
Renewing request to question Juror 50 directly and proposing twenty-one pages of questions.
Civil Case Testimony
Testimony given by Maxwell in a civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell).
Famous people (e.g., Prince Andrew, Donald Trump)
The witness, Kate, states that Maxwell might be talking on the phone about her famous friends while Kate was present.
Reply brief
A filing titled "Maxwell Reply" is cited, where the Defendant raises an argument in a footnote for the first time.
Scheduling appointments
Maxwell called to schedule massage appointments for Carolyn, who was a minor.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity