CAROLYN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Friend |
12
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Romantic |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Melissa
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
location
Virginia
|
Recruiter recruit |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Recruiter victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
27 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Sean stole a car and ran away from Florida to Georgia. | Florida to Georgia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn and Ms. Roberts leaving Epstein's house after payment | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits by Carolyn to Epstein's home. | Mr. Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Receipt of package containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Second visit to Epstein's property. Sean drove and waited in the car. Carolyn sat in the kitchen ... | Epstein's Residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defendant (Maxwell) entered massage room while Carolyn was nude and touched her. | Massage room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial testimony regarding Count Five and Count Three. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn's second visit: Greeted by Sarah, Chef offered food, Sarah prepared table. | Epstein's residence (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn dropped out of school in the seventh grade. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn testified and wrote down her mother's phone number to avoid saying it aloud. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia and Carolyn enter Epstein's house for approximately one hour and five minutes. | Jeffrey Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage encounter where Epstein masturbated in Carolyn's presence. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn visited Jeffrey Epstein's house at age 14. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments attended by Carolyn. | Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Larry Visoski, Cimberly Espinosa, and Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn turned 18, marking the legal end of the specific charged sex-trafficking conspiracy regar... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn received a package via FedEx containing lingerie and a movie. | West Palm Beach (Carolyn's ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. | Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony given by Carolyn and Juan Alessi regarding the roles of Maxwell and Kellen. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn going to Epstein's house for massages. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn observing Maxwell in the office area off the kitchen. | Jeffrey Epstein's house (of... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence; Defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. | The residence | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016167.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. It features a discussion between the Court and attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding opening statements. The Judge overrules an objection but questions the defense's basis for suggesting attorneys told witnesses what to say. Mr. Pagliuca argues that in 2008, a witness named Carolyn provided detailed interrogatories, depositions, and a complaint that did not include Ms. Maxwell, implying her later inclusion may have been influenced.
DOJ-OGR-00016165.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues regarding the admissibility of communications between witnesses' lawyers (specifically mentioning Mr. Scarola) and the government, citing an email where Scarola suggested ten interview topics for a witness named Carolyn. The discussion centers on whether these communications and proffers are privileged or if they can be used as evidence regarding the 'cultivating of stories'.
DOJ-OGR-00016160.jpg
This document is a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Sternheim, likely the defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the four accusers, using pseudonyms, have fabricated or altered their stories decades after the alleged events, particularly after Epstein's death, in order to get a "payday." She urges the jury to focus on the themes of memory, manipulation, and money, and states that expert testimony will be presented to show how memory is unreliable and can be contaminated over time.
DOJ-OGR-00015969.jpg
This document is a flight log page from pilot David Rodgers for March and April 1998. It primarily details flights for passenger "JE" (likely Jeffrey Epstein) on aircraft N908JE, with frequent co-passenger "GM" (likely Ghislaine Maxwell) and numerous other individuals including Paul Mellon, Oliver Sachs, and George Schultz. The log records trips to various US locations and the Bahamas, and also includes entries for the pilot's simulator training and training flights conducted for other individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00021775.jpg
This legal document, part of an appeal for Ms. Maxwell, argues that there is insufficient evidence to prove she supervised Sarah Kellen in any criminal capacity. It cites testimony from witnesses Kimberly Espinoza and Carolyn, who state that Kellen's employment with Epstein began after Maxwell and Epstein had already separated. The document concludes by requesting that Ms. Maxwell's convictions be reversed or the case be remanded to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00021767.jpg
This legal document argues that the District Court abused its discretion by imposing unreasonable limitations on the questioning of Juror 50 during a post-verdict hearing. The filing contends that this prevented the defense for Ms. Maxwell from fully exploring the juror's potential bias, which was evidenced when he disclosed his own history of sexual assault to fellow jurors, thereby influencing their deliberations and the final verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00021756.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was intended to provide broad immunity to co-conspirators. It cites a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report where Epstein's counsel stated Epstein wanted to be the sole person to take blame. The document also notes that at the time of the agreement, the Government believed it lacked specific evidence against individuals like Ms. Maxwell, despite having interviewed accusers.
DOJ-OGR-00021754.jpg
This document is a page from a legal brief (Case 22-1426) filed on July 27, 2023, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell should be considered a third-party beneficiary of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The text cites legal precedents regarding plea agreements and asserts that the NPA's immunity for 'potential co-conspirators' extends to Maxwell for offenses between 2001 and 2007. A footnote highlights that Florida investigators interviewed victims Carolyn, Virginia Roberts, and Annie Farmer, establishing an overlap between the Florida investigation and the SDNY trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021737.jpg
This legal document, part of an appeal, outlines the court's findings regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's supervisory role over Sarah Kellen. It cites testimony from Epstein's pilots and evidence from trial, such as flight logs and Kellen's scheduling of illicit massages under Maxwell's direction, to affirm that Maxwell led Kellen. The document dismisses Maxwell's argument that another person was her assistant, emphasizing that the key issue was Maxwell's exercise of authority over Kellen, not formal job titles.
DOJ-OGR-00021727.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 22-1426, details the Government's arguments during the trial of Maxwell, focusing on the legal requirement that the criminal conduct was directed at New York. The prosecution argued that transporting victims like Jane to New York and intending for abuse to occur there was sufficient for conviction, even if the abuse itself happened elsewhere. The document also mentions the District Court's jury instructions, which focused on Maxwell's intent for sexual activity to take place in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021693.jpg
This legal document argues that a 2003 amendment to Section 3283, which extended a statute of limitations, was properly applied to Maxwell's case under the 'Landgraf' legal framework. It contends that since the original limitations period had not expired when Congress passed the amendment, the charges against Maxwell are timely. The document also cites evidence from a separate case (United States v. Rutigliano) showing that an individual named Carolyn visited Epstein's residence through 2004, establishing a relevant timeline.
DOJ-OGR-00021672.jpg
This legal document describes the sexual abuse of a 16-year-old minor named Melissa, who was brought by another girl, Carolyn, to provide paid sexualized massages to Epstein at his Palm Beach residence. The document then outlines the legal proceedings against Maxwell, detailing the jury's guilty verdict on December 29, 2021, and Judge Nathan's subsequent denial of Maxwell's motions for a new trial and other post-trial motions in April 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00021670.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal filing detailing the sexual abuse of a minor named Carolyn by Jeffrey Epstein and the facilitation of that abuse by Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia (Giuffre). It describes how Virginia introduced 14-year-old Carolyn to the pair at Epstein's Palm Beach villa in 2001 and instructed her on how to perform sexual massages. The text details specific acts of sexual violence committed by Epstein against Carolyn between the ages of 14 and 18 and notes Maxwell's role in scheduling these encounters.
DOJ-OGR-00021649.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing in Case 22-1426, dated June 29, 2023. It outlines the structure of the filing, which includes the government's case detailing the alleged sexual abuse of six individuals (Jane, Kate, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, Carolyn, and Melissa) and a legal argument regarding whether Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement bars the prosecution of Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021636.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely a sentencing hearing included in an appeal appendix) dated June 29, 2023. The text details the abuse of a victim named Carolyn, stating that Ghislaine Maxwell exploited Carolyn's prior trauma (abuse by a grandfather) to groom her. It explicitly states Maxwell personally touched Carolyn sexually at age 14 and paid her for massages. The speaker (likely the judge) notes that Maxwell and Epstein used this 'playbook' on multiple underage girls.
DOJ-OGR-00021635.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed June 2023, Case 22-1426) arguing for strict punishment for Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details her predatory behavior, specifically highlighting her role in grooming a 14-year-old victim named 'Jane' through shopping and movies before normalizing sexual abuse. It describes specific sexual acts involving Epstein and Maxwell, including Maxwell instructing the child on how to touch Epstein's penis and Maxwell touching the victim's breasts.
DOJ-OGR-00021601.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing hearing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). The prosecutor, Ms. Moe, is delivering an opening argument requesting an 'above-guideline sentence of multiple decades in prison,' citing the exploitation of victims Jane, Kate, Annie, Virginia, Carolyn, and Melissa. Specifically, it notes that Maxwell met Jane at a summer camp in August 1994 when Jane was 14 years old.
DOJ-OGR-00021596.jpg
This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, discussing factual objections in a conspiracy case. The court affirms that Melissa, Virginia, and Carolyn were victims, detailing a recruitment chain, and credits Carolyn's testimony about her age. The discussion then shifts to the defendant's finances, specifically an objection to including a $10 million bequest from Epstein when determining her ability to pay a fine.
DOJ-OGR-00021593.jpg
This document discusses the calculation of offense levels for multiple individuals (Jane, Annie, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa) based on guideline ranges and sections of the legal code. It mentions factors that enhance the offense levels, such as the age of the victims, undue influence into commercial sex acts, and supervisory roles in criminal activity.
DOJ-OGR-00021588.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023, discussing the legal definition of 'extensive' criminal activity. The court outlines the scope of the conspiracy, identifying Epstein and the defendant as knowing participants, noting Sarah Kellen joined in 2002, and stating that Virginia and Carolyn recruited minors starting in 2001. It also credits testimony from employee Juan Alessi regarding his role in facilitating massages under the defendant's instructions and identifies Visoski and Rodgers as Epstein's pilots.
DOJ-OGR-00021587.jpg
This legal document, dated June 29, 2023, is a judicial finding or ruling. The judge concludes that the defendant supervised Sarah Kellen, a knowing participant in a criminal conspiracy, thereby making the defendant a criminally responsible participant. This conclusion is based on testimony from Larry Visoski, David Rodgers, and Carolyn, as well as evidence from flight records and a household manual.
DOJ-OGR-00021584.jpg
This legal document is a judicial analysis determining the applicable sentencing guidelines for a defendant. The judge concludes that the offense occurred between November 1, 2004, and early 2005, based on an evaluation of evidence like message pads, thereby mandating the use of the 2003 guidelines. The document then begins to address the defendant's objections to specific sentencing enhancements related to a sex crime conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00021583.jpg
This legal document analyzes the testimony of a woman named Carolyn to determine if a sex trafficking conspiracy involving her continued into November or December 2004. It discusses her testimony about visiting Epstein's house multiple times in 2004 after giving birth, and again in 2005 after turning 18, at which point Epstein allegedly asked for younger friends because she was 'too old for him'. The document notes that while there is evidence of contact, there is no specific evidence of conspiratorial conduct in the last two months of 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00021582.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a judge discusses the sentencing guidelines applicable to the defendant, Guerrero. The central issue is determining whether the offense, a conspiracy of sexual abuse involving a victim named Carolyn, continued past November 1, 2004, which would trigger harsher 2004 guidelines. The judge states that both they and the jury found Carolyn to be a credible witness, whose testimony is being used to establish the timeline of the crime.
DOJ-OGR-00021578.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a court hearing (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023. The defense argues against a 'leadership enhancement' for Ghislaine Maxwell, citing testimony from Larry Visoski and Cimberly Espinosa to prove that Sarah Kellen was Jeffrey Epstein's assistant, not Maxwell's subordinate. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) counters by citing testimony from a victim named Carolyn, who stated Maxwell was present at the Palm Beach residence for massage appointments even after Kellen took over scheduling duties.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Sarah Kellen / Je... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Massage book for dummies | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $400.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Victims' Compensa... | CAROLYN | $2,800,000.00 | Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant (Ma... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... | View |
| N/A | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein sent her gifts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. | View |
| N/A | Received | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | CAROLYN | Shawn | $0.00 | Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein (... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein /... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money received for attending 'appointments'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Over 100 paid sexualized massages. | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money for engaging in sex acts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | General statement that 'we could make money' by... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unnamed Older Man... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Virginia... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus | View |
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding identification of birth certificate (Government Exhibit 11).
Discrepancies in Epstein Victim Compensation Fund submission
Mr. Pagliuca questions the witness, Carolyn, about the start date of alleged abuse (May 1, 2001) and additional claims of specific sexual acts in her submission to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, which she denies making.
Direct Examination regarding personal history
Witness testifies about moving to Florida in 1999, dropping out of school in 7th grade, and addiction to pain pills and cocaine.
Cross-examination regarding substance abuse
Attorney questions witness about drug use in 2002-2003 and at age 13.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.
Lawsuit settlement and victim compensation fund payments
An unnamed questioner interviews Carolyn about money she received from a 2009 lawsuit settlement against Jeffrey and Sarah, and a subsequent award from a victim compensation fund related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Cross-examination
Questioning regarding signature on Exhibit C8.
Redirect Examination
Testimony regarding age of first contact with Maxwell/Epstein and denial of coaching or financial motive.
Confirmation of past events and prior legal complaints
Questioning regarding paragraph 33 of a 2009 complaint and the details of a sexual encounter with Epstein.
Cross-examination regarding instructions to lie about age...
Carolyn is being cross-examined about being told by Ms. Roberts and Virginia to say she was 17 to Epstein, and about her first visit to Epstein's house.
Victim Compensation Application
Submission of application for compensation.
Witness meetings
Witness was meeting with the government during the same time period she applied to the fund.
Unknown
Emails forwarded by Scarola to Carolyn.
Legal representation/advice
Witness confirms speaking with Mr. Scarola in 2020
Contacting the government
Mr. Scarola left multiple voice messages for the witness (Carolyn) in 2020 regarding the government.
Legal consultation
Witness confirms speaking with Mr. Scarola in 2020.
Re-establishing contact
Agents contacted Carolyn; she requested to speak to her lawyer first.
Unspecified
The witness confirms she did not respond to messages from Mr. Scarola in 2019.
Request to come to Epstein's home
Requests for Carolyn to visit Epstein's home, made on Epstein's behalf.
Request to come to Epstein's
Requests for Carolyn to visit Epstein, made by Sarah or Maxwell rather than Epstein directly.
Lawsuit connection
Alleged 6.5-hour meeting at lawyer's office regarding the lawsuit.
Deposition Testimony
Witness testified under oath regarding whether she told the truth to the FBI.
Deposition
Witness confirms testimony said nothing about Ms. Maxwell other than two specific words.
Deposition testimony
Carolyn described Maxwell in her deposition.
Civil complaint accuracy
Testimony regarding trafficking and abuse; defense claims Maxwell was not mentioned.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity