CAROLYN
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
13
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Friend |
12
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Acquaintance |
12
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Business associate |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Romantic |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Melissa
|
Friend |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
11
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
location
Virginia
|
Recruiter recruit |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Recruiter victim |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
27 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Witness 'Carolyn' throws binder of evidence in distress during cross-examination. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interaction between Virginia and Carolyn | Disputed: either 'a party' ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Melissa (age 16) and Carolyn visited Jeffrey Epstein's house together. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Melissa and Carolyn exited Epstein's house after one hour possessing money. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn (age 13) begins dating Shawn (age 17) in West Palm Beach. | West Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage incident at Epstein's house. Ms. Roberts led Carolyn upstairs. Roberts instructed Carolyn... | Epstein's house (Upstairs) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Carolyn | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn massaging Jeffrey Epstein, sometimes with Virginia or other females present. | Unknown (likely Epstein's r... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness snorted cocaine in the bathroom of Epstein's house. | Epstein's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Gathering at Virginia's house | Virginia's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car ride to Jeffrey Epstein's home | Car (White) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Jeffrey Epstein's house. | Jeffrey Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Group activities involving driving around and smoking pot. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruitment of Carolyn | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trip to Jeffrey Epstein's house. | Jeffrey Epstein's house, Pa... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transportation of Carolyn to Epstein's house | West Palm Beach to Epstein'... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn testified about receiving calls from Sarah Kellen | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Redirect examination of witness Carolyn. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruitment of Carolyn (age 14). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a legal complaint | State Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn visiting Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house alone multiple times. | Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beac... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Shawn and Carolyn using drugs. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving Carolyn, Jeffrey Epstein, and an unnamed blond female with a strong ac... | Massage Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving Carolyn, Jeffrey Epstein, and an unnamed female model with brown hair.... | Massage Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage appointments scheduled by Sarah Kellen where Maxwell was present. | Palm Beach residence | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014572.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a rebuttal argument by Ms. Comey. She counters the defense's focus on inconsistencies in the testimony of a victim named Carolyn, specifically regarding her age at the time of abuse (16 vs. 14) and her memory of a photo of a pregnant Maxwell. Ms. Comey argues these are minor details, asserts the act was still a crime, and directs the jury to government exhibits that support the presence of such photos in the Palm Beach house.
DOJ-OGR-00014566.jpg
This document is a page from the rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by case number). Comey argues that the testimony of four key witnesses (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) is sufficient for a guilty verdict and refutes defense attorney Ms. Menninger's claims regarding age limits at the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. Comey also details witness testimony corroborating that the victim 'Annie' was 16, not 17, during a trip to Santa Fe.
DOJ-OGR-00014564.jpg
This document is a page from a prosecutor's (Ms. Comey) rebuttal in a criminal trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor argues that the defendant was knowingly complicit in a sexual abuse scheme, citing a list of masseuses, a Palm Beach house, and a $30 million payment characterized as 'we-molested-kids-together money'. The prosecutor urges the jury to focus on the powerful testimony of victims like Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie, and dismisses the defense's arguments about missing evidence as a distraction.
DOJ-OGR-00014562.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically the beginning of the government's rebuttal argument delivered by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Comey refocuses the jury on Maxwell's specific alleged crimes, mentioning victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie by name, and argues that the defense is attempting to distract from the evidence presented by her colleague, Ms. Moe.
DOJ-OGR-00014554.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Menninger, filed on August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that the jury should doubt the credibility of witnesses Carolyn and Jane, citing their changed stories, the passage of time, and potential financial motivation. She contrasts their testimony with that of witnesses Eva and Michelle, who she claims directly contradicted Jane's allegations of sexual orgies.
DOJ-OGR-00014551.jpg
This document is page 151 of a court transcript containing the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Menninger argues that Maxwell was not involved with the accuser 'Kate' in New York and that regarding 'Carolyn' and the Palm Beach property, mere presence or management duties do not constitute conspiracy or sex trafficking. The defense emphasizes the lack of physical evidence (message pads, phone records) linking Maxwell to orchestrating massages and notes that Sarah Kellen was present at the property.
DOJ-OGR-00014550.jpg
This document is a transcript of a closing argument by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Menninger argues for Maxwell's acquittal on 'Count Six', which relates to an accuser named Carolyn, by attacking Carolyn's credibility and claiming she never traveled to New York as alleged. The attorney also distances Maxwell from any involvement in the travel of another individual, Annie Farmer, to undermine the government's broader conspiracy theory involving Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014529.jpg
This document is a page from the closing arguments (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that a witness named Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in sworn testimony or depositions 12 years prior (2009), nor did message pads show calls to Maxwell from Carolyn, only to Epstein. The defense uses this inconsistency to attack the credibility of the witness's current testimony connecting Maxwell to the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00011725.jpg
This document is page 60 of a court transcript (Opening Statement by Ms. Sternheim) filed on August 10, 2022, likely from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that unlike the 9/11 fund, the Epstein compensation fund claims were based on 'unreliable' memories. The text focuses on an accuser named 'Jane,' describing Epstein as a 'benefactor' who paid for her professional schooling, vocal lessons, and a Wall Street apartment where she lived with her family.
DOJ-OGR-00017466.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Visoski. The questioning focuses on whether the witness can identify the true names of individuals referred to as 'Kate' (LV4) and 'Carolyn' (LV5) and if there are any records of them flying on 'Epstein's flights.' The witness states they do not recall seeing any records of Kate flying under her true name.
DOJ-OGR-00014491.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a defense attorney. She challenges the prosecution's narrative by questioning the credibility of evidence related to Jeffrey Epstein and a young woman named Jane, pointing out inconsistencies in their story about flight logs and Jane's age. Menninger also attacks the credibility of a witness, Juan Alessi, labeling him a burglar with a flawed memory, and argues that the prosecution failed to prove its claim of a "culture of silence" among Epstein's Palm Beach employees.
DOJ-OGR-00014490.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the government failed to provide corroborating witnesses (specifically relatives of accusers Jane, Kate, and Carolyn) or phone records to back up the victims' stories. Additionally, the defense highlights the testimony of pilot Larry Visoski, who stated he never saw women under the age of 20 on the planes, using this to cast doubt on the prosecution's case.
DOJ-OGR-00014485.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the testimonies of accusers 'Carolyn' and 'Jane' are unreliable because their stories changed over time to implicate Maxwell after pressure from lawyers and the FBI. Specifically, it notes that Carolyn's 2008 lawsuit against Epstein and Sarah Kellen never mentioned Maxwell, and alleges that Jane was coached to identify Maxwell as the woman with the 'foreign accent' present during the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00014479.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge denies a request for a mistrial concerning evidence about phone numbers, stating the admission was for a limited purpose. The court then calls for a 20-minute luncheon recess, after which a technical difficulty with a non-working screen is reported.
DOJ-OGR-00014473.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe in the trial of a defendant named Maxwell. Ms. Moe refutes the defense's arguments regarding Maxwell's London residence and counters the claim that four key witnesses (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) are lying for financial gain. She asserts the witnesses have no financial stake in the current trial's outcome, as their civil suits are concluded and they have already received compensation from the Jeffrey Epstein Victim Compensation Program.
DOJ-OGR-00014468.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe in the trial of a defendant named Maxwell. Ms. Moe argues to the jury that the testimony of four witnesses—Jane, Annie, Carolyn, and Kate—is credible, despite the defense's claims that they are liars or have faulty memories. She asserts that their consistent accounts of being exploited by Maxwell and Epstein are devastating evidence of Maxwell's guilt and cannot be dismissed as a mass delusion.
DOJ-OGR-00014466.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case USA v. Maxwell. Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that the case centers on manipulation, money, and memory, highlighting how Maxwell groomed victims for Epstein. The text contrasts the small payments made to victim Carolyn (approx. $100) against the $30 million Maxwell received from Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014464.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation delivered by Ms. Moe. She argues that crimes occurred within the Southern District of New York, citing evidence related to several counts, including trips to Manhattan by individuals named Jane and Annie, and Maxwell calling Carolyn to schedule 'sexualized massages' in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00014463.jpg
This document is a page from the prosecution's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe outlines the evidence for 'Count Five' (sex trafficking conspiracy spanning 2000-2004), detailing how Maxwell recruited Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago and facilitated Carolyn's sexual abuse in Palm Beach and New York. The prosecutor emphasizes the legal standard for conspiracy, noting that the jury only needs to find that the agreement existed for 'one moment' and that an overt act was taken by either Maxwell or Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014462.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Moe in the case against Maxwell. The summation outlines three conspiracy counts, alleging that from 1994 to 2004, Maxwell conspired with Epstein to commit crimes against victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie. Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell groomed Carolyn and Annie as part of an agreement to provide Epstein with underage girls for abuse, which constitutes the conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00014460.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe argues that Maxwell is guilty of Count Four and Count Six (sex trafficking of a minor). The text details Maxwell's interactions with victims named Kate, Jane, and specifically Carolyn, a 14-year-old middle school dropout whom Maxwell recruited for massage appointments with Epstein knowing she was a minor.
DOJ-OGR-00014454.jpg
This page contains a transcript of the prosecution's summation in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The prosecutor argues that despite dating Ted Waitt in 2004, Maxwell remained deeply involved with Epstein, citing a 2005 household manual, a 2007 payment of $7.4 million from Epstein to Maxwell, and her presence during police searches. The text also notes the presence of teenage boys and girls at Epstein's properties.
DOJ-OGR-00014453.jpg
This document is a legal summation from a court case, outlining Ghislaine Maxwell's activities between 1995 and 2004. It details her role in recruiting, grooming, and exploiting several young women, including Kate, Jane, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn, for Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a timeline of abuse, financial transactions from Epstein to Maxwell totaling over $23 million, and the evolution of the abuse into a 'pyramid scheme' where victims were incentivized to recruit their friends.
DOJ-OGR-00014451.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court summation by Ms. Moe in the trial of Maxwell. The prosecution argues that Maxwell is guilty, citing evidence of a pyramid-like recruitment scheme for underage girls, a 'little black book' containing victim names as proof of her knowledge and intent, and a $30 million payment from Jeffrey Epstein as her motive for being his 'partner in crime'.
DOJ-OGR-00014450.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Moe, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Moe connects several individuals, including Virginia Roberts, Carolyn, Sean, and Melissa, by referencing entries in a 'black book' and phone messages from 2003. The summation highlights the young ages of the girls (16 and 17) during events in the early 2000s and uses evidence like phone numbers and photographs to link them together.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Sarah Kellen / Je... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Offer of 'five to $600' to take pictures of the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Massage book for dummies | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment made before Carolyn left the house with... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $400.00 | Payment for massage, left on the sink. Stated a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Victims' Compensa... | CAROLYN | $2,800,000.00 | Payout received by the witness Carolyn, cited b... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant (Ma... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Payments for sexualized massages, personally pa... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for an encounter involving a massage an... | View |
| N/A | Received | Ghislaine Maxwell... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Payment for each time Carolyn gave Epstein an e... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein sent her gifts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Epstein paid Carolyn after sexual act. | View |
| N/A | Received | the defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Paid twice as much when she brought friends to ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | CAROLYN | Shawn | $0.00 | Money given to witness, ostensibly for gas, adm... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Ms. Roberts told Carolyn 'we could make money' ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein (... | CAROLYN | $600.00 | Payment for massage/visit, paid in hundreds. | View |
| N/A | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Cash payment found on top of the sink after the... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein /... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Carolyn begging to come over because she 'neede... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money received for attending 'appointments'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Over 100 paid sexualized massages. | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Large sums of money needed to fuel her drug add... | View |
| N/A | Received | The defendant | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Money for engaging in sex acts. | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Epstein/... | CAROLYN | $0.00 | General statement that 'we could make money' by... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unnamed Older Man... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Proposed payment for providing a massage (discu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Implied (Virginia... | CAROLYN | $300.00 | Offer made by Virginia to Carolyn to 'make $300'. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | CAROLYN | $0.00 | Gift: Concert tickets to Incubus | View |
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding identification of birth certificate (Government Exhibit 11).
Confirmation of past events and prior legal complaints
Questioning regarding paragraph 33 of a 2009 complaint and the details of a sexual encounter with Epstein.
Carolyn's introduction to Virginia and Jeffrey Epstein
This is a transcript of a direct examination where a witness named Carolyn is questioned about her relationship with Virginia, whom she met at age 14. The questioning covers their social group and activities, and how Virginia first approached Carolyn with an opportunity to make money, which is linked to the first mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
Redirect Examination
Testimony regarding age of first contact with Maxwell/Epstein and denial of coaching or financial motive.
Direct Examination regarding personal history
Witness testifies about moving to Florida in 1999, dropping out of school in 7th grade, and addiction to pain pills and cocaine.
Clarification of prior testimony regarding sexual interco...
Witness explains she previously denied having intercourse with Epstein because she was not a willing participant (it was non-consensual).
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding identification of a photograph (Exhibit 104) depicting the witness at age 14.
Cross Examination
Questioning regarding prior statements and drug use.
Cross-examination regarding substance abuse
Attorney questions witness about drug use in 2002-2003 and at age 13.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding witness's mental health diagnoses (schizophrenia), medications (Vyvanse, Doxepine), and reliability of memory.
Victim Compensation Application
Submission of application for compensation.
Witness meetings
Witness was meeting with the government during the same time period she applied to the fund.
Unknown
Emails forwarded by Scarola to Carolyn.
Legal representation/advice
Witness confirms speaking with Mr. Scarola in 2020
Contacting the government
Mr. Scarola left multiple voice messages for the witness (Carolyn) in 2020 regarding the government.
Legal consultation
Witness confirms speaking with Mr. Scarola in 2020.
Re-establishing contact
Agents contacted Carolyn; she requested to speak to her lawyer first.
Unspecified
The witness confirms she did not respond to messages from Mr. Scarola in 2019.
Request to come to Epstein's home
Requests for Carolyn to visit Epstein's home, made on Epstein's behalf.
Request to come to Epstein's
Requests for Carolyn to visit Epstein, made by Sarah or Maxwell rather than Epstein directly.
Lawsuit connection
Alleged 6.5-hour meeting at lawyer's office regarding the lawsuit.
Testimony
Carolyn mentioned Maxwell twice without prompting regarding scheduling massages.
Escort Service
Deposition where Carolyn was not asked about working for an escort service.
Deposition
Witness confirms testimony said nothing about Ms. Maxwell other than two specific words.
Deposition/Prior Testimony
Reference to prior testimony given under oath in 2009.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity