| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
30
Very Strong
|
29 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Business associate |
15
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employee |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Employment |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Rodgers
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Mr. Visoski
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Visoski
|
Employee |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Weinberg
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MARK EPSTEIN
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Dershowitz
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Alessi
|
Employee |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Gift giver receiver |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about her relationship with Mr. Epstein being separate from her oth... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about whether Mr. Epstein had a relationship with Reid Hoffman. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning Ghislaine Maxwell about observing Reid Hoffman flying with her or Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell introducing a masseuse (DOJ REDACTION) to Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ghislaine Maxwell's efforts to find masseuses for Jeffrey Epstein, including visiting legitimate ... | Massage spas, Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Southern District of New York was in touch with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein charged federally in New York. | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social parties hosted by Mr. Epstein where young women, characterized as masseuses, were guests o... | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Ghislaine Maxwell attending weddings of famous people with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Jeffrey Epstein's activities and Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement, particularly r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Epstein potentially helping Maxwell help the Clintons in the context of the Clin... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for Mr. Epstein's plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Period when Ghislaine Maxwell was 'general manager' for Epstein, and questions arise about lists ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawyer for Ms. Maxwell mentioned Mr. Dershowitz was among people Epstein directed to have sex with. | Court proceedings | View |
| N/A | N/A | Brief encounter between Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz at Epstein's New York mansion. | Mr. Epstein's mansion in Ne... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz frequently seen with Mr. Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein allowed Mr. Dershowitz to use his bedroom. | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz visited Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home 4-5 times a year, staying 2-3 days. | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Dershowitz received a massage at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house, stated the masseuse was not ... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] went to Miami for the weekend, returned and told Mr. Epstein she met a man who, w... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... | Mr. Epstein's mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion about Mr. Epstein's wealth, business, and assets (planes, island, New Mexico ranch). | N/A | View |
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the beginning of a court session where the direct examination of a witness, Lawrence Visoski, is resumed by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The questioning is focused on continuing a discussion from the previous day about Mr. Epstein's office and his employees.
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing against the government's request to preclude evidence of her 'good acts.' The defense asserts that evidence of Ms. Maxwell's absence during Mr. Epstein's alleged abuse of certain victims is admissible and crucial for demonstrating her lack of intent or knowledge, and that the government's motion to block this evidence is premature and legally flawed.
This document is a proposed juror questionnaire from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It includes a section on 'Media Issues' which is contested by the government and defended by the defendant. The defendant's response argues for in-depth questioning about media exposure, citing legal precedents like the Tsarnaev case to emphasize the necessity of uncovering potential juror bias in high-profile cases involving individuals like Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein.
This document is a continuation page from a Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report filed in 2003 (printed 2006). It details an interview with Juan (surname Alessi confirmed by son's mention), Epstein's former house manager, who admits to entering Epstein's home at 358 El Brillo on two occasions to steal money ($1,900 and $5,600) from a briefcase. Juan claims he originally entered to steal a gun to commit suicide due to depression over a divorce and cancer, but later stole money to pay for a girlfriend's immigration papers; he subsequently agreed with Epstein to repay the funds.
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE filed on October 29, 2021, presents an argument to exclude testimony about Mr. Epstein allegedly raping 'Accuser-1' from Ms. Maxwell's trial. The filing contends that such evidence is irrelevant to the specific charges against Maxwell and that its potential for creating unfair prejudice against her substantially outweighs any probative value, citing Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402, and 403.
This legal document argues that certain proffered documents cannot be authenticated as required by Federal Rules of Evidence. The filing suggests the documents, which surfaced in 2009, were likely manipulated or manufactured by Mr. Rodriguez, a former employee of Mr. Epstein, in an attempt to secure a $50,000 payment. The document asserts there is no evidence linking the creation or maintenance of these documents to Ms. Maxwell or any other credible source.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The witness denies being told by federal prosecutors about reimbursement or entitlement to money from a Mr. Epstein. However, the witness confirms having met with federal prosecutors, who they believe were from the FBI, at their home around the year 2008.
This document is page 40 of a deposition transcript (stamped DOJ-OGR-00033028) involving the cross-examination of a witness by Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on sexual acts (masturbation) and whether the witness previously lied to the police. The witness admits that while she told police Epstein did not touch her, that statement was not 'fully truthful,' and she confirms in this testimony that Epstein did, in fact, touch her.
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report, dated April 20, 2006, details investigative activities from late March and early April 2005 related to Jeffrey Epstein. The report documents a conversation with Haley Robson about her interactions with Epstein, the drafting of subpoenas for phone records, surveillance conducted on Epstein's property at 358 El Brillo, and the identification of an item from a trash pull. It also notes a check on Epstein's concealed weapons permit and online business queries.
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to the prosecution's closing argument regarding 'grooming-by-proxy' for Jeffrey Epstein; the Judge overrules this, clarifying that while experts couldn't testify to it, lawyers could argue it based on evidence. Prosecutor Ms. Moe then discusses Government Exhibit 52, arguing it demonstrates knowledge and intent because the listed individuals were obviously not 'real masseuses.'
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Comey are discussing legal obligations under Rule 16 regarding the disclosure of impeachment evidence (specifically photographs) prior to cross-examination. The text mentions a witness who testified about the appearance of a home and notes that this witness worked for Jeffrey Epstein until 2019.
This document is a page from a court transcript of a redirect examination of a witness named Mr. Visoski, filed on August 10, 2022. Visoski denies letting his 14-year-old daughters give Mr. Epstein a massage and is questioned about two different individuals named Jane. He distinguishes between them by recalling meeting one on Mr. Epstein's smaller aircraft in the 1990s and the other on Epstein's Boeing aircraft sometime in 2000 or later.
This document is a page from a court transcript where a lawyer, Ms. Menninger, is delivering a summation. She attempts to discredit a witness named Kate by highlighting inconsistencies in her background and motives, such as her immediate application to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund. Menninger also reminds the jury of the judge's instruction not to convict Ms. Maxwell based on Kate's testimony about non-illegal sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Mr. Rohrbach and the presiding judge. The conversation centers on the legal definition of 'illegal sexual activity' within an indictment, specifically whether events in New Mexico and the intent for activity in New York satisfy the requirements of the Mann Act for conspiracy charges against 'minor Victim 2'. The judge expresses concern about potential jury confusion over the complex legal points being argued.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, and the judge. The discussion centers on a legal point about whether a defendant can be convicted based 'solely' on the testimony of 'witness 3' concerning sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein. The judge seeks to clarify the precise legal standard and the government's stance on the evidence.
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between the judge and attorneys regarding procedural matters. The court affirms that defense experts are precluded from testifying without providing specific notice as required by Rule 16. The conversation then shifts to a specific limiting instruction for the jury, which states that the defendant cannot be convicted based on testimony about sexual conduct between 'witness 3' and 'Mr. Epstein'.
This document is page 9 of a legal filing outlining a dispute between 'The Post' and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office regarding the unsealing of appellate briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights that while Epstein's counsel took 'no position' on the unsealing, the DA's office reversed its initial stance of 'not opposing' the motion and subsequently opposed it, arguing that the Post failed to notify prosecutors in Florida. The document includes a footnote disputing the legal necessity of notifying Florida prosecutors.
This is a deposition transcript (pages 78-81) involving a witness (likely Scott Rothstein, based on the mention of RRA and Ponzi scheme) being questioned by an attorney named Tonja. The witness admits to running a Ponzi scheme, creating fake settlement documents, and luring investors. The questioning shifts to the 'Epstein case,' specifically asking if the witness or his associates (Kip, Brad, Russ) utilized the case for publicity or spoke to the press, to which the witness claims no specific recollection. The witness confirms knowing Epstein was from Palm Beach but denies further knowledge of his residence.
A deposition transcript involving a witness (likely Scott Rothstein, based on context of Ponzi scheme and Ken Jenne association) being questioned by 'Tonja'. The witness admits to running a Ponzi scheme and discusses using the Epstein case flight manifest—containing 'big names'—as a tool to convince investors of the case's value. The witness also recalls conversations with Ken Jenne regarding a confidential informant in their office and confirms hiring a man named Wayne Black.
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 54-57) in which the deponent admits to operating a Ponzi scheme involving 'fake settlements.' The deponent discusses hiring former federal agent Cara Holmes to add legitimacy to the scheme and mentions using a case management system called 'Q-task.' The questioning focuses on whether the deponent used the 'Epstein case' and an associated flight manifest to further the Ponzi scheme, specifically referencing emails from July 2009 involving Ken Jenne, Brad Edwards, and Mr. Adler regarding an Epstein meeting.
This is page 4 of a signed affidavit by David S. Stone, dated April 5, 2019. Stone details a 2015 meeting where Alan Dershowitz attempted to convince attorney David Boies that Virginia Roberts (the client) was mistaken in her sexual allegations, suggesting she confused him with Nathan Myhrvold, who frequented Epstein's company. Stone attests that Boies never conceded the allegations were false and notes that Roberts passed a lie detector test.
This document is page 2 of a legal letter from Kirkland & Ellis LLP to John Roth, dated June 19, 2008. The firm argues that a previous review of the Epstein case by the DOJ/CEOS was insufficient and requests a true 'de novo' review, citing recent Supreme Court decisions (*Santos* and *Cuellar*) that weaken the federal case. The letter complains that AUSA Villafana has violated the Non-Prosecution Agreement by re-initiating a grand jury investigation and subpoenaing a [redacted] individual to provide testimony and documents (photos, emails, phone records) on July 1, 2008.
This document, likely an affidavit by attorney Bradley Edwards from the House Oversight production, details Epstein's obstruction of justice and evidence collection by the Palm Beach Police. It describes an incident where Epstein diverted his private plane to the US Virgin Islands to prevent the FBI from serving a subpoena to Nadia Marcinkova, while simultaneously harassing her and Sarah Kellen to ensure their silence. It also details the Palm Beach Police investigation in late 2005, including a trash pull that revealed Epstein purchased books on sexual slavery and training (e.g., 'SlaveCraft' and 'Training with Miss Abernathy') via Amazon.
This document outlines the traumatic experiences of a victim (name redacted) involving Mr. Epstein, beginning when she was 16 years old. It details the psychological abuse, isolation, and sexual assault she endured, leading to the destruction of her modeling career, severe depression, and suicidal thoughts. The text describes specific incidents, including Epstein tracking her to Kansas, her reaction to his arrest, and the long-term scarring from the abuse.
This document page details the account of a victim describing her grooming and sexual abuse by Mr. Epstein. It recounts specific aggressive sexual acts, the psychological manipulation used to control her, her resulting mental health crisis, and her eventual escape from New York back to Kansas.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Epstein purchased a travel ticket for the witne... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Unnamed School | $0.00 | Attorney Menninger notes that a form lists Mr. ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | The Family / The ... | $0.00 | Financial assistance/guarantor for school admis... | View |
| N/A | Received | Les | MR. EPSTEIN | $100,000,000.00 | Les Wexner theoretically owed Mr. Epstein $100 ... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane Doe Number 3 | $200.00 | Payment for massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Underage females | $200.00 | Payment for sexual massages | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Money accepted for a trip to Thailand. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of cowboy boots for Ms. Farmer. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jane / Profession... | $0.00 | The Court notes testimony indicating Epstein wa... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Bruce Rinehart | $0.00 | Rinehart 'appeared to be being paid by Mr. Epst... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Mr. Alessi | $6,300.00 | Theft of cash (band of hundred dollar bills) fr... | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Purchase of boots. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Airline/Vendor | $0.00 | Purchase of a plane ticket to fly to New York. | View |
| N/A | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | A. Farmer | $0.00 | Discussion of potential college tuition payment... | View |
| 2025-12-01 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Plaintiff (unnamed) | $0.00 | Settlement of a suit | View |
| 2019-07-18 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | THE COURT | $0.00 | Defense offer to put up 'any amount' of collate... | View |
| 2007-05-08 | Paid | MR. EPSTEIN | Jim Eisenberg | $0.00 | Payment for attorney services for a subpoenaed ... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | Unknown | MR. EPSTEIN | $0.00 | Purchase of Bell helicopter | View |
She said that Sophie got her messages + said that she's sorry for not seeing you in California.
she will see you at 7:30
Invitation to come to the lodge, discussed in context of August dates.
Deposition excerpt regarding whether Epstein had moved.
Telephoned. (No specific message text written)
Emails constituting 'past recollection recorded'.
Telephoned / Please Call
Messages written in a book with carbon copies.
Southern District of New York was in regular telephone contact with Mr. Epstein until his death.
Pressuring her not to cooperate with Grand Jury investigation.
The document references a message on the upper right-hand corner of Exhibit 2T that says 'for Mr. Epstein'.
A deposition was taken by the U.S. Attorney's Office where Mr. Epstein was questioned about the timing of his move between two properties in early 1996.
Ghislaine Maxwell says she had phone calls with Mr. Epstein on occasion, especially during times of legal drama or press attention, to find out what was going on.
A letter providing Mr. Epstein with information about building a scholarship lodge on Interlochen's campus and what a donation for the project would entail.
A letter thanking Mr. Epstein for his $200,000 donation for a new scholarship lodge and providing updates on construction timelines.
Ghislaine Maxwell emailed Mr. Epstein for details, asking 'what do I do?'
Message located on top left of exhibit 1C.
Mr. Epstein contacted Mr. Alessi stating, "We need to talk."
Polina called at 7:30 AM from 1-917-612-3450. The message states, "She's in the neighborhood".
As a condition of his proposed bail, Mr. Epstein would be required to report daily by telephone to Pretrial Services.
Mr. Epstein would occasionally speak to Rodgers to schedule flights or let him know a flight was happening.
Conversation led Epstein to believe FBI would serve Marcinkova.
Communicating on email (based on discovery)
Call details (name, telephone number) were written into a message book if Epstein was not present.
Discussion about going to Thailand.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity