BRAD EDWARDS
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Questioner (Q)
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AK
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Three young women
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe #1
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Brittany Henderson
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein victims
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Co counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Informant contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Counsel for plaintiff |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Accuser investigator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ
|
Source of information indirect |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Cooperating party |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ
|
Source of evidence cooperating witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ
|
Connected via documents statements |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafana
|
Collaborated on story |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
plaintiff
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sharon Churcher
|
Collaborated on story |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, Declarant
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Professional co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting where Kate asked the Government to look into sponsoring her for a U-Visa. Brad Edwards ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a lawsuit against the affiant, Brad Edwards, and Scott Rothstein alleging conspirac... | Court (implied) | View |
| N/A | Proffer session | Brad Edwards provided a U-Visa application to the government on behalf of Kate. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal consultation | Kate reached out to attorney Brad Edwards to report the abuse she suffered. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A trial that the author indicates might not have happened without her attorneys. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | New court filing submitted asking for Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending case. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Questioning of Attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman by the defense. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Fundraisers and parties at witness's home | Witness's Home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Start of Brad Edwards' investigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Win/Settlement with Deutsche Bank | Legal Court/Settlement | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting and Contacts with Peter Skinner, Stan Pottinger, and Brad Edwards by AUSA [REDACTED]. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Florida Defamation Action (Case No. CACE 15-000072). | Broward County Circuit Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit brought by Epstein against Brad Edwards. | Florida | View |
| 2025-10-01 | N/A | Brad Edwards called the FBI. | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's second deposition. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's first deposition. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Alfredo Rodriguez's first deposition where he mentioned handwritten notes/journal. | N/A | View |
| 2025-07-01 | N/A | Brad Edwards had access to 'the list'. | N/A | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal proceeding appearances | Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-20 | N/A | Discussion regarding trial order and witness testimony logistics. | N/A | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Plea Hearing | SDNY Court | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | FBI received a USB drive containing photographs from Brad Edwards. | New York Office | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation dated by counsel | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | Filing of Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule | New York, New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020704.jpg
This document is a court docket report from the Southern District of New York for the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering proceedings between December 11 and December 15, 2021. It details various filings including letters regarding witness orders, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as a significant Memorandum Opinion denying a defense motion to allow witnesses to testify anonymously. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (USA) and the defense, along with Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings during this trial period.
DOJ-OGR-00020459.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 12 to December 16, 2021. It details various legal filings including letters regarding witness lists, privilege stipulations, and expert testimony, as well as orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan denying defense motions for witness anonymity and setting deadlines for responses regarding witnesses Dr. Loftus and Alexander Hamilton. The document also references the placement of sealed documents in a vault.
DOJ-OGR-00021435.jpg
This document contains a page from a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report regarding the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the USAO (specifically Acosta, Sloman, and Villafaña). It details the prosecutors' justifications for not notifying victims about the non-prosecution agreement and plea deal, citing a belief that the state would handle notification and a fear that the restitution payments ($150,000) would be used by Epstein's defense to impeach victim witnesses. The text highlights a lack of coordination between federal and state prosecutors regarding victim lists and the specific terms of the plea hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00016486.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge is ruling on a defense request to call victims' attorneys (Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman) as witnesses during the defense's case-in-chief to establish bias or motive. Specifically, the text highlights an issue regarding whether Mr. Glassman told a victim named 'Jane' that cooperating with the prosecution would 'help her case,' while noting the complexities of attorney-client privilege.
DOJ-OGR-00010667.jpg
This document is a victim impact statement by an individual named "Kate," submitted for consideration in the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Kate details the psychological grooming and manipulation she endured from Maxwell, identifying her as the primary enabler and facilitator of the sexual abuse perpetrated by Epstein. The statement emphasizes that the abuse would not have occurred without Maxwell's premeditated actions in recruiting and controlling vulnerable girls.
DOJ-OGR-00010608.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing dated June 24, 2022, containing a personal statement from an individual named Kate. In the statement, Kate expresses her profound gratitude to her attorneys, Brad Edwards and Brittney Henderson, for their support and dedication during a trial. She specifically thanks them for fighting for what is right and concludes with a reflection on the importance of both forgiveness and consequences.
DOJ-OGR-00005551.jpg
This legal document outlines the recollections of an individual identified as 'AK' regarding discussions about the Epstein case. AK recalls a meeting with attorneys where she sought to clarify their proposal to have the SDNY re-investigate conduct previously handled in Florida, and she disputes an account of the meeting from Brad Edwards's book. The document also notes AK's vague memory of being told about depositions and the possibility of perjury charges against Maxwell, though no investigation was opened, and her decision to take no further action on the Epstein matter after calling Sean Watson.
DOJ-OGR-00005546.jpg
This document summarizes a conference call held on February 11, 2021, with Amanda Kramer (AK) regarding her recollections of a meeting on February 29, 2016. During the 2016 meeting, attorneys Pete Skinner, Brad Edwards, and Stan Pottinger presented information to AK, who was then a prosecutor, advocating for the SDNY to open a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The memo details AK's limited memory of the meeting, the roles of the attorneys, and the mention of civil lawsuits, including the 'Guiffre v. Maxwell' case.
DOJ-OGR-00005718.jpg
This document is Page 6 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) arguing against the admissibility of a specific document compilation. The text details how former Epstein employee Alfredo Rodriguez attempted to sell 97 pages of evidence to lawyer Brad Edwards in 2009, leading to an FBI sting operation where Rodriguez sold the documents to an undercover officer for $50,000. The filing argues these documents are unauthenticated hearsay, lack relevance to the current indictment, and should be excluded.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031403.jpg
This document is an email chain dated March 5, 2019, between attorney Lilly Sanchez and a recipient identified as 'J' (jeevacation@gmail.com). The correspondence is marked 'Privileged' with significant redactions in the message bodies. The visible content consists of a pasted Miami Herald article by Julie K. Brown reporting that the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office recused itself from the Jeffrey Epstein case and reassigned it to Atlanta, following scrutiny involving Attorney General nominee William Barr.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022160.jpg
This document is a scan of pages 262-263 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (evidenced by the header), containing a transcript of a deposition, likely of Alan Dershowitz. The speaker describes contacting Abigail Wexner to warn her of an 'extortion plot' against her husband, Leslie Wexner, involving Virginia Roberts and attorney Brad Edwards. The speaker also details his efforts to persuade ABC not to air Virginia Roberts' story, claiming it was false, and argues that Roberts' failure to name him initially proves his innocence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022159.jpg
This document contains pages 262-263 from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich'), which includes a transcript of a deposition (likely of Alan Dershowitz). The speaker describes contacting Abigail Wexner, wife of Leslie Wexner, to warn her of an alleged 'extortion plot' by lawyers in Florida involving Virginia Roberts. The text discusses the speaker's efforts to corroborate Roberts' media appearances, specifically mentioning attorney Brad Edwards promoting her interviews on shows like 'Good Day Show' and ABC.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022152.jpg
This document appears to be pages 254 and 255 from a book titled "Filthy Rich," containing a transcript of a deposition or legal testimony. The speaker is being questioned about allegations of suborning perjury against lawyers Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell regarding Virginia Roberts, and discusses a phone conversation with a woman named Rebecca whose last name is in the speaker's notes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022148.jpg
Pages 250-251 of the book 'Filthy Rich' (Chapter 65), marked as a House Oversight exhibit. The text juxtaposes a fictional 'Law & Order: SVU' plot—where a character named Jordan claims he was raped by a 12-year-old girl to avoid prosecution—with the real-life legal battles surrounding the Epstein case. Specifically, it details an October 15, 2015, deposition where Alan Dershowitz alleged a 'criminal extortion plot' involving Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell's clients during defamation litigation in Broward County, Florida.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012107.jpg
This document is a transcript of a teleconference from April 7, 2011, between attorneys Jack Scarola and Brad Edwards, and Virginia Roberts. Scarola establishes consent to record the call and identifies himself as Edwards' lawyer, stating the purpose is to gather information for a potential jury regarding the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein'. Virginia Roberts confirms her identity and maiden name, though her married surname is redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012032.jpg
This document is a news article from Politico dated December 31, 2014, reporting on a new court filing in which a woman identified as Jane Doe #3, an alleged sex slave of Jeffrey Epstein, accused prominent friends of Epstein, including Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Jean Luc Brunel, of participating in debauchery. The article details Epstein's prior conviction and plea deal, and states that the new filing seeks to allow Jane Doe #3 and another woman to join a pending victims' rights case against federal prosecutors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017518.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 110-113) from a congressional oversight file. The witness (likely Scott Rothstein based on context) admits to running a Ponzi scheme with co-conspirator Russell Adler. The testimony reveals that the 'Epstein case' was used as part of the pitch for the Ponzi scheme. The witness discusses an employee, Ms. Holmes (former federal law enforcement), who worked on Epstein cases, and Brad Edwards, an attorney whose compensation and work on the Epstein case are scrutinized.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017516.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 102-105) where a witness, likely Scott Rothstein, admits to using the 'Epstein case' as a 'fake product' to drive his Ponzi scheme. He testifies that he sold 'purportedly confidential settlements' to investors and needed to create fictions around the Epstein case to secure an influx of money. The witness confirms consulting with his co-conspirator, Russell Adler, to gain enough knowledge about the Epstein case to successfully pitch it to investors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017514.jpg
Deposition transcript of Rothstein, who discusses his Ponzi scheme and the hiring of attorney Brad Edwards at his firm (RRA). Rothstein confirms his partner, Russell Adler, was a co-conspirator in the Ponzi scheme and recommended hiring Edwards because Edwards had a 'huge case involving a billionaire pedophile' (Epstein). Rothstein hoped the legitimate fees from the Epstein case would help him exit the Ponzi scheme during 2009.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017507.jpg
This document is a four-page condensed transcript (pages 66-69) of a deposition of Scott Rothstein. He is questioned by Ms. Haddad regarding the electronic filing of federal court cases via PACER in 2009, specifically concerning a complaint filed by attorney Brad Edwards around July 24th. Rothstein admits that while he lacks specific recollection of the filing or a July 23rd meeting, the case may have been utilized to further his Ponzi scheme. The document ends with a question regarding whether Cara Holmes was an FBI or IRS agent.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017504.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 54-57) in which the deponent admits to operating a Ponzi scheme involving 'fake settlements.' The deponent discusses hiring former federal agent Cara Holmes to add legitimacy to the scheme and mentions using a case management system called 'Q-task.' The questioning focuses on whether the deponent used the 'Epstein case' and an associated flight manifest to further the Ponzi scheme, specifically referencing emails from July 2009 involving Ken Jenne, Brad Edwards, and Mr. Adler regarding an Epstein meeting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017503.jpg
This document contains pages 50-53 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (implied by RRA and Ponzi scheme references). The witness is questioned by Ms. Haddad about his interactions with investors (Discala/Clockwork Group) in 2009 and his use of the Epstein case files to legitimize a Ponzi scheme. The witness admits to stealing money from investors and mentions specific lawyers involved in the Epstein case at the RRA firm, including Brad Edwards and Russ Adler, and notes looking at a flight manifest at Adler's direction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017491.jpg
This document is a four-page excerpt (pages 2-5) of a deposition transcript for witness Scott Rothstein. The transcript lists appearances by attorneys including Jack Goldberger (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Scarola (representing Brad Edwards). Notably, Darryn Indyke is present and identified as Epstein's in-house counsel. The questioning begins regarding a 'scheme' at Rothstein's firm that allegedly started in 2005 or 2006.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010583.jpg
This page from a legal filing details the judicial orders prohibiting Jeffrey Epstein from contacting his victims following his 2008 guilty plea. It outlines specific no-contact orders issued by Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo and the federal court. Furthermore, it documents two civil lawsuits filed by attorney Brad Edwards against Epstein in August and September 2008 on behalf of victims 'Jane Doe' and 'E.W.,' alleging sexual assault and a RICO conspiracy.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Firm/Ponzi Scheme | BRAD EDWARDS | $0.00 | Potential bonuses discussed regarding work on c... | View |
Cases
Edwards denies participating in any communications with investors or 'pumping' cases.
U-Visa Application
Brad Edwards provided a U-Visa application to the government on behalf of Kate during a proffer session.
U-Visa Application
Brad Edwards provided a U-Visa application to the government on behalf of Kate during a proffer session.
Information regarding abuse/Dershowitz
Jane Doe No. 3 provided information related to the subject of abuse by Dershowitz.
Epstein case status
"Hey, Brad how are you? How is the Epstein stuff going?"
TV Interviews
Urging people to watch Virginia Roberts' interview scheduled on three TV programs.
Congratulations
Congratulating Brad on the Deutsche Bank win and asking about the settlement figure and the JP Morgan lawsuit.
Reporting abuse by Ghislaine Maxwell
Kate reached out to attorney Brad Edwards when her daughter was 1 or 2 to tell him the full extent of the manipulation and abuse instigated by Ghislaine Maxwell.
[EXTERNAL] Trial
Discussing an Order, next steps, and potential travel/scope of testimony for a witness.
doc 001 Doe vs Epstein estate complaint.pdf
Original email sending a PDF attachment of a legal complaint.
Re: [Redacted]
Following up on document request; specifically asking for photographs of the witness.
RE: [Redacted]
We will send you all of the emails we have.
N/A (Body of email shown)
Legal outreach requesting cooperation and truthful testimony regarding events on Little St. James and recruitment by Ghislaine Maxwell.
Questioning regarding Jane and dates
Alessi was questioned by Brad Edwards in Fort Lauderdale.
Resolution of matter regarding a tape
Edwards explained the legal necessity of the tape for the Jane Doe case; Carroll warned that Mr. Rush's disclosure was a 'stupid move' putting his job at risk.
Voicemail
Voicemail left in the morning, likely regarding the Rothstein firm complaint.
Deposition of Larry Visoski
Questioning regarding Visoski's knowledge of Epstein's activities and belief in allegations.
Deposition of Larry Eugene Morrison
Questioning regarding Morrison's knowledge of Epstein's activities and willingness to leave his daughter with Epstein.
Reporting evidence related to Epstein
Brad Edwards allegedly called the FBI to report evidence, including the 'Epstein list'.
Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition
Service of notice via U.S. Mail and email transmission (exact date in August illegible, likely mid-August)
Draft Protective Order
Sending draft protective order regarding disclosure of non-prosecution agreement to Edwards and Jane Does 1 and 2.
RE: Draft Protective Order
Discussing the proposed protective order, specifically objecting to paragraph C regarding client acknowledgement requirements.
Stipulation of facts regarding Epstein case
Edwards proposes adding facts about the secret NPA to the court notice and demands a copy of the agreement.
Change of course regarding undisputed facts
Referenced in the opening paragraph.
Response to Proposed Facts
Response to proposed facts and request for NPA and interview report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity