Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MS. POMERANTZ

Person
Mentions
906
Relationships
87
Events
370
Documents
441
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
87 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Dr. Rocchio
Legal representative
13 Very Strong
10
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
11
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Opposing counsel
11 Very Strong
7
View
person A. Farmer
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person A. Farmer
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
61
View
organization The government
Representative
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Dr. Rocchio
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
10 Very Strong
23
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Mr. Flatley
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person Mr. Flatley
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person Kate
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional adversarial
8 Strong
4
View
person Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel
8 Strong
4
View
person Flatley
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
7
3
View
person Rocchio
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Kate
Professional
7
3
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
7
3
View
person Ms. Drescher
Professional
7
3
View
person DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
Professional
7
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness 'Kate' Courtroom View
N/A N/A Testimony of Stephen Flatley Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Calling of witness David Mulligan. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination testimony regarding sexual abuse disclosure statistics. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court testimony regarding the nature of Epstein and Maxwell's relationship. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding Government Exhibit 3. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of Jane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Lisa Rocchio Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A Court testimony Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... Courtroom View
N/A Court examination Direct examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2049. N/A View
N/A Court examination Redirect examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2213. N/A View
N/A Court examination Direct examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2231. N/A View
N/A Court examination Redirect examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2245. N/A View
N/A Court examination Direct examination of JANICE SWAIN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2247. N/A View
N/A Court testimony Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... courtroom View

DOJ-OGR-00018658.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) is questioning a witness named Mr. Flatley regarding Government Exhibit 418B, which contains the metadata properties for Exhibit 418. The court also admits Exhibit 418 under seal due to the presence of third-party telephone numbers.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018657.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing attorney Ms. Pomerantz conducting a direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibits 418 and 418R, confirming they are accurate copies of a document he reviewed. Subsequently, Ms. Pomerantz offers the exhibits into evidence to the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018656.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. Flatley reads into the record excerpts from an email sent by 'gmax' (gmax1@mindspring.com) to 'MarkhamCPM@earthlink.net'. The email content discusses the creation of a household manual, specific cleaning supply preferences (Tide, Downy, Bounce), purchasing locations (Publix, Sam's Club-PB Gardens), and coordination with an individual named John regarding checkoff lists.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018655.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley. The testimony focuses on an email exchange from May 25, 2001, sent by 'Sally' to 'Ms. Maxwell' regarding a 'PB manual' (likely Palm Beach manual) and a conversation with 'John'.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018654.jpg

This document is a court transcript page from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Witness Mr. Flatley reads an email dated May 25, 2001, from 'gmax1@mindspring.com' to Sally Markham. The email details specific failures by a staff member named John, including issues with a Mercedes ('black Merc'), a dirty pool deck, technical issues with a computer, and disorganized massage creams in Jeffrey Epstein's ('JE') bathroom.

Court transcript (testimony)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018653.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz, focusing on the authentication and admission of Government Exhibit 424, which is described as an email. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, offers no objection, and the Judge admits the exhibit into evidence.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018648.jpg

This document is page 50 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding forensic evidence. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 54 as a hard drive he examined, noting its unique identifier 'NYC024350', and begins describing the forensic process involving a write blocker.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018647.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. Flatley provides technical definitions for digital evidence, computers, and hard drives, and confirms that he examined digital evidence relevant to the case, noting that forensic examiners usually know nothing about the case details while analyzing data.

Court transcript (direct examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018645.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, covering the beginning of testimony from a government witness, Stephen Flatley. After being sworn in, Flatley is questioned by attorney Ms. Pomerantz and establishes his identity and his employment with the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team in the New York division.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018614.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge and counsel for the government (Mr. Rohrbach) and an opposing party (Ms. Menninger). Mr. Rohrbach confirms that the government will not question a witness, Mr. Flatley, about 'CDs' during direct examination, which resolves a procedural issue and satisfies the court and Ms. Menninger. The judge remarks that prior preparation for this line of questioning is now moot but may be saved for future use.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018597.jpg

This document is an index of examination from a court transcript for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It outlines the examination of witnesses KATE, PATRICK McHUGH, KELLY MAGUIRE, and KIMBERLY MEDER by various attorneys, listing the page numbers for each direct, cross, redirect, and recross examination. The document also lists several government exhibits that were received into evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018477.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of a cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her U visa status. During the proceeding, attorney Ms. Sternheim moves to admit Exhibits K-8 and K-10, which the court accepts under seal to protect the witness's identity.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018476.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on whether she has discussed her alleged abuse by Epstein with other victims and probes her memory of a meeting with the government concerning her U visa application, which her lawyer, Mr. Edwards, attended. The witness states she has not discussed her experiences with others and does not recall specific details about the meeting or her lawyer's actions during it.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018475.jpg

This document is page 138 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim cross-examines a witness named Kate regarding her memory of being asked to wear a uniform and an alleged conversation with Ghislaine about 'St. Trinian's,' which the witness does not recall. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) successfully objects to questions about costumes as being 'beyond the scope' of redirect.

Court transcript (cross-examination)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018474.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the testimony of a witness named Kate. Under questioning by Ms. Pomerantz, Kate explains that money received from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund represented recognition of her pain and truth, rather than just financial gain, and she explicitly denies having a financial stake in the outcome of the current trial. The page concludes with Ms. Sternheim beginning recross-examination.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018469.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the judge (THE COURT) and three attorneys (Mr. Everdell, Mr. Rohrbach, and Ms. Pomerantz) regarding an objection to having an agent testify about exhibits. The discussion clarifies that the agent in question is the one who conducted a search, not the current witness, after which the judge concludes the matter and calls for the witness and jury to enter.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018466.jpg

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a conversation between the judge (THE COURT), Ms. Pomerantz, and Ms. Sternheim about the admissibility of email evidence. The judge rules that the dates of the emails can be presented to the jury, but the content and subject matter must be redacted, and information identifying a witness must be sealed.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018465.jpg

This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues for the admission of evidence showing the dates a female witness ('she') maintained contact via email with a male subject ('him') to prove a relationship existed after the events in question. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) argues that the witness already admitted to the dates, making the evidence cumulative.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018463.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the admissibility of evidence—specifically an email—under the doctrine of 'past recollection recorded.' The Judge questions what specific details the witness failed to recall that would necessitate admitting the prior record.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018462.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a legal exchange between Ms. Sternheim (Defense) and Ms. Pomerantz (Prosecution) regarding an exhibit labeled 'Defendant's K-8' or '3513-019'. Ms. Pomerantz begins a legal argument citing the 'recorded recollection rule' as an exception to hearsay.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018461.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz discuss the admissibility and origin of two exhibits: a visa application bearing the name 'Kate' (Exhibit K-9) and emails between a witness and Mr. Epstein (Exhibit K-7). Ms. Pomerantz clarifies that the visa form was provided by the witness's counsel during a previous meeting to discuss visa status.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018458.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a brief exchange where an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, requests a lunch break during the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The Court grants the request, announcing to the jury a break for 45 minutes to an hour starting at 12:45.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018457.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, questions Kate about her employment in the music industry and her limited knowledge of the requirements for a U visa, specifically its connection to being a victim of a crime. After the questioning concludes, another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, requests a break from the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018456.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on the justification for her visa, which she claims is based on an 'extraordinary ability' related to music coaching. The attorney challenges this basis, and an objection from another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, is sustained by the court.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00018449.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a cross-examination of a person named Kate. The questioning covers a $1,200 payment for therapy and Kate's familiarity with a man named Ray Hamilton, whom she describes as an acquaintance and a friend of a friend, known both in 'the states' and London.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
56
As Recipient
4
Total
60

Cross-examination

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: ["Ms. Espinosa"]

Ms. Pomerantz begins her cross-examination of the witness, Ms. Espinosa.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Questioning about a diary entry from January 25, 1996

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: ["A. Farmer"]

MS. POMERANTZ questions the witness, Annie Farmer, about an entry in what appears to be a diary or journal. The entry, dated January 25, 1996, is admitted as Government's Exhibit 604, and the witness is asked to read it to the jury.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Diary entry from January 25, 1996

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: ["A. Farmer"]

Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie (A. Farmer), about a diary entry dated January 25, 1996, and asks her to read it to the jury. The entry details the witness's activities in New York.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Questioning about Jeffrey Epstein's actions

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: ["A. Farmer"]

Ms. Pomerantz asks the witness, A. Farmer (Annie), to describe what Jeffrey Epstein did when he got into bed with her. This follows objections from Ms. Menninger which were overruled by the court.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: Flatley

Questions regarding Flatley's background, role in CART, and experience.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Topics for cross-examination

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: MR. PAGLIUCA

Conferred with defense counsel regarding topics for cross-examination of Dr. Rocchio.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Redirect Examination

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: Annie Farmer

Questioning regarding memory of abuse and reliance on documentation.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: Kate

Establishing that 'Kate' is a pseudonym and directing her to the evidence binder.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidence Request

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: THE COURT

Requesting jurors view Government Exhibit 16.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Direct Examination

From: MS. POMERANTZ
To: Kate

Questioning regarding Government Exhibits 16 and 18.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search