MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness 'Kate' | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Calling of witness David Mulligan. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony regarding sexual abuse disclosure statistics. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court testimony regarding the nature of Epstein and Maxwell's relationship. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding Government Exhibit 3. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Jane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lisa Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2049. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2213. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2231. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2245. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of JANICE SWAIN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2247. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00016359.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, concerning Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) is being cross-examined by Ms. Menninger about a 2006 visit from agents and the presence of holiday decorations. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to the defense attempting to show the witness an exhibit marked AF10.
DOJ-OGR-00016352.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on Farmer's visit to Epstein's ranch, specifically detailing a tour of a movie set on the property, horseback riding, and a shopping trip where Epstein purchased cowboy boots for her. The witness denies memory of a 'big glorious mansion' or a construction site.
DOJ-OGR-00016349.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of witness Ms. Farmer (Annie Farmer). The defense attorney questions Farmer about FBI interview notes from 2006, specifically regarding a memory of a chef preparing dinner for 'all three of you.' Farmer acknowledges the notes indicate she had this memory in 2006, but confirms she does not currently have a visual memory of the chef.
DOJ-OGR-00016346.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to New Mexico, specifically whether Ghislaine Maxwell was involved in their transport, which the witness denies having knowledge of. Farmer confirms the trip was over a weekend and that they discussed this fact with their mother and subsequently informed the government of that conversation.
DOJ-OGR-00016345.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'A. Farmer'. The questioning focuses on a trip to New Mexico, seeking to establish that the witness has no personal knowledge of Ghislaine Maxwell arranging, encouraging, or having prior knowledge of the travel logistics. The witness repeatedly states she does not know or does not have a memory of Ghislaine's involvement in the trip.
DOJ-OGR-00016342.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It records an afternoon session where Ms. Pomerantz (Government) addresses the Court regarding the scheduling of the next witness and raises an objection to Ms. Menninger asking the current witness (A. Farmer, a psychologist testifying as a lay witness) questions about 'hindsight bias,' which Pomerantz argues is the domain of expert testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00016341.jpg
This document is page 125 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a brief procedural exchange immediately before a luncheon recess where the Judge (The Court) confirms with Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) that there are no matters to discuss while the jury is not present. The header indicates that a witness named 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer) was previously under cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00016339.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by Ms. Menninger regarding a 2006 FBI interview. The questioning focuses on a discrepancy between the witness's current memory and an FBI report stating that a person named Maria was originally supposed to accompany Annie to New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00016335.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the accuracy of the witness's memory regarding a trip to Thailand that occurred 25 years prior, which the witness recalled by associating it with their birthday. The transcript also records a legal objection by Ms. Pomerantz, which was overruled by the court, and mentions that the witness had previously discussed the trip dates with a Mr. Baker.
DOJ-OGR-00016334.jpg
This document is page 118 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer), focusing on how she reconstructed her memory of a specific trip occurring in April 1996 by referencing the movie 'Primal Fear' and her prom. The page concludes with an objection from Ms. Pomerantz regarding mischaracterization by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00016332.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on establishing Ms. Farmer's prior communications with Mike Baker, a journalist for The New York Times. Ms. Farmer confirms she had email exchanges and gave an interview to Mr. Baker, and that one of the topics discussed was the timing of her trip to New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00016331.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, questions the witness about the lack of journal entries regarding a trip to New Mexico and suggests her memory is reconstructed based on internet research about the release date of the movie 'Primal Fear'. The witness maintains that the movie confirmed her existing memory of the timeline. The page concludes with the introduction of exhibit AF-8.
DOJ-OGR-00016330.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on the witness's memory of a trip to New Mexico, which they believe occurred in April 1996. A. Farmer admits to having very little memory of how the trip was planned and confirms they have no journal entries from that period to refresh their recollection.
DOJ-OGR-00016326.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The testimony centers on verifying a specific page of a journal (Exhibit 604/AF-1) that the witness provided to the government as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00016316.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. Counsel, Ms. Menninger, raises an issue with redactions and the court addresses a 'terminological issue' regarding the labeling of exhibit AF1, which overlaps with Government Exhibit 603. The court decides to temporarily admit the full exhibit under seal to allow the questioning to proceed.
DOJ-OGR-00016315.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination dated August 10, 2022, involving Ms. Menninger questioning A. Farmer. The testimony focuses on entries made by Farmer after returning from New York, specifically confirming details about attending 'Phantom of the Opera', visiting Mr. Epstein's home, meeting Maria's boyfriend, and going cross-country skiing during a trip. Ms. Pomerantz also addresses 'Your Honor' during the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00016313.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger, specifically regarding the admission of a journal entry (Exhibit AF1, Bates AFarmer10472) written by Farmer before a trip to New York. The government, represented by Ms. Pomerantz, agrees that no redactions are necessary for this specific page.
DOJ-OGR-00016311.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Defense attorney Ms. Menninger introduces defense exhibit 'AF1'—identified as a page from a journal—which the government prosecutor, Ms. Pomerantz, does not object to. The Court admits the exhibit temporarily under seal while the attorneys discuss potential redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00016307.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger questions Farmer about a trip to New York during her junior year (age 16) and whether she used a journal to refresh her memory during a September 2019 meeting with the government. Farmer contests the interpretation of a summary document presented by the defense regarding exactly how she determined her age at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00016304.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to Mr. Epstein's New York home for a New Year's party after Christmas 1995. Farmer confirms that no sexual activity occurred and no one physically touched them during the visit, and also discusses the possibility that the home was under renovation at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00016302.jpg
This document is page 86 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It details a brief recess during the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer). Attorneys Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger confirm they have no procedural matters to discuss during the break before the witness returns to the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00016292.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the cross-examination of a witness, A. Farmer, by an attorney, Ms. Menninger, regarding a flight Farmer took alone in September 2019. The witness confirms the flight and explains it was to visit family, while another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, makes objections on the witness's behalf.
DOJ-OGR-00016289.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, A. Farmer. The witness confirms that their prior civil lawsuit against Maxwell and Epstein is concluded, having received a settlement from a fund in exchange for dismissing the case. Farmer also testifies that they have no financial stake in the outcome of the current trial.
DOJ-OGR-00016282.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys (Ms. Pomerantz, Ms. Menninger, Ms. Sternheim) and the judge. The core issue is the admissibility of a witness's prior statement, specifically the use of the word 'rape', with one side arguing it is highly prejudicial and the judge ultimately overruling the objection. The discussion highlights the strategic use of witness statements and the legal standards for evidence in a trial.
DOJ-OGR-00016281.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a sidebar conversation between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Menninger. The discussion centers on the admissibility of a witness's 'prior consistent statement.' Ms. Menninger argues it is premature as the witness has not been impeached, and reveals the anticipated testimony is that the witness told her mother, 'I wasn't raped.'
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
Identification of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Mr. Flatley, to establish his recognition and the authenticity of Government Exhibits 418 and 418R. Mr. Flatley confirms he recognizes them, that they were printed from 'Government 54', and that they are a true and accurate copy.
Request for a lunch break
Ms. Pomerantz requests that the proceedings break for lunch and resume afterward.
Calling next witness
Ms. Pomerantz calls the witness 'Kate' on behalf of the government.
Cross-examination
Ms. Pomerantz begins her cross-examination of the witness, Ms. Espinosa.
Allegations of sexual abuse against Epstein and the defen...
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the facts of the case, detailing the sexual abuse committed by Epstein against teenage girls and the defendant's alleged role as an essential accomplice who recruited, groomed, and facilitated the abuse.
First meeting with Jeffrey Epstein
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Annie, about her age during a trip to New York and asks her to identify Jeffrey Epstein in a photograph. She then asks Annie to describe her first meeting with Epstein.
Explanation of a forensic practice
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, asking him to explain to the jury what a forensic practice entails. Dr. Rocchio describes being hired by attorneys to conduct psychological evaluations for various legal matters.
Direct examination of Dr. Lisa Rocchio's professional qua...
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about her profession as a clinical and forensic psychologist, the definitions of those fields, and her educational background from Emory University and the University of Rhode Island.
Clarification on questioning a witness
Ms. Pomerantz asked for clarification about a planned line of questioning for a witness, initially believing it concerned an unsigned declaration involving the witness's ex-husband.
Allegations of sexual abuse and recruitment against the d...
Ms. Pomerantz outlines the prosecution's case, alleging the defendant recruited multiple underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein and facilitated their sexual abuse at various locations, including New York, Florida, and New Mexico.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Basis of witness testimony and knowledge of the case
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio, who confirms he has not interviewed witnesses, has no personal knowledge of the case facts, and that his testimony will not be based on information from this specific case. He also states he is being paid hourly for his time.
Relationship between Epstein and Maxwell; events at a ranch
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, A. Farmer, about her observations of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell during a weekend at a ranch, and who was staying at the residence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity