MS. POMERANTZ
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Opposing counsel |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
A. Farmer
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
61 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Dr. Rocchio
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Flatley
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Opposing counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Opposing counsel |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Drescher
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of witness 'Kate' | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony of Stephen Flatley | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 5 into evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conclusion of A. Farmer's testimony. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Calling of witness David Mulligan. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct Examination of Lisa Rocchio by Ms. Pomerantz | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination testimony regarding sexual abuse disclosure statistics. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Defendant's Exhibit MA1 into evidence under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court testimony regarding the nature of Epstein and Maxwell's relationship. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 424 into evidence during the testimony of Mr. Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Dr. Rocchio regarding Government Exhibit 3. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of Jane | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of Lisa Rocchio | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Court Sidebar/Discussion without Jury | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2049. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of ANNIE FARMER by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2213. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2231. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Redirect examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2245. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of JANICE SWAIN by Ms. Pomerantz, starting on page 2247. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Court testimony | Witness Annie Farmer is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz, identifies the defendant in the courtroom, a... | courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009797.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a voir dire proceeding filed on March 24, 2022. A judge questions a potential juror about their personal habits, media consumption, and past affiliations to determine their fitness for jury duty. The juror affirms they can be fair and impartial, and the two counsel present, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Sternheim, decline to ask any questions.
DOJ-OGR-00009795.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) recording the voir dire process. The Court is questioning Juror No. 50, a 35-year-old Manhattan resident who works as an executive assistant in finance and has held that role since graduating college in 2008.
DOJ-OGR-00014740.jpg
This is page 7 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and the Court discussing a dispute over redactions in a witness testimony, specifically regarding an answer that lacked a 'predicate foundation.' The Judge reads a portion of the disputed testimony which mentions individuals going 'their separate ways' and explicitly names 'Ghislaine'.
DOJ-OGR-00017355.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. In it, the judge confirms the jury's deliberation schedule, which includes holidays, and reads a note from the jury requesting the transcripts of expert witness Elizabeth Loftus. Counsel then raises an issue regarding the transcript of Cimberly Espinosa.
DOJ-OGR-00011709.jpg
This document is page 44 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim, who argues that Ghislaine Maxwell is being used as a 'scapegoat,' 'target,' and 'stand-in' for the deceased Jeffrey Epstein to satisfy the anger of his victims. Prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz objects repeatedly during the statement.
DOJ-OGR-00011705.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecutor outlines upcoming evidence, including flight logs showing Maxwell and Epstein traveling with minors, FedEx records of gifts sent to a 15-year-old victim, and records placing Maxwell and Epstein at an arts camp with a 14-year-old victim named Jane. The statement asserts that this evidence proves the defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic and sexually abuse children.
DOJ-OGR-00011704.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecution outlines its case against an unnamed defendant, alleging their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in the abuse of underage victims. The statement details the evidence to be presented, including testimony from victims' relatives, Epstein's pilots and staff, and law enforcement who searched Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences, to establish the defendant's role and efforts to create a 'culture of silence'.
DOJ-OGR-00011700.jpg
This document is a page from a prosecutor's (Ms. Pomerantz) opening statement in a criminal trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor alleges that the defendant conspired with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit and facilitate the sexual abuse of multiple underage girls. Specific examples cited include the abuse of a girl named 'Jane' in New York and Florida, and the grooming and abuse of a 16-year-old girl at Epstein's ranch in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00011699.jpg
This document is page 34 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) containing the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz. It details the grooming and sexual abuse of a minor referred to as 'Jane' (aged 14-16) by Jeffrey Epstein and the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The text describes how they befriended the child, provided financial incentives, and committed sexual acts at Epstein's Palm Beach home, often with the defendant present in the room to normalize the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00011698.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case, filed on August 10, 2022. Pomerantz alleges that an unnamed female defendant knowingly assisted Epstein in luring young girls by providing a 'cover of respectability.' The statement introduces the case of 'Jane,' who was 14 when she met the pair in 1994 and was subsequently invited to Epstein's Palm Beach home under the false pretense of mentorship and scholarships.
DOJ-OGR-00011697.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz, filed on August 10, 2022. She outlines the prosecution's case, detailing a decade-long sexual abuse scheme where Epstein assaulted teenage girls, and alleges that an unnamed female defendant was an essential accomplice who recruited, groomed, and facilitated the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00011696.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz. It outlines allegations against a defendant and Epstein, detailing how they purportedly used promises of career advancement and the guise of massage to groom and sexually abuse young girls at properties in Palm Beach and Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00011695.jpg
This document is page 30 of a court transcript (Opening Statement by Ms. Pomerantz) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor describes Maxwell as Epstein's 'second in command' and 'lady of the house,' detailing how she managed staff to create a 'culture of silence' and utilized a specific 'playbook' to groom and abuse teenage girls, specifically targeting vulnerable daughters of single mothers with promises of financial aid and schooling.
DOJ-OGR-00011694.jpg
This document is a page from the opening statement transcript by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor outlines the prosecution's intent to prove Maxwell's guilt and describes her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as his 'right hand,' 'best friend,' and 'closest associate.' It details Epstein's wealth, properties (Palm Beach, Manhattan, New Mexico, Paris, USVI), and private planes, noting that Maxwell shared in this lifestyle beginning in the early 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00011693.jpg
This document is a page from the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text outlines how Maxwell and a 'middle-aged man' (implied Epstein) targeted victims like 'Jane' between 1994 and 2004. It details Maxwell's role in grooming victims through shopping trips and normalizing sexual topics to facilitate their abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00011692.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the beginning of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz for the government. Ms. Pomerantz begins to narrate the story of a girl named Jane, who, at age 14 in 1994, met an older man and woman at a summer camp. This meeting is framed as the start of a long-term, nightmarish relationship for Jane with the couple, who were more than double her age.
Scheduling concerns
Asking if there are concerns regarding the Friday morning session plan.
Displaying Government Exhibit 604
Ms. Pomerantz asks Ms. Drescher to pull up Government Exhibit 604 for the witness, parties, and the Court.
Professional Capacity
Questioning regarding duties as president-elect of the division of trauma psychology.
Grooming by proxy
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about their knowledge of the term 'grooming by proxy' in scientific or clinical literature.
Audio volume
Instruction to speak into the microphone.
Exhibit management
Discussion regarding providing binders and locating Tab 6 for the witness and judge.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Agreement with an article's conclusions
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article, focusing on a specific passage. Dr. Rocchio states that he does not agree with the article's conclusions and finds the specified text to be incomplete.
Conferring
(Counsel confer) noted in transcript.
Witness's professional qualifications in psychology
Ms. Pomerantz questions the witness, Rocchio, about their specialization in trauma psychology, leadership roles in professional organizations like the Rhode Island and American psychological associations, and how they maintain their expertise.
A peer-reviewed article from October 2020
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about an article he provided to the government, confirming its publication date, peer-review status, and the conclusions of the study regarding perpetrator behaviors.
Reliability and validity of psychological judgments on gr...
Rocchio answers questions about the concepts of validity and reliability in psychological science, specifically in the context of identifying grooming behaviors. Validity is measured by the overlap between victim and offender accounts, while reliability is measured by the agreement among professionals. Ms. Pomerantz then directs Rocchio to a specific page and section of a document.
Clarification on Detective Byrne
Disputing a representation regarding Detective Byrne and noting tech support was available.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding Government Exhibits 16 and 18.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding memory of abuse and reliance on documentation.
Scheduling and Scope of Cross-Examination
Ms. Pomerantz asks about the timing for the next witness and flags an issue regarding 'hindsight bias' questions being asked of a lay witness who happens to be a psychologist.
Redirect Examination
Questioning regarding the emotional significance of compensation funds and potential financial interest in the trial outcome.
CBP Record Keeping
Questioning regarding whether CBP records in the 1990s were paper and if they were logged in systems prior to 9/11.
Evidence Request
Requesting jurors view Government Exhibit 16.
Direct Examination
Questioning regarding travel logistics to New York and payment of flight.
Witness Transition
Pomerantz ends questioning of Farmer and calls David Mulligan; Sternheim requests a sidebar.
Clarification of questioning regarding grooming
Discussion regarding a distinction between third-party presence and sexual gratification in the context of grooming strategies.
Direct Examination regarding 1995 trip
Q&A regarding a trip to NY in 1995, meeting Epstein, and identifying a photo.
Work location cross-examination
Pomerantz confirms Espinosa worked at the Madison Ave office, not the homes or Palm Beach house.
Objection Ruling
Judge sustains an objection regarding the line of questioning, prohibiting the attorney from drawing associations with other defendants the witness has testified for to avoid prejudice under Rule 403.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity