Trove
Sign In Sign Up

MARK S. COHEN

Person
Mentions
320
Relationships
15
Events
65
Documents
157
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
15 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
24 Very Strong
47
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
8
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
31
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Business associate
10 Very Strong
10
View
person Christian R. Everdell
Business associate
8 Strong
4
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
6
1
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Professional
5
1
View
person ALISON J. NATHAN
Legal representative
5
1
View
person CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
1
1
View
person Laura Menninger
Business associate
1
1
View
person Bobbi C. Sternheim
Business associate
1
1
View
person Bobbi C Sternheim
Business associate
1
1
View
person Assistant United States Attorney
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Arraignment, initial appearance, and bail hearing Southern District of New York View
2025-08-04 Legal proceeding A court order was issued granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohe... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2025-08-01 Legal proceeding A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Co... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-06-23 Legal filing Filing of a 'MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL'. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-03-30 N/A Filing of Notice of Appearance Court (Docket 21-770) View
2021-02-04 Legal filing Document 135 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-02-04 Legal filing Filing of a 'MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MS. MAXWELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX ... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 N/A Filing of multiple motions by defense (Separate Trial, Dismiss Counts as Multiplicitous, Dismiss ... Court Docket View
2021-01-25 N/A Submission of Motion for Accelerated Disclosure New York, New York View
2021-01-25 Court filing Document 120 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Filing of a memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss counts one through fou... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Document 123 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-01-25 Legal filing A legal memorandum was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing for the dismissal of charges... N/A View
2021-01-25 Court filing Multiple motions and supporting memorandums were filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team, includi... U.S. Court View
2021-01-25 Court filing Filing of a memorandum in support of a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Ghisl... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 N/A Multiple motions filed by defense (Separate Trial, Dismiss various counts). Court View
2021-01-25 Court filing Document 122 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-01-25 Legal filing A memorandum was filed in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss either Count One or Co... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Filing of a Memorandum in Support of Motion for Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in C... N/A View
2021-01-25 Court filing Document 121 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. N/A View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a request to the Court to strike all references to 'Acc... New York, New York View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel submitted a Notice of Motion to strike surplusage from the ... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel filed a Notice of Motion to dismiss the superseding indictm... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel, filed a notice of motion for a bill of particul... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View
2021-01-25 Legal filing Filing of a Notice of Motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... View

EFTA00015968.pdf

This document is an email chain from July 17, 2020, between defense counsel (Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger) and government prosecutors regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (referred to as 'GM' in attachments). The defense provides a proposed Protective Order and argues for specific terms, including the removal of a 'Highly Confidential' designation and the provision of a laptop to Maxwell in the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) so she can review discovery materials, as in-person legal visits were not allowed at the time. The email emphasizes the defense's desire to avoid trying the case in the press and cites concerns about witness harassment.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015911.pdf

An email from attorney Bobbi Sternheim to redacted officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at MDC. The email requests permission for Maxwell to use a laptop for reviewing discovery due to technical limitations of MDC computers and outlines several grievances, including invasive surveillance, freezing cell conditions, removal of bedding, excessive searches, and failure to deliver mail.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015898.pdf

This document is an email metadata printout dated December 29, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. The email is copied to other defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark S. Cohen) and a representative from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line references Ghislaine Maxwell and her Bureau of Prisons register number (02879-509).

Email metadata / communication record
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015882.pdf

This document is an email header dated December 29, 2020, with the subject line 'RE: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509'. The email appears to be sent from a government source (indicated by the 'USAHUB' Bcc) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, specifically Bobbi Sternheim, Christian Everdell, and Mark Cohen. The document contains technical metadata including message IDs but no body text.

Email header / litigation correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015303.pdf

This document is a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to a third party (name redacted) and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment. The defense argues that the subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment due to overbreadth and lack of a warrant, violated the 'Martindell' doctrine regarding the sanctity of protective orders in civil litigation, and infringed upon Maxwell's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination regarding her 2016 civil deposition testimony.

Legal memorandum / motion to suppress and dismiss
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00015185.pdf

An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell and others) dated October 8, 2021. The email serves as notification for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and discusses logistical arrangements for providing digital evidence to Ms. Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00013302.pdf

This document is an email chain dated December 30, 2020, between Assistant US Attorney Maurene (Comey) and defense attorney Christian Everdell, with other legal team members CC'd. The correspondence concerns a recent order by Judge Nathan denying bail; the defense states they believe no redactions are necessary for the opinion, and the prosecution agrees, attaching a draft joint letter to the Court to convey this position. The document is marked with Bates stamp EFTA00013302.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00013277.pdf

This document is an email chain initiated by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, addressed to prison officials (MDC) and forwarded to the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). Sternheim alleges that Maxwell was physically mistreated during a body search, specifically claiming a guard groped her breast, while another threatened her with assault charges. The letter explicitly links the BOP's handling of Maxwell to the negligence surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in the MCC.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011418.pdf

This document is a discovery request letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Cohen & Gresser LLP, to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2020. The defense requests a wide range of materials including exculpatory Brady evidence, information on Minor Victims 1-3, communications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and records of coordination between the government and civil attorneys representing Epstein's accusers. The letter also requests specific FBI files, unredacted reports, and evidence related to the credibility and potential financial motives of government witnesses.

Legal correspondence / discovery request (defense to prosecution)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011417.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2020 involving the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, Laura Menninger, etc.). The email circulates a PDF attachment titled 'Letter to Government re Rule 16 and Brady Requests,' indicating legal maneuvering regarding evidence disclosure and discovery requests in a federal case.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011266.pdf

An email dated February 2, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to defense attorney Christian Everdell regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The prosecutor informs the defense that additional discovery is ready and requests an FTP link to transmit the files.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011259.pdf

This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Cohen & Gresser) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties providing Maxwell with discovery materials at the MDC (CDs vs. Hard Drives), a request for an unredacted 2006 FBI report found on Epstein's devices, and missing pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (specifically pages 1-27). The defense also questions the government about a Daily Beast article referencing a 'newly unsealed' affidavit regarding a cell-site simulator used to track Maxwell.

Legal correspondence (email chain)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011192.pdf

This document is a legal opinion provided by David Perry QC regarding the extradition law of England and Wales in the context of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the United States. It outlines the extradition process between the UK and US, potential bars to extradition, human rights considerations, and the implications of Ms. Maxwell waiving her right to extradition. The document concludes that if Ms. Maxwell were to abscond to the UK, it is highly unlikely she would be granted bail or successfully resist extradition.

Legal opinion
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011179.pdf

This document is an email dated December 8, 2020, from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email serves as a cover letter for the submission of unredacted exhibits O through X, related to a Renewed Bail Motion in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The documents were filed under seal pursuant to a court order.

Email correspondence / legal filing cover letter
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011167.pdf

This document is an email from attorney Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Nathan, dated December 8, 2020. It serves as a transmittal for filing a Renewed Bail Motion and several redacted exhibits (O-P, S, W-X) under seal in the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The email copies other members of the defense team including Mark Cohen, Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, and Laura Menninger, as well as representatives from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USANYS).

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00009895.pdf

An email dated April 20, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves filing notice for a letter regarding redactions to the defense's reply briefs in the case US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015078.jpg

This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated August 4, 2025, and signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The order officially grants the request of attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of the firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to withdraw from representing Ghislaine Maxwell as her co-counsel in case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00015077.jpg

This is a proposed court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 1, 2025, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, to be signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer, grants the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to withdraw as co-counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001878.jpg

This document is the cover page for the court transcript of an arraignment and bail hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell, held via teleconference on July 14, 2020. The case, United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, was heard in the Southern District of New York before District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The page lists the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and the defense, represented by attorneys from the law firms Cohen & Gresser, LLP and Haddon Morgan & Foreman, P.C.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001875.jpg

This document is the final page of a legal letter dated December 7, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. The letter requests the immediate elimination of 'onerous' and 'restrictive' detention conditions for her client, Ms. Maxwell. Copies of the letter were sent via email to four other attorneys involved in the case.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001862.jpg

This is a letter dated November 25, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys at Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The attorneys state their intention to file a renewed motion for bail for Ms. Maxwell and request an 'in camera' conference to discuss filing portions of the motion and supporting materials under seal. They argue for sealing to protect sensitive and private information concerning Ms. Maxwell and the third-party sureties (family and friends) supporting her bail application.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001718.jpg

This is the final page (6 of 6) of a legal filing submitted on August 10, 2020, to Judge Alison J. Nathan by attorneys Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The document requests that Maxwell be released to the general population within the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) and be granted increased access to a computer terminal to review discovery materials for her defense.

Court filing / legal correspondence
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001713.jpg

This is a letter motion dated August 10, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorneys (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense is requesting two court orders: one to compel the government to disclose the identities of 'Victims 1-3' mentioned in the indictment, and another to direct the Bureau of Prisons to move Maxwell to the general population to facilitate access to discovery materials. The document includes a handwritten and stamped order from Judge Nathan dated August 11, 2020, setting a deadline of August 13 for the government's response.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001689.jpg

This document is the final page of a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated July 29, 2020. The defense argues for a protective order to restrict prospective witnesses—specifically those who have also filed civil suits against Maxwell—from using criminal discovery materials to bolster their civil cases or leak information to the press. The document highlights the intertwined nature of the criminal indictment and existing civil complaints.

Legal correspondence / court filing (reply letter regarding protective order)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001646.jpg

This document is the final page of a legal letter dated July 27, 2020, from attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter concludes a submission requesting that the Court enter a proposed protective order on behalf of their client, Ms. Maxwell. The document is part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
13
As Recipient
0
Total
13

No Subject

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Unknown

Email address mcohen@cohengresser.com is provided for attorney Mark S. Cohen.

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Correspondence regarding pretrial motions.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Regarding pretrial motions

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding the filing of pretrial motions.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding pretrial motions.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Regarding filing of motions and redactions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: The Honorable Alison J...

Explanation of procedure for filing motions containing Confidential Information, including emailing unredacted versions to the Court and government for review before public docketing.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Pretrial Motions

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding pretrial motions.

Letter
2021-01-25
Communication Source

Notice of Appearance

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: all parties

Notice that Mark S. Cohen is appearing as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell for specific hearings.

Legal notice
2020-07-08
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding scheduling.

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding scheduling

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter regarding scheduling.

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: MARK S. COHEN
To: Judge Alison J. Nathan

Regarding scheduling.

Letter
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search