MARK S. COHEN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
24
Very Strong
|
47 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
31 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Arraignment, initial appearance, and bail hearing | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2025-08-04 | Legal proceeding | A court order was issued granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Cohe... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-01 | Legal proceeding | A proposed order was filed granting the motion for attorneys Christian R. Everdell and Mark S. Co... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-23 | Legal filing | Filing of a 'MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER RENEWED MOTION FOR BAIL'. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-03-30 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance | Court (Docket 21-770) | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Legal filing | Document 135 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Legal filing | Filing of a 'MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MS. MAXWELL’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX ... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-01-25 | N/A | Filing of multiple motions by defense (Separate Trial, Dismiss Counts as Multiplicitous, Dismiss ... | Court Docket | View |
| 2021-01-25 | N/A | Submission of Motion for Accelerated Disclosure | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Court filing | Document 120 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | Filing of a memorandum in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss counts one through fou... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | Document 123 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | A legal memorandum was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing for the dismissal of charges... | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Court filing | Multiple motions and supporting memorandums were filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team, includi... | U.S. Court | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Court filing | Filing of a memorandum in support of a motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Ghisl... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-01-25 | N/A | Multiple motions filed by defense (Separate Trial, Dismiss various counts). | Court | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Court filing | Document 122 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | A memorandum was filed in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss either Count One or Co... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | Filing of a Memorandum in Support of Motion for Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in C... | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Court filing | Document 121 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell submitted a request to the Court to strike all references to 'Acc... | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel submitted a Notice of Motion to strike surplusage from the ... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel filed a Notice of Motion to dismiss the superseding indictm... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through her counsel, filed a notice of motion for a bill of particul... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-01-25 | Legal filing | Filing of a Notice of Motion to dismiss the superseding indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
EFTA00023705.pdf
Email correspondence from September 30, 2020, between defense attorney Christian Everdell and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Everdell requests access to roughly 40,000 non-nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residences in New York and the Virgin Islands for his client, Ghislaine Maxwell, to review at the MDC. The AUSA responds that they are coordinating with the FBI to transport a laptop with the files to the detention center, though the large volume of files requires a few days for processing.
EFTA00023478.pdf
This document is an email dated October 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves as a transmittal notice for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The prosecutor notes that digital files are being sent via USAfx and a physical CD is being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell.
EFTA00023329.pdf
Defense counsel Christian Everdell writes to Judge Alison Nathan opposing the government's request to delay the disclosure of evidence (photographs and documents) regarding alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues these materials are exculpatory under Brady because they relate to post-1997 allegations where witnesses do not implicate Maxwell, thereby supporting her defense against perjury charges that she was unaware of Epstein's abuse. The letter also argues the government has failed to show 'good cause' under Rule 16 to delay this discovery.
EFTA00023113.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 30, 2020, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and the Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Sternheim details complaints regarding Maxwell's detention conditions, specifically citing excessive searches, lack of privacy during showers, cold temperatures in her isolation cell due to lack of insulation and body heat from other inmates, and constant surveillance. The thread concludes with the attorneys arranging a phone call to discuss the matter.
EFTA00023047.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Motion' filed on January 25, 2021, by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in the Southern District of New York. The motion seeks to suppress all evidence obtained from a government subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller and to dismiss Counts Five and Six of the indictment, citing the Due Process Clause. The document lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell.
EFTA00023026.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery disputes in January 2021. The defense raises issues about defective hard drives provided to Maxwell in prison, missing pages from pilot David Rodgers' flight logs (specifically pages 1-27), and requests unredacted FBI reports from 2006. The government responds that the 'missing' flight log pages are accounted for in a separate document, asserts that redactions in the FBI report were original to the files found on Epstein's devices, and denies requests for grand jury subpoenas.
EFTA00022320.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2020 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and a Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn. Sternheim complains that Maxwell was deprived of blankets and food, leaving her cold and hungry, while the MDC attorney refutes these claims, stating Maxwell had three blankets, received meals, and the cell temperature was 76.5 degrees.
EFTA00022316.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2020 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and officials at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Brooklyn/BOP. Sternheim complains on Dec 26 that Maxwell is freezing, her cell is uninsulated during 32-degree weather, and she was denied a holiday meal and blankets. On Dec 28, a BOP Staff Attorney responds, disputing these claims, stating Maxwell has three blankets, received her meals, and that the cell temperature was measured at 76.5 degrees.
EFTA00021937.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger) dated July 27, 2020. The prosecution requests a 'meet and confer' to discuss a protective order, specifically challenging the defense's desire to name victims in public filings rather than using pseudonyms. The email also requests a 1 terabyte hard drive to facilitate the production of discovery materials.
EFTA00021898.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 9-12, 2020, between defense attorneys (Jeff Pagliuca, Nicole Simmons, Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen) and the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY regarding a discovery dispute. The defense is pressing for a quick response to an August 9th letter, citing a tight schedule with the Circuit and threatening to advise Judge Nathan if they do not receive a response sooner than the Government's proposed date of August 13th. The correspondence also notes technical email issues at the defense firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman.
EFTA00021875.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 involving legal counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, etc.) and likely government prosecutors (names redacted). The discussion concerns a discovery letter sent by the defense, the handling of criminal grand jury materials in relation to Maxwell's civil cases, and a dispute over the disclosure of victim names. The redacted senders discuss strategy for responding to 'Jeff and Laura,' specifically refuting claims of government malfeasance and debating whether to allow materials to be filed under seal.
EFTA00021769.pdf
An email chain from July 2020 involving defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, et al.) discussing a 'Protective Order' for discovery, likely in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (implied by 'GM' in filenames). Everdell sends a revised draft to the Government following a call on July 20th. The top emailer (name redacted) forwards this message expressing confusion, noting they cannot see the difference between the attached documents or find the redline.
EFTA00021019.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on January 25, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The defense team, consisting of attorneys from three separate law firms, formally requests a severance and separate trial for Counts Five and Six of the Superseding Indictment. The filing includes the attorneys' contact information and signatures.
EFTA00020978.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office regarding various discovery disputes in early 2021. Key issues include technical difficulties with Maxwell accessing discovery on prison computers, requests for unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Epstein's devices, and clarification regarding 'missing' pages from flight logs produced by pilot David Rodgers (which the prosecution explains were re-numbered/included in a different file). The defense also raises concerns about a Daily Beast article referencing a search warrant affidavit, which the prosecution confirms was unsealed by the court in New Hampshire, not leaked by their office.
EFTA00020832.pdf
This document is an email dated November 9, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Everdell, Cohen, Pagliuca, Menninger, Sternheim). The email notifies counsel that a hard drive containing new discovery production is available for pickup at One St. Andrew's Plaza and highlights a specific disclosure regarding a witness statement. It also confirms that copies of this and prior productions are being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell's review.
EFTA00020439.pdf
This document contains an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorney David Oscar Markus and a redacted Assistant United States Attorney regarding U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus introduces himself as appellate counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries. The government confirms its opposition to the bail motion and notes that a protective order (ECF No. 36) is already in place.
EFTA00020437.pdf
This document is an email correspondence between attorney David Oscar Markus and Assistant United States Attorneys regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus informs the government of his representation of Maxwell in her bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries, while the government responds regarding document availability and existing protective orders.
EFTA00019291.pdf
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team on December 18, 2020, in support of her renewed motion for bail. The defense argues that the government lacks significant documentary evidence, relies solely on witness testimony from decades ago, and that Maxwell has strong ties to the U.S. through her spouse (whose name is redacted) and friends who have pledged assets. The document also addresses flight risk concerns, arguing that extradition from France or the UK is possible or unlikely to be needed due to waivers, and cites a COVID-19 surge at the detention center as further justification for release.
EFTA00018837.pdf
An email chain from October 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that discovery materials were shared via USAfx and discusses logistics for providing digital copies (CD or hard drive) to Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00018572.pdf
Defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell requests the Court to order the government to disclose the identities of three alleged victims referenced in the indictment to allow for effective investigation of allegations from 25 years ago. Additionally, the defense requests that Maxwell be moved to the general population at the MDC and given increased computer access to review discovery, arguing her current isolation and surveillance are punitive reactions to Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in BOP custody.
EFTA00018515.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team arguing against the government's motion for detention and requesting release on bail. The defense argues that the COVID-19 pandemic poses a severe health risk and impedes defense preparation, and asserts that Maxwell is not a flight risk, citing her presence in the U.S. since Epstein's arrest. They propose a $5 million bond secured by UK property and strict conditions including home confinement and GPS monitoring.
EFTA00017823.pdf
This document is a letter motion dated November 25, 2020, from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The defense requests an in camera conference and permission to file a renewed bail motion under seal to protect the identities of family and friends acting as sureties, citing severe harassment and death threats (including social media examples). The letter mentions a financial report by Macalvins Limited. Judge Nathan endorsed the letter on the same day, stating she saw no basis for sealing the letter itself and ordered the defense to justify the sealing request by December 2, 2020.
EFTA00017813.pdf
This document is an email chain between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Christian Everdell) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding discovery production disputes in November 2020. The defense expresses significant frustration regarding technical issues with hard drives provided to Maxwell at the MDC, including broken drives and a lack of consolidation, as well as severe restrictions on the hours Maxwell is permitted to use a laptop to review over 2 million pages of evidence. The prosecution responds by offering to consolidate materials onto a single drive and explaining that the limited laptop access (8:30am-3:30pm) is due to MDC security protocols requiring lieutenant supervision.
EFTA00017768.pdf
An email dated July 6, 2020, from Assistant US Attorney Maurene (likely Comey) to redacted recipients, copying defense attorneys Christian Everdell and Mark S. Cohen. The email concerns arranging a pretrial interview for the attorneys with their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, prior to her upcoming bail hearing in case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
EFTA00016302.pdf
An email dated September 4, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Judge Nathan's chambers. The email submits agreed-upon proposed redactions to defense letters dated August 24, 2020, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). Legal counsel Jeff Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Christian Everdell, and Mark S. Cohen are copied.
No Subject
Email address mcohen@cohengresser.com is provided for attorney Mark S. Cohen.
Pretrial Motions
Letter regarding pretrial motions.
Pretrial Motions
Letter regarding the filing of pretrial motions.
Regarding filing of motions and redactions
Explanation of procedure for filing motions containing Confidential Information, including emailing unredacted versions to the Court and government for review before public docketing.
Pretrial Motions
Letter regarding pretrial motions.
Pretrial Motions
Regarding pretrial motions
Pretrial Motions
Correspondence regarding pretrial motions.
Notice of Appearance
Notice that Mark S. Cohen is appearing as counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell for specific hearings.
Scheduling
Letter regarding scheduling.
Scheduling
Letter by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan
Scheduling
Regarding scheduling.
Scheduling
Letter regarding scheduling.
Scheduling
Letter regarding scheduling
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity