Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Sternheim

Person
Mentions
877
Relationships
86
Events
390
Documents
429
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
86 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
19 Very Strong
25
View
person Mr. Everdell
Co counsel
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
13 Very Strong
11
View
person Ms. Comey
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
10
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Opposing counsel
12 Very Strong
11
View
person Kate
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Professional
10 Very Strong
14
View
person Judge
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
organization The Court
Professional
10 Very Strong
116
View
person MS. POMERANTZ
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Moe
Professional adversarial
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Professional
9 Strong
5
View
person Loftus
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MR. ROHRBACH
Opposing counsel
8 Strong
4
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
8 Strong
4
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
person Gill Velez
Professional
7
3
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Co counsel
7
3
View
person Ms. Conrad
Professional
7
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings regarding finalization of the verdict sheet and jury charges in Case 1:20-cr-00... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of court document 761 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussio... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Ghislaine Maxwell formally waives her right to testify in her own defense. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Sidebar conference during Opening Statements Courtroom Sidebar View
2022-08-10 N/A Jury dismissal scheduling Courtroom View
2022-08-10 Legal proceeding A sidebar conversation during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) to discuss the admissibility of te... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion rega... Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceeding sidebar conference Courtroom Sidebar View
2022-08-10 N/A Medical Request Courtroom - Request for COV... View
2022-08-10 Court proceeding An opening statement by Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine, where she argues that her client... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony of witness Loftus regarding memory science. Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell context implie... Southern District of New Yo... View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Conclusion of Professor Loftus's testimony Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court hearing regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial) Southern District Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Sidebar conference in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Courtroom (Sidebar) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell). Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Discussion cent... Southern District Court View
2022-08-10 N/A Sidebar conference during opening statements in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. Courtroom Sidebar View
2022-08-10 N/A Courtroom discussion regarding logistics of presenting evidence on screens. Courtroom (Southern District) View
2022-08-10 N/A Court testimony in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Expert witness Lo... Courtroom View
2022-08-10 N/A Court proceedings regarding jury instructions and upcoming witness testimony. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
2022-08-10 N/A Filing of Document 741 (Transcript of Opening Statement) Court (Southern District) View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
55
As Recipient
5
Total
60

Defense's argument against the credibility of accusers an...

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Court/Jury (implied)

Ms. Sternheim argues that the government's case lacks substantive evidence and relies on the thin, uncorroborated stories of four accusers. She suggests the accusers' testimonies are unreliable, having been influenced by lawyers, media, and the prospect of large financial rewards from the Epstein fund.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relevance objection

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim objects to evidence based on relevance and foundation as a business record.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Court proceedings

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim responds to the Court's questions and begins to address the Court on a matter before being instructed to use the microphone.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary objection regarding witness credibility

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

A dialogue between Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the legal basis for an objection to testimony. The Court argues that since Ms. Sternheim's side attacked a witness's credibility regarding her upbringing, the opposing side can bring in evidence to support it. The Court presses Ms. Sternheim for the specific rule (e.g., Relevance, 403) underpinning her objection.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scope of witness testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

MS. STERNHEIM and THE COURT discuss the allowable scope of a witness's testimony. The Court rules to limit the testimony to issues from cross-examination that pertain to attacking the credibility of an unnamed woman.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Witness's memory and knowledge of media coverage

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Mulligan

Ms. Sternheim questions Mr. Mulligan about his ability to recall events from over 25 years ago, his conversations with Ms. Farmer, and his awareness of media and documentaries related to the case and Ms. Farmer.

Cross-examination
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Courtroom Temperature

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim asks the Judge if the temperature can be raised because it is very cold. The Court responds that they are sweating but will get it raised.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Description of Epstein's private jets and relationship wi...

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["Court/Jury"]

Ms. Sternheim describes Epstein's private jets as a form of high-style commuting for a wide array of people, including friends, celebrities, and politicians. She also outlines the evolution of Ghislaine's relationship with Epstein, from a companion to solely an employee, and states the case will center on four women.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Scheduling

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding jury deliberation schedule over holidays and COVID-19 protocols.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of insurance form content

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding hearsay, the Lieberman case, and verification of employee information.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relevance of Mr. Alessi's testimony

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument regarding inferences drawn from employment status versus physical presence of a child in 2001.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Defendant's decision to testify

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Judge confirms with attorney Sternheim that she has advised her client regarding the right to testify.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Format Inquiry

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Inquiring if a specific format was satisfactory to the Court.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Witness Schedule

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Confirming the defense will not call Mr. Hamilton.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scheduling break

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Sternheim

Let's get started. My plan was to break at 3:30.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pending redaction issues

From: Ms. Moe
To: Ms. Sternheim

Spoke regarding pending redaction issues.

Conversation
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Confusion

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Argument that the jury mentioning New Mexico for a New York count indicates confusion not solved by simple referral.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Scheduling

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Requesting to wait until tomorrow.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Procedural discussion regarding demonstrative evidence

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the use of digital equipment to simulate a whiteboard due to COVID restrictions and whether a photograph of the work should be preserved for the record.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Kate

Questioning regarding fund application vetting for fraud.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Admissibility of lawyers as witnesses

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

A discussion between Ms. Sternheim and the Judge about whether lawyers who attended proffer sessions can be called as witnesses or if their testimony can be referenced.

Court dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Request for a sidebar

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Sternheim requests a sidebar to discuss matters related to a witness with anonymity status.

Court proceeding dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Cross-examination of Gill Velez

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: ["Gill Velez"]

Ms. Sternheim questions Gill Velez about her employment history with a property management company and her lack of personal knowledge regarding a document dated 2000, as she only started working there in 2007.

Court testimony
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Relationship between Ghislaine and Epstein, and Epstein's...

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Court/Jury (implied)

Ms. Sternheim describes Epstein's charisma and his relationship with Ghislaine, which evolved from friendship to her becoming his employee managing his real estate portfolio. She details his various properties and travel habits, and mentions that Epstein spent time with other women without Ghislaine.

Opening statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Opening Statement (Defense)

From: Ms. Sternheim
To: Members of the jury

Ms. Sternheim begins her opening statement for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, by arguing that women are often unfairly blamed for men's actions and that Maxwell is not Jeffrey Epstein, despite the charges relating to his conduct.

Courtroom statement
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search