Ms. Sternheim

Person

Mentions

877

Relationships

Events

390

Documents

429

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

86 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
person JANE	Professional	5	1	View
person Mr. Everdell	Business associate	5	1	View
person Mr. Everdell	Co counsel defense	5	1	View
person her	Client	5	1	View
person Mr. Alessi	Witness counsel	5	1	View
person MS. MENNINGER	Co counsel	1	1	View
person MS. MENNINGER	Co defense counsel	1	1	View
person Kate	Opposing counsel	1	1	View
person Catherine Conrad	Client	1	1	View
person Defendant (Implied Maxwell)	Legal representative	1	1	View
person four accusers	Adversarial	1	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	N/A	Court proceeding regarding trial schedule, closing arguments, and jury deliberation timing relati...	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Court Recess pending verdict	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Court proceeding sidebar or argument regarding courtroom logistics and COVID protocols.	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Opening statement by Ms. Sternheim defending Ghislaine Maxwell	Open Court	View
N/A	N/A	Discussion regarding three missing jurors who are stuck on the security line or unaccounted for o...	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report.	Courtroom (Southern District)	View
N/A	N/A	Jury Selection (Voir Dire) for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).	Courtroom (Southern Distric...	View
N/A	N/A	Examination of witness 'Kate'	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Reading of Jury Note regarding Count Four	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Examination of Janine Gill Velez	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Reading of Jury Note	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Cross-examination of witness 'Kate' regarding exhibits 3513-014.	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Discussion regarding jury deliberation schedule and closing arguments	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Sentencing hearing where the judge discusses factors for punishment.	Courtroom	View
N/A	N/A	Court proceedings discussing jury instructions and a question from the jury regarding Count Four.	Courtroom	View
N/A	Trial	Discussion of the trial schedule. The defense case is set to begin on the 16th.	Courtroom	View
N/A	Legal proceeding	Closing arguments are anticipated for the 20th or 21st.	Courtroom	View
N/A	Court testimony	Witness Kate is questioned by Ms. Pomerantz about a visit to Maxwell's house and is shown Governm...	Courtroom	View
N/A	Court proceeding	A court hearing to discuss the schedule for jury deliberations.	Courtroom	View
N/A	Court examination	Cross-examination of DAVID JAMES MULLIGAN by Ms. Sternheim, starting on page 2242.	N/A	View
N/A	Future court hearing	The court scheduled the next session for the 23rd of the month.	Courtroom	View
N/A	Trial	An upcoming trial that Ms. Sternheim is scheduled to start on the 16th of the month.	Unspecified	View
N/A	Court proceeding	Examination of witness KATE, including direct, cross, redirect, and recross.	N/A	View
N/A	Court proceeding	The judge discusses jury deliberation scheduling with counsel, sends a note to the jury, takes a ...	Courtroom (implied)	View
N/A	Court examination	Cross-examination of witness DANIEL ALAN BESSELSEN by Ms. Sternheim.	N/A	View

DOJ-OGR-00011600.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a defense attorney's argument during a sentencing hearing. The attorney, Ms. Sternheim, asks the Court for a sentence below the recommended guidelines, arguing the government's request is disproportionate and that the more culpable Jeffrey Epstein would have faced the same sentencing guidelines as her client, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011598.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on July 22, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim, Ms. Stein, delivers a powerful impact statement describing how Maxwell's actions affected her for 25 years and calls for Maxwell to be imprisoned. Following the statement, another individual, Ms. Sternheim, addresses the court to speak to the victims.

Legal document

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011574.jpg

This is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion about the order of statements. Counsel Ms. Moe asks the judge if victims should speak before or after the main parties. The judge clarifies the intended sequence is government, victims, defense counsel, and then Ms. Maxwell, to which all parties present agree before the court takes a luncheon recess.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript

2025-11-20

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

From: Ms. Sternheim

To: THE COURT

Defense renews motion pursuant to Rule 29 (Motion for Judgment of Acquittal).

Court proceeding

2021-12-18

Communication Source

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search