THE WITNESS
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Subject of inquiry |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. BILAFONIA
|
Interviewer interviewee |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
AGENT RICHARDS
|
Interviewer interviewee |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interacted after massage |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Questioner deponent |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Plaintiff defendant |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed woman
|
Payer payee |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Unnamed friend
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interacted with |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective Pagan
|
Gave statement to |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Justin Silk
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Interrogator witness |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed female speaker
|
Switched name tags |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Herman (Plaintiff's Lawyer)
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed counsel
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial questioner deponent |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DETECTIVE RECAREY
|
Law enforcement and witness |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness's boss
|
Employee |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding legal strategy and factual basis for allegations. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Exhibit 2 (a pleading) | Court (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness realized a footnote was missing due to a clerical error and filed a correction. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident where an unnamed male subject ('he') showed the witness photographs of 'young women i... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An unnamed male subject ('he') took naked photographs of the witness. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. ... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness recalls an incident where an unnamed male subject showed them photographs of 'young women... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness testifies that an unnamed male subject took naked pictures of them, which were never reco... | Not mentioned | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of an unidentified witness regarding a lawsuit referred to as 'Epstein versus RRA'. Th... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by Mr. Scarola, with Mr. Pike present as coun... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness, a... | A restaurant | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of the witness by Mr. Tein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was scheduled to take place, but Mr. Leopold could not start it on time due to a cou... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness met with their attorney, Mr. Leopold, to prepare for the deposition. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness was at a restaurant eating nachos while allegedly evading service of process. | A restaurant (name redacted) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness at a restaurant, allegedly having to... | A restaurant (name redacted) | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness, at age 18, states she would visit 'Jeffrey' and felt comfortable with him. | Undisclosed ('there') | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a lawsuit in federal court against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of the witness. | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness. T... | Restaurant | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness deleted their MySpace page. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Tein states that Mr. Leopold filed a fifty-milli... | federal court | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony is being conducted, as detailed on page 31 of the transcript. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness lied about her age to Jeffrey Epstein, telling him she was 18. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | An incident at a restaurant where Mr. Epstein's process servers attempted to serve the witness. T... | A restaurant | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012417.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, likely dated September 29, 2010. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about whether they were induced by anyone to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money, which the witness denies. The transcript captures a contentious exchange between Mr. Tein and the witness's counsel, Mr. Leopold, whom Mr. Tein repeatedly accuses of coaching the witness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012415.jpg
This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about an incident at Jeff Epstein's house three years prior. The witness confirms they previously told police they did not have sex with Epstein and maintains this denial, while also being questioned about a fifty-million-dollar civil complaint they filed against him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012412.jpg
This document is page 17 of a deposition transcript, potentially from a U.S. House Oversight investigation. An unnamed witness is questioned about using the racial slur 'Niggaa' in a message, which they state they do not find offensive. The transcript also captures a heated procedural argument between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, over the questioning and the proper identification of an exhibit numbered 31-001.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012411.jpg
This document is page 16 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a female witness about a message she sent on MySpace. The questioning becomes contentious when Mr. Tein asks if the witness finds a racial slur offensive, implying she used it, which the witness denies. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning, leading to procedural arguments between the lawyers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012403.jpg
This document is a fragment of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects and instructs the witness not to answer questions if their knowledge comes from their private conversations, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness denies having knowledge of the lawsuit from any other source.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012402.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit recently filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects, citing attorney-client privilege and instructing his client not to answer if their knowledge comes only from their protected conversations. The exchange becomes tense, with Mr. Leopold mistakenly calling the questioning attorney 'Lewis'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012398.jpg
This document is page 4 of a deposition transcript from a case in Florida, identified by the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012398. An attorney, Mr. Tein, begins his direct examination of a witness who has just been sworn in by Court Reporter Judith F. Consor. The witness's name and the spelling of their name are fully redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012333.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview from April 25, 2007, with an unnamed witness. The witness denies giving or taking prescription drugs, admits to smoking pot at age 16, and states she was mostly sober when visiting 'Jeffrey' at age 18, noting that he made her feel very comfortable.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012307.jpg
This document is a transcript from an interview dated April 25, 2007, where investigators Ms. Bilafonia and Agent Richards question a witness about their knowledge of girls who would call and leave messages for Jeffrey. The witness denies being close friends with them, calling them 'associates' or 'friends of friends,' and the conversation shifts to the interviewers asking about specific redacted names, one of which the witness dismisses as sounding like a 'black girl's name'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012294.jpg
This document is a transcript from a 2007 interview where a witness is questioned by Ms. Bilafonia and Agent Richards. The witness recounts being paid $200 by a woman upon arrival for a massage, and states that after the massage, a man named Jeffrey asked for her phone number because he wanted to see her again.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012286.jpg
This document is page 5 of an interview transcript dated April 25, 2007, from the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' collection. An unnamed witness is questioned by Ms. Bilafonia and Agent Richards, confirming they know Jeffrey Epstein (who they call 'Jeffrey') and that they work at a cleaning company called 'Advanced Cleaning Systems' located at 11 Swanee Drive, Las Palmas.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012285.jpg
This document is page 4 of an interview transcript dated April 25, 2007. The witness discusses their education, stating they received their GED three months prior, and their future plans, which include college. Currently, the witness is focusing on their two-year-old son and a modeling career.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012274.jpg
This document is page 19 of a sworn statement transcript from Onsor & Associates. It captures the conclusion of the testimony, where the questioner confirms the witness was not coerced and told the truth. The statement, attended by Mr. Goldberger and Ms. Sanchez, concluded at 12:15 p.m.
Questioning about socializing with Alan Dershowitz and To...
Mr. Scarola questions the witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors, to which the witness pleads the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments. Scarola then asks about socializing with Tommy Mottola, which the witness calls an irrelevant question brought by Mr. Edwards to harm his relationships.
No Subject
The witness was asked 'Jeff never text messaged you, did he?' and answered 'No.'
No Subject
The deposition from which this transcript is taken, concerning the witness's interactions with Jeff Epstein.
Questioning about socializing with Alan Dershowitz and To...
Mr. Scarola questions the witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors, to which the witness pleads the 5th, 6th, and 14th amendments. Scarola then asks about socializing with Tommy Mottola, which the witness calls an irrelevant question brought by Mr. Edwards to harm his relationships.
Questioning about associations with Alan Dershowitz and T...
Mr. Scarola questions an unnamed witness about socializing with Alan Dershowitz in the presence of minors and with Tommy Mottola. The witness refuses to answer, citing constitutional rights, and complains the questions are irrelevant and intended to harm their personal relationships.
No Subject
The witness was asked 'Jeff never e-mailed you, did he?' and answered 'No.'
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding pictures of teenage girls. The witness confirms the unnamed male took naked photos of them and showed them photos of other young women in a bathtub. Mr. Pagliuca makes objections during the questioning.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject ('he').
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding 'pictures of teenage girls'. The witness confirms 'he' took naked photos of her and showed her photos of other 'young women in the bathtub'. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questions.
Photographs taken by an unnamed male subject ('he').
Mr. Edwards questions the witness about a prior statement regarding 'pictures of teenage girls'. The witness confirms 'he' took naked photos of her and showed her photos of other 'young women in the bathtub'. Mr. Pagliuca objects to the questions.
Pro bono work and footnotes
The Dean suggested it might be helpful to include a footnote in filings; discussed support for pro bono work.
Timing of written agreement execution
Questioning regarding whether a written agreement was executed before or after December 30th, 2014.
Legal representation and public record
The witness discusses the credibility of David Boies based on his work in Bush v. Gore and notes his representation of Virginia Roberts.
A trip for students to New Mexico
Jeffrey Epstein called the witness to propose a trip for 20-25 students. The witness asked about accommodations and chaperones, and Epstein stated his 'wife' Ghislaine would chaperone the girls.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition or hearing.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness is questioned about their past MySpace profile.
No Subject
The witness states she told Jeffrey Epstein she was 18.
No Subject
The witness gave a statement to Detective Pagan about her interaction with Jeffrey Epstein, which is the subject of the deposition questioning.
No Subject
The witness is questioned about sending a message to a friend on MySpace. The questioning attorney implies it contained a racial slur, which the witness denies.
No Subject
The questioner asks if anyone called or e-mailed the witness to induce them to engage in sexual activity with Epstein. The witness denied this.
No Subject
The witness gave a statement to Detective Pagan about the interaction with Epstein, allegedly stating they said their age 'really fast'.
No Subject
The witness told Epstein they were 18.
No Subject
The witness sent a message to a friend on MySpace. The message referred to the ongoing deposition. The questioning attorney, Mr. Tein, implies the message contained the offensive term 'n-i-g-g-e-r', which the witness denies.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks if 'anyone call or e-mail you to induce you to engage in sexual activity with Epstein?' The witness denies this.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition where Mr. Tein questions the witness.
No Subject
MR. TEIN questions THE WITNESS about an incident involving evading service from Mr. Epstein's process servers, with MR. LEOPOLD representing the witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity