Unidentified Attorney (Q)
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
DOJ-OGR-00014916.jpg
This is page 40 of a court transcript (Document 782, filed Jan 15, 2025) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, Rocchio (likely Dr. Lisa Rocchio), is under direct examination discussing the differences between clinical and forensic psychology roles, specifically noting that in a clinical setting, she does not verify the truth of a victim's report via external evidence like newspaper articles. She testifies that there is 'remarkable consistency' regarding grooming tactics across her clinical work, forensic work, and scientific literature.
DOJ-OGR-00014905.jpg
This document is page 29 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Jan 15, 2025) featuring the direct examination of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio establishes their credentials as an expert in psychology, specifically regarding traumatic stress and complex trauma. The testimony focuses on the nature of childhood sexual abuse, with the expert stating that most instances occur without physical force (using coercion/control) and are committed by people known to the child.
DOJ-OGR-00014891.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, identified as Rocchio (Dr. Lisa Rocchio), is testifying on direct examination about her professional background. She distinguishes her clinical practice, which focuses on treatment and therapy, from her forensic practice, which involves investigative roles, expert testimony, and objective evaluations in civil and criminal cases involving traumatic stress.
DOJ-OGR-00019052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, a pilot. Rodgers testifies that he kept his own personal pilot logbook and did not send it to Ghislaine (Maxwell), nor did he have reason to believe she reviewed flight manifests or knew which passengers were on flights she did not attend. The questioning then shifts to the ownership of Mr. Epstein's planes (a Gulfstream and a Boeing) between 1994 and 2004, specifically regarding their ownership by LLCs.
DOJ-OGR-00019047.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the pilot's practice of maintaining passenger manifests and keeping track of passenger counts, distinguishing between FAA requirements and his personal practice. It specifically references 'Government's Exhibit 662,' which is identified as the witness's pilot logbook.
DOJ-OGR-00019042.jpg
A transcript page from the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by case number). The defense attorney attempts to refresh Rodgers' recollection using a document regarding Sarah Kellen taking over as Jeffrey Epstein's primary assistant in late 2001. There is some confusion regarding which specific page and paragraph the witness should be reading.
DOJ-OGR-00019005.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely pilot David Rodgers). The testimony focuses on the methodology of flight log numbering, specifically distinguishing between flights taken on a Boeing 727 (B727-31) versus a Gulf Stream (G1159B). Specific flights discussed include Flight 24 (Boeing), Flight 1538 (Gulf Stream), and Flight 1433, which occurred on December 11, 2000.
DOJ-OGR-00019003.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot). The testimony confirms flight details from 1996, specifically identifying Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell as passengers on flights between Palm Beach, Teterboro, and Santa Fe. Notably, the testimony highlights a flight on May 22, 1996, where Epstein and Maxwell were the only two passengers.
DOJ-OGR-00018975.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a pilot named Rodgers. Rodgers describes the fleet of aircraft owned by his employer between 1991 and 2004, specifically listing a Hawker Siddeley 125, Gulfstream G2B, Cessna 421, and Boeing 727. The questioning focuses on the physical layout of the Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft, establishing that doors separating the cockpit from the passenger areas prevented the pilot from observing passenger activities.
DOJ-OGR-00018890.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of Gill Velez, the Human Resources Director for Florida Properties Management, which manages the Mar-a-Lago Club. Velez testifies about their 15-year tenure, duties involving employment processes, and the storage of employee records in physical paper files.
DOJ-OGR-00018850.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, identified as Carolyn, is under redirect examination. She testifies that she was 13 years old when she first saw Ghislaine Maxwell and when she first visited Jeffrey Epstein's house. She denies that anyone told her what to say on the stand and the questioning cuts off as she is asked if she is testifying for money.
DOJ-OGR-00018709.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She describes the routine of visiting Epstein's house, going upstairs to his bathroom to set up a massage table, and removing her clothing. She testifies that while she initially kept her underwear on during massages, this eventually changed to her being 'fully nude.'
DOJ-OGR-00018686.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Carolyn testifies that she grew up in New York, moved to Florida in 1999, dropped out of school in the seventh grade, and has struggled with addiction to pain pills and cocaine.
DOJ-OGR-00018675.jpg
This page is a transcript from the cross-examination of a forensic expert named Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony focuses on technical details of how computer file dates are auto-populated by the system clock and how forensic examiners access data via cloned images and forensic software to bypass operating system password protections.
DOJ-OGR-00018642.jpg
This document is a page from a cross-examination transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Meder is being questioned about their role in copying and reviewing large sets of photographs (approx. 18,000 to 20,000) from CDs and black binders. The questioning attorney establishes that Meder has no personal knowledge of who took the photos or how they were placed on the CDs, despite Meder noting that some binders contained initials.
DOJ-OGR-00018508.jpg
This document is page 171 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named McHugh, focusing on the definitions and distinctions between 'signatory authority' and 'power of attorney' regarding bank accounts. The questioning establishes that an account holder can authorize others to sign checks or hold power of attorney over their finances.
DOJ-OGR-00018424.jpg
This document is page 87 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on a television appearance Kate made with approximately six other women to discuss allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney questions the nature of their interaction, suggesting they appeared as a 'sisterhood' or were affectionate, while Kate clarifies she had only met the other women the day prior at a court appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00018415.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her past modeling work in Europe (Milan, Paris, London) and her subsequent move to the United States on an 'extraordinary ability' visa.
DOJ-OGR-00018403.jpg
This document is page 66 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). A witness testifying under the pseudonym 'Kate' describes being interviewed by the government and the FBI in August 2019 regarding her experiences with Maxwell and Epstein. She explains that while she spoke publicly that same day, she withheld specific details due to feelings of humiliation and shame.
DOJ-OGR-00018392.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named 'Kate'. She testifies that she worked as a musician and model, and that Epstein initiated sexual activity with her starting at age 17 and continuing into her early thirties. She states this occurred 'every time' they were together, including sexualized massages in London, Palm Beach, and on his island.
DOJ-OGR-00016871.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Healy. The questioning establishes that Healy never visited Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house, only visited the New York residence to drop off documents without entering, visited Zorro Ranch exactly once, and never flew on Epstein's private planes or traveled with him.
DOJ-OGR-00016354.jpg
This page is from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a past event where the witness went shopping and horseback riding, specifically establishing that Jeffrey Epstein bought her cowboy boots. The defense attorney highlights that the witness kept these boots for 25 years and wore them in recent years.
DOJ-OGR-00016334.jpg
This document is page 118 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer), focusing on how she reconstructed her memory of a specific trip occurring in April 1996 by referencing the movie 'Primal Fear' and her prom. The page concludes with an objection from Ms. Pomerantz regarding mischaracterization by the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00016306.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer regarding a meeting with the FBI and prosecutors in September 2019. The questioning focuses on whether the witness used a personal journal to refresh her memory regarding a 'movie theater incident' and her age during a trip to New York (which the witness momentarily confused with New Mexico).
DOJ-OGR-00016299.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (likely Annie Farmer) during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney questions Farmer to establish that Maxwell was not present during a specific conversation at Epstein's home and highlights Farmer's financial motivations by confirming she filed a civil lawsuit against Maxwell and a claim with the Victims Compensation Fund. Farmer confirms Maxwell's absence during the specific conversation but states she does not remember if Maxwell was mentioned by Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity