Unidentified Attorney (Q)
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Rocchio
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
DOJ-OGR-00016295.jpg
This document is page 79 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) detailing the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The testimony confirms that Farmer traveled to New York to visit her sister Maria and to meet Mr. Epstein, who purchased her ticket. The witness confirms staying at her sister's apartment in 'the Village' and a ski cabin, explicitly denying staying at Epstein's home, while also mentioning attending performances like the Blue Man Group and 'The Dutchess'.
DOJ-OGR-00016231.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Brown, a supervisor/investigator familiar with Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) practices. The testimony details the standard procedure for obtaining an identification card, including the requirement to provide original documentation such as social security cards, passports, and birth certificates for verification.
DOJ-OGR-00019156.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Chapell. The testimony focuses on an invoice regarding a package shipment picked up on October 7, 2002. The defense attorney establishes that the sender listed was Cecilia Steen and explicitly confirms with the witness that Cecilia Steen is not Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016708.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Aznaran, a CBP officer. The testimony focuses on the reliability of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) travel records prior to September 11, 2001. Aznaran testifies that pre-9/11, airline submission of manifests to the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) was voluntary, meaning CBP records would 'not necessarily' reflect all inbound or outbound travel during that period.
DOJ-OGR-00016637.jpg
This document is page 154 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination testimony of an expert witness named Loftus regarding memory science. Loftus explains the concepts of 'confidence malleability' and 'prestige enhancing memory distortion,' describing how humans often inaccurately remember themselves in a more positive light without intending to lie.
DOJ-OGR-00016618.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of expert witness Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. Loftus testifies about the fallibility of memory, specifically explaining 'rich false memories' and how scientific studies have successfully planted entire false events into people's minds, such as being attacked by an animal or nearly drowning.
DOJ-OGR-00016612.jpg
This document is page 129 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. The text features direct examination testimony from a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus) discussing the suggestiveness of psychotherapy, the creation of false memories through recovered memory therapy, and the psychological concept of 'labeling' altering perception of ambiguous stimuli.
DOJ-OGR-00016608.jpg
This document is page 125 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the psychology of memory, specifically the 'retention stage,' and how 'post-event suggestion' and misinformation can contaminate, alter, or distort a witness's memory over time.
DOJ-OGR-00016596.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the 'misinformation effect' in memory science, describing experiments where witnesses to simulated accidents incorporate false post-event information (such as a yield sign replacing a stop sign) into their memories, rendering them inaccurate.
DOJ-OGR-00016595.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on establishing her credentials as a psychologist in the field of memory science, detailing her career since receiving her Ph.D. in 1970, including publishing over 20 books and 600 scientific articles. The document is stamped with DOJ-OGR-00016595.
DOJ-OGR-00016591.jpg
This document is page 108 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Elizabeth Loftus), who testifies about her numerous academic awards from the Association for Psychological Science and the American Psychological Association. She further describes her career research, noting she has conducted hundreds of experiments specifically focused on human memory.
DOJ-OGR-00016590.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus, who is discussing their professional credentials. Loftus notes their CV is 47 pages long and highlights their election to the National Academy of Sciences in 2004 as a significant honor.
DOJ-OGR-00016577.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Sud. The testimony focuses on the witness's role at Shoppers Travel, detailing the process of booking travel, billing customers via credit card or check, and recording invoices in the QuickBooks accounting system.
DOJ-OGR-00016450.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Swain during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The testimony focuses on a woman named Annie, detailing her travels to Thailand and Mexico, her attendance at an Ivy League college, and the fact that she worked to pay for her Thailand trip herself. Crucially, the defense establishes that Jeffrey Epstein did not pay for Annie's college education and questions the witness's knowledge of what Ghislaine Maxwell knew about Annie's movements.
DOJ-OGR-00016369.jpg
This document is page 153 of a court transcript from United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) regarding her memory of a massage where she was undressed. The defense questions inconsistencies in her recollection regarding whether she was wearing underwear, while Farmer confirms that Ghislaine Maxwell massaged her chest and upper breast.
DOJ-OGR-00013140.jpg
This document is a transcript of direct examination testimony from a witness named Carolyn, filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Carolyn testifies that she has not spoken to her ex-boyfriend, Sean, since their breakup regarding Epstein or her testimony. She confirms that she was interviewed by the FBI in 2007, where she identified an older woman with short black hair and an accent (Maxwell) at Epstein's residence during a visit with Virginia.
DOJ-OGR-00013101.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn, who testifies about moving from New York to Florida in 1999, dropping out of school in the seventh grade, and her history of addiction to pain pills and cocaine.
DOJ-OGR-00013088.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on digital forensics, specifically establishing that the witness cannot determine the physical 'geo location' (whether Florida, New York, or elsewhere) of a desktop computer used to create specific exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00013054.jpg
This document is page 41 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the cross-examination of a witness named Meder, focusing on the provenance of specific photographs entered into evidence. The questioning establishes that the witness testified about photos retrieved from CDs, rather than photos physically displayed on the walls of 'the house.'
DOJ-OGR-00013053.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Meder. The testimony focuses on the chain of custody and location of evidence, specifically CDs identified by '1B numbers,' which were found in various locations within a 'house,' including a potential third-floor closet. Meder confirms working for the government to verify these items but states they cannot recall the exact locations where specific CDs were found.
DOJ-OGR-00013988.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of expert witness Loftus. The testimony focuses on the suggestiveness of psychotherapy, the potential for creating false memories regarding childhood trauma, and the psychological concept of 'labeling' in relation to memory distortion.
DOJ-OGR-00013986.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an expert witness named Loftus (likely Elizabeth Loftus), who is testifying about memory contamination, the difference between open-ended and leading questions, and the impact of stress on memory. The witness advises using neutral questions to avoid contaminating a witness's memory and notes that stress is usually relevant to the time of the event itself rather than the interview environment.
DOJ-OGR-00013984.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Loftus (likely memory expert Dr. Elizabeth Loftus). The testimony focuses on the science of memory, specifically the 'retention stage,' and argues that as time passes, witnesses become more susceptible to 'post-event suggestion' which can contaminate, alter, or distort their memories.
DOJ-OGR-00013978.jpg
This document is page 119 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It captures a brief segment of direct examination testimony from an expert witness named Loftus (likely Dr. Elizabeth Loftus), confirming she has testified many times regarding the impact of post-event information on memory. The page contains very little text as the testimony continues on the next page.
DOJ-OGR-00013971.jpg
This document is page 112 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Loftus, a psychologist specializing in memory science, who testifies about receiving her Ph.D. in 1970 and publishing over 20 books and 600 scientific articles. The questioning attorney focuses on establishing the witness's credentials and the volume of her research.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity