Jane Doe
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Robson
|
Recruiter victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim alleged perpetrator |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Trump
|
Plaintiff defendant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Mother
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jonee' Edwards
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Victim abuser |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GLORIA ALLRED
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Assailant victim alleged |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Haley Robson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Robson
|
Facilitator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juan Alessi
|
Passenger driver |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Assailant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defendant Trump
|
Party attendee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Father
|
Familial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John Doe
|
Hypothetical comparison |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thomas F. Meagher
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe's Stepmother
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Facilitator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman on behalf of Jane Doe, her father, and stepmother against Jeffrey... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jane Doe dropped her lawsuit against Epstein due to parental squabbling. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's molestation of Jane Doe and other minors. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Exhaustive attempts by Jane Doe and other plaintiffs to obtain discovery from Epstein, including ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed complaints against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of two redacted clients ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of three minor girls | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley James Edwards filed state court actions on behalf of two redacted clients and a federal c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Intimidation of Jane Doe | Jane Doe's home/Hiding place | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe | Epstein's home (massage room) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of Jane Doe involving massage and specific sexual acts. | Epstein’s mansion in Palm B... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of RICO claim | Federal Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint, invoking his Fifth Amendment right to si... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein took Jane Doe's deposition, asking questions suggesting she is fabricating allega... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of Complaint for sexual assault and abuse. | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of state and federal court actions against Jeffrey Epstein. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein sexually abused three clients of Edwards (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein filed a summary judgment motion regarding federal nexus. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled the case before trial. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acting classes | Herbert Berkoff Studios and... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voice lessons | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Taking of photographs of minor Plaintiff without her knowledge | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car trips for Doe driven by Decedent's drivers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal activity | Defendants allegedly participated in an enterprise and a pattern of criminal activity, including ... | Florida | View |
| N/A | Recruitment and assault | Ms. Robson recruited Jane Doe and brought her to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane Doe was in... | Epstein's mansion in Palm B... | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029885.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, between paralegal Jessica Cadwell (of Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP) and Jacquie Johnson. The conversation concerns the 'Jane Doe' case and specifically inquires about the status of serving a subpoena to 'Maxwell' (Ghislaine Maxwell). The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029884.jpg
An email chain from August 11, 2009, involving paralegal Jessica Cadwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Jacquie Johnson. The subject line references 'Jane Doe.' Most of the content between Cadwell and Epstein is redacted under privilege, but a visible message from Jacquie Johnson states, 'Yes – we are still trying to get the details though.' The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029881.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 2009 between paralegals Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding the scheduling of depositions in the 'Jane Doe' case. The emails confirm that Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition was rescheduled to September 23, 2009, and explicitly state that Mr. Trump's deposition was scheduled for August 18, 2009. The chain also discusses issues with serving a subpoena on Maxwell and the filing of an emergency protective order.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029860.jpg
A 2017 Palm Beach Post article reveals that Jeffrey Epstein paid a total of $5.5 million to settle lawsuits with three young women (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) represented by attorney Bradley Edwards. The specific settlement amounts ($1M, $2M, and $2.5M) were disclosed in court documents after Epstein's attorneys compelled Edwards to answer questions in a related lawsuit. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee release.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029398.jpg
A Law.com article published on October 10, 2016, reporting that high-profile Florida attorney J. Cheney Mason has filed court papers to represent a 'Jane Doe' plaintiff. The suit alleges that Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein raped the plaintiff when she was a 13-year-old girl. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029322.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, arguing that adverse inferences should be drawn from Jeffrey Epstein's refusal to answer questions during legal proceedings. It lists specific questions Epstein refused to answer regarding procuring minors for prostitution, sexual assaults on private planes, and assaults on victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. The document asserts that the reasonable inference is that these allegations are true and that Epstein's counter-claims against attorney Mr. Edwards were motivated by extortion and malice.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029321.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's use of the Fifth Amendment and obstructionist tactics (including securing lawyers for staff who recruited girls) creates an adverse inference of guilt. It states that attorney Bradley Edwards was pursuing discovery to prove Epstein was a 'serial molester' and discusses the admissibility of evidence regarding Epstein's abuse of other minors to establish modus operandi. The document cites case law supporting the use of adverse inferences in civil cases when a party refuses to testify.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029319.jpg
This document, dated September 12, 2013, is a legal defense of attorney Edwards against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. It argues that Edwards did not 'pump' cases to investors, noting that he filed complaints against Epstein long before meeting Scott Rothstein or joining RRA. The text highlights that Epstein settled three cases (including one for 'Jane Doe') in July 2010 for significant sums via court-ordered mediation presided over by Judge Kenneth A. Marra, and that the Florida Bar dismissed Epstein's ethics complaint against Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029318.jpg
This document, dated September 12, 2013, appears to be a legal filing or summary defending attorney Bradley Edwards against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. The text refutes Epstein's allegations that Edwards was involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein, noting that Epstein failed to provide evidence during deposition and instead invoked attorney-client privilege. It also details that Edwards represents three victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) in civil suits against Epstein for sexual abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029316.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, likely a brief supporting attorney Edwards' Motion for Summary Judgment against Jeffrey Epstein. The text argues that Epstein cannot sue Edwards for damages while simultaneously asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege ('sword and shield' doctrine) to avoid answering questions about his sexual abuse of minors, including specific allegations by victims L.M. and Jane Doe. It also reveals that Epstein settled three cases handled by Edwards for confidential amounts that were not of 'minimal value,' contradicting his own claims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029315.jpg
A legal letter from Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley P.A. to mediator Alvin Capp regarding the case 'Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein.' The letter defends attorney Bradley Edwards against a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein, characterizing Epstein's suit as a 'vengeful assault' and 'extortion.' It details Epstein's allegations that Edwards conspired with Scott Rothstein to use sexual assault cases (involving victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) to fuel a Ponzi scheme.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025940.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal declaration filed on June 20, 2016, in Case 1:16-cv-04642, signed by 'Jane Doe' under penalty of perjury. The plaintiff alleges that both Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein threatened to kill her and her family if she revealed details of sexual abuse, with Trump specifically threatening she would 'disappear' like a specific 12-year-old girl (name redacted). The plaintiff requests a protective order, citing recent threatening phone calls received after filing a complaint in California.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014073.jpg
This document is a page from a legal academic article (Vol. 104, likely by Paul Cassell) analyzing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details that the FBI found abuse allegations against Epstein credible and presented the case to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Florida, which then negotiated a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. The text argues that victims should have been notified and allowed to confer with prosecutors once substantial evidence was developed, rather than being excluded from the plea negotiation process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021974.jpg
This document is a scanned excerpt (page 116) from a book, likely by James Patterson, stamped as evidence for House Oversight. It details the background of Ghislaine Maxwell, including her father Robert Maxwell's fraud and death, her move to NYC, and her evolving relationship with Jeffrey Epstein from lover to procurer. The text also introduces a victim, Nadia Bjorlin (referred to as Nadia B.), who met Epstein while attending school in Michigan.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021542.jpg
This document is an FBI file copy of a March 18, 2008, Palm Beach Post article. It details a civil lawsuit filed in state court by a 17-year-old 'Jane Doe' against Jeffrey Epstein, his recruiter Haley Robson, and his assistant Sarah Kellen, alleging conspiracy, racketeering, and sexual assault stemming from incidents in 2005. The article notes that Robson admitted to police she acted 'like a Heidi Fleiss' and mentions Epstein's upcoming criminal trial for solicitation of prostitution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021525.jpg
This document is a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated February 27, 2008, reporting that a girl (Jane Doe) dropped her lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy money manager, due to squabbling between her divorced parents. The article details allegations of sexual activity with Jane Doe when she was 14, other accusations against Epstein, and the legal history of the involved parties, including Epstein's 2006 indictment for felony solicitation of prostitution and the father's 2001 federal fraud conviction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021524.jpg
This newspaper clipping details the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on civil lawsuits filed by two 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs. It highlights a family conflict where the mother of the first Jane Doe is trying to halt the lawsuit filed by the father, citing the daughter's estrangement from him. The article also mentions Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew), the defense strategy led by Alan Dershowitz involving Myspace evidence, and attorney Herman's press conference at the bridge used to transport recruited girls.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021523.jpg
This document is an FBI filing (Form FD-350) containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated February 1, 2008. The article details a second civil lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein in two weeks, seeking over $50 million for sexual acts committed against a minor (Jane Doe No. 2) in 2004 or 2005 at his Palm Beach mansion. The article outlines the recruitment method involving another girl, the specific allegations of sexual contact during a massage, and a $200 payment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021522.jpg
A newspaper article details a lawsuit alleging that Jeffrey Epstein paid a minor $300 for sexual acts after she was recruited by Haley Robson. The article discusses the police investigation, Epstein's indictment on solicitation charges, and mentions other lawsuits and allegations regarding his properties in Palm Beach and the Virgin Islands.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021521.jpg
This document is an FBI FD-350 form containing a newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post dated January 25, 2008. The article reports on a federal lawsuit filed by attorney Jeffrey Herman on behalf of a 14-year-old girl ('Jane Doe') and her parents against Jeffrey Epstein, seeking over $50 million for alleged sexual assault in 2005. The article details the allegations, including Epstein's preference for minors, and describes a counter-strategy by Epstein's legal team (Goldberger, Sanchez, Lefcourt) to discredit the plaintiffs by highlighting the parents' criminal history and alleging financial motivation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, primarily between legal professionals and Jeffrey Epstein. Jessica Cadwell, a paralegal at Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman, LLP, corresponds with Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com) regarding a subject line 'Jane Doe'. The body text of the emails involving Epstein is redacted as privileged, but a lower email from Jacquie Johnson to Cadwell remains visible, stating, 'Yes – we are still trying to get the details though.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 11, 2009, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email jeevacation@gmail.com), paralegal Jessica Cadwell, and Jacquie Johnson. The subject line references 'Jane Doe,' and while the content of the discussion between Epstein and his legal team is redacted as privileged, Jacquie Johnson notes they are 'still trying to get the details.' The document originates from the House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.jpg
This document is an email chain ending on November 5, 2016, between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). Epstein forwarded Ruemmler an automated court notification regarding the voluntary dismissal of a lawsuit filed by a 'Jane Doe' against Donald Trump in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA). Ruemmler responded with the subject line 'Re: told you,' though the body of her response is redacted for privilege.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032332.jpg
This document is an automated 'Notice of Electronic Filing' from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 4, 2016. It confirms that in the case 'Doe v. Trump et al' (Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA), the plaintiff Jane Doe, through attorney Thomas Meagher, filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal against all defendants. The notice was electronically mailed to attorney Michael C. Miller.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.jpg
This is a court order filed on October 4, 2016, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, regarding a civil case (No. 16 CV-7673) filed by a 'Jane Doe' against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein. Judge Ronnie Abrams orders an initial status conference for December 16, 2016, and requires the parties to submit a joint letter by December 9, 2016, outlining the nature of the action, jurisdiction, motions, and discovery status. The document bears a footer indicating it is part of House Oversight committee records.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Plaintiff was enticed by "promises of money" to... | View |
| N/A | Received | employer | Jane Doe | $100,000.00 | Hypothetical salary for absolute income example | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Epstein chose to settle the case before trial. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/E... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Cash payments | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Mention of intent to give massage for monetary ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | monetary com[pensation] for a massage (implied ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Promise of payment for a massage (pretense for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Defendant intended to pay cash in exchange for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for massage mentioned in complaint | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $200.00 | Fee paid on each occasion after Epstein ejacula... | View |
| 2017-10-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $2,500,000.00 | Settlement payment. | View |
| 2016-06-20 | Paid | Jane Doe | U.S. District Cou... | $400.00 | Filing Fee for Complaint (Receipt Number 0208-1... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe | $300.00 | Payment for 'massage' (sexual acts). | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-11-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-10-12 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-10-09 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-08-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-07-30 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Mr. Epstein (impl... | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff documented in End... | View |
| 2004-06-07 | Received | Epstein/Kellen | Jane Doe | $0.00 | Payment received by Plaintiff for alleged acts | View |
Declaration of Plaintiff Jane Doe, Exhibit A
A written declaration by the plaintiff, submitted as Exhibit A in the case.
Criticism of plea bargain
Criticism of the unduly lenient plea bargain Epstein received.
Criticism of Plea Bargain
Jane Doe exercised First Amendment rights to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
N/A
Phone records showing calls made by Indyke to Jane Doe
Instructions
Told her to remove her clothes; later told her to write down her name and phone number.
Massage Request
Epstein called Doe over the telephone requesting a massage for payment, which was a fraudulent pretense for sexual acts.
Investigation Interview
Jane Doe met with Pagan approximately 10-12 times regarding the case.
Police Report
Witness admits to lying to police about who was in the car with her when she went to Epstein's house.
No Subject
Plaintiff believes she communicated with Kelly Bovino Umekubo.
Money and modeling career
Plaintiff was enticed with promises of money and a modeling career to attend parties.
Criticism of Epstein plea bargain
A victim appeared on TV to criticize the unduly lenient plea bargain.
Silence
Threatened that she would disappear like a specific 12-year-old female if she spoke out.
Defense
Questions suggesting Jane Doe is fabricating allegations.
Victim Statement
A statement read by Ms. Moe describing Maxwell's manipulation and role in Epstein's abuse.
Victim Statement
Written statement read aloud by Ms. Moe describing abuse by Maxwell and Epstein.
Victim impact statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein
Jane Doe provides a statement to the court detailing her sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein in 2004 at Zorro Ranch when she was 15 years old. She describes the psychological manipulation and trauma she endured.
Threats
Short threatening calls (approx 20 seconds) received after filing the initial complaint.
Investigators at their homes
Investigators were knocking on their doors trying to talk about Jane Doe.
Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo...
Plaintiff's request to secure Alfredo Rodriguez for testimony.
Deposition Preparation
Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.
Solicitation
Scheduling times for Plaintiff to appear at Epstein's home for 'massages' or sexual services.
No Subject
Threatening call stating Jane Doe owed Decedent $10,000 for rent paid on her apartment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity