RICHARD D. KAHN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor |
78
Very Strong
|
74 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Executor |
49
Very Strong
|
49 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor of estate |
22
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Client |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Bennet J. Moskowitz
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Executor of estate |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Executor |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor representative |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Executor of estate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor deceased |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Co executors |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Mary S. Dirago
|
Client |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Co defendants |
4
|
4 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Executor |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Maria Farmer
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Mary "Molly" S. Dirago
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Charles L. Glover
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Mary S. Dirago
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Teresa Helm
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Estate executor |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Valerie Sirota
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Professional |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Charles L. Glover
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Executor administrator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-19 | N/A | Dismissal of Complaint | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2022-12-20 | N/A | Filing of Motion to Withdraw Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2022-12-20 | N/A | Order filed granting the withdrawal of the Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2022-08-01 | N/A | Filing of Co-Executors' Supplemental Brief. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2021-11-09 | N/A | Proposed end date for the requested sixty-day stay of action. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-11-05 | N/A | Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice filed | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-09-06 | N/A | Deadline for Defendants to move, answer, or respond to the Complaint. | Court Filing | View |
| 2021-09-06 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Co-Executors' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-08-13 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Bennet J. Moskowitz | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-04-02 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Gordon C. Rhea | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed and ordered. | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-04-01 | N/A | Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed; Maria Farmer dismisses action against Epstein Estate execu... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-03-29 | N/A | Brief filed by Co-Executors (referenced in text). | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2021-03-29 | N/A | Filing of the Brief Pursuant to Court's March 17, 2021 Order. | Superior Court of the Virgi... | View |
| 2020-12-08 | N/A | Case Dismissed with Prejudice | SDNY Court | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Dismissal of lawsuit with prejudice following resolution via compensation program | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Submission of Status Report | New York | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Submission of Joint Status Report via ECF | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-10-15 | N/A | Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-10-01 | N/A | Submission of Joint Status Report requesting a stay of the case. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action filed | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation to stay the action for 60 days. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-13 | N/A | Defendants served Supplemental Responses to Interrogatories | New York, NY | View |
015.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on September 9, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified as 'VE', is suing several Epstein-related entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, NES LLC) and individuals Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. This specific summons is addressed to NES, LLC in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands.
013.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action (Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN) filed on September 9, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff 'VE' is suing multiple defendants including Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., NES, LLC, Darren K. Indyke, and Richard D. Kahn. The summons is specifically directed to Nine East 71st Street Corporation, care of Darren K. Indyke.
006.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on August 27, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Brittany N. Henderson of Edwards Pottinger, LLC requests permission to represent Plaintiff 'VE' in a civil case against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and associated entities (Nine East 71st Street Corp, Financial Trust Company, NES LLC). Henderson certifies her good standing with the Florida bar.
004.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on August 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN). The plaintiff, identified only as 'VE', is requesting permission to proceed anonymously in a lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The defendants include Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as representatives of the estate, as well as Nine East 71st Street Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., and NES, LLC.
2023.10.03%20Response.pdf
In this May 2023 filing to the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, a pro se incarcerated Ghislaine Maxwell requests a 180-day stay in her civil suit for indemnification against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues she needs time to find new counsel following her previous attorney's withdrawal, citing severe communication restrictions and lack of access to legal resources (computers, state case law) within FCI Tallahassee. She also argues the civil case should be paused pending the outcome of her criminal appeal (2nd Circuit Case 22-14626-CR) and cites a 2002 lawsuit (Shanks v. Wexner) as evidence that Epstein historically indemnified her for legal costs.
2023.09.19%20Proposed%20Order.pdf
A court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated September 19, 2023, dismissing Ghislaine Maxwell's complaint against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, executors Indyke and Kahn, and NES, LLC. The dismissal was granted based on a failure to prosecute or alternatively to compel the plaintiff to appear pro se. The order is signed by Presiding Judge Harold W.L. Willocks.
2023.02.15%20Order%20Scheduling%20Hearing.pdf
This document is a court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on February 15, 2023, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein et al. The order schedules a remote hearing for March 17, 2023, to determine if Maxwell intends to pursue her indemnification claims, noting that her previous attorney withdrew in September 2022 and she has not responded to prior orders. The court directs the order to be sent to FCI Tallahassee, where Maxwell is incarcerated, to facilitate her appearance via Microsoft Teams.
2023.02.15%20Notice%20of%20Entry%20of%20Judgment.pdf
This document is a Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, filed on February 15, 2023. It notifies Ghislaine Maxwell (Plaintiff) and various attorneys that an order was entered regarding case ST-2020-CV-00155, a debt action against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, his executors (Indyke and Kahn), and NES, LLC.
2022.09.08%20Notice%20of%20Entry%20of%20Judgment.pdf
A Notice of Entry of Order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on September 8, 2022. The document concerns a debt action (Case ST-2020-CV-00155) brought by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, his executors (Indyke and Kahn), and NES, LLC. The notice informs the listed attorneys that an order dated September 7, 2022, has been entered into the record.
2022.09.07%20Order%20Granting.pdf
This document is a court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated September 7, 2022, in the civil case of Ghislaine Maxwell vs. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein et al. The court granted the motion for Maxwell's attorneys (Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. and Kyle R. Waldner) to withdraw as counsel. The case was stayed for 60 days to allow Maxwell to find new representation, with instructions that all future legal correspondence be mailed directly to her at FCI Tallahassee.
2022.08.02%20Memorandum%20Of%20Law.pdf
This document is a Supplemental Brief filed on August 1, 2022, by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The brief supports a Motion to Dismiss Ghislaine Maxwell's complaint seeking indemnification from the Estate. The Co-Executors argue that because Maxwell was convicted of intentional criminal acts (sex trafficking and conspiracy) in the Southern District of New York on June 29, 2022, public policy prohibits enforcing any contract or equitable doctrine that would indemnify her for the financial consequences of her crimes.
2022.08.01%20Brief.pdf
This document is a legal brief filed by Ghislaine Maxwell in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell argues that Virgin Islands public policy does not prevent her from seeking indemnification (reimbursement) for legal fees and security costs incurred due to her employment with Epstein, despite her criminal conviction in New York (SDNY). She asserts claims based on contract promises, common law joint tortfeasor indemnity, and corporate indemnity laws regarding her role at NES, LLC.
2022.07.01%20Order%20Scheduling%20Hearing.pdf
Court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated July 1, 2022, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Staff Master Joseph T. Gasper schedules a remote status conference for July 29, 2022, to discuss case management, including a pending motion to intervene by the VI Government and a motion to dismiss by the Estate. The document references delays requested by Maxwell's counsel due to her criminal case in the Southern District of New York.
2022.03.09%20Hearing%20-%20Record%20Of%20Proceeding.pdf
Record of Proceedings from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated March 9, 2022, regarding a civil debt case (ST-2020-CV-00155) filed by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and its executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, as well as NES, LLC. The document details a status hearing presided over by Judge Harold W.L. Willocks, attended by attorneys Kyle R. Waldner and Christopher A. Kroblin. The court set a deadline of August 1, 2022, for the parties to file briefs.
2022.02.22%20Order%20Scheduling%20Hearing.pdf
A court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands dated February 22, 2022, in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein et al. (Case No. ST-2020-CV-00155). Judge Harold W.L. Willocks ordered a status conference to be held via Zoom on March 9, 2022. The defendants include Epstein's estate, his executors Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, and NES, LLC.
2021.04.13%20Reply%20Motion.pdf
This document is a 'Plaintiff's Reply to Co-Executors' Brief' filed on April 13, 2021, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands by Ghislaine Maxwell's legal team. Maxwell argues that her indemnification case against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein should not be transferred to the Complex Litigation Division nor assigned to the same judge handling the 'CICO action' (Government v. Indyke). She asserts that her case does not meet the criteria for complex litigation and shares no common facts or claims with the government's racketeering case against the executors.
2021.04.02%20Notice%20of%20Appearance.pdf
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on April 2, 2021, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands for Case No. ST-20-CV-155 (Ghislaine Maxwell v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein et al.). Attorney Gordon C. Rhea enters his appearance as counsel for Defendant Richard D. Kahn, who is an Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The document includes a Certificate of Service confirming the filing was served electronically to attorneys Kyle Waldner, Christopher Kroblin, Shari N. D’Andrade, and Carol Thomas-Jacobs.
2021.03.29%20Response%20to%20Order.pdf
This document is a legal brief filed on March 29, 2021, by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. The brief argues against designating Ghislaine Maxwell's lawsuit for legal fee indemnification as 'complex' litigation and opposes consolidating it with a separate government 'CICO action' (Case No. ST-2020-CV-00014). The Executors contend that Maxwell's case is a simple single-issue dispute, whereas the CICO action involves complex allegations of a multi-decade criminal enterprise.
2020.09.28%20Response%20to%20Opposition.pdf
This is a Reply Brief filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in response to a lawsuit by Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is suing the Estate and NES, LLC for indemnification (payment of her legal fees) related to her criminal and civil cases in New York. The Co-Executors argue the case should be dismissed because: 1) The claim is 'unripe' as her underlying guilt or innocence hasn't been established; 2) Public policy forbids indemnifying criminal conduct; 3) The NES Operating Agreement explicitly allows the company to decline indemnification; and 4) The Statute of Frauds bars claims based on alleged oral promises.
2020.09.22%20Reply%20Motion.pdf
This document is a Reply Brief filed by the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands supporting its motion to intervene in Ghislaine Maxwell's lawsuit against the Epstein Estate. The Government argues it must intervene to prevent the dissipation of Estate assets, which Maxwell seeks for her legal defense, because those assets are needed to satisfy potential judgments in the Government's separate 'CICO' (racketeering) enforcement action against the Estate. The brief reveals that the Estate is actively paying legal fees for other associates, including an immigration attorney suspected of obtaining visas for trafficking victims.
2020.07.30%20Stipulation%20For%20Extension%20of%20Time.pdf
This document is a legal stipulation filed on July 30, 2020, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands (Case ST-20-CV-155). It represents an agreement between Ghislaine Maxwell (Plaintiff) and the Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands (Proposed Intervenor) to extend the deadline for Maxwell to respond to the Government's Motion to Intervene until August 17, 2020. The document lists the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and his executors, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as defendants.
2020.07.13%20Motion%20to%20Intervene.pdf
This document is a Motion to Intervene filed by the Government of the US Virgin Islands in a civil case brought by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The Government seeks to intervene to prevent Maxwell from using the Estate's assets to pay for her legal defense (indemnification), arguing that those assets should be preserved to satisfy a potential judgment in the Government's separate CICO (racketeering) lawsuit against the Estate. The document details Maxwell's evasion of subpoenas prior to her arrest, the Government's interest in the Estate's assets for victim restitution and penalties, and the allegation that Maxwell and the Estate are colluding rather than being true adversaries. While flight logs are mentioned as existing evidence of trafficking, no specific flight records are contained within this specific motion.
2020.03.12%20Civil%20Complaint.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on March 12, 2020, by Ghislaine Maxwell against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and its executors, Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, as well as NES, LLC. Maxwell seeks indemnification for legal fees, security costs, and safe accommodation expenses she has incurred due to her prior employment with Epstein. The complaint alleges that Epstein repeatedly promised, both verbally and in writing (specifically in a 2004 letter), to support Maxwell financially and indemnify her, a practice he reportedly maintained during previous lawsuits in 2009 and 2017.
2022.12.20%20Notice%20-%20Proposed%20Order.pdf
This document is a court order from the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands filed on December 20, 2022. It grants a motion filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, to withdraw a previous motion for the award of attorneys' fees.
2022.12.20%20Motion%20-%20Motion.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on December 20, 2022, in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn). They are moving to withdraw a previous motion for attorneys' fees because a resolution was reached in a related case (Govt of USVI v. Epstein Estate et al., ST-2020-CV-00014). The document includes a certificate of service listing government officials and attorneys served with this motion.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity