PAUL G. CASSELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co authors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Susan Baca
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co plaintiffs |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Trish Regan
|
Spousal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 4
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Keli Luther
|
Professional correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ann Bauer
|
Professional clerkship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Twist
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Douglas E. Beloof
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 3
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel plaintiffs |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Crime Victims' Rights Movement
|
Academic advocate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 2
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Professional co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel co plaintiffs |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Co counsel for |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lisa Collins
|
Certifier subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | Northwestern University Sch... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a motion for joinder in the CVRA action on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and 4. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Paul G. Cassell by Mr. Simpson regarding previous legal filings. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding Crime Victims' Rights Act | Journal of Criminal Law & C... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal proceeding appearances | Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... | N/A | View |
| 2017-03-16 | N/A | Original scheduled date for hearing on Edwards Subpoena | New York, NY | View |
| 2017-03-15 | N/A | Medical procedure for Paul Cassell involving general anesthesia | Salt Lake City, UT | View |
| 2017-03-13 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Paul G. Cassell | Salt Lake City, Utah (Signe... | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Determine Confidentiality | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Deposition of Paul G. Cassell | Unknown (facilitated by Esq... | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Videotaped Deposition of Paul G. Cassell | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2015-07-31 | N/A | Follow-up inquiry regarding UK investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. | Correspondence between Utah... | View |
| 2015-03-11 | N/A | Paul G. Cassell acknowledged a foregoing instrument before Notary Susan Baca under oath. | Salt Lake County, Utah | View |
| 2015-01-06 | N/A | Filing of Complaint for Defamation against Alan Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-01-06 | N/A | Edwards and Cassell filed legal pleadings seeking intervention in CVRA action alleging Dershowitz... | Federal District Court, Sou... | View |
| 2010-11-23 | N/A | Order Granting Motion for Limited Appearance | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2010-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Limited Appearance and Certificate of Service in Case 9:10-CV-81111-WPD | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States (CVRA case). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Publication of the Utah Law Review article discussing victims' rights. | Utah (Publication) | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Tenure of Paul G. Cassell as a United States District Judge. | United States | View |
| 1992-05-27 | N/A | Paul G. Cassell admitted to practice law in the State of Utah. | Utah | View |
039.pdf
This legal filing is a Motion to Compel submitted by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests the court to order Epstein to answer 23 specific requests for admission regarding his net worth, asset transfers, and allegations of sexual abuse and trafficking of minors, which he had previously refused to answer by asserting Fifth Amendment privileges. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's blanket assertion of the privilege is improper and that he must provide a particularized justification for each refusal or face an adverse inference.
030.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Joinder' filed on June 8, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 join a motion for a no-contact order against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing alleges that Epstein's associate and recruiter, Hayley Robson, has been harassing victims Jane Does 4 and 7 through text messages and in-person threats while claiming to be financially supported by and cooperating with Epstein. The plaintiffs request a court order prohibiting Epstein from any direct or indirect contact with the victims.
082.pdf
This document is a Reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in November 2009 requesting a permanent order for the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The filing highlights that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including about 13 boxes related to Epstein cases, amidst concerns of 'serious ethical and potentially criminal issues' at the firm. The document also argues against delaying the deposition of RRA's Chief Restructuring Officer, Herbert Stettin, citing upcoming trial deadlines.
064.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Compliance' filed on July 28, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It pertains to multiple civil cases filed by 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs against Epstein. The filing states that while the court ordered the parties to agree on a preservation of evidence order, they were unable to reach a full agreement, leading Epstein to submit his own proposed order. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing the attorneys representing the various plaintiffs and defendants, including Sarah Kellen.
061.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The motion seeks to force Epstein to answer 23 specific Requests for Admission regarding his net worth (specifically if it exceeds $1 billion), his financial support of modeling agency MC2, his ownership of Caribbean property, and specific allegations of sexual battery, assault, and sex trafficking of minors. Epstein had previously refused to answer these questions by invoking his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
060.pdf
This is a Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Production filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. The motion seeks a court order requiring Epstein to answer 16 specific requests for production of documents (including telephone records, photos, tax returns, and passport copies) or to provide a privilege log, as Epstein has refused to produce documents by asserting a blanket Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The plaintiff argues that Epstein's boilerplate objections are invalid, violate local rules requiring a privilege log, and that he must provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation for each request.
045.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Joinder' filed on June 8, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 join a motion for a 'No-Contact Order' against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing alleges that Epstein's associate, Hayley Robson (who originally recruited the victims), has been harassing Jane Does 4 and 7 via text messages and in-person threats while claiming to be financially supported by Epstein. The plaintiffs argue that a court order is necessary to prevent Epstein from contacting or harassing victims through third parties like Robson.
012.pdf
This document is an Emergency Motion filed on June 14, 2010, by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team to quash a subpoena and prevent the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, scheduled for the following day. Epstein's lawyers argue that the subpoena issued by C.L.'s counsel (Spencer Kuvin) is premature under Rule 26(d) and that the cross-notice by Jane Doe's counsel (Brad Edwards) is invalid because discovery in the Jane Doe case had already concluded on May 31, 2010. The document includes the motion, a subpoena exhibit, and a cross-notice exhibit.
EFTA00030231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Gov't Says Epstein Victims Can't Scrap Nonprosecution Deal.' The article details the federal government's response to a lawsuit by Epstein's victims (Doe v. U.S.), where prosecutors argued that while the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) was violated by Alexander Acosta in 2008, the nonprosecution agreement cannot be undone. The government proposed a meeting and a public hearing for victims to be heard, a remedy the victims' lawyer Brad Edwards criticized as insufficient.
EFTA00029458.pdf
This document consists of an exchange of letters between Paul G. Cassell of the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law and an Assistant Commissioner at New Scotland Yard (Metropolitan Police). In the first letter (July 31, 2015), Cassell follows up on previous correspondence regarding allegations of international sex trafficking against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, offering his client's assistance in the investigation. In the response (August 10, 2015), the Metropolitan Police confirm they are progressing with the matter and request formal written confirmation that Cassell is legally authorized to represent the specific client involved.
EFTA00029457.pdf
A letter dated July 31, 2015, from Paul G. Cassell (University of Utah College of Law) to an Assistant Commissioner at New Scotland Yard. Cassell is following up on a previous correspondence from May 2015 regarding an investigation into international sex trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. He reiterates his client's (name redacted) offer to assist with the investigation.
EFTA00028850.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing held on April 21, 2016, before Judge Robert W. Sweet in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The proceedings cover motions to admit attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell pro hac vice, which the defense contested citing potential conflicts from related Florida litigation. The hearing also addresses discovery disputes, including the production of the plaintiff's medical records, tax returns, employment history, and communications with law enforcement. No flight logs or aircraft data are contained in this document.
EFTA00027776.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
EFTA00027770.pdf
This document is an email from May 2019 forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Epstein Victims Demand Apology From Prosecutors'. The article details how two victims (Jane Does) requested a Florida federal court to nullify the 2008 non-prosecution agreement signed by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, arguing it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims sought nullification of the deal, a reopening of the criminal case, an apology, and a hearing with Acosta and Epstein present.
EFTA00022960.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team objecting to the unsealing of specific docket entries (143, 173, 199, 164, and 230) in the civil case brought by Virginia Giuffre. The defense argues that these documents contain sensitive information regarding non-parties ('Does'), inadmissible hearsay, and prejudicial materials such as flight logs and police reports that were improperly filed to bias the court. The filing emphasizes the need to protect the privacy of non-parties and the integrity of ongoing criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's conduct.
EFTA00022546.pdf
This document is a Reply Brief filed by victims Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's intervention brief regarding remedies for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims argue for the partial rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed in 2007, specifically the immunity provisions, on the grounds that the agreement was illegally concealed from victims in violation of the CVRA. The brief refutes Epstein's arguments regarding due process, contract law, estoppel, and separation of powers, asserting that the NPA is unenforceable due to its illegal formation and the government's failure to confer with victims.
EFTA00013926.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by attorneys for victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) in the Jeffrey Epstein case, arguing that the U.S. Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The filing details how the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI secretly entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein in September 2007 while misleading victims for months that the investigation was ongoing and that federal charges were still possible. The motion requests the court to order the government to produce the full Non-Prosecution Agreement and FBI interview reports, and to schedule a hearing to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00013570.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by victims of Jeffrey Epstein (Jane Doe #1 and #2) against the United States Government. The victims allege violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically that the government entered into a secret Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein in September 2007 without conferring with them and actively misled them into believing a federal investigation was ongoing. The filing requests the court to order the production of the NPA and an FBI interview report, and to schedule a hearing to determine remedies for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00010542.pdf
This document is the United States Government's legal response to proposed remedies by victims (Petitioners) of Jeffrey Epstein following a court finding that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with them before entering a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The government admits its communication with victims was insufficient but argues against the Petitioners' request to partially rescind the NPA, citing contract law, potential harm to other victims relying on the agreement, and separation of powers. Instead, the government proposes holding a public hearing for victim impact statements, arranging meetings between victims and DOJ representatives, and mandating additional training for prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00030279.tif
This document is a page from a court filing, Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM, dated September 17, 2009, listing multiple attorneys and their respective law firms, contact information, and the specific related cases they represent plaintiffs in. It details legal counsel for various plaintiffs, including 'Jane Doe' and 'C.M.A.', across several related case numbers, providing contact details for each attorney and their firm.
DOJ-OGR-00015113.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 18 of 27) of a legal filing submitted to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer in Case 1:20-cr-00330. Attorneys Bradley Edwards, Brittany Henderson, and Paul G. Cassell argue for the protection of victim rights under the CVRA, specifically requesting privacy protections and victim participation regarding the release of grand jury materials. The filing date listed in the header is August 6, 2025.
DOJ-OGR-00008284.jpg
This document is an appearances page from a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 9, 2021. It lists the names, roles, and affiliations of the attorneys and a paralegal representing the Plaintiff, and the attorneys representing the Defendant. A videographer is also noted as being present for the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00010703.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from June 25, 2022, argues that the Court should allow victims of Maxwell's sex trafficking conspiracy to speak at her sentencing. The author contends that allowing victim impact statements provides a cathartic benefit, promotes transparency regarding the conspiracy, and is a legally recognized right for victims. The document cites legal precedent to support the claim that a victim's right to speak is important regardless of its effect on the final sentence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019297.jpg
A legal letter dated February 7, 2018, from the law firm Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, representing intervenor Alan Dershowitz in the Giuffre v. Maxwell case. The letter is addressed to attorneys J. Stanley Pottinger, Paul G. Cassell, Sigrid S. McCawley, and Laura A. Menninger. The correspondence begins an allegation that the plaintiff's counsel improperly leaked submissions from a pending disciplinary proceeding to the Washington Post.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on a victim's right to attend court proceedings and be heard. The text analyzes the rationale behind allowing victims to be present during trials and cites various state constitutions and federal rules (Rule 615). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal research or an exhibit in proceedings related to the investigation of the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, likely concerning the violation of victims' rights.
Direct Examination
Initial questioning establishing the witness's background as a former US District Judge.
Unknown
Letter regarding victims' rights/rules of evidence
Invitation to confer
Invitation for Petitioners to meet with U.S. Attorney Pak in person to share thoughts on the matter.
Giuffre v. Maxwell - Regarding Continuance of Hearing on ...
Requesting a one-week continuance for a hearing due to medical reasons.
Declaration of Paul G. Cassell Support of Application for...
Formal declaration of good standing and lack of criminal/disciplinary record for bar admission.
Response to July 31st Letter
Confirming the matter is progressing; requesting signed confirmation of legal representation from the client.
International Sex Trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghis...
Follow-up on previous correspondence regarding an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell; reiterating client's offer to help.
International Sex Trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghis...
Follow-up regarding investigation status and reiterating client's offer to help.
Unknown
Indicated they would look into the matter and be back in touch.
Initial response
Referenced in the July 31 letter; indicated they would look into the matter.
Unknown (implied same topic)
Initial letter sent regarding the client.
Initial correspondence
Referenced in the July 31 letter.
Notices of Electronic Filing
Authorization for Paul G. Cassell to receive electronic notifications at cassellp@law.utah.edu
Unknown
Regarding the need to change a sentencing recommendation after seeing a presentence report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity