PAUL G. CASSELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co authors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Susan Baca
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co plaintiffs |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Trish Regan
|
Spousal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 4
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Keli Luther
|
Professional correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ann Bauer
|
Professional clerkship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Twist
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Douglas E. Beloof
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 3
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel plaintiffs |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Crime Victims' Rights Movement
|
Academic advocate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 2
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Professional co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel co plaintiffs |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Co counsel for |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lisa Collins
|
Certifier subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | Northwestern University Sch... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a motion for joinder in the CVRA action on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and 4. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Paul G. Cassell by Mr. Simpson regarding previous legal filings. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding Crime Victims' Rights Act | Journal of Criminal Law & C... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal proceeding appearances | Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... | N/A | View |
| 2017-03-16 | N/A | Original scheduled date for hearing on Edwards Subpoena | New York, NY | View |
| 2017-03-15 | N/A | Medical procedure for Paul Cassell involving general anesthesia | Salt Lake City, UT | View |
| 2017-03-13 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Paul G. Cassell | Salt Lake City, Utah (Signe... | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Determine Confidentiality | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Deposition of Paul G. Cassell | Unknown (facilitated by Esq... | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Videotaped Deposition of Paul G. Cassell | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2015-07-31 | N/A | Follow-up inquiry regarding UK investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. | Correspondence between Utah... | View |
| 2015-03-11 | N/A | Paul G. Cassell acknowledged a foregoing instrument before Notary Susan Baca under oath. | Salt Lake County, Utah | View |
| 2015-01-06 | N/A | Filing of Complaint for Defamation against Alan Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-01-06 | N/A | Edwards and Cassell filed legal pleadings seeking intervention in CVRA action alleging Dershowitz... | Federal District Court, Sou... | View |
| 2010-11-23 | N/A | Order Granting Motion for Limited Appearance | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2010-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Limited Appearance and Certificate of Service in Case 9:10-CV-81111-WPD | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States (CVRA case). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Publication of the Utah Law Review article discussing victims' rights. | Utah (Publication) | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Tenure of Paul G. Cassell as a United States District Judge. | United States | View |
| 1992-05-27 | N/A | Paul G. Cassell admitted to practice law in the State of Utah. | Utah | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017750.jpg
This page from a law review article discusses the rights of crime victims to access presentence reports under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to ensure accurate restitution. The author recounts their testimony before the Sentencing Commission and counters arguments from the Practitioners' Advisory Group, which opposed victim access to these reports. The text argues that legislative history supports broad rights for victims to be heard and informed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017749.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that victims should have access to presentence reports to meaningfully participate in sentencing hearings, citing statements by Senators Feinstein and Kyl. The document appears to be an exhibit submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely in the context of the investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and the violation of victims' rights under the CVRA.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017748.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and federal sentencing procedures. It details the rights of victims to access presentence reports and be heard regarding sentencing guidelines, citing Senator Kyl and various legal precedents. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely submitted as a legal exhibit or research material during congressional inquiries related to the Epstein case (Schoen was one of Epstein's attorneys).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017725.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 11 of 52) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the necessity of amending Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (specifically Rule 11) to ensure victims' rights are not ignored during plea hearings. It cites the Oklahoma City bombing case as an example where victims were excluded due to rigid adherence to evidence rules. The document bears the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN' and a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was likely part of the materials reviewed during the congressional oversight of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the failure to notify victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017715.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2005 law review article by Paul G. Cassell titled 'Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure'. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) of 2004 and proposes amendments to federal rules to better integrate victims into criminal proceedings. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' in the footer, suggesting it is part of a production related to congressional oversight, likely involving the Epstein case where the CVRA was a central legal issue.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017698.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It argues for rules allowing closed-circuit transmission of proceedings for victims (citing the Oklahoma City bombing case) and mandating victim notification. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional inquiry, likely related to the handling of victims' rights in the Jeffrey Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017686.jpg
This document discusses the legal interpretation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) regarding a victim's right to access presentence reports. It analyzes the Ninth Circuit's decision in *In re Kenna*, distinguishing the author's proposal for "relevant" access from the rejected claim for a "general right" to the entire report. The text argues for a balanced approach where prosecutors facilitate victim access to relevant portions of the report to assist in victim impact statements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017664.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 29 of 78 in the evidence file) discussing amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding victims' rights. It specifically details proposals for Rule 17 to protect victims from abusive subpoenas of their confidential information by defense attorneys, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The document bears the name 'David Schoen' and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case (likely related to the non-prosecution agreement and victims' rights violations).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017640.jpg
This document is Page 5 of 78 from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article detailing the legislative history of the Crime Victims' Rights amendment between 1996 and 1999. It outlines the efforts of Senators Kyl and Feinstein to pass a constitutional amendment ensuring rights for crime victims, noting failures in the 104th and 105th Congresses despite support from the Justice Department and President Clinton. The document bears the name of David Schoen (Epstein's attorney) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Epstein investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017638.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article titled 'The Crime Victims' Rights Movement.' It details the history of the movement, specifically the 1982 President's Task Force on Victims of Crime, which recommended that victims be notified of proceedings and allowed to submit impact statements. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney known for representing Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating it was submitted as evidence or research in a congressional inquiry, likely regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017613.jpg
This document appears to be Page 10 of a legal filing or article (Excerpt from 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 59) submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. It analyzes the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically citing the 'In re Dean' (BP Products) case to argue that victims have rights to confer with the government before charges are formally filed or plea deals are reached. While Epstein is not named on this page, the legal argument mirrors the controversy surrounding the failure to notify victims during Epstein's 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017606.jpg
This document is a page from a legal analysis or journal article (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) included in a House Oversight production, likely submitted by attorney David Schoen. It argues for the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) during the investigation phase, before formal charges are filed, critiquing the DOJ/OLC position to the contrary. The text specifically cites the "Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case" as a primary example of why victim participation is necessary before charges are filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017604.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2014 legal article published in the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards (a key attorney for Epstein victims). The article argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply during criminal investigations before charges are filed, explicitly referencing a 'notorious federal sex abuse case' (the Epstein case) where victims were deprived of rights due to the DOJ's narrow interpretation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name David Schoen, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015668.jpg
This is the cover page for Volume 3 of a videotaped continued deposition of Alan M. Dershowitz, taken on January 12, 2016. The deposition is part of the civil case (Case No. CACE 15-000072) filed by Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The document covers pages 334 through 461 of the transcript.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015660.jpg
A court order from the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida, dated December 18, 2015, in the civil case of Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz. Judge Thomas Lynch granted a motion filed by Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP to seal an affidavit by Alan Dershowitz regarding his meetings with David Boies. The document bears the footer HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015660.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015638.jpg
This document is page 18 of 20 from a court filing in the case 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz' (Case No. CACE 15-000072), specifically a response to a motion regarding the confidentiality of court records. It contains the signature blocks and contact information for the Utah Attorney General's office, plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell, and a counsel list including Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015621.jpg
This is a court filing from November 2015 in Broward County, Florida, involving a defamation case between plaintiffs Bradley Edwards/Paul Cassell and defendant Alan Dershowitz. The plaintiffs are responding to Dershowitz's motion to keep certain records confidential, arguing that the records—which detail Virginia Giuffre's allegations of sexual abuse by Dershowitz—are central to the case and have never been deemed confidential by any other court.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015616.jpg
This is a court order from the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida, dated November 2, 2015, in the case of Edwards & Cassell v. Dershowitz. The court granted Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP's motion to quash a subpoena against the firm entirely, but only partially granted a similar motion for 'Jane Doe No. 3,' ordering that she must submit to a deposition limited to four hours at the law firm's offices.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015546.jpg
This document is a notary acknowledgment page from the House Oversight Committee files (Bates stamp 015546). It certifies that Paul G. Cassell appeared before Notary Public Susan Baca in Salt Lake County, Utah, on March 11, 2015, to acknowledge a legal instrument. The notary verified his identity through personal knowledge and administered an oath.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014044.jpg
This document is page 65 of a 2014 law review article detailing the history of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It explains that in April 2004, advocates shifted focus from a constitutional amendment to federal legislation due to the difficulty of obtaining a supermajority. The text discusses the limitations of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act and cites various legal scholars and Senators (Kyl, Leahy, Feinstein) regarding the legislative history. This document appears in the House Oversight collection likely as background material regarding the legal framework relevant to the Epstein case's non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014043.jpg
This document is a page from a legal academic text (specifically 'Vol. 104' likely by Paul Cassell) bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It discusses the history of the Crime Victims' Rights movement, specifically the push for a U.S. Constitutional amendment following the success of state-level bills of rights. It details a 1996 Rose Garden ceremony attended by President Bill Clinton in support of such an amendment. The text appears to be part of the legislative or legal background materials often associated with Paul Cassell's representation of Epstein victims regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014042.jpg
This document is page 63 of a 2014 legal academic publication discussing Crime Victims' Rights. It argues for victim participation during criminal investigations, explicitly citing the 'Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case' as a primary example of why victims need rights before charges are filed. The text also provides historical context regarding the victims' rights movement, referencing the Warren Court and President Reagan's Task Force on Victims of Crime.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014038.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2014 law review article titled 'Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations?' published in The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards (a prominent attorney for Epstein victims), Paul Cassell, and Nathanael Mitchell, the article argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply during the investigation phase, contrary to a DOJ memorandum. The text alludes to a 'notorious federal sex abuse case' (referencing the Epstein case) where victims were deprived of rights before charges were filed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014037.jpg
This document is the cover page for a 2014 legal article titled 'Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed,' published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. The article is co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards, a key attorney for Epstein's victims, and Paul G. Cassell, suggesting a focus on the legal failures regarding the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was included in evidence provided to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021840.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript of Paul G. Cassell, questioned by Mr. Simpson. They discuss a 'motion for joinder' filed in a previous 'CVRA action' on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4. The document confirms that Cassell and attorney Bradley J. Edwards were co-signatories on this motion.
Direct Examination
Initial questioning establishing the witness's background as a former US District Judge.
Unknown
Letter regarding victims' rights/rules of evidence
Invitation to confer
Invitation for Petitioners to meet with U.S. Attorney Pak in person to share thoughts on the matter.
Giuffre v. Maxwell - Regarding Continuance of Hearing on ...
Requesting a one-week continuance for a hearing due to medical reasons.
Declaration of Paul G. Cassell Support of Application for...
Formal declaration of good standing and lack of criminal/disciplinary record for bar admission.
Response to July 31st Letter
Confirming the matter is progressing; requesting signed confirmation of legal representation from the client.
International Sex Trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghis...
Follow-up on previous correspondence regarding an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell; reiterating client's offer to help.
International Sex Trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghis...
Follow-up regarding investigation status and reiterating client's offer to help.
Unknown
Indicated they would look into the matter and be back in touch.
Initial response
Referenced in the July 31 letter; indicated they would look into the matter.
Unknown (implied same topic)
Initial letter sent regarding the client.
Initial correspondence
Referenced in the July 31 letter.
Notices of Electronic Filing
Authorization for Paul G. Cassell to receive electronic notifications at cassellp@law.utah.edu
Unknown
Regarding the need to change a sentencing recommendation after seeing a presentence report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity