PAUL G. CASSELL
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co authors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Susan Baca
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co plaintiffs |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Trish Regan
|
Spousal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 4
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Keli Luther
|
Professional correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ann Bauer
|
Professional clerkship |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Twist
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Douglas E. Beloof
|
Co authors |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 3
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel plaintiffs |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Crime Victims' Rights Movement
|
Academic advocate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE NO. 2
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Professional co counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Co counsel co plaintiffs |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe
|
Co counsel for |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Lisa Collins
|
Certifier subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | Northwestern University Sch... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a motion for joinder in the CVRA action on behalf of Jane Doe 3 and 4. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Paul G. Cassell by Mr. Simpson regarding previous legal filings. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Publication of legal article regarding Crime Victims' Rights Act | Journal of Criminal Law & C... | View |
| 2021-12-09 | Legal proceeding appearances | Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... | N/A | View |
| 2017-03-16 | N/A | Original scheduled date for hearing on Edwards Subpoena | New York, NY | View |
| 2017-03-15 | N/A | Medical procedure for Paul Cassell involving general anesthesia | Salt Lake City, UT | View |
| 2017-03-13 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice by Paul G. Cassell | Salt Lake City, Utah (Signe... | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Determine Confidentiality | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Deposition of Paul G. Cassell | Unknown (facilitated by Esq... | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Videotaped Deposition of Paul G. Cassell | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2015-07-31 | N/A | Follow-up inquiry regarding UK investigation into Epstein and Maxwell. | Correspondence between Utah... | View |
| 2015-03-11 | N/A | Paul G. Cassell acknowledged a foregoing instrument before Notary Susan Baca under oath. | Salt Lake County, Utah | View |
| 2015-01-06 | N/A | Filing of Complaint for Defamation against Alan Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-01-06 | N/A | Edwards and Cassell filed legal pleadings seeking intervention in CVRA action alleging Dershowitz... | Federal District Court, Sou... | View |
| 2010-11-23 | N/A | Order Granting Motion for Limited Appearance | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2010-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Motion for Limited Appearance and Certificate of Service in Case 9:10-CV-81111-WPD | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Filing of case Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States (CVRA case). | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Publication of the Utah Law Review article discussing victims' rights. | Utah (Publication) | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Tenure of Paul G. Cassell as a United States District Judge. | United States | View |
| 1992-05-27 | N/A | Paul G. Cassell admitted to practice law in the State of Utah. | Utah | View |
010.pdf
Declaration by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 30, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. The document lists 18 exhibits (A-R) supporting Maxwell's opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena. Several exhibits are filed under seal, while others include procedural documents from related cases (Cassell v. Dershowitz, Epstein v. Rothstein, Jane Doe v. US) and communications regarding discovery and subpoenas.
010-16.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court hearing on April 21, 2016, in the case of Giuffre v. Maxwell. The hearing addresses motions to admit Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell as counsel for the plaintiff, which the defense opposes citing conflicts with other litigation (Florida cases) and their status as potential witnesses. The judge also rules on various discovery disputes, including the production of Giuffre's medical records (limited to 1999-2002), tax returns (15 years ordered), and statements made to law enforcement (to be reviewed in camera).
010-15.pdf
This document is a press release and joint statement dated April 8, 2016, announcing the settlement of a defamation lawsuit between Professor Alan Dershowitz and attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. The attorneys acknowledged it was a mistake to have filed sexual misconduct accusations against Dershowitz on behalf of their client, Virginia Roberts, and withdrew those claims. Dershowitz withdrew his counterclaims regarding unethical conduct and reiterated his denial of the allegations, citing travel records as evidence of his absence during the alleged events.
010-05.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on January 6, 2015, in Broward County, Florida, by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs allege that Dershowitz defamed them in media interviews (specifically on CNN) by accusing them of misconduct and lying after they filed court pleadings alleging Dershowitz participated in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal conduct. The complaint asserts that Dershowitz's statements were false, malicious, and intended to distract from his own alleged involvement in Epstein's crimes and the negotiation of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
001-05.pdf
This document outlines Ghislaine Maxwell's formal objections and responses to Virginia Giuffre's second request for production of documents in the 2015 civil case. Maxwell's counsel objects to numerous requests on grounds of privilege, relevance, and burden, specifically refusing to produce financial documents (tax returns, bank statements, asset lists) pending a motion for a protective order. The document also addresses requests for Joint Defense Agreements with Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications regarding sexual abuse allegations, and funding sources for the TerraMar Project, including any from the Clinton Foundation.
001-01.pdf
Legal declaration by attorney Bradley J. Edwards filed on June 13, 2016, in support of a motion to quash a subpoena from Ghislaine Maxwell. Edwards details his representation of Virginia Giuffre and the undue burden of reviewing over 200,000 emails for communications with journalists. He explicitly states that Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein share a joint defense agreement and mentions Giuffre's association with the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.'
078.pdf
This document is a legal notice filed on June 14, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The notice, filed by attorney Spencer T. Kuvin on behalf of Plaintiff C.L., withdraws a subpoena and cancels the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, which was scheduled for the following day, June 15, 2010. The document also includes a certificate of service listing legal counsel for various parties involved in related cases.
076.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed by the Plaintiffs (Jane Does 2-8) in response to Jeffrey Epstein's appeal of a Magistrate Judge's order compelling him to produce his income tax returns for the years 2003-2008. The Plaintiffs argue that the tax returns are relevant for determining punitive damages and are not protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, citing the 'required records' exception. The document also notes Epstein's attempt to avoid producing records by offering to stipulate to a net worth in the 'nine figures,' which the Plaintiffs reject as insufficient.
073.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on November 28, 2009, by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano (Jane Doe No. 2) in her civil case against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing opposes a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview—Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer since November 2005—who sought to avoid being deposed by claiming he had no knowledge of relevant facts. The Plaintiff argues that Zinoview must be deposed because he worked for Epstein during the active Palm Beach Police investigation (2005-2006) and likely possesses knowledge regarding activities at the Epstein residence, especially since Epstein himself invoked the Fifth Amendment.
071.pdf
A 2009 legal motion filed in the Southern District of Florida on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein requesting permission to attend mediation in a case involving Carolyn Andriano (C.M.A.). The motion notes that a prior 'no contact order' exists regarding Andriano, but states that neither she nor her counsel object to Epstein's presence at depositions, mediation, or trial. The document includes a comprehensive service list of attorneys involved in multiple related cases against Epstein.
069.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by Igor Zinoviev, a third-party witness and employee of Jeffrey Epstein, seeking a protective order to prevent or limit his deposition in the civil case 'Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein'. Zinoviev claims he has no relevant information for the civil cases as his employment with Epstein began in November 2005, after the period of the alleged misconduct, and he has not discussed Epstein's criminal or civil cases with him.
052.pdf
This document is a Motion for Protective Order filed on July 29, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiffs 'Jane Does 2-7' against Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiffs allege that Epstein hired private investigators to harass and intimidate them by contacting their former employers, ex-boyfriends, and friends to ask intrusive personal questions and potentially 'out' them as sexual abuse victims. The motion seeks a court order to stop Epstein's investigators from making ex parte contacts with nonparties associated with the plaintiffs.
050.pdf
This document is a Notice of Compliance filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman) on July 28, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. It addresses a court order regarding the preservation of evidence and a protective order, noting that while the parties agreed on many sections, they could not finalize a joint order, leading Epstein to submit his own proposed order separately. The document lists numerous related civil cases involving Jane Doe plaintiffs and provides a comprehensive service list of attorneys involved in the various Epstein-related litigations at that time, including Bruce Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
045.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Jeffrey Epstein on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiff lists 23 specific interrogatories regarding Epstein's finances, properties, travel, and alleged sexual abuse of minors, all of which Epstein refused to answer by invoking his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. The motion argues that Epstein's blanket refusals are improper and requests the court force him to answer or provide a privilege log.
044.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the Southern District of Florida, requesting the court to force Jeffrey Epstein to answer 23 specific requests for admission in a civil suit brought by Jane Doe No. 2. Epstein had previously asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to refuse answering questions regarding his net worth (alleged to be over $1 billion), his financial support of modeling agency MC2, his ownership of foreign property, and specific allegations of sexual assault, battery, and sex trafficking of minors. The plaintiff argues that the Fifth Amendment cannot be used as a blanket refusal in a civil case and demands Epstein answer or provide specific justification for his silence.
043.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel Answers to Plaintiff's First Request for Production filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida (Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON). The motion argues that Epstein has improperly asserted blanket Fifth Amendment privileges in response to sixteen specific requests for production of documents, including telephone records, appointment books, financial records, and correspondence. The Plaintiff requests the Court to order Epstein to answer the requests, provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocations, and produce a privilege log.
021.pdf
This document is a Notice of Filing Proposed Order submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 27, 2009. It lists eleven separate civil cases filed against Jeffrey Epstein by various plaintiffs, including Jane Does 2-7, 101, 102, C.M.A., and Doe II. The filing serves to submit a proposed order related to case no. 08-80119 and includes a service list of attorneys involved in the litigation.
030.pdf
This document is a Notice of Withdrawing Subpoena filed on June 14, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Plaintiff C.L., represented by attorney Spencer T. Kuvin, withdrew a subpoena and cancelled the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez, which had been scheduled for June 15, 2010. The document includes a certificate of service listing legal counsel for various parties involved in the primary case (Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein) and related cases.
028.pdf
This document is a legal memorandum filed on May 28, 2010, by Plaintiffs (Jane Does 2-8) in the case Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON). The memorandum opposes Epstein's appeal of a Magistrate Judge's order compelling him to produce his income tax returns for the years 2003-2008. The Plaintiffs argue that the tax returns are not protected by the Fifth Amendment (citing the 'required records' exception and 'foregone conclusion' doctrine) and are critical for determining punitive damages given the allegations of sexual molestation and Epstein's refusal to provide net worth discovery beyond a stipulation of 'nine figures.'
021.pdf
This document is a legal response filed by Plaintiff Carolyn M. Andriano (Jane Doe No. 2) opposing a motion by third-party witness Igor Zinoview to avoid deposition. Zinoview, who worked as Epstein's driver, bodyguard, and trainer starting in November 2005, claimed he had no relevant knowledge of Epstein's legal matters. The Plaintiff argues that Zinoview worked for Epstein during the police investigation period and likely has relevant observations, regardless of whether he discussed legal matters with Epstein.
017.pdf
Legal filing from November 2009 in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein's attorneys reply to a response regarding the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA), which was undergoing restructuring. The document notes that the Department of Justice had seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes related to the Epstein case, and alludes to serious ethical and criminal issues involving the RRA firm that could impact the validity of the cases against Epstein.
016.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 9, 2009, by third-party witness Igor Zinoviev, seeking a protective order to prevent or limit his deposition in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Zinoviev, a driver and bodyguard for Epstein since November 2005, claims he has no relevant information regarding Epstein's criminal or civil cases, particularly concerning events prior to September 2005. The motion cites legal precedents regarding the scope of discovery and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c) to argue against the deposition.
059.pdf
This document is a motion filed on November 20, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requesting permission for Jeffrey Epstein to attend mediation in the case involving Carolyn Andriano (C.M.A.). The motion notes that a previous no-contact order exists regarding Andriano, but her counsel has no objection to Epstein attending the deposition, mediation, or trial. The document includes a service list detailing the attorneys involved in this and related cases, including Bruce Reinhart representing Sarah Kellen.
057.pdf
This document is a legal reply filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on November 16, 2009, regarding the preservation of evidence held by the law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA). The filing notes that the Department of Justice seized approximately 40 boxes of documents from RRA, including 13 boxes specifically related to Epstein cases. The document highlights scheduling conflicts involving the deposition of Herbert Stettin (RRA's Chief Restructuring Officer) and alludes to potential ethical or criminal issues within RRA that could impact the validity of the cases against Epstein.
040.pdf
This document is a Motion to Compel filed on July 10, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiff Jane Doe (represented by Bradley Edwards). The motion requests the court to force Jeffrey Epstein to answer a set of interrogatories regarding his financial assets, net worth, foreign travel, property ownership, and alleged interactions with the plaintiff and other minor females. Epstein refused to answer nearly all questions (except for providing the name/address of the person answering), invoking his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights against self-incrimination and right to counsel.
Direct Examination
Initial questioning establishing the witness's background as a former US District Judge.
Unknown
Letter regarding victims' rights/rules of evidence
Invitation to confer
Invitation for Petitioners to meet with U.S. Attorney Pak in person to share thoughts on the matter.
Giuffre v. Maxwell - Regarding Continuance of Hearing on ...
Requesting a one-week continuance for a hearing due to medical reasons.
Declaration of Paul G. Cassell Support of Application for...
Formal declaration of good standing and lack of criminal/disciplinary record for bar admission.
Response to July 31st Letter
Confirming the matter is progressing; requesting signed confirmation of legal representation from the client.
International Sex Trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghis...
Follow-up on previous correspondence regarding an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell; reiterating client's offer to help.
International Sex Trafficking by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghis...
Follow-up regarding investigation status and reiterating client's offer to help.
Unknown
Indicated they would look into the matter and be back in touch.
Initial response
Referenced in the July 31 letter; indicated they would look into the matter.
Unknown (implied same topic)
Initial letter sent regarding the client.
Initial correspondence
Referenced in the July 31 letter.
Notices of Electronic Filing
Authorization for Paul G. Cassell to receive electronic notifications at cassellp@law.utah.edu
Unknown
Regarding the need to change a sentencing recommendation after seeing a presentence report.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity