Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Counsel

Person
Mentions
172
Relationships
34
Events
237
Documents
81
Also known as:
Plaintiffs' Counsel Plaintiffs' counsel (Edwards and Cassell) Special Counsel Jeffrey Epstein's Counsel Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein All Counsel Counsel General (South African) Counsel General Nine victims who had previously retained counsel legal counsel at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) Government and Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) legal counsel Counsel (Comey and Sternheim)
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
34 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Judge
Professional
8 Strong
3
View
person Juror 50
Client
7
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Professional
7
3
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Client
7
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
6
2
View
person defendant
Professional
6
2
View
person Judge (implied speaker)
Professional
6
1
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Judge
Legal representative
6
2
View
person the defendant
Professional
5
1
View
person The jury
Professional
5
1
View
person Unnamed Speaker (presumably the judge)
Professional
5
1
View
person defendant
Legal representative
5
1
View
organization GOVERNMENT
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
Professional
5
1
View
person the defendant
Client
5
1
View
person Designating Party
Legal representative
5
1
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
5
1
View
person The President
Adversarial
5
1
View
person Attorney General
Administrative
5
1
View
person Juror No. 50
Client
5
1
View
person MDC warden
Adversarial professional
5
1
View
organization Peters and Peters
Professional
5
1
View
person Juror 50
Professional
5
1
View
organization The Court
Professional
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Legal visits characterized by uncomfortable conditions, lack of privacy, and surveillance MDC Legal Visiting Rooms View
N/A N/A Meeting between Court and Counsel at 8:45 AM. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Trial sessions planned for Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday before Christmas and New Year's. Courtroom View
N/A N/A 10-minute break (Recess) Courtroom View
N/A N/A 9 a.m. conference regarding the jury charge. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Charging Conference (Trial Tr. at 2758–61) Court View
N/A N/A Jury Charge / Instructions phase of the trial. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Scheduled oral argument in both cases. Court View
N/A N/A Side bar conferences Courtroom View
N/A N/A Government Exhibit 10 is admitted into evidence. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Potential firing of the Special Counsel or Attorney General by the President. Washington D.C. (Implied) View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberation Scheduling Discussion Courtroom View
N/A N/A Reading of Jury Note regarding Count Four Courtroom View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberation/Recess Courtroom View
N/A Legal proceeding The Hearing N/A View
N/A N/A Protracted discussion regarding a jury note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Potential Evidentiary Hearing Court View
N/A N/A Guards setting up a tripod/camera focused on Maxwell during legal conferences. MDC View
N/A N/A Closing arguments in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell Courtroom View
N/A N/A Counsel Meeting Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal conferences where Maxwell is separated by a cloudy plastic shield, cannot handle documents,... MDC Visiting Room View
N/A Trial A trial in which the jury is being instructed on how to evaluate witness testimony. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The Court and the Defendant's counsel discussed a note received from the deliberating jury. Court View
N/A Meeting A daily meeting scheduled for 8:30 a.m. beginning 'tomorrow' to prepare for voir dire. courtroom, 518 View
N/A Court proceeding The court is in session to discuss a note from the jury regarding their deliberation schedule aro... Courtroom View

EFTA00031439.pdf

This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves as a transmittal for discovery materials, specifically an additional photograph and a cover letter, which are being prepared on a drive for the client (Ghislaine Maxwell) to review at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).

Legal correspondence / email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031434.pdf

This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to defense counsel regarding 'Discovery Production 7' in the case U.S. v. Thomas (No. 19 Cr 830). The email confirms the upload of discovery materials to USAfx and notes the attachment of a specific document marked 'attorney's eyes only'.

Email / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030991.pdf

This document is an email dated August 21, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to opposing counsel. The email serves as a transmittal for discovery materials in the case US v. Maxwell, referencing an attached cover letter and a redacted password for accessing the materials.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030225.pdf

This document is a digital calendar entry for a 'counsel call' scheduled for July 9, 2019, from 14:00 to 14:30 UTC. The organizer's identity and the specific counsel's name are redacted. The entry is classified as 'X-PERSONAL' and was created on July 8, 2019.

Calendar entry / electronic log
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027655.pdf

This document is an email dated November 10, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves as a transmittal for a supplemental production of testifying witness material (3500 material) and exhibits for a hearing scheduled for the following day (likely a Daubert hearing). The sender's name and recipient email addresses are redacted.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00026450.pdf

This document is an email dated June 5, 2020, from attorney Jason Foy of Foy & Seplowitz LLC to opposing counsel regarding the case 'US v. Tova Noel'. The email attaches a supplemental discovery demand and asks for an anticipated timeline for a response.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00023108.pdf

This document is an email from the chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 28, 2020, addressed to counsel involved in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves to distribute an Opinion & Order regarding Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, noting that the document is temporarily sealed to allow parties to propose redactions by December 30, 2020.

Email correspondence / court notification
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00021688.pdf

An email dated February 27, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense counsel regarding 'US v. Maxwell'. The email transmits discovery production files and a cover letter, with the password for the files redacted.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019458.pdf

An email dated November 24, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to opposing counsel regarding a deadline for a protective order related to Rule 17(c) subpoena materials. The email includes an attachment with 'GM' in the filename, strongly suggesting the context is the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019082.pdf

A letter from U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss (SDNY) to defense counsel in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated March 29, 2021. The letter concerns the identification of 'Minor Victim-4' referenced in the superseding indictment (S2) and provides a list of relevant discovery materials (Bates ranges), though the specific list and victim's birth date are redacted.

Legal correspondence / us attorney letter
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019081.pdf

An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's legal counsel dated March 29, 2021. The email serves to notify the defense of a superseding indictment (S2) returned by a grand jury that day and proposes times for a meeting the following day to discuss discovery issues and potential supplemental briefings regarding pretrial motions.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00016031.pdf

An email dated December 18, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel. The email provides replacement discovery materials to correct documents that were inadvertently labeled with incorrect Bates numbers in a previous production. It notes that a physical copy on disc is being sent to the MDC for Maxwell.

Legal correspondence / email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00010287.pdf

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel dated October 2, 2020, detailing a production of discovery materials. The production includes financial records from Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citibank, and UBS related to Maxwell, Epstein, and various associated entities like the Terramar Project and Max Foundation. It also provides technical instructions for viewing specific file types (.dat, .vol, video files) included in the production.

Legal correspondence (discovery production letter)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00000203.tif

This document, likely a legal brief or argument, discusses the importance of the government upholding its promises in plea agreements. It argues that the NACDL urges the Court to ensure the government honors its commitments to defendants, especially given the significant rights defendants waive when entering such agreements. The text emphasizes that courts should enforce these promises to maintain fairness and trust in the legal system.

Legal argument/brief
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017663.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion during a cross-examination. Attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger debate with the Court about the proper handling of a witness's (Jane Cross's) lack of recollection, specifically concerning whether Epstein directed her seating. The core issue revolves around refreshing a witness's memory versus allowing the jury to consider the witness's current inability to recall as relevant evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00017645.jpg

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on her activities in 1996, including performances and applications to programs like a School of the Arts and Interlochen. The central point of this excerpt is to establish that on three of her applications from that time, there was no mention of Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008621.jpg

This document is a page of jury instructions from a legal case, filed on December 18, 2021. A judge is instructing the jury on the procedures for reaching and reporting a verdict, emphasizing that it must be unanimous and that deliberations must be kept confidential. The judge also reminds the jurors to be courteous to one another and announces a brief sidebar conference with counsel before the case is formally submitted to the jury.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008549.jpg

This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 4) from a court case, filed on December 18, 2021. The judge directs the jury that they must decide the case based solely on their own recollection of the evidence, not on the arguments, objections, or statements made by the attorneys for the Government or the Defendant. The instruction explicitly states that statements from counsel and the court are not evidence and that the jury's memory of the facts is the ultimate authority.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008536.jpg

This document page contains the final jury instructions from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on December 17, 2021. The judge instructs the jury that their verdict must be unanimous, explains the role of the foreperson in filling out the verdict form and notifying the marshal, and urges courtesy during deliberations. The transcript concludes with the judge pausing proceedings for a brief sidebar conference with counsel and the court reporter before officially submitting the case to the jury.

Court transcript / jury instructions
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008459.jpg

This document is the table of contents for jury instructions in the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 17, 2021. It outlines the structure of the instructions, covering the roles of the court and jury, general legal principles like the presumption of innocence, and specific charges including conspiracy, enticement, and transportation of a minor for illegal sexual activity.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008441.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines a joint proposal from the prosecution and defense regarding the presentation of closing arguments. The parties argue that alternatives like toggling monitors or using printed binders for the jury are unworkable due to potential interruptions, logistical difficulties, and the risk of inadvertently exposing sealed material, which would violate the privacy of victims and third parties. They propose instead to provide redacted copies of their presentation slides to the public on the following day.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008252.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 8, 2021, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. A judge is outlining the specific procedures for the jury selection process, known as voir dire, to the legal counsel. The judge explains how jurors' privacy will be protected, the protocol for striking a juror for cause, and how counsel can raise objections or request follow-up questions at sidebar.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001745.jpg

This is page 3 of a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 25, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's request for an order against the BOP regarding her surveillance and confinement conditions, citing security concerns and deference to prison administrators. However, the Court orders the Government to provide written status updates every 90 days regarding any changes to her conditions to ensure she can participate in her defense.

Court order / legal filing (page 3 of 4)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00001651.jpg

This document is a page from a Protective Order in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on July 27, 2020. It establishes strict rules for handling 'Discovery' materials, limiting their use by both government and defense witnesses and counsel solely for preparation for the criminal trial. The order explicitly prohibits using the information for civil proceedings and forbids any party, including the Defendant and defense team, from posting the Discovery or its contents on the Internet.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Plaintiffs Counsel $0.00 Obligation to pay counsel a reasonable fee for ... View
0001-07-01 Received Attorney General ... Counsel $0.00 Hypothetical refusal of the Special Counsel's b... View
As Sender
33
As Recipient
75
Total
108

Unknown

From: Counsel
To: Counsel

Back and forth emails between counsel described as self-serving and hearsay

Email
N/A
Communication Source

Legal Defense

From: the defendant
To: Counsel

5 hours daily / 25 hours weekly of privileged attorney-client communication.

Video-teleconference (vtc)
N/A
Communication Source

Registration status

From: Counsel
To: ["administrative agency"]

The court speculates that counsel would have filed an application or a letter to an administrative agency to get a response regarding the individual's registration requirements.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Restitution and Sentencing

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Discussion regarding supervised release conditions and restitution prior to judgment.

Meeting
2022-08-22
Communication Source

Cross-examination testimony

From: Counsel
To: McHugh

Questioning regarding banking relationships with high net worth individuals, specifically Jeffrey Epstein, and large financial transfers at JP Morgan.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Readiness check

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

The Court asks if counsel is ready; Mr. Rohrbach confirms; Court orders jury to be brought in.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Pre-break discussion

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

The Court asks if counsel needs to speak before the break. Ms. Pomerantz replies 'Nothing from the government'.

Court proceeding dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Juror Status

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Informing counsel that three jurors are missing from the security line and discussing logistics of moving jurors between floors.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Procedural matters during break

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Judge asks if there are matters to discuss before breaking; counsel confirms there are none.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Procedural matters during break

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Discussion regarding if there are matters to take up before or after the recess.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Exhibit 309 Ruling

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Judge sustains objection to Exhibit 309 on 401/403 grounds.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Selection Protocol

From: The Court (Judge)
To: Counsel

Instructions regarding the arrival of 58 jurors, the questions to be asked regarding bias, and the procedure for peremptory strikes.

Court instruction
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Briefing Schedule

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Discussion regarding deadlines for legal briefs. Judge sets deadline of 7 p.m. for government and 10 p.m. for defense.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Note/Exhibit

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

The court plans to write a note, send it back, and mark it as an exhibit.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Disagreements on privacy issues

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Judge instructs counsel to submit a letter 'tonight' if they cannot agree on the privacy accommodations.

Letter
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Charge and Alternates

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Sidebar discussion regarding the reading of the charge, instructions for alternate jurors, and deliberation timing.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Selection Instructions

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Instructions regarding jury selection, swearing in, opening statements, and seating arrangements for unvaccinated jurors.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Jury Instructions / Conscious Avoidance

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

The Judge rules that a conscious avoidance instruction is appropriate regarding Ms. Maxwell's knowledge of Epstein's actions.

Court proceeding
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Evidentiary Rulings

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Rulings on the admissibility of impeachment statements regarding witnesses Jane and Annie.

Meeting
2022-08-10
Communication Source

Sentencing Guidelines

From: Counsel
To: THE COURT

Written briefing regarding objections to the PSR.

Briefing
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Sidebar Conference

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Discussion regarding follow-up questions for the juror.

Meeting
2022-03-11
Communication Source

Briefing Schedule and Redactions

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Judge sets a deadline for simultaneous briefing for the 15th, limits to 15 pages double-spaced. Discusses docketing materials and redacting Juror 50's information.

Court proceeding
2022-03-11
Communication Source

Logistics for Monday / Jury Voir Dire

From: Judge
To: Counsel

Instructions regarding the assembly of jurors, video feed usage, and specific questions to be asked regarding media exposure and impartiality.

Court proceeding
2021-12-10
Communication Source

Pretrial Conference

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

Discussion regarding logistics of voir dire and prospective juror lists.

Meeting
2021-12-08
Communication Source

Adjournment and Health Safety

From: THE COURT
To: Counsel

The court adjourns proceedings, mentions upcoming masking rules, offers supplies, and wishes happy holidays.

Court proceeding
2021-12-01
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search