Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Decision making regarding immunity

From: Mr. Castor
To: Court

Characterized as equivocal and inconsistent regarding intent (transactional vs use immunity).

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Count 4 / NY Penal Law

From: Jury
To: Court

Evidence of jury's misunderstanding regarding sexual activity in New Mexico violating NY law.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Motion to vacate/Rule 29

From: defendant
To: Court

Arguments regarding prejudice due to absent witnesses and pre-indictment delay.

Briefing/reply brief
N/A
Communication Source

Conditions of confinement

From: Government officials
To: Court

Regular updates regarding Maxwell's confinement status.

Updates
N/A
Communication Source

Character Reference

From: Ex. F
To: Court

Described family event hosted by Maxwell and husband.

Legal declaration/letter
N/A
Communication Source

Ex.I

From: defense
To: Court

Referenced as 'Ex.I.' (Exhibit I), likely detailing the asset monitoring proposal.

Legal exhibit
N/A
Communication Source

Role of Sarah Kellen

From: LARRY VISOSKI
To: Court

Testified he didn't know Kellen's exact role but recalled she was an assistant for Epstein.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Assistant Roles

From: Cimberly Espinosa
To: Court

Stated she was Maxwell's assistant and Kellen was Epstein's assistant.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Clarification during deliberations

From: Jury
To: Court

Revealed potential confusion regarding the location of the crime (New Mexico vs New York).

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Character Reference

From: Ex. C
To: Court

Discussed Maxwell's 30-year history in the US and family ties.

Legal declaration/letter
N/A
Communication Source

Character Reference

From: Ex. B
To: Court

Attested to loving relationship between Maxwell and husband.

Legal declaration/letter
N/A
Communication Source

Bail Support

From: Spouse
To: Court

Explains why he did not co-sign initially (media aggression) and offers full support now.

Legal declaration (exhibit a)
N/A
Communication Source

Sentencing arguments

From: Defense counsel
To: Court

Referenced by the judge as distinct from the written submission.

Oral statement
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot. 11

From: defense
To: Court

Defense motion arguing that evidence of rape is irrelevant and inflammatory.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Motion for Summary Judgment

From: Bradley Edwards
To: Court

Denied Epstein's allegations and called claims frivolous.

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Recruitment

From: CAROLYN
To: Court

Testified she was recruited by Virginia and recruited others.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Recruitment of Virginia

From: Juan Alessi
To: Court

Testified he was driving when defendant stopped to recruit Virginia.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Renewed motion for release on bail

From: Ghislaine Maxwell (Def...
To: Court

Proposed a larger bail package and attempted to respond to previous denial reasons.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Closing Arguments/Briefs

From: the government
To: Court

Arguments establishing the 'playbook' pattern and conspiracy.

Legal argument
N/A
Communication Source

Court Exhibit #15

From: Court
To: Jury/Counsel

Contains the text: '... the flight to New Mexico where/if the intent was for Jane to engage in sexual activity ...'

Court exhibit
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mem. at 35-36

From: defense
To: Court

Argument that Juror 50 repeatedly lied.

Legal memorandum
N/A
Communication Source

Request for reconsideration (dkt. no. 1078)

From: GHISLAINE MAXWELL
To: Court

Maxwell requested reconsideration of the unsealing order based on her arrest and indictment.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot. at 11

From: defense
To: Court

Defense motion arguing that the plea agreement should be universally binding.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror 50 repeatedly made clear that he could be fair and impartial.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Request for modification of protective order

From: defendant
To: Court

After receiving some discovery, the Defendant filed a request to modify the protective order to use documents for purposes other than the criminal defense.

Court filing
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search