Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Court

Person
Mentions
8
Relationships
1
Events
0
Documents
4
Also known as:
New York State Court
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Harvey Weinstein
Legal representative
1
1
View
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00008623.jpg

This document is page 2 (Bates DOJ-OGR-00008623) of a Table of Contents for Jury Instructions filed on December 18, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines instructions for the jury regarding their role, the burden of proof, and specific charges including 'Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Two) and 'Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity' (Count Four). The document details the structure of the legal charge, breaking down specific crimes into their constituent elements for jury consideration.

Court filing (table of contents for jury instructions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009579.jpg

This legal document, part of a court filing, analyzes a question posed by a jury during a trial. The core issue is whether sexual activity involving the defendant and a minor named Jane in New Mexico could be considered as evidence for a conviction on a charge related to transporting Jane to New York. The text argues that the jury's question is legally valid and references a prior statement by the Court from the trial transcript to support the relevance of the New Mexico events to the defendant's intent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005596.jpg

This document is the Table of Contents for a legal filing (Document 384) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The filing outlines the Defense's arguments that the Government failed to identify co-conspirator statements and overwhelmed the defense with document dumps, violating court orders. The Defense argues this hinders cross-examination and requests the preclusion of these purported statements as a remedy.

Court filing (table of contents)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00005369.jpg

This document is page 12 of 17 from a court filing (Document 367-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It lists proposed voir dire (jury selection) questions 43 through 48, focusing on juror bias regarding expert witnesses, evidence types, and the absence of co-conspirators at trial. The document contains significant sidebar commentary detailing objections from the Defense regarding the wording of questions about search evidence and missing witnesses, citing legal precedents like Skilling v. United States.

Court filing (proposed voir dire questions)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$555,318,320.00
97 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$555,318,320.00
97 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Fine for Counts 3, 4, 6 related to conspiracy t... View
N/A Received Esposito Court $9,800,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received defendant Court $500.00 Mention of fine for misdemeanors. View
N/A Received Karni Court $7,500,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Khashoggi Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Dreier Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $0.00 Defendant proposes a 'substantially larger bail... View
N/A Received Sadr Court $32,600,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
N/A Received Narrator Court $100.00 Fine for possession of magic mushrooms (negotia... View
N/A Received Ms. Maxwell Court $0.00 Judge intends to impose a fine. View
N/A Received Madoff Court $10,000,000.00 Comparative bond amount. View
2022-07-07 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $505.00 Filing fee for Notice of Appeal (Receipt number... View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Criminal Fine imposed at sentencing View
2022-06-29 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $300.00 Special Assessment due immediately View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $250,000.00 Fine imposed on each count. View
2022-06-28 Received GHISLAINE MAXWELL Court $750,000.00 Total fine imposed. View
2021-03-26 Received Boies Schiller Fl... Court $200.00 Filing fee for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (R... View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due regarding Notice of Appeal 173. View
2021-03-24 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $505.00 Appeal Fee Due View
2021-03-23 Received Maxwell/Sureties Court $10,000,000.00 Proposed 'eight-figure bond secured by real pro... View
2021-03-16 Received Ghislaine Maxwell... Court $28,500,000.00 Proposed bond package. View
As Sender
54
As Recipient
455
Total
509

Conditions of confinement

From: Government officials
To: Court

Regular updates regarding Maxwell's confinement status.

Updates
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questions (25, 48, 49)

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of crime victimization and sexual harassment/abuse accusations.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Voir Dire Question 48

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Have you or a friend or family member ever been the victim of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual assault?

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: juror
To: Court

A note received in court used as a timeline anchor.

Juror note
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Jury
To: Court

Described as a 'single ambiguous jury note'.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Pleading

From: Speaker (Counsel)
To: Court

Filing made to put information out there for safety

Legal filing
N/A
Communication Source

Character Reference

From: Ex. F
To: Court

Described family event hosted by Maxwell and husband.

Legal declaration/letter
N/A
Communication Source

Question about finding the defendant guilty based on sexu...

From: Jury
To: Court

The jury posed a question during the trial, which is the subject of this legal analysis. The question asked if the defendant 'can' be found guilty based on sexual activity in New Mexico and used the word 'aided'.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Ex.I

From: defense
To: Court

Referenced as 'Ex.I.' (Exhibit I), likely detailing the asset monitoring proposal.

Legal exhibit
N/A
Communication Source

Ambiguous note regarding Mann Act counts

From: Jury
To: Court

An ambiguous note from the jury was sent to the Court. The Defendant argued it revealed an improper conviction, but the Court disagreed with this interpretation.

Jury note
N/A
Communication Source

Reply Brief

From: Government officials
To: Court

Contains allegations that the client is a flight risk and has been hiding out.

Legal brief
N/A
Communication Source

referral to instruction

From: defendant
To: Court

Defendant requested the Court refer the jury to lines 14 to 17 of Instruction No. 21.

Request
N/A
Communication Source

Role of Sarah Kellen

From: LARRY VISOSKI
To: Court

Testified he didn't know Kellen's exact role but recalled she was an assistant for Epstein.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Def. Mot.

From: defendant
To: Court

Argument regarding waiver of right to appeal extradition.

Legal motion
N/A
Communication Source

Experts' reports

From: experts
To: Court

Reviewed by the Court regarding flight risk.

Report
N/A
Communication Source

particular inquiries

From: deliberating jury
To: Court

A note sent by the deliberating jury to the Court with specific questions.

Note
N/A
Communication Source

Recruitment

From: CAROLYN
To: Court

Testified she was recruited by Virginia and recruited others.

Court testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Character reference for bail

From: Maxwell's spouse
To: Court

Describes Maxwell as wonderful and loving, refutes criminal charges, describes domestic life.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Protective Order Arguments

From: defense
To: Court

Acknowledging baseline prohibitions on disclosing victim identities.

Legal filing
2025-11-29
Communication Source

Awareness of facts concerning Juror Number One [Conrad]

From: Court
To: ["Defendants' counsel ...

The Court held a conference to ask the defendants if they were aware of disturbing information revealed about Juror Conrad. Trzaskoma responded on their behalf.

Telephone conference
2025-11-07
Communication Source

Joint scheduling letter

From: Parties (Joint)
To: Court

Defense requested identification of co-conspirator names; Government responded it was appropriate to disclose via Jencks Act materials.

Letter
2025-10-18
Communication Source

Witness lists and Secrecy Factors

From: Government officials
To: Court

Submission regarding grand jury secrecy factors, witness status, and proposed redactions.

Legal filing
2025-07-29
Communication Source

Gov't Opp. at 192

From: Government officials
To: Court

Argument regarding notice of co-conspirator statements via Jencks Act production.

Legal filing
2025-07-23
Communication Source

No Subject

From: Unknown
To: Court

The brief was submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Electronic filing system
2025-05-09
Communication Source

No Subject

From: Unknown
To: Court

Forty copies and one unbound copy of the brief were sent through Federal Express.

Overnight next day federal express
2025-05-09
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search