Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Leventhal
|
Professional succession |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
government counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Curcio client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001399.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The letter details severe sanitary issues including mold, vermin, and undrinkable tap water, as well as restrictive legal visitation conditions that impede attorney-client privilege. It also notes Maxwell's deteriorating health and lack of access to fresh air for eight months.
DOJ-OGR-00001398.jpg
This is a legal letter dated April 7, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter responds to a government filing from the previous day and complains about unsanitary conditions at the MDC, specifically detailing a 'pervasive stench of sewage' in Maxwell's isolation unit caused by unused drains and overflowing toilets from the cellblock above.
DOJ-OGR-00001395.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 19, 2021, by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues for a continuance (delay) of the trial for their client, Ms. Maxwell. The defense contends that the government's proposed trial schedule is unrealistic, especially given a recent second superseding indictment, and that proceeding would violate Ms. Maxwell's constitutional rights. The filing also notes the prejudicial impact of Ms. Maxwell's continued detention and ongoing media coverage, and mentions an upcoming bail appeal hearing in the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00001394.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, requests a 90-day continuance for her trial, originally set for July 12, 2021. The defense argues that the government's recent disclosure of 226 witnesses necessitates more time for investigation and preparation. The request is made reluctantly, acknowledging it will prolong Ms. Maxwell's 'miserable and punishing detention'.
DOJ-OGR-00001393.jpg
A legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim arguing for a continuance of Ghislaine Maxwell's trial. The defense cites the difficulties of preparing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to investigate new charges and 'quarter-century-old allegations,' and the review of voluminous discovery produced in November 2020. The document criticizes the government's timeline estimates and their opposition to the delay.
DOJ-OGR-00001392.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of their client Ms. Maxwell, details the significant challenges the defense faces in reviewing a massive amount of discovery evidence. The defense argues that new charges, the addition of 'Accuser-4', and the sheer volume of materials (including 214,000 photos and 250,000 non-searchable documents) necessitate a lengthy re-review process. The document also mentions technical difficulties with an FBI-supplied laptop, further complicating and delaying their review of 'Highly Confidential' photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00001391.jpg
This page from a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim argues that recent voluminous discovery materials, including witness interviews, contain exculpatory information for Ms. Maxwell that requires significant time to investigate. The defense disputes the government's claim that no additional time is needed, asserting that millions of pages from Epstein's devices, previously irrelevant, are now pertinent due to the expanded scope of the superseding indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00001390.jpg
This page is from a legal motion filed by the defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (specifically Bobbi C. Sternheim's office) on April 19, 2021. The defense argues that the government's opposition to a trial continuance is unreasonable because the prosecution has significantly expanded the case, including increasing the conspiracy timeline from 4 to 11 years and adding new charges related to 'Accuser-4'. The document highlights a massive discovery dump on April 13, 2021, involving 20,000 pages of documents related to 226 non-testifying witnesses, which the defense claims they need more time to review before the scheduled July 12 trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001288.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ms. Maxwell. It details complaints about sleep deprivation due to flashlight checks, physical abuse during searches, retaliation by guards, restricted movement within her cell, poor food quality involving melted plastic, and contaminated water.
DOJ-OGR-00001287.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter disputes government claims about Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC, highlighting excessive physical searches (approx. 1400 times), lack of legal access, and intense surveillance measures. Sternheim explicitly links these harsh conditions to BOP negligence surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00001265.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal motion filed on March 16, 2021, requesting bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists her defense team (Sternheim, Everdell, Pagliuca, Menninger) and includes a significant footnote detailing complaints about her confinement at the MDC. Specifically, the footnote alleges violations of attorney-client privilege during video conferences due to guard proximity and audio recording, as well as a denial of legal calls regarding pretrial motions.
DOJ-OGR-00001255.jpg
This is the cover page for a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The document is a Reply Memorandum supporting Maxwell's third motion for bail, filed on March 22, 2021. It lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from firms in New York and Denver.
DOJ-OGR-00001241.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing, dated February 23, 2021, submitted by the legal team of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorneys argue that proposed restrictive bail conditions, including renunciation of foreign citizenship and asset monitoring, are sufficient to ensure her appearance at trial. They conclude that denying bail under these circumstances would constitute a miscarriage of justice.
DOJ-OGR-00001233.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The document lists the defense legal team, including Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00001200.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated December 18, 2020. It lists the attorneys and their respective law firms representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including Mark S. Cohen of COHEN & GRESSER LLP, who signed the document.
DOJ-OGR-00001186.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 23, 2020. It is a 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail' for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00001141.jpg
This document is the final signature page (page 39 of the brief, page 45 of the PDF filing) of a legal motion filed on December 4, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text concludes an argument requesting the Court order Maxwell's release on bail based on proposed conditions. It lists the defense counsel team from three different law firms: Cohen & Gresser LLP, Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C., and the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00001097.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on June 23, 2021, it is a memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her renewed motion for bail. The document lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00000898.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from Case 21-770 (related to Ghislaine Maxwell) covering filings between February 4, 2021, and February 16, 2021. It details numerous defense motions filed by Maxwell's legal team (Cohen, Pagliuca) to dismiss charges, suppress evidence, and strike surplusage, alongside multiple sealed documents. The log also records correspondence to Judge Nathan regarding conditions at the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) from both the prosecution (USA) and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00000897.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from Jan 26 to Feb 4, 2021. It details significant pre-trial activity, including the filing of twelve pre-trial motions by the defense, disputes over laptop access at the MDC Brooklyn involving the Bureau of Prisons, and specific motions to suppress evidence and dismiss charges (counts 1-6). The document highlights the involvement of various AUSAs, defense attorneys, and Judge Alison J. Nathan in managing redactions and discovery disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00000892.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from Case 21-770, dated March 24, 2021, detailing events from early December 2020 concerning the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of letters from Maxwell's legal team and subsequent orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding procedural matters such as briefing schedules, sealing documents, a renewed motion for bail, and Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. A key event is the Court's denial of Maxwell's request to summon the prison warden to testify about her confinement, instead ordering the Government to continue providing written updates.
DOJ-OGR-00000890.jpg
This document is a page from a federal court docket in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, listing entries from November 6, 2020, to December 1, 2020. It details various filings including letters regarding discovery deadlines, affidavits, mandates from the USCA dismissing an appeal, and several memo endorsements and orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding discovery schedules and conditions of confinement.
DOJ-OGR-00000861.jpg
This document is a docket summary from the legal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing court filings and orders from late February to mid-March 2021. Key events include Maxwell's third motion for bond, subsequent responses and replies, and a motion for a time extension which was granted. The document culminates in a detailed order from Judge Alison J. Nathan on March 18, 2021, addressing disputes over the redaction and sealing of pretrial motions and exhibits, setting deadlines for the parties to confer and propose joint redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00000860.jpg
This document is a court docket log from February 2021 for Case 21-770 involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the filing of numerous defense motions including attempts to suppress evidence, dismiss counts based on time-bars and a non-prosecution agreement, and strike surplusage. The log also records the filing of sealed documents and correspondence between attorneys (both defense and prosecution) and Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00000859.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 21-770), covering entries from January 26, 2021, to February 4, 2021. It details various legal filings, including government letters regarding laptop access at MDC Brooklyn, a denial of a BOP request to vacate an order, and multiple defense motions to suppress evidence and dismiss specific counts of the indictment. The document highlights the active legal maneuvering regarding redactions, detention conditions, and pre-trial dismissal attempts.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
Suggestions to Dkt 404
Letter regarding draft preliminary remarks for voir dire.
[EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Courtesy copy of today's ECF fling. Notification of new office address.
[EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Courtesy copy of today's ECF filing. Please note my new office address and preferred email address.
[EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Courtesy copy of today's ECF filing. Includes attachment regarding juror names disclosure.
FW: [EXTERNAL] U.S. v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Courtesy copy of ECF filings regarding bail application and juror name disclosure.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Request to release names of potential jurors for attorneys' eyes only to allow for background research.
Legal Mail Delivery Request
A letter filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a request for legal mail delivery.
Legal Mail Delivery Request
Letter regarding mail delivery issues
[EXTERNAL] US v. Maxwell S2 20 Cr 330 (AJN)
Courtesy copy of today's ECF filing.
[EXTERNAL] URGENT: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint regarding 4 items of legal mail waiting at USPO since 10:30 a.m. that MDC has not retrieved. Threatens to file an order to show cause if not resolved immediately.
Re: [EXTERNAL] URGENT: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
I am following up with the appropriate department.
URGENT: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Demanding status of 4 items of legal mail listed as 'Available for Pickup' by USPO but not retrieved by MDC. Threatens filing order to show cause.
Re: [EXTERNAL] URGENT: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Sender states they are following up with the appropriate department regarding the legal mail issue.
URGENT: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint that 4 items of legal mail are listed as 'Available for Pickup' by USPO but MDC has not retrieved them. Maxwell has not received legal mail in over a week. Threatens legal action if not resolved.
[EXTERNAL] URGENT: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint regarding 4 items of legal mail sitting at 'Available for Pickup' at USPO and not retrieved by MDC. Threatens legal action if not resolved.
Re: [EXTERNAL] URGENT: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
There was mail picked up today.
URGENT: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint regarding 4 items of legal mail listed as 'Available for Pickup' by USPO but not retrieved by MDC. Threatens legal action if not resolved immediately.
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense response regarding jury selection scheduling disputes with the government.
Jury Selection / Witness Inconvenience (inferred from text)
Argument regarding the government's focus on witness inconvenience over fair jury selection.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Apology for delay; promise to inquire with appropriate staff regarding concerns.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Thank you.
[EXTERNAL] Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Sender apologizes for delay and agrees to inquire with appropriate staff regarding Sternheim's concerns.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Confirmation that legal mail was picked up on the 15th and 18th and delivered to Ms. Maxwell.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense counsel submits a response to the Court's Order regarding draft preliminary remarks for jurors. They object to the government's request to withhold prospective juror names until oral voir dire.
[EXTERNAL] Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Complaint regarding non-functional HEPA filters during legal visit, request to use corner room for future visits, and complaint regarding uncollected legal mail with tracking numbers provided.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity