Bobbi C. Sternheim
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
102
Very Strong
|
211 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
29
Very Strong
|
34 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
70 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
John M. Leventhal
|
Professional succession |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
government counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Curcio client
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Counsel of record
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Pagliuca
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Detention | Ms. Maxwell is being held at the MDC under problematic conditions, including over-management and ... | MDC | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | An ongoing legal case involving Ms. Maxwell, where her conditions of confinement are a point of c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The ongoing criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal document service | Bobbi C. Sternheim certified the service of a legal motion with an exhibit to multiple parties in... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim executed a declaration requesting to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine Maxw... | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Motion Information Statement to be relieved as continued coun... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | Legal filing | Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a declaration in support of a motion to be relieved from repres... | UNITED STATES COURT OF APPE... | View |
| 2022-07-15 | N/A | Court Order issued granting Bobbi C. Sternheim's motion to be relieved as counsel for Ghislaine M... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Bobbi C. Sternheim filed a Notice of Appeal for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing payment | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' for case 20CR330-1 AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | Payment of a $505.00 fee for a 'Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee' in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | U.S. District Court, New Yo... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | Legal filing | A Notice of Appeal was filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Payment of Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee | U.S. District Court, Manhattan | View |
| 2022-07-07 | N/A | Notice of Appeal Filed | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Meeting | Bobbi C. Sternheim met with her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the detention facility. | MDC | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court Record | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 672 (Submission Under Seal) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Document 672 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Filing of legal document regarding sentencing procedures. | Court Docket | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal filing | Document 662 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014877.jpg
This document is the title page of a court transcript for a hearing held on November 10, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It lists Judge Alison J. Nathan as presiding and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (U.S. Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman).
DOJ-OGR-00014749.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. It lists the legal counsel present for both the government (Moe, Pomerantz, Comey, Rohrbach) and the defense (Sternheim, Everdell), as well as the defendant herself. The judge acknowledges reviewing preparatory documents, including a probation report and defense memoranda, prior to the sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00008435.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal filing dated December 15, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the contact information and signatures of Maxwell's defense attorneys: Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00008434.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on December 18, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense requests permission for a witness, Mr. Hamilton, to testify remotely from London via WebEx because he has tested positive for COVID-19 and cannot travel. The defense argues that precluding his testimony would violate Maxwell's constitutional rights to present a defense and confront accusers, specifically mentioning the need to expose the bias of an accuser named Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00008427.jpg
This document is the third and final page of a legal filing (Document 553) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated December 15, 2021, and filed on December 17, 2021. It serves as the signature page for a letter or motion addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan from the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, including attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim. The document also indicates that a copy was sent via email to the counsel of record.
DOJ-OGR-00008385.jpg
A legal letter from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter argues that the government used suggestive questioning techniques on accusers, specifically citing an instance where a witness named 'Jane' changed her testimony regarding a trip to New York and seeing 'The Lion King' after pressure from AUSA Rossmiller. The defense uses this to justify the necessity of expert testimony from Dr. Loftus regarding memory and suggestive questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00008372.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing (Document 544) from December 13, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell assert her constitutional right to call Mr. Scarola, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Glassman as witnesses. The page includes the contact information for her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00008360.jpg
This is a legal letter dated December 12, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim informs the court of logistical issues with defense witnesses, including travel from abroad, and notifies the judge that three witnesses have requested to testify under pseudonyms. The letter states that the government opposes this request and warns that the court's ruling could compromise Maxwell's right to present her defense.
DOJ-OGR-00008312.jpg
This document is a transcript from a final pretrial conference in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 10, 2021. Counsel for the government and for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, state their appearances for the record. The court outlines the plan for jury selection, which is scheduled to conclude on "Monday morning, the 29th," and notes that unused jurors are being kept on call at the recommendation of the jury department.
DOJ-OGR-00008311.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court hearing transcript from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The hearing took place on November 23, 2021, before District Judge Alison J. Nathan. The page lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00008246.jpg
This document is a transcript from a pretrial conference held on December 8, 2021, for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over the session, with legal teams for both the government (led by Maurene Comey) and the defense (led by Bobbi C. Sternheim) introducing themselves. The primary purpose of the conference is to discuss the logistics of jury selection (voir dire) and review lists of prospective jurors based on questionnaires administered in November.
DOJ-OGR-00008245.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for a conference in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 15, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00008210.jpg
This document is the signature page (page 5 of 5) of a legal filing, Document 521, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, dated December 3, 2021. It is respectfully submitted to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan by the legal team representing Ghislaine Maxwell, which includes attorneys Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, Christian R. Everdell, and Bobbi C. Sternheim from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00001875.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal letter dated December 7, 2020, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim. The letter requests the immediate elimination of 'onerous' and 'restrictive' detention conditions for her client, Ms. Maxwell. Copies of the letter were sent via email to four other attorneys involved in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001873.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, details her alleged mistreatment while in custody at the MDC. The filing outlines several issues, including invasive physical searches that increase her COVID-19 risk, severe deprivation of adequate and nutritious food leading to significant weight loss and health problems, and sleep deprivation due to constant checks with flashlights. These conditions are presented as negatively impacting her health and her ability to prepare for her legal defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001871.jpg
This legal document, a letter from the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, is being subjected to "draconian" and punitive pretrial detention conditions. The letter posits that these harsh measures are not related to Maxwell's own conduct but are a direct result of the government's attempt to repair its reputation following the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein in federal custody. The attorney details failed attempts to resolve these issues through internal prison channels and claims the conditions are impeding Maxwell's ability to prepare her legal defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001868.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 7, 2020. The letter argues that Maxwell is facing unduly harsh conditions, including solitary isolation, as a result of the Bureau of Prisons' incompetence and embarrassment over Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. Sternheim asserts that Maxwell is an 'exemplary detainee' and calls for Warden Tellez to address the concerns regarding her confinement, which are allegedly interfering with her legal defense.
DOJ-OGR-00001867.jpg
This legal document, filed by the law office of Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues against the restrictive conditions of her confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The filing contends that these measures, including constant surveillance and repeated searches, are an overreaction to the BOP's failure to prevent Jeffrey Epstein's death, rather than being based on any specific risk posed by Maxwell. The document also raises concerns about Ms. Maxwell's exposure to COVID-19 and the erasure of her legal emails, quoting then-Attorney General William Barr's stated interest in ensuring she makes it to trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001866.jpg
This legal letter, sent by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim on behalf of her client Ghislaine Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, formally complains about Maxwell's harsh and restrictive conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The letter refutes a previous communication from MDC staff, detailing issues such as significant weight loss, isolation, constant surveillance, and a recent quarantine that hindered her defense preparation. Sternheim renews the request for the MDC Warden, Heriberto Tellez, to respond directly to the Court and justify these conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001778.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on October 5, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim formally notifies the court that she will be serving as legal counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00001439.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. The text alleges severe mistreatment by prison staff, including physical abuse, withholding of food, destruction of legal documents, and excessive surveillance (including filming her showers). It also argues against flight risk allegations by citing monitored calls that demonstrate Maxwell's strong ties to the United States and desire to clear her name.
DOJ-OGR-00001438.jpg
This legal letter, sent from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan, protests the detention conditions of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the MDC. The letter argues that the 15-minute flashlight checks are disruptive and based on spurious justifications, such as 'enhanced security'. Sternheim refutes the government's claim that Maxwell possesses a contraband eye mask and provides evidence from an intake form showing Maxwell did not express safety concerns about being in the general population, contradicting the MDC's assertions.
DOJ-OGR-00001431.jpg
This legal document, filed on April 29, 2021, is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the Court regarding the confinement conditions of her client, Ms. Maxwell, at the MDC. Sternheim requests the Court to order the MDC to stop the disruptive 15-minute flashlight surveillance of Ms. Maxwell and argues that the threat of placing her in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) is ironic and unwarranted, as her only contact is with staff.
DOJ-OGR-00001402.jpg
This legal document is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the Court, filed on February 7, 2021, concerning her client, Ms. Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the Court's request for public updates on Maxwell's confinement is harmful, fueling negative media attention and jeopardizing her right to a fair trial. The letter criticizes the government's actions and requests that any future updates on Maxwell's condition be filed under seal to protect her privacy and legal rights.
DOJ-OGR-00001401.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. It details grievances including the persistence of mail delays (specifically a FedEx package with a discovery disc), the serving of moldy food, sleep deprivation due to constant lighting and flashlight checks, and the deletion of legal emails via CorrLinks. The filing argues that Maxwell is in 'de facto solitary confinement' and lacks adequate computer resources to review discovery for her trial.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-07 | Paid | Bobbi C. Sternheim | U.S. District Cou... | $505.00 | Notice of Appeal/Docketing Fee for Case 20CR330... | View |
U.S. v. Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Submission of a courtesy copy of that day's ECF filing, specifically a bail application.
MDC Conditions
Complaint regarding conditions of confinement at MDC Brooklyn.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Complaint regarding confinement conditions, excessive searches, and lack of legal access.
Detention conditions of Ms. Maxwell
A letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim detailing the detrimental effects of Ms. Maxwell's detention conditions at the MDC. The letter argues that constant monitoring, deprivation of basic rights, and stress are harming her health and ability to prepare a defense, and suggests these measures are an overreaction to the BOP's handling of Jeffrey Epstein's death.
Updates on Ms. Maxwell's conditions of confinement
A letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the Court arguing that the government's updates on Ms. Maxwell's confinement are detrimental, fuel negative media attention, and prejudice her right to a fair trial. The letter requests that any future updates be filed under seal or redacted.
Opposition to MDC letter
Defense opposition to a previous letter regarding MDC.
Opposition to MDC letter
Letter opposing the MDC's position.
Opposition to MDC letter
Defense opposition to MDC letter.
Opposition to MDC letter
Letter opposing the MDC's position.
United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Defense counsel arguing against MDC's objection to Maxwell using a laptop on weekends/holidays to review discovery.
Opposition to MDC letter
Opposition correspondence.
Request for continued laptop access for pretrial detainee...
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim argues that her client, Ms. Maxwell, should continue to be permitted laptop access on weekends and holidays to review electronic discovery for her trial. The letter states this is a reasonable accommodation that does not burden the BOP or MDC and asks that the Court's order remain in effect.
Request for Ms. Maxwell's continued access to a laptop on...
A letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim arguing that the court's order allowing her client, Ms. Maxwell, to use a laptop on weekends and holidays should remain in effect to allow for adequate trial preparation, stating it poses no burden on the BOP or MDC.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Denying request to hand-deliver mail. Cites BOP policies, lack of legal department involvement in mail processing, and no-visitor policy due to institution rules.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Thanking the recipient for responding regarding the denial of hand-delivery requests.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Requesting to hand-deliver legal mail to MDC for direct deposit due to mail delays and a filing deadline on 1/25.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Confirmed.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Confirming VTCs for Tuesday through Friday, 12:30-3:30.
Re: URGENT re: Ghislaine Maxwell
Sternheim is on VTC with Maxwell; Maxwell has not received time-sensitive legal mail delivered that morning. Requests assistance.
Re: URGENT re: Ghislaine Maxwell
Notifies that express mailing was delivered to MDC at 7:25 am. Imperative Maxwell receives it today.
Re: URGENT-Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509 - COURT ORDER
Aledging receipt of confirmation that MDC counsel was contacted.
URGENT-Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509 - COURT ORDER
Reporting that Officer Regan stated "I don't care" regarding the court order and denied laptop access.
Re: URGENT re: Ghislaine Maxwell
Acknowledges missing previous email. Wishes recipient a good weekend.
Re: URGENT re: Ghislaine Maxwell
States legal department is not involved in processing legal or regular mail and cites BOP policies.
Re: URGENT re: Ghislaine Maxwell 02879-509
Confirming mail was delivered to MDC at 7:25 am and stating it is imperative Maxwell receives it TODAY.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity