Jane
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Association |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jane's mother
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Matt
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Mr. Glassman
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane's father
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michelle
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Association |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Incident | Witness saw Ghislaine without a top on for the first time. | by the pool | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Jane talked to Kate's lawyers. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Jane talked to Brad Edwards. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged incident | The witness claims she, Epstein, and Ghislaine went upstairs to a room where fondling occurred. | a room | View |
| 2025-11-09 | Meeting | The witness's very first meeting with agents and prosecutors. | N/A | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Abuse | Jane was forced to do things she didn't want to do, which involved massage, by Jeffrey Epstein an... | a house | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Flight assistance | The Defendant helped Jane get on a commercial flight when she had trouble with identification by ... | unspecified airport | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Trip | Jane began traveling from Palm Beach to New York with the Defendant and Epstein. | Between Palm Beach and New ... | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Trip | Jane stayed at Mr. Epstein's eight-story mansion in New York when she was 14 years old. The mansi... | Mr. Epstein's eight-story m... | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Trip | Jane traveled with the defendant and Epstein to Epstein's townhouse in New York City and his ranc... | New York City and New Mexico | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Sexual abuse | Epstein sexually abused Jane on some occasions while the Defendant was present. | New York | View |
| 2025-01-01 | Sexual abuse | The defendant and Epstein began sexually abusing Jane when she was 14, and the abuse continued fo... | Palm Beach, Florida; New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Jane regarding past trips and a document labeled J-6. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Redirect examination of witness Jane, where she explains her reasons for speaking to a reporter. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A portion of a court proceeding involving the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The dial... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Redirect examination of witness Jane in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A court hearing, specifically the cross-examination of a witness named Jane, where procedural iss... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Jane regarding a discrepancy in her testimony about a trip to New Yo... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of a witness named Jane regarding exhibits, including her signature, photograph... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal testimony | Direct examination of witness Jane, as recorded in a court transcript filed on this date. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of a witness named Jane as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The examination focu... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Jane. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of a witness named "Jane" in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, during which Government E... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of Mr. Rodgers regarding his observations on flights for Mr. Epstein, specifica... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A witness named Jane is under direct examination. She confirms she is testifying under a pseudony... | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017801.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a redirect examination of a witness named Jane, filed on August 10, 2022. Jane explains her evolving comfort level in meetings with the government; initially, she found it too emotionally difficult to share details, but over time, as she became more familiar with the people and the meetings became smaller, she felt more trust and it became easier to discuss what happened to her.
DOJ-OGR-00017797.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. An attorney, Ms. Moe, objects to questioning by another attorney, Ms. Menninger, on the grounds of relevance and personal knowledge. The Court overrules the objection and admits Defendant's Exhibit J-15 into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00017793.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on her recollection of attending Mike Wallace's 80th birthday party, which the questioner suggests occurred in May 1998. Jane confirms she sang "Happy Birthday" but is unsure of other details, while her attorney, Ms. Moe, makes several successful objections.
DOJ-OGR-00017792.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as Jane. The questioning focuses on Jane's past interactions, specifically her meetings with Mike Wallace of 60 Minutes, including at his 80th birthday party, and a meeting where Epstein was also present. Jane also confirms having met with 'the government' and discussed her meeting with Mike Wallace.
DOJ-OGR-00017784.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane by an attorney, Ms. Menninger. The questioning aims to define the profession of an actor, establishing that they portray fictional characters for a living using their voice, body, and lines written by others. The transcript also includes an objection from another attorney, Ms. Moe, regarding a court exhibit, which the judge agrees to review.
DOJ-OGR-00017775.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a procedural discussion between the judge and several attorneys (Moe, Sternheim, Menninger). The conversation focuses on the next witness, identified as Matt, and addresses how potential evidentiary issues, such as the introduction of prior consistent statements, will be handled. An attorney also requests permission to ask a leading question under Rule 611(c).
DOJ-OGR-00017770.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a criminal case dated August 10, 2022. It captures a sidebar or legal argument between two attorneys, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger, and the presiding judge regarding the admissibility of a line of questioning for a witness named Jane. The discussion focuses on whether questions about what Jane was told regarding her testimony's impact on a civil case are proper for impeaching the credibility of the prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00017769.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about attorney-client privilege. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, argues that a portion of the privilege was waived, while another, Ms. Moe, states she is unprepared to respond. The judge ultimately rules that the issue is too complex to be decided on the spot and requires the parties to submit formal legal briefs on the matter.
DOJ-OGR-00017764.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger before a judge. The discussion centers on whether Ms. Menninger can question a witness, Jane, about her potential expectation of receiving a higher financial payout in a related civil case as a result of her testimony in the current criminal proceeding. The attorneys and the court explore the relevance of this line of questioning, touching upon privileged communications and the timeline of a victims' compensation fund.
DOJ-OGR-00017762.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal debate during the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. Attorney Ms. Menninger argues that attorney-client privilege was waived because a communication was shared with the government. In response, attorney Ms. Moe suggests questioning the witness about her motives and potential bias related to a civil case, as a way to proceed without directly challenging the privileged communication.
DOJ-OGR-00017757.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over the admissibility of 'Exhibit J-40'. An attorney, Ms. Menninger, moves to admit the document, which concerns a prior civil settlement involving the witness, Jane, under seal. Opposing counsel, Ms. Moe, objects on legal grounds, arguing the information is already on record. The judge postpones the discussion until after a lunch break.
DOJ-OGR-00017752.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on the financial support she provided to her mother, who lived with her, and a conversation she had with her attorney, Mr. Glassman, about cooperating in a criminal case after hiring him in September 2019. An objection by Ms. Moe to a question about this conversation was sustained by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017747.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on a trip she took to Europe with her family when she was possibly 15 years old. The attorneys, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger, briefly discuss an exhibit, J-6, which is being used to refresh the witness's memory about past flights.
DOJ-OGR-00017746.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a legal cross-examination dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as Jane. Jane discusses her knowledge of the 'Epstein case' and clarifies that she hired a lawyer due to ongoing harassment, including calls to her, her husband, her work, and her friends, rather than solely based on information from tabloids. She also mentions having traveled frequently to a northern country during her teenage years.
DOJ-OGR-00017740.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on events in 2019, establishing that Jane was contacted by the media and an Agent Amanda Young before Epstein's arrest. The transcript reveals Jane was initially uninterested in getting involved but later hired a new attorney, Mr. Glassman.
DOJ-OGR-00017735.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination, likely a deposition or court testimony, dated August 10, 2022. The witness, identified as Jane, is questioned about commercial flights paid for by an unidentified male, sending a photograph with a note ('Thanks for rocking my world') to Epstein when she was 19, and her mother's alleged involvement in making her send it. The testimony also references exhibits and the lack of dates on photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00017734.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal cross-examination, filed on August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as 'Jane.' The questioning focuses on her interactions with 'the government' regarding trial preparation and a mock cross-examination, as well as her travel with 'Mr. Epstein' on his private jet after 1999. Jane confirms meetings and preparation with the government but denies continuous travel with Epstein after 1999, admitting to only one flight on his private jet.
DOJ-OGR-00017733.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on her lack of physical evidence to support claims about her relationship with 'Epstein', including his alleged possession of a photo of her and his payment for her acting and voice lessons. The witness confirms she has no records of these payments or other events from that time, such as a trip to see 'the Lion King'.
DOJ-OGR-00017731.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Jane. She clarifies that she knew individuals named Emmy and Michelle in New York, not Florida. Jane confirms that as a 14-year-old, she stayed at Mr. Epstein's staffed, eight-story mansion in New York and that Epstein gave her "hundreds of dollars at a time" on a regular basis.
DOJ-OGR-00017730.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner confronts Jane with a prior statement she allegedly made to the government about receiving phone calls from someone named Emmy in Florida when she was a teenager. Jane denies making the statement and claims the written record of it is incorrect, leading to objections from her counsel, Ms. Moe, and rulings from the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017726.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It details a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Jane, who is asked if she has seen pictures of someone named Sophie since September 2019. An attorney, Ms. Moe, objects, and another attorney, Ms. Menninger, provides 'Lack of evidence' as the grounds, which the judge questions.
DOJ-OGR-00017725.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court cross-examination transcript dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as 'Jane.' The questioning focuses on Jane's associations with individuals named Emmy, Michelle, and Kelly, and her claims regarding their involvement in 'sexual contact' and 'group massages.' It also touches upon Jane's prior interactions with government agents and prosecutors, including her ability to identify individuals from pictures and statements made during an initial meeting in September.
DOJ-OGR-00017724.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioner confirms Jane's previous statements about the involvement of three other women—Sophie, Emmy, and Michelle—in events described as a 'group scenario,' 'abuse,' and 'group sexualized massages.' Jane affirms that these women were present and participated in the events.
DOJ-OGR-00017722.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on Jane's previous testimony about her participation in recurring 'group sexualized massages' and her specific recollection of another participant, a massage therapist named Sophie. The questioner probes Jane's memory of Sophie's profession and physical attributes.
DOJ-OGR-00017719.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning establishes that Mr. Epstein introduced Jane to Donald Trump and took her to Mar-a-Lago when she claimed to be 14, where she met Trump. The questioning also briefly touches on her schooling and an unspecified "pool house incident".
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane | $200.00 | Payment for her time visiting his mansion while... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unknown | Jane | $0.00 | Settlement award discussed in the context of cr... | View |
| N/A | Received | defendants | Jane | $0.00 | Discussion of a plan to 'get more money from th... | View |
Benefit of testifying
Communication that testifying would benefit her in the criminal case.
Request to take extra classes
The questioner refers to a letter the witness (Jane) had submitted asking to take extra classes the next summer.
Potential abuse in New Mexico
The document describes how the government repeatedly questioned Jane about abuse in New Mexico, despite her initial statements of having no memory of such events.
No Subject
A photograph was sent to Epstein with a note saying 'Thanks for rocking my world'.
Trip to New Mexico and sexual abuse
Jane previously told the FBI about a trip to New Mexico but denied being sexually abused there.
Names of participants in group massages
The witness confirms that she previously told the government the names of other women who participated in the group massages.
A document shown to Jane on the witness stand.
Jane communicated with Brian about a document she had been shown while on the witness stand. Ms. Menninger wants to know the full extent of this communication.
Question regarding testimony
The government communicated a question to Jane through her attorney.
Timeline of 'The Lion King'
The government communicated to Jane through her attorney that 'The Lion King' Broadway show did not come out until 1997.
Information for the government
Jane communicated information to Mr. Glassman with the knowledge that he intended to share it with the government.
Photographs from soap opera
Jane, a soap opera star, sent photographs of herself and other cast members in an envelope to her fan, Ms. Espinosa.
Unknown content
The content of this communication is the subject of the legal debate; Menninger wants to exclude the specific content while allowing the witness to state how she felt.
Legal Strategy
Communications regarding the impact of criminal testimony on the civil case.
Receiving financial help from Jeffrey Epstein
Jane told the witness that she had received financial help from Jeffrey Epstein. The exact timing and details of the conversation are not fully specified in this excerpt.
Confirming Maxwell's identity
After Matt learned that Maxwell had been arrested, he called Jane to ask if she was the woman Jane had told him about years ago. Jane confirmed that she was.
Harassment
People calling and harassing Jane.
Jane's family living in her house
The witness is questioned about telling Matt that her family was living in her house.
A woman making her feel comfortable
Jane told her boyfriend from a decade ago, Matt, about the woman who would make her feel comfortable in the room.
Advice about boyfriends
Maxwell advised Jane that once she has a sexual relationship with a boyfriend, she can always have one again because they are 'grandfathered in'.
Abuse suffered in New Mexico
Maxwell received notes from Jane's interview, which recorded the abuse she suffered in New Mexico, over three weeks before her trial.
Making arrangements
The questioner alleges that the witness, Jane, previously told the government she recalled Emmy calling her home phone in Florida between the ages of 14 and 16 to make arrangements. The witness denies ever making this statement.
Involvement in sexualized massages
Jane testified to the government that she was involved in sexualized massages with multiple people and provided their first names.
The case
The speaker states, 'You heard that Jane and Annie gave some interviews themselves...'
Post-event discussions
Jane spoke with her family and ex-boyfriend Matt, which the speaker claims contaminated her memory of events.
Her experience with Epstein
Jane told the government that she was in the same house for three years when she met Epstein until she moved to New York.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity