David Schoen
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
23 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submitter recipient |
11
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document production |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
IG (Inspector General)
|
Friend |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Production submission |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission of evidence |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Submission involvement |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E. (Epstein)
|
Correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
LexisNexis
|
Subscriber user |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein Case
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigative subject witness |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document custodian subject of inquiry |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation target witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Document producer |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
OLC
|
Adversarial critical |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The IG
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sean Hannity
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Investigation subject provider |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
House Oversight Committee
|
Subject of investigation provider of documents |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between David Schoen and Lefkowitz regarding a prospective client. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-03-22 | N/A | Email sent regarding a Tea Party Pac article. | Internet | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen conducted a LexisNexis search for legal materials regarding 'cvra and sixth amendment'. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | David Schoen performed a LexisNexis search for legal articles regarding the Crime Victims' Rights... | N/A | View |
| 2019-02-28 | N/A | Legal research conducted by David Schoen. | N/A | View |
| 2016-06-01 | N/A | Proposed meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and David Schoen. | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Publication of Law Review Article | Utah | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Publication of BYU Law Review article | Unknown | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | State v. Casey court case | Utah | View |
| 2001-01-01 | N/A | United States v. Fortier decision | Tenth Circuit | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016534.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016533.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103), submitted to the House Oversight Committee by David Schoen (Epstein's attorney). The text discusses legal theories regarding prosecutorial discretion, public corruption, and the under-enforcement of sexual assault and police violence. It contrasts U.S. federalism with English law regarding the judicial review of non-prosecution decisions, likely serving as legal support for arguments regarding the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016532.jpg
This page from the Minnesota Law Review discusses the pros and cons of federalism-based enforcement redundancy in criminal law, specifically comparing it to private prosecution and administrative review. It argues that while federalism offers a check on state underenforcement, it relies heavily on the discretion of federal prosecutors rather than private victims. The text is heavily footnoted with references to UK and Canadian case law regarding prosecutorial oversight.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) discussing federalism, prosecutorial discretion, and the expansion of federal law enforcement (including the FBI) to address local corruption and bias. The footnotes provide a comparative legal analysis, citing German laws (StPO) regarding the mandatory duty to prosecute crimes, contrasting it with discretionary powers. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531' and bears the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' (Jeffrey Epstein's attorney), suggesting it was part of a legal file or submission regarding arguments about prosecutorial oversight or misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016530.jpg
This page from the Minnesota Law Review discusses the legal concept of "dual sovereignty" and the Double Jeopardy Clause, specifically focusing on federal oversight of state prosecution decisions. It highlights the Department of Justice's policy of reviewing state enforcement practices in areas like civil rights violations and notes the upcoming Supreme Court case United States v. Gamble. The footnotes provide comparative legal analysis regarding victim rights to review non-prosecution decisions in Scotland, England, France, and Ireland.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016529.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) produced by attorney David Schoen for the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016529). The text discusses the legal theory of 'Federalism Safeguards on Prosecutorial Discretion,' specifically analyzing how the U.S. system allows federal prosecutors to override or 'second-guess' state prosecutors' decisions not to prosecute (declination decisions), contrasting this with models in Canada, Germany, and Australia. The footnotes discuss historical racial inequities in the U.S. justice system and EU directives on crime victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016528.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It contains an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing 'Declination Oversight,' comparing U.S. and European approaches to prosecutorial discretion and private prosecution. The page includes extensive footnotes citing various state laws (RI, NH, NC, OK, PA) and legal scholarship regarding grand juries and selective prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016527.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing the oversight of declination decisions in state justice systems compared to the federal system. It highlights the lack of administrative and judicial review for state prosecutors' charging decisions and details the limited exceptions and historical context through extensive footnotes citing case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), submitted as an exhibit to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The text discusses legal theories regarding the judicial and administrative review of decisions *not* to charge (prosecutorial discretion), contrasting the lack of such mechanisms in the U.S. with their prevalence in the E.U. and England. This legal argument is relevant to the controversy surrounding the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case and the rights of his victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016523.jpg
This document discusses the role of private prosecutions as a structural check on district attorneys, similar to grand juries, and argues that their rarity does not justify abolition. It further explores the historical connection between the decline of private prosecution in the U.S. and racial discrimination, noting how legal barriers prevented African Americans from prosecuting crimes or testifying. The footnotes provide extensive comparative legal references to prosecution systems in Germany, England, Wales, Canada, and Australia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016522.jpg
This page from a law review article discusses the historical evolution of public versus private prosecution in the United States compared to England. It notes that while private prosecution has largely vanished in the U.S. in favor of public prosecutors, some states like Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire retain vestiges of it. The footnotes provide legal citations regarding victims' rights statutes and case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016521.jpg
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol. 103, circa 2019) discussing the legal theory and international differences regarding private prosecutions versus public prosecutors. It specifically highlights the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the footnotes. The document appears to be from the files of David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer), as indicated by the footer, and was submitted to the House Oversight Committee as part of an investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016521).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016520.jpg
This page is an extract from a legal brief or filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (likely related to the Epstein investigation). It cites a Minnesota Law Review article discussing the limitations of victims' rights in the U.S. compared to other jurisdictions, specifically noting that U.S. victims generally lack the power to challenge prosecutorial discretion (decisions not to prosecute). The document includes extensive footnotes citing various examples of enforcement discretion and budget limitations in contexts like tax law and marijuana enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016519.jpg
This document is a page from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing mechanisms of prosecutorial accountability and the impact of resource constraints on charging decisions. It details three models for checking underenforcement: private prosecution authority, independent review of non-prosecution, and multiple public prosecution agencies, noting the U.S. preference for the third model. The page also includes extensive footnotes citing various legal scholars, articles, and cases related to prosecution failures and police bias.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016517.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), likely submitted as evidence to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes legal underenforcement and systemic bias, specifically regarding police misconduct, sexual assault, and crimes against marginalized groups (sex workers, undocumented immigrants, LGBT individuals). It argues that professional relationships between prosecutors and police create conflicts of interest that prevent fair adjudication, citing various legal standards and academic works.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515.jpg
This document is a page from a legal academic article (Minnesota Law Review) discussing the concept of 'underenforcement' in the criminal justice system, particularly regarding sexual assaults and corruption. It argues that underenforcement often stems from bias or favoritism and undermines the legitimacy of legal institutions. The document bears the name of David Schoen (one of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, likely to argue points regarding prosecutorial discretion or failure to prosecute.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016514.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of criminal prosecution jurisdiction between state and federal levels, particularly regarding police misconduct and sexual assault. It argues that federal oversight is an imperfect backstop due to higher legal standards and political shifts, and highlights the lack of safeguards against unjustified decisions not to prosecute compared to the robust protections against improper charging. The text includes extensive footnotes citing legal cases, statutes, and articles related to police violence and civil rights enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016513.jpg
This page from a legal article discusses the concept of "enforcement redundancy" as a tool to combat criminal law underenforcement, particularly in cases of police violence and sexual assault. It analyzes the U.S. approach of federalism-based redundancy compared to other mechanisms like private prosecution or judicial review used internationally. The text argues that while federal intervention helps with public corruption and some civil rights violations, it has a mixed record on police violence and has failed to adequately address sexual assault underenforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016512.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) submitted as an exhibit, marked with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016512 and the name David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer). The text is an academic legal analysis discussing 'enforcement redundancy,' 'underenforcement,' and the interplay between federal and state jurisdiction, as well as the Department of Justice's internal review processes. It appears to be part of a legal argument regarding prosecutorial discretion or jurisdiction, likely relevant to the double jeopardy or dual sovereignty issues in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016511.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing structural responses to underenforcement in criminal justice systems, particularly through "redundant charging authority" and overlapping jurisdictions. It introduces the concept of creating distinct enforcement agencies with duplicative jurisdiction, such as in transnational law or U.S. federalism, to ensure laws are enforced even if one entity declines to act. The page includes extensive footnotes citing relevant U.S. Supreme Court cases and legal scholarship.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016510.jpg
This document is a page from a 2018 Minnesota Law Review article by Darryl K. Brown titled 'Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute.' The text discusses the legal theory behind underenforcement of criminal law, specifically citing failures to prosecute sexual assaults and racially motivated crimes. While the text does not mention Epstein, the document bears the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN' (an attorney associated with Epstein) and a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016510', indicating it was part of an evidentiary production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as legal research regarding the controversial non-prosecution agreement Epstein received.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017766.jpg
This document is page 52 of a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the implementation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It emphasizes the necessity for the judiciary to comprehensively protect victims' rights in federal criminal cases to avoid further congressional intervention. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of materials submitted during a congressional investigation, likely regarding the violation of victims' rights in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017765.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 Brigham Young University Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on closed-circuit transmission of trials for victims and the right to be heard at sentencing for petty offenses. The text argues that the CVRA necessitates changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to ensure victim participation. The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was likely used as an exhibit or reference in legal proceedings or congressional inquiries related to the Epstein case (likely regarding CVRA violations).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017763.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically the victim's right against unreasonable delay in proceedings. It cites Senators Feinstein and Kyl, along with various state statutes, to argue that delays should not occur merely for the convenience of the court or parties. The document bears the name of David Schoen (a known attorney for Epstein) and a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017762.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article (page 48 of 52) discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It outlines proposed changes to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 48 and 50, arguing that courts must consider victims' views before dismissing charges and ensure proceedings are free from unreasonable delay. The document bears the name David Schoen at the bottom and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence or testimony during a congressional investigation, likely related to the handling of the Epstein case.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen shares a Fox News article about a civil settlement, criticizes the article's framing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement), expresses a desire for 'true facts' about accusers to be published, and wishes Epstein 'Good Shabbos'.
From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offender,...
Schoen informs Epstein that Fox News is re-running an old piece about his civil settlement.
From Fox News...
I know it was an old piece but Fox is running it again today. [Includes text of Fox News article about Epstein lawsuit settlement]
Re: From Fox News - Jeffrey Epstein, registered sex offen...
no worry how are you
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Forwarded a Fox News article snippet and link about the death of a federal judge overseeing an Epstein lawsuit.
Re: From Fox News...
Yup
From Fox News - Federal judge overseeing key lawsuit rela...
Sharing a Fox News article about the death of a federal judge involved in the Epstein lawsuit.
Mueller’s Star Witness Against Trump Once Arrested For Ch...
Schoen shares a link to a 'nut site' article that alleges the recipient is a Mueller informant, noting the political contradictions involving Acosta and Trump.
Re: Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped se...
yes, every outlet needs a sex story
Shared Article from AOL...
Discusses media coverage, Dershowitz, and Lefkowitz. Claims the article is wrong about victims being silenced.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
Re: Hello
Asks if something is 'overblown' and questions why 'stryok' is treated differently than mob prosecutors who despised targets like Gotti.
No Subject
Discusses his obsession with fighting prosecutorial/FBI misconduct, mentions an article tying Jeffrey E. to #metoo and Trump, hopes Jeffrey E.'s cases are behind him, and expresses regret for not having helped.
No Subject
A short message asking 'judge jeannie?'.
No Subject
The main body of text at the top of the document. David Schoen critiques Jeannie Rhee and Greg Andres, opines on Russian election interference, and mentions his friendship with the IG.
Re: Hello
Detailed criticism of Mueller's team (Rhee, Andres), discussion of Russia election interference, and mention of being a guest on Hannity.
Re: Hello
Asks if the situation is overblown, compares it to mob prosecutors hating Gotti, asks why Strzok is different.
N/A
Discusses obsession with prosecutorial misconduct, mentions #metoo press tying Epstein to Trump, expresses regret at not being able to help Epstein legally.
Re: Hello
Discusses Strzok testimony, McCabe, bias, and asks 'we're on the same team'.
Re: Hello
Asks if something is 'overblown' and questions why 'stryok' is treated differently than mob prosecutors who despised targets like Gotti.
Re: Hello
A reply questioning if the bias described by Schoen is 'overblown'. Compares the situation to mob prosecutors having strong feelings for their targets like Gotti and asks why 'stryok' (Peter Strzok) is considered different.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity