Matt
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
JANE
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Romantic |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Confidant |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Profile owner (name redacted)
|
Social |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Confidant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
women (unnamed accusers)
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
women (witnesses)
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Market
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Silverman
|
Interviewer interviewee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Unspecified |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed female witness
|
Confidant witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Profile Owner (takingbackmicrosoft)
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Donald Trump
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
takingbackmicrosoft
|
Social |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deepak Chopra
|
Professional intellectual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Co witnesses |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Confrontation | Jane confronted her mother about Jeffrey Epstein. | a house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Foot massage given to Matt on a flight. | On a plane | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Jane gave powerful testimony at the trial, which was corroborated by Alessi, Matt, and various do... | Trial | View |
| N/A | N/A | Arrival in L.A. and good-bye to Matt. | L.A. | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lunch meeting/Interview | Gusto, Moscow | View |
| N/A | Relationship | Matt dated Jane for several years. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Witnesses, including ex-boyfriends Matt, Dave, and Shawn, and Juan Alessi, testified in court. | court | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Conversations between Matt and Jane where Jane discussed her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Matt provided testimony in a trial. | court | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Testimony by witnesses including ex-boyfriends (Matt, Dave, Shawn) and Juan Alessi. | Court | View |
| N/A | Court examination | Direct examination of witness MATT by Ms. Moe. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Discussion | A "colloquy discussion" between Matt and Jane that occurred at an earlier time. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Testimony | Jane provided powerful testimony at the trial, which was corroborated by Alessi, Matt, and variou... | Court | View |
| N/A | Trial | A trial where expert testimony was heard from Dr. Rocchio and testimony from Matt. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Confrontation | Jane confronted her mother about money not being free, implying the mother knew about the abuse. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct testimony of witness Matt in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Matt regarding his conversations with a woman named Jane ab... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A witness named Matt is excused after direct examination, and the government calls its next witne... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A court proceeding for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE involving the direct examination of a witness named... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of witness Matt regarding his past relationship with Jane and her home life, i... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A witness named Matt is under direct examination, testifying about his conversations with Jane re... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | A witness, Matt, provides testimony under direct examination by Ms. Moe. | In open court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Witness 'Matt' is called by the government and sworn in. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court Testimony (Direct Examination of Matt) | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing date of the court transcript document. | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017818.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022. After a witness named Jane is excused, the court calls for a break. An attorney, Ms. Sternheim, then raises a procedural issue, requesting a proffer from the government regarding the testimony of the next witness, Matt, to ensure it complies with evidence rules and avoids improper statements.
DOJ-OGR-00017775.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a procedural discussion between the judge and several attorneys (Moe, Sternheim, Menninger). The conversation focuses on the next witness, identified as Matt, and addresses how potential evidentiary issues, such as the introduction of prior consistent statements, will be handled. An attorney also requests permission to ask a leading question under Rule 611(c).
DOJ-OGR-00017752.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on the financial support she provided to her mother, who lived with her, and a conversation she had with her attorney, Mr. Glassman, about cooperating in a criminal case after hiring him in September 2019. An objection by Ms. Moe to a question about this conversation was sustained by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00017745.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022) documenting the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane'. The questioning focuses on Jane's communications regarding the Epstein case, specifically confirming that she spoke with Stan Pottinger, her ex-boyfriend Matt, and some family members. The defense attorney attempts to establish that her knowledge of the Epstein case is influenced by these conversations and press coverage.
DOJ-OGR-00018857.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys and the judge. The primary topic is the status of witnesses, with the government (represented by Ms. Moe) seeking confirmation that the defense will not recall a witness named Jane, following the completed testimony of Matt and the withdrawal of Brian. The defense (represented by Ms. Menninger) requests time to consider, and the judge instructs them to confer and address the issue the next day.
DOJ-OGR-00021383.jpg
This page from an OPR report discusses the handling of the Epstein case, concluding that prosecutors did not intend to benefit Epstein but that the outcome resulted from Acosta's concerns about state authority. It highlights communication failures within the team, noting that while Acosta was unusually involved in decision-making, he was removed from the supervisory chain and may not have been fully aware of critical details known by staff members like Villafaña.
DOJ-OGR-00021243.jpg
This legal document details a professional dispute between Criminal Division Chief Menchel and another individual, Villafaña, concerning the Epstein investigation. The text includes a communication from Menchel asserting his authority and admonishing Villafaña for bypassing the chain of command, alongside conflicting statements made by both parties to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). Villafaña characterized Menchel's communication as intimidating, while Menchel claimed Villafaña had a history of resisting supervision, highlighting significant internal conflict over the handling of the case.
DOJ-OGR-00021231.jpg
This document is a page from an OPR report detailing internal DOJ deliberations in May 2007 regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights a conflict between prosecutors Lourie (who favored meeting with defense) and Villafaña (who strongly opposed it, arguing the case warranted prison time rather than probation negotiations). The text includes details of emails and a draft memo where Villafaña expresses concern that meeting with Epstein's lawyers, including Lefcourt and Dershowitz, would reveal too much prosecution strategy.
DOJ-OGR-00017199.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a rebuttal argument given by Ms. Comey on August 10, 2022. She argues for the credibility of several witnesses, including Juan Alessi and the ex-boyfriends (Matt, Dave, Shawn) of other female witnesses, stating they have no motive to lie. Comey highlights corroborating evidence, such as flight records showing minors Jane and Virginia on Jeffrey Epstein's planes and Alessi's own admission of stealing from and repaying Epstein, to bolster their testimony against the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00017196.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (rebuttal by Prosecutor Ms. Comey) in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor argues against the defense theory that victims fabricated stories for financial gain, pointing out that victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie disclosed details about Maxwell to the FBI and personal confidants (Dave Mulligan, Matt, Sean) years before any compensation fund existed (specifically citing 2006 and 2007). The text details specific allegations, including Maxwell touching Annie's breasts during a massage and Carolyn identifying Maxwell by her hair and accent.
DOJ-OGR-00017192.jpg
This document is a legal rebuttal arguing for the credibility of a witness named Jane, asserting that her memory of meeting Maxwell and Epstein and the onset of abuse at age 14 is accurate. It counters defense attempts to discredit her timeline by referencing Interlochen and flight records from 1994 and 1996, which place Jane, Maxwell, Epstein, and the defendant together at key times and locations, including flights to New York. The speaker emphasizes that Jane's memory of the abuse is more significant than minor discrepancies in dating events by public figures' birthdays.
DOJ-OGR-00017133.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by Ms. Menninger, arguing that a witness named Jane has an unreliable and deliberately altered memory concerning her time with Epstein. The speaker highlights inconsistencies in Jane's testimony about a property in Santa Fe, contrasting her account with testimony from other witnesses (Annie, Larry Visoski) and a flight log entry. The summation posits that Jane's memory was contaminated by news reports and conversations with family, and that she intentionally falsified her timeline to appear younger.
DOJ-OGR-00017095.jpg
This document is a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the conclusion of a prosecutor's closing argument, which urges the jury to convict Maxwell for sexually exploiting and trafficking underage girls, citing the testimony of witnesses like Juan Alessi, David Mulligan, and Janice Swain. Following the argument, the judge addresses the jury, announcing a short lunch break and reminding them not to discuss the case.
DOJ-OGR-00017055.jpg
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues for Maxwell's guilt by recounting the testimonies of two victims, 'Jane' and 'Annie Farmer'. The summary details how Jane's testimony of sexual exploitation by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein was corroborated, and describes Epstein's initial grooming of a 16-year-old Annie Farmer in 1995, presenting these as part of a consistent 'playbook' of abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a legal summation given by Ms. Moe. She argues for the credibility of a witness, Jane, by citing the expert testimony of Dr. Rocchio, who explains that delayed disclosure is typical for victims of sexual trauma. Ms. Moe further supports Jane's testimony by highlighting that it is corroborated by the strikingly similar experiences of three other witnesses: Annie, Carolyn, and Kate.
DOJ-OGR-00017050.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court summation by Ms. Moe, likely a prosecutor. She argues that testimony from a witness named Matt corroborates the account of a victim named Jane. Matt, who dated Jane in the mid-2000s, testified that Jane told him years ago about being abused by her "godfather," Jeffrey Epstein, and another woman, whom Jane later confirmed was Maxwell after her arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00013272.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The discussion involves logistics regarding witnesses identified as Jane, Matt, and Brian. The government (Ms. Moe) seeks confirmation that the defense will not recall Jane so she can be released, noting that Matt has testified and Brian will not be testifying.
DOJ-OGR-00031673.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile for a user with the URL 'takingbackmicrosoft', captured on February 9, 2006, as part of a public records request. The profile owner, from Rantoul, Illinois, indicates they are in a relationship, White/Caucasian, Agnostic, and had 82 friends at the time. The user's last login was on February 4, 2006, and their interests include groups like 'Lumberjacks for Lyfe' and 'Military Personal Against'.
DOJ-OGR-00031308.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile with the URL 'takingbackmicrosoft', captured on November 14, 2005. The profile owner's last login was October 9, 2005, and they list 91 friends, several of whom are visible. The profile includes personal blurbs, interests, and membership in several groups, including 'Military Personal Against Forsake The Troops.info'.
DOJ-OGR-00031265.jpg
This document is a printout of a MySpace profile page from November 14, 2005. The profile belongs to a user with the URL handle 'takingbackmicrosoft' and indicates their last login was on October 9, 2005. The profile includes personal blurbs, a list of interests and groups, and a 'Friend Space' showing connections to users named Alex, Virginia, Juice, matt, and Lisa.
DOJ-OGR-00017311.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the court and several individuals about a new rule requiring N95 or KN95 masks in the courthouse. The court also addresses the handling of two notes requesting evidence, specifically "Parkinson's transcript" (to be provided) and "Matt's transcript" (which has already been sent).
DOJ-OGR-00017309.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT), and two attorneys (Mr. Everdell and Ms. Moe). They are discussing how to respond to a note from the jury, which requested a transcript of 'Matt's' testimony and a definition of 'enticement'. The judge decides to send the transcript and directs the jury to specific page and line numbers in the jury instructions for the definition.
DOJ-OGR-00017306.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details proceedings where the jury is not present, and the Court discusses a note received from the jury requesting office supplies (Post-Its, highlighters), a transcript of testimony by a person named "Matt," and a definition of the legal term "enticement." Ms. Moe argues that the jury should be referred back to the original jury instructions stating that such terms have their "ordinary everyday meanings."
DOJ-OGR-00017202.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Rebuttal by Ms. Comey) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues against the defense's conspiracy theory by highlighting the consistency of eight witnesses (including Juan Alessi and accusers like Annie and Carolyn) and pointing out the chronological impossibility of a conspiracy formed in 2019, given that incriminating statements were made to the FBI and in depositions in 2006 and 2009. The prosecutor references corroborating evidence such as flight records, FedEx records, and message pads.
DOJ-OGR-00003233.jpg
This legal document from April 2021 details events from May 2007 concerning the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, revealing significant internal disagreement within the U.S. Attorney's Office. Prosecutor Villafaña strongly objected to holding further meetings with Epstein's defense team, led by counsel Lefcourt, fearing it would compromise their strategy, and documented her dissent in a draft email to her supervisors, Matt Menchel and Jeff Sloman. The document highlights the strategic conflicts among prosecutors as they considered how to proceed with the high-profile case.
Confirming Maxwell's identity
After Matt learned that Maxwell had been arrested, he called Jane to ask if she was the woman Jane had told him about years ago. Jane confirmed that she was.
Allegations concerning Ms. Maxwell
Discussion about whether she revealed allegations to Matt earlier than meeting with the government.
Jeffrey Epstein and money
Matt asked Jane if she was involved with Epstein for money. Jane discussed having to do things she didn't want to do.
Unknown
Witness confirmed talking to her ex-boyfriend Matt.
Identity of Godfather
Jane reveals to Matt that the 'godfather' helping her family is Jeffrey Epstein.
Mind-body medicine and consciousness
Discussion regarding the speaker's publishing history, the backlash from the medical establishment regarding 'Quantum Healing', and philosophical discussions on consciousness and reality.
Childhood finances
Jane told Matt about her family going broke after her father's illness and death.
Disclosure of abuse
Jane alluded to what happened and gave the gist without details.
Presence of people in a room
Jane told Matt there were 'girls' present, though the age of these individuals is debated.
Disclosure of abuse
Jane told Matt that she had been sexually abused by Maxwell and Epstein.
Jane's abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and a woman (Maxwell)
Jane told her then-boyfriend Matt that her godfather, Jeffrey Epstein, paid for things but made her do things she didn't want to, involving massage, and that a woman was also involved.
Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest
Matt asked Jane if the arrested woman (Maxwell) was the one Jane had referred to previously. Jane confirmed 'yes'.
Why Sarah Silverman Is ‘Thankful’ for Trump / On looking ...
Article discussing Sarah Silverman's views on Trump and her clarification regarding past comments about Louis C.K.
Maxwell description
Jane told Matt about the woman who made her feel comfortable.
Childhood finances and abuse disclosure
Jane told Matt her family struggled financially and mentioned an 'uncle' who helped pay for things.
Label
Handwritten sticky note reading 'Matt 5.28' placed on a coil of cables.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity