ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
54
Very Strong
|
90 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
24
Very Strong
|
33 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
21
Very Strong
|
66 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
46 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judicial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judicial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Paula Speer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor judge |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial authority |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial assignment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judge defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Date of sentencing for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Scheduled date for sentencing. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | The scheduled sentencing for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, S... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | The Court scheduled the sentencing for Ghislaine Maxwell for June 28, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing hearing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case USA v. Maxwell. | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Date of Sentence | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-27 | Court filing | A letter from Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan was electronically filed with the court. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court order | The Court issued an Order to which the Government's letter is a response. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Legal filing | The court order (Document 684) was filed. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Court action | The Court contacted the Warden for MDC regarding the Defendant's access to legal materials. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-25 | N/A | Order filed and signed by Judge Nathan | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Court Order | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Filing of court order regarding victim statements at sentencing. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 682 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Court order | The Court denied the Defendant's request for redactions. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Letter submitted regarding Victim Impact Statement | New York, NY | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Order signed and filed | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-21 | Legal filing | The court order (Document 665) was filed. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
EFTA00029590.pdf
Defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca writes to Judge Nathan objecting to the government's recent attempts to avoid disclosing the identities of unnamed co-conspirators and specific co-conspirator statements intended for trial. The defense characterizes the government's position as an improper 'motion to reconsider' prior court orders without showing extraordinary circumstances. The letter requests the Court confirm its orders requiring disclosure by October 11, 2021, to allow the defense to prepare motions in limine regarding the admissibility of statements from Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed employee.
EFTA00029540.pdf
This document is an Opinion & Order by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court denies Maxwell's motions to dismiss the indictment based on Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations arguments, and pre-indictment delay. However, the Court grants Maxwell's motion to sever the perjury charges from the sex trafficking-related charges, ruling they must be tried separately to ensure a fair trial. The Court also orders the parties to negotiate a schedule for outstanding pretrial disclosures.
EFTA00029535.pdf
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
EFTA00029354.pdf
This document is a Court Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated May 14, 2021, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to modify the frequency of flashlight safety checks during the night at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The defense argued the checks occurred every 15 minutes and disrupted sleep, while the Government maintained the checks were necessary for safety due to Maxwell being housed alone and the high-profile nature of the case. The Court ruled the request unsubstantiated but urged the MDC to consider ways to reduce sleep disruption for pre-trial detainees.
EFTA00029241.pdf
A letter from defense attorney Christian R. Everdell to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated April 8, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter requests permission for defense counsel to bring electronics and specific legacy media equipment (VCR, cassette players, etc.) into the courthouse for an evidence view scheduled for mid-April 2021.
EFTA00028706.pdf
A court order filed on June 2, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes a detailed schedule for pre-trial disclosures, including deadlines for victim identification, witness lists, Jencks Act materials, and motions in limine, spanning from September to November 2021.
EFTA00028584.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to Judge Nathan's chambers regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated May 22, 2021, the email submits the Government's opposition to the defense's supplemental pretrial motions. The sender notes they are emailing the document because the electronic filing system prevents them from filing an opposition brief before the original defense motion appears on the public docket.
EFTA00028277.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2021 regarding the legal case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The correspondence involves Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers distributing a court order to counsel and subsequent discussion among counsel regarding the docketing of motions in limine and filing an opening brief.
EFTA00028265.pdf
A joint letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter outlines the Government and Defense positions on protecting witness identities, including the use of pseudonyms (nomenclature), voir dire procedures, jury instructions, and the handling of sealed exhibits to prevent public disclosure of victim identities. The document contains significant redactions regarding the actual names and pseudonyms of the witnesses.
EFTA00028260.pdf
A joint letter submitted to Judge Alison J. Nathan by the U.S. Attorney's Office and Defense Counsel in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines agreed-upon procedures and disagreements regarding the protection of witness identities during the upcoming trial, including the use of pseudonyms, voir dire protocols to screen jurors, specific jury instructions, and the use of physical binders for sealed exhibits to prevent public viewing. It includes a heavily redacted chart meant to map true witness names to their trial pseudonyms.
EFTA00028165.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York dated November 3, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules a hearing for November 10, 2021, to address motions regarding Federal Rules of Evidence 412 and 702 (Daubert). The order also sets briefing deadlines for issues concerning anticipated witness testimony and instructions for docketing redacted exhibits.
EFTA00028103.pdf
A formal 'Touhy request' letter dated August 30, 2021, from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney Christian Everdell to Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Polite. The letter requests the testimony of four redacted FBI/Task Force agents for Maxwell's upcoming trial. These agents were involved in two key investigations: the 2006-2008 Palm Beach FBI investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and the subsequent New York FBI investigation that led to the 2019/2020 indictments of Epstein and Maxwell.
EFTA00028055.pdf
Memorandum Opinion and Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan in US v. Maxwell denying the defendant's request to broadly modify a protective order to use criminal discovery documents in civil cases. The Court found Maxwell failed to show good cause or relevance for the modification. However, the Court permitted Maxwell to share specific factual information regarding grand jury subpoenas and prior rulings by other courts ('Court-1' and 'Court-2') with relevant judicial officers under seal, as these facts were largely public record.
EFTA00027753.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the delivery of legal mail to Ghislaine Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government explains the MDC's mail processing protocols and attributes a specific delay in delivering a hard drive to an 'institutional emergency' on October 13, 2021. Judge Nathan appends an order to the end of the document, denying the defense's request for a specific delivery order but stating a firm expectation that legal mail be delivered within one business day.
EFTA00027704.pdf
A letter from U.S. Attorney Damian Williams to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated October 18, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests permission to file motions *in limine* with redactions designed to protect the privacy of victims and third parties, specifically requesting the sealing of 'Section X' until the conclusion of the trial. The specific Assistant US Attorney signing the document has their name redacted.
EFTA00027661.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 11, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan approves the parties' proposed redactions and sealing requests to protect the privacy of victims and witnesses, ordering the redacted documents to be filed by November 12, 2021.
EFTA00027654.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 8, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan schedules a conference for November 10, 2021, to address defense motions concerning Federal Rules of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence) and 702 (expert testimony). The order explicitly mandates the parties to confirm by November 9 that alleged victims have been notified of the upcoming hearing and their right to attend.
EFTA00027653.pdf
An email from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). The email notes that a court-ordered response due by 12:00 p.m. that day had not yet been received.
EFTA00027649.pdf
Court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on November 8, 2021, in the case of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order schedules a conference for November 10 to address evidentiary motions (Rule 412 and Rule 702) and mandates that parties confirm by November 9 that alleged victims referenced in the Rule 412 motion have been notified of the hearing and their right to attend.
EFTA00027648.pdf
An email chain from November 9, 2021, regarding the case US v. Maxwell (20cr330). Judge Alison J. Nathan's chambers emailed counsel noting a missing response to a court order (Dkt. 421) that was due at noon. Defense attorney Christian Everdell forwarded this to others (likely including the prosecution), clarifying that the defense understood the government was responsible for handling victim notifications and reporting to the Court.
EFTA00027456.pdf
This document is an email dated April 23, 2021, from the Chambers of Judge Alison J. Nathan to attorneys Jeff Pagliuca and Laura Menninger. The email serves to transmit a sealed order attached as a PDF regarding the case '20-cr-330, US v Ghislaine Maxwell'. The document indicates legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell were ongoing in 2021 under Judge Nathan.
EFTA00027416.pdf
This document is a Court Order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated September 3, 2021. The order grants the Defendant's request for the Government to disclose the identities of unnamed co-conspirators alleged in the S2 indictment whom the Government intends to refer to at trial, rejecting the Government's objection as untimely and unpersuasive. The Court also sets a deadline of October 11 for the disclosure of all co-conspirator statements the Government intends to offer at trial.
EFTA00027169.pdf
Defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca writes to Judge Alison Nathan arguing against the government's request to defer ruling on Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence until after the trial on non-perjury counts. The defense contends that an evidentiary hearing is necessary immediately because the government's alleged misconduct (misleading a judge to obtain a subpoena) constitutes a due process violation that could suppress all 90,000 pages of evidence and any derivatives ('fruit of the poisonous tree'). Furthermore, the defense argues that Maxwell cannot knowingly decide whether to testify without knowing the admissibility of this evidence, as the government has only promised not to use it in its case-in-chief but reserved rights for impeachment.
EFTA00027163.pdf
This is a court order dated April 21, 2021, from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a joint letter from the Defendant and law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP (BSF) regarding proposed redactions to filings concerning a Rule 17(c) subpoena. The court orders the parties to confer by April 22 and sets a deadline of April 23 for the Government to justify any redaction requests or for the letter to be filed publicly.
EFTA00027159.pdf
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330). The order states that the trial for severed perjury counts will be scheduled after the non-perjury trial is completed and defers resolution on pending motions to suppress until that time. A deadline for objections is set for April 22, 2021.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity