ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
54
Very Strong
|
90 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
24
Very Strong
|
33 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
21
Very Strong
|
66 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
46 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judicial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judicial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Paula Speer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor judge |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial authority |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial assignment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judge defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | Legal filing | Filing of court order correcting contact information and outlining procedures for victim statements. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Date the document was filed and the request was denied by Judge Nathan. | New York | View |
| 2022-05-03 | Legal proceeding | The legal process involving Ghislaine Maxwell is moving to its close. | United States Courthouse, N... | View |
| 2022-04-29 | Legal proceeding | Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's post-trial motions are before the Court. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-04-29 | N/A | Court Order filed denying motion on pre-indictment delay and granting motion on multiplicity. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-04-24 | Communication | Catherine Vaughan-Edwards wrote a letter of support for Ghislaine Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Opinion and Order issued by Honorable Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Opinion & Order | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Motion for new trial denied | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-09 | Court filing | The Court docketed several documents, including an Opinion & Order, proposed questions from the G... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-03-08 | N/A | Hearing for Juror 50 held before Honorable Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Hearing | A court hearing where Juror 50 is directed to appear and intends to invoke his Fifth Amendment pr... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2022-03-03 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan denied the request for a proffer made in the letter. | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2022-03-01 | Legal proceeding | Questioning of an individual regarding their answers on a questionnaire, likely for jury selectio... | N/A | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 636 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Court (implied) | View |
| 2022-02-25 | Court order | Judge Alison J. Nathan approved the defense's proposed redactions. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Order issued by Honorable Alison J. Nathan | Court | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Filing of a letter by the defense to propose limited redactions to a court's Opinion and Order. | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court order | The Court issued an Order (Dkt. 610), to which this letter is a response. | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Filing | The court order (Document 607) was filed. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Legal filing | Document 612 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court associated with Case ... | View |
| 2022-02-24 | Court order | Judge Nathan issued an Order (ECF No.: 610) directing Juror 50 to appear for a hearing. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Court Order signed regarding the unsealing of redactions. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Signing of Court Document 620 | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-18 | N/A | Order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan | New York, New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019684.jpg
This is page 2 of a court order from an appellate court dismissing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denying her motion to consolidate. The document outlines the legal basis for the dismissal, citing the "final judgment rule" in criminal cases and the strict conditions required for collateral order appeals.
DOJ-OGR-00019678.jpg
This document is page 2 of an appellate court order dated October 19, 2020, dismissing Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denying her motion to consolidate her criminal appeal with the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The court outlines the 'final judgment rule,' explaining that appeals generally cannot occur until after a final conviction and sentencing, and determines Maxwell's request does not meet the strict criteria for an exception (collateral order). The document cites numerous legal precedents regarding jurisdiction and finality in criminal cases.
DOJ-OGR-00017350.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It identifies the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, as well as the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
DOJ-OGR-00017334.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 28, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and details the legal appearances for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense (Haddon Morgan and Foreman, Cohen & Gresser). It also notes the presence of FBI and NYPD representatives in the courtroom.
DOJ-OGR-00017305.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, with the Honorable Alison J. Nathan presiding as District Judge. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00017279.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 21, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00010753.jpg
This document is a letter dated June 27, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley explains that her client, victim Virginia Giuffre, cannot physically attend a court hearing due to a medical issue and requests permission to read Giuffre's statement on her behalf. A handwritten note on the document, signed by Judge Nathan, grants this request, ordering that counsel will be permitted to read a shortened version of the statement.
DOJ-OGR-00010752.jpg
This is the final page of a court order issued by United States Circuit Judge Alison J. Nathan. It instructs counsel to ensure shortened statements conform to requirements and orders the Government to provide copies of the order to counsel for eight specific individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00010750.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated June 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a letter from the defendant regarding her access to legal materials needed for sentencing preparation at the MDC. The Court confirms with the MDC Warden that Maxwell has been given access to documents and a writing implement and orders the Government to follow up with the Warden and report back to the Court by 2:00 p.m. the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00010749.jpg
This is a court order issued on June 26, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a motion filed by the attorney for an individual named 'Kate', which was referenced in a letter from the Defendant but had not been received by the Court. The judge orders the Government to officially docket this motion by midnight on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010748.jpg
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 25, 2022. The order requires the parties to submit their positions regarding a motion filed by Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein (Dkt. No. 675) by 10:00 a.m. the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00010747.jpg
This is a court order dated June 24, 2022, from Judge Alison J. Nathan in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order denies the Defendant's request to redact seven written witness statements, citing the presumption of public access and the fact that the witnesses themselves did not seek to file their statements under seal. The Court directs the Government to docket the statements without redactions and affirms that witnesses Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre may present in-person statements at the future sentencing hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00010744.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order addresses the rights of victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to be heard at sentencing. The court grants the request for three individuals, Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, to make oral statements at the sentencing, noting that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, does not object to their inclusion.
DOJ-OGR-00010736.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 26, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter serves as a court filing in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. In it, the government submits a motion filed by the attorney for an individual named 'Kate', which was attached to her victim impact statement, in response to a court order issued that same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010729.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 26, 2022, regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution states that, in response to a court order, they have confirmed with the Metropolitan Detention Center's Warden and Chief Psychologist that the defendant has full access to her legal documents and counsel. Consequently, the government argues there is no reason to postpone her sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00010727.jpg
This document is a letter filed on June 26, 2022, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government is responding to a court order concerning an application by Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein to speak at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter references a previous order where the Court declined to allow individuals not proven at trial to be directly harmed to speak at the hearing, instead permitting them to submit written statements.
DOJ-OGR-00010726.jpg
This is a letter from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 25, 2022, concerning her client, Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim reports that the MDC has unjustifiably placed Maxwell on suicide watch, depriving her of legal materials and sleep, which prevents her from preparing for her upcoming sentencing. Sternheim asserts that both she and a psychologist have confirmed Maxwell is not suicidal and states her intent to formally request a postponement if the conditions are not changed.
DOJ-OGR-00010725.jpg
This legal letter, dated June 25, 2022, is from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim opposes a motion filed on behalf of Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, who seek to provide oral victim impact statements at Maxwell's sentencing. The letter argues that the motion should be denied because neither Ransome nor Stein qualify as statutory crime victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
DOJ-OGR-00010674.jpg
This document is a letter filed on June 24, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves to submit a written victim impact statement from Teresa Helm, who identifies herself as a victim trafficked by Maxwell in 2002 at the age of 22. Helm's statement directly addresses Maxwell, describing the grooming process, the psychological trauma endured, and the devastating long-term effects on her self-worth and life trajectory.
DOJ-OGR-00010672.jpg
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, counsel for Maria Farmer, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, providing a victim impact statement for Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing. Maria Farmer details how Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein trafficked, assaulted, and threatened her in 1996 on the Wexner estate, leading to the destruction of her career, health issues, and profound personal suffering. Due to a medical issue, Maria Farmer requests her statement be read into the record by her attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00010664.jpg
This document is a letter from Sigrid S. McCawley, counsel for Annie Farmer, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 22, 2022. It provides Annie Farmer's victim impact statement regarding the crimes committed by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and requests permission for Ms. Farmer to make an oral statement at Maxwell's sentencing. The statement details the profound and ongoing psychological and emotional impact of the abuse on Annie Farmer.
DOJ-OGR-00010660.jpg
This legal document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated June 24, 2022, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter responds to a court order about the defendant's objections to victim statements, identifying six victims by their first names (Jane, Annie, Kate, Carolyn, Virginia, and Melissa). It also notes that two of the victims, Kate and Annie, plan to attend the upcoming sentencing hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00010649.jpg
A letter dated June 22, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. McCawley, representing Teresa Helm, asserts that Helm was trafficked by Maxwell in 2002 and requests permission for Helm to make an oral victim impact statement at the upcoming sentencing. The majority of the detailed statement is redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00010592.jpg
This document is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, filed on June 24, 2022. In the letter, Maxwell formally objects to Sarah Ransome, Maria Farmer, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant being legally characterized as 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) for the purpose of sentencing. The defense argues these individuals do not meet the statutory requirements, specifically regarding their age at the time of alleged abuse, the timing relative to the indictment, and proximate harm resulting from the specific federal offenses of conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00010527.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 21, 2022. It establishes deadlines for filing objections and non-objected statements on June 24, 2022. Crucially, it orders the Government to confirm by noon on June 22, 2022, that victims have been notified of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity