Joscha Bach
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Noam Chomsky
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Joi Ito
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Joi Ito
|
Acquaintance |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondents |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Noam
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Joi
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondence association |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Intellectual correspondents |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dietrich Dorner
|
Academic theoretical |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondence patronage |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Intellectual correspondent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Noam
|
Debate intellectual opposition |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Noam Chomsky
|
Debaters intellectual adversaries |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional intellectual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dietrich Dorner
|
Academic influence successor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dietrich Dorner
|
Academic professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Noam Chomsky
|
Professional adversarial intellectual |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ben Goertzel
|
Professional proposal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stephen Pinker
|
Professional proposal |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey E.
|
Intellectual correspondence |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Intellectual correspondence |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-23 | N/A | An email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Joscha Bach about the nature of human intelligence,... | View | |
| 2016-07-23 | N/A | An email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Joscha Bach regarding 'Mechanisms for learning', wh... | via Email | View |
| 2016-07-23 | N/A | An email exchange between Jeffrey E. and Joscha Bach discussing theories on human intelligence, g... | N/A | View |
| 2016-07-23 | N/A | An email exchange between Jeffrey E. and Joscha Bach discussing 'Mechanisms for learning', which ... | via Email | View |
| 2016-07-23 | N/A | An email conversation between Jeffrey E. and Joscha Bach discussing concepts related to intellige... | via Email | View |
| 2016-07-23 | N/A | An email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Joscha Bach on the topic 'Mechanisms for learning',... | via email | View |
| 2016-07-23 | N/A | An email exchange between Jeffrey E. (Epstein) and Joscha Bach discussing abstract and controvers... | N/A | View |
| 2016-07-10 | N/A | A discussion or meeting where Joscha Bach presented an argument that 'triggered' Noam Chomsky. Jo... | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-10 | N/A | An intellectual discussion or meeting took place where Joscha Bach felt he 'embarrassed' himself ... | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-10 | N/A | Attendance at the 'Forbidden Research conference', where discussions included the efficacy of dem... | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-09 | N/A | A gathering or meeting where Joscha Bach debated Noam Chomsky. | Unknown (implied physical m... | View |
| 2016-07-09 | N/A | Joscha Bach participated in a discussion where he felt he was an 'embarrassment' and made a point... | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-09 | N/A | A discussion or meeting occurred where Joscha Bach felt he was an 'embarrassment'. The conversati... | Unknown | View |
| 2016-07-09 | N/A | Meeting or discussion involving Joscha Bach, Jeffrey Epstein, and Noam Chomsky. | Unknown | View |
| 0009-07-01 | N/A | Meeting or gathering involving Joscha Bach, Jeffrey Epstein, and Noam Chomsky. | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027008.jpg
This document appears to be page 5 of a proposal outlining the creation of an Artificial Intelligence research 'pilot team.' It details the proposed staff composition (researchers and developers), a list of high-profile potential scientific board members (including Stephen Pinker, Ben Goertzel, and Daniel Dennett), and includes a biographical section for the proposer, Joscha Bach. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was obtained during a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027004.jpg
A scientific proposal authored by Joscha Bach in February 2013, arguing for a new Artificial Intelligence initiative focused on the 'Computational Structure of Mental Representation.' The document contrasts this proposed approach with the biological brain mapping initiatives proposed by Barack Obama and Henry Markram (Blue Brain project). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer number, indicating it is part of a larger investigative file, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's funding of scientific research and academia, although Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013255.jpg
This document is page 339 of a technical glossary, likely from a book or scientific paper regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It defines terms such as 'Procedure Learning,' 'Psi,' 'Psynese,' and 'Reinforcement Learning,' specifically referencing the OpenCog and Novamente AI architectures. The footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013255' indicates this document was produced as evidence in a House Oversight Committee investigation, likely related to Epstein's funding of or interest in AI research and scientists.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013012.jpg
This document is a page (p. 96) from an academic text regarding Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and cognitive architecture, specifically Chapter 5. It discusses technical models such as CogPrime, LIDA, and CogAff, referencing prominent AI scientists like Aaron Sloman and Jeff Hawkins. While the text itself is purely scientific, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013012' indicates this document was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's extensive funding of and connections to the scientific community.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013004.jpg
This document is page 88 from a scientific text titled 'Brief Survey of Cognitive Architectures.' It discusses technical theories of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), specifically comparing 'LIDA' and 'CogPrime' systems, and introducing 'Psi' and 'MicroPsi' architectures created by Dietrich Dorner and Joscha Bach. While the content is purely academic, the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013004' indicates it was part of documents collected by the House Oversight Committee, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's funding of or interest in transhumanist and AI research.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025963.jpg
This document is a printout of an email thread between cognitive scientist Joscha Bach and Jeffrey Epstein from July 2016. Bach apologizes to Epstein for an argument that occurred earlier that day involving Noam Chomsky, discussing the nuances of their disagreement regarding linguistics and cognitive development theories. The email contains controversial racial theories regarding cognitive development and references Joi Ito's views on public communication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025960.jpg
An email thread from July 2016 between cognitive scientist Joscha Bach and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). They discuss theoretical topics including intelligence distribution (Bell curves), gender differences in IQ variance, the nature of cells and organisms, and the relationship between mathematics, censorship, and political correctness. Epstein's writing in the thread is characterized by numerous typos and disjointed philosophical musings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025957.jpg
An email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein following a meeting that included Noam Chomsky. Bach apologizes for his performance during the meeting and elaborates on his theories regarding cognitive science, specifically discussing genetic developmental switches, comparisons between human and ape brain development, and controversial racial comparisons regarding cognitive versus motor development.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025954.jpg
An email chain between cognitive scientist Joscha Bach and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'Jeffrey E.') dated July 23, 2016. The correspondence involves high-level, controversial discussions regarding neuroscience, genetics, censorship, and scientific racism, specifically theorizing about correlations between motor development and cognitive development in black children. Epstein contributes disjointed theories about money as a signaling mechanism and the brain as a nucleus, characterized by his typical typos and erratic punctuation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025951.jpg
In this email from July 2016, cognitive scientist Joscha Bach writes to Jeffrey Epstein to apologize for his behavior during a debate with Noam Chomsky earlier that day, thanking Epstein for his support. Bach details his disagreements with Chomsky's linguistic theories and critiques Joi Ito's communication style, describing Ito as unoriginal but politically savvy. The email cuts off while Bach is discussing racial differences in child motor development.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025949.jpg
An email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein dated July 23, 2016. The correspondence discusses controversial theories regarding neuroscience and genetics, specifically linking them to racial differences in cognitive vs. motor development, gender differences in interest in abstract systems vs. social relations, and cultural differences regarding authority between Chinese and Jewish populations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026416.jpg
This document is an email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein dated July 10, 2016. Bach apologizes for an 'embarrassment' during a recent intellectual discussion with Noam Chomsky, shares his theories on linguistics and child development, and provides a separate, critical analysis of Joi Ito's public communication methods. The email contains controversial statements regarding racial differences in child development and indicates a collegial relationship between Bach and Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026413.jpg
This document is an email thread from July 23-24, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and AI researcher Joscha Bach. The discussion, under the subject 'Re: Mechanisms for learning', delves into topics of human intelligence, the role of outliers versus averages, gender differences in IQ distribution based on bell curves, and philosophical ideas about the nature of human consciousness and society. The document is marked with a Bates number from the House Oversight Committee, and Joscha Bach's email address is redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026409.jpg
This document is an email from AI researcher Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 10, 2016. Bach discusses a recent academic debate he had with 'Noam' (likely Chomsky), analyzes the communication style of 'Joi' (likely Ito), and presents his controversial theories on child development and cognition. The email, marked as evidence from a House Oversight investigation, highlights the intellectual and social circle Epstein cultivated.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026406.jpg
This document is an email thread from July 23-24, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein (jeffrey E.) and AI researcher Joscha Bach. They engage in a philosophical and scientific discussion about intelligence, genetics, gender differences in IQ, social structures, and censorship. Epstein posits that 'the average is the only thing that matters' and that brains are like the nucleus of a larger social 'organism', while Bach discusses outliers on the Bell curve and variations in traits between genders.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026402.jpg
This document is an email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 10, 2016, with a brief follow-up message. Bach apologizes for an 'embarrassment' during a recent discussion with Noam Chomsky and proceeds to detail his theories on cognitive development, including controversial claims about racial differences. The follow-up note reflects on the purpose of communication, citing 'Joi' (likely Joi Ito).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026399.jpg
This document is an email chain from July 23, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and AI researcher Joscha Bach about 'mechanisms for learning'. The conversation includes discussions on IQ differences between genders and a controversial section written by Bach where he interprets Epstein's prior suggestions, leading Bach to conjecture about being able to 'make blacks smarter' through genetic manipulation. This section ends with Bach's bizarre parenthetical note, '( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions )', seemingly a dark metaphor for culling neurons.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026395.jpg
This document is an email from Joscha Bach to Jeffrey Epstein, dated shortly after July 10, 2016. Bach thanks Epstein for his support and provides commentary on fascism, Jeffrey's 'political incorrectness', and a 'Forbidden Research conference.' He also offers a detailed critique of Joi Ito's communication style, alleging that Ito has others write his work for him.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026393.jpg
This is an email from Jeffrey E. to Joscha Bach discussing theories on learning, intelligence, and motivation. The email contains speculative and controversial ideas about racial differences in cognitive and motor development, suggesting biological and evolutionary explanations, and also posits that gender differences in fields like math and computer science are primarily motivational.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
This email from Joscha Bach quotes and responds to an earlier email from Jeffrey E. about brain differences, censorship, and social reasoning.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Jeffrey E. discusses differences between males, brain size, IQ, censorship, and social vs. abstract reasoning. He proposes a 'radical idea' about brains being the nucleus of a human 'cell'.
Mechanisms for learning
Joscha Bach interprets a suggestion from Jeffrey E. about altering intelligence, stating 'you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development'. He also mentions culling unused neurons and includes the parenthetical '( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ).'
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Quoted in the main email. The content is not fully visible but it appears to be a reply to Epstein's 4:41 AM email. The visible text is a question: 'Cells seem to be mostly indistinguishable (except for XX), I thought?'
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Quoted in the thread. Epstein discusses differences between males and females, such as brain size and IQ distribution. He proposes a 'radical idea' about brains as the nucleus of a human 'cell' and social behavior as the 'cooridiation of indiv brains'. He also interprets Bach's earlier idea, suggesting it implies one 'might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer development'. The email ends with a dark comment '( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions )' in the context of culling unused neurons.
Mechanisms for learning
Quoted at the bottom of the email chain. The content from Bach is not visible, only Epstein's reply to it, which begins 'Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time: no worry...'
Re: Mechanisms for learning
A lengthy philosophical email discussing cell differentiation (XX chromosomes), brain size, IQ differences between genders, a 'radical idea' of brains as the nucleus of a human 'cell', and views on censorship and mathematical thinking.
Mechanisms for learning
Initiates a new branch of the conversation with 'Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:'.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
A lengthy philosophical email discussing cell differentiation (XX chromosomes), brain size, IQ differences between genders, a 'radical idea' of brains as the nucleus of a human 'cell', and views on censorship and mathematical thinking.
Mechanisms for learning
Initiates a new branch of the conversation with 'Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:'.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Joscha Bach replies to Jeffrey E.'s points, discussing higher trait variation in males leading to more high IQ men, and the surprising small difference in average IQ given brain size differences.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Jeffrey E. presents a 'radical idea' that brains are the nucleus of a human 'cell', with the body as the membrane and society as an 'organizm' of interacting brains. He also states that math-based thinking doesn't allow for censorship and that most people have it built-in at a deep level.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Joscha Bach initiates this part of the thread, stating he is sending 'Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time'. The specific thoughts are then discussed in the subsequent replies.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Discussion on neuroscience, evolutionary psychology, racial differences in cognitive/motor development, gender differences in motivation, and cultural differences in authority.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Discussion on neuroscience, evolutionary psychology, racial differences in cognitive/motor development, gender differences in motivation, and cultural differences in authority.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Reply to a thread discussing brain mechanisms, gender differences, and controversial theories on race and intelligence.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Quoted text discussing gender differences, cell distinctiveness, and brains as the nucleus of the human 'cell'.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
Lengthy, typo-laden philosophical musing on cells, 'organizms', censorship, political correctness, and math.
No Subject
Joscha Bach discusses differences between male and female traits, noting higher variation in males leading to more high IQ men, and finds the small difference in average IQ surprising given brain size differences. He also questions if cells are mostly indistinguishable except for chromosomes (XX).
No Subject
Jeffrey E. proposes a 'radical idea' that brains are the nucleus of a human 'cell' and society is the organism. He also states that mathematical thinking doesn't allow for censorship and that most people have 'censorship built in at a deep level'.
No Subject
Joscha Bach initiates a topic, stating 'Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time:'. The rest of the content is not visible.
No Subject
Jeffrey E. discusses differences between sexes, including higher variation in traits for males leading to more high IQ men, and proposes a 'radical idea' about brains being the 'nucleus of the human cell' and society being the interaction of brains. He also states that math-based thinking doesn't allow for censorship.
No Subject
Joscha Bach discusses differences between male and female traits, noting higher variation in males leading to more high IQ men, and finds the small difference in average IQ surprising given brain size differences. He also questions if cells are mostly indistinguishable except for chromosomes (XX).
No Subject
Jeffrey E. proposes a 'radical idea' that brains are the nucleus of a human 'cell' and society is the organism. He also states that mathematical thinking doesn't allow for censorship and that most people have 'censorship built in at a deep level'.
Re: Mechanisms for learning
A brief, one-line response stating 'the average is the only thing that matters'. This is a reply to Joscha Bach's email from 6:02 PM the same day.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity