Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Ms. Moe

Person
Mentions
1588
Relationships
122
Events
654
Documents
778
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
122 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization The Court
Legal representative
19 Very Strong
26
View
organization The government
Representative
17 Very Strong
21
View
person Mr. Everdell
Opposing counsel
15 Very Strong
13
View
organization The government
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
8
View
organization The Court
Professional
11 Very Strong
228
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Opposing counsel
11 Very Strong
13
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Mrs. Hesse
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional
10 Very Strong
13
View
person JANE
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person your Honor
Professional
10 Very Strong
7
View
person Maguire
Professional
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional
10 Very Strong
28
View
person the Judge
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Professional
10 Very Strong
27
View
person MR. PAGLIUCA
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person Jane
Professional
10 Very Strong
10
View
person MR. COHEN
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Mr. Everdell
Professional adversarial
10 Very Strong
9
View
person Special Agent Maguire
Professional
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Ms. Sternheim
Professional adversarial
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Drescher
Professional
9 Strong
4
View
person MS. MENNINGER
Opposing counsel
9 Strong
5
View
person Ms. Comey
Business associate
8 Strong
4
View
person Mr. McHugh
Professional
8 Strong
4
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Court proceeding regarding trial schedule, closing arguments, and jury deliberation timing relati... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberations and Court Response to Note Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of photographic exhibits and the timing of defense obj... Courtroom View
N/A N/A Sentencing Hearing (likely for Ghislaine Maxwell) Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding sentencing enhancements for Ghislaine Maxwell. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Dismissal of Counts Seven and Eight against Ghislaine Maxwell. Court View
N/A N/A Carolyn testified and wrote down her mother's phone number to avoid saying it aloud. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding sentencing or appeal arguments (Case 22-1426). Courtroom (likely SDNY) View
N/A N/A Examination of Jane Courtroom View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding upcoming sentencing and review of the presentence report. Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Prosecution announces intent to rest case Courtroom View
N/A N/A Sentencing Hearing / Pre-sentencing argument Southern District of New Yo... View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Patrick McHugh Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of witness Kelly Maguire Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Dubin regarding media reports of Epstein's flight logs Courtroom View
N/A N/A Examination of Nicole Hesse Courtroom View
N/A N/A Sentencing Hearing Calculation Courtroom (Southern District) View
N/A N/A Court hearing regarding Maxwell's sentencing or appeal points concerning her role in the conspiracy. Courtroom (likely SDNY) View
N/A N/A Conclusion of Shawn's testimony and calling of Nicole Hesse to the stand. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding the admissibility of Exhibit 52 (a book) to the jury. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Discussion regarding jury deliberation schedule and closing arguments Courtroom View
N/A N/A Direct examination of witness Dubin regarding sexualized massages and relationship timeline. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Legal sidebar regarding cross-examination of witness 'Jane'. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Government meeting with witness Brian Unknown View
N/A N/A Legal argument regarding jury questions and instructions for Count Four. Courtroom (Southern Distric... View

DOJ-OGR-00011541.jpg

This document is a court transcript from July 22, 2022, capturing a dialogue between a judge (THE COURT) and a government attorney (MS. MOE). The discussion centers on the legal end date of a conspiracy, with the government arguing it extended through 2004 and into 2005. The judge expresses concern that the evidence cited by the government is 'post conspiracy' because it falls after the date in the indictment and, crucially, after a person named Carolyn turned 18, an event upon which the conspiracy's continuation was legally dependent.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011537.jpg

This document is a partial transcript from a court hearing on July 22, 2022, discussing factual objections and the calculation of sentencing guidelines. The Court, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe participate in the discussion, with the Court adopting PSR recitations and outlining the process for guideline calculation. The defense contends a guideline calculation of 51 to 63 months' imprisonment, while the government's contention is cut off.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00011523.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated July 22, 2022, involving Ms. Sternheim (defense) and Ms. Moe (government). The proceedings cover administrative confirmations of filings on ECF and a substantive discussion regarding the government's compliance with the 'Justice For All Act.' Specifically, Ms. Moe confirms that the government has notified six victims, proven at trial to be impacted, about the upcoming sentencing and their right to be heard.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
124
As Recipient
13
Total
137

End date of a conspiracy and use of post-conspiracy evidence

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe, representing the government, argues that trial evidence shows the conspiracy was ongoing through 2004 and into 2005. She contends they are relying on evidence that 'exceeds the date in the indictment' but denies it is post-conspiracy evidence.

Court dialogue
2022-07-22
Communication Source

End date of a conspiracy and use of post-conspiracy evidence

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe, representing the government, argues that trial evidence shows the conspiracy was ongoing through 2004 and into 2005. She contends they are relying on evidence that 'exceeds the date in the indictment' but denies it is post-conspiracy evidence.

Court dialogue
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Defendant's leadership role and travel overlap with Sarah...

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe argues that flight records show the defendant and Sarah Kellen were both flying on Epstein's jet during the same time period, supporting the claim of a leadership role.

Court dialogue
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Response to Everdell

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Declined to argue further, resting on written briefing.

Court hearing statement
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Sentencing Recommendation

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Requesting an above-guideline sentence to send a message that nobody is above the law.

Court statement
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Defendant's supervisory role for sentencing guidelines

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

MS. MOE argues to the Court that trial evidence establishes the defendant (Ms. Maxwell) had a supervisory role over Sarah Kellen, which is sufficient to meet the criteria for a sentencing enhancement, even without five or more participants.

Court hearing dialogue
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Anonymity order for witness Kate

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe asks the Court to confirm that the anonymity order for the witness, Kate, is in effect, particularly regarding sketch artists.

Court dialogue
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Objection/clarification on sentencing calculation

From: Ms. Moe
To: the Judge

Ms. Moe responds to the judge by pointing out that under guideline 3D1.4, 5 units should add 4 levels to the offense score, not 5 as the judge had stated.

Courtroom dialogue
2022-07-22
Communication Source

Trial Procedure / Evidence Presentation

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Discussion regarding the use of electronic displays versus paper copies for impeaching witnesses and protecting victim anonymity.

Court proceeding
2021-12-10
Communication Source

Clarification of witness testimony regarding Government E...

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe confirms the judge's understanding and clarifies that the witness recognizes the exhibit as one in a series but does not know how it came into the government's possession.

Courtroom dialogue
2021-12-10
Communication Source

Defendant's finances and flight risk

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

MS. MOE presents arguments to the court regarding the defendant's finances, suggesting they indicate a significant flight risk. The finances discussed include annual income, net worth, liquid assets, and a multi-million dollar trust account.

Court hearing
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Superseding Indictment Correction

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Clarifying that the S1 indictment contains a small ministerial correction regarding civil docket numbers in the perjury counts.

Meeting
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Detention Hearing Arguments

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Ms. Moe argues that the defendant has not rebutted the presumption of detention and poses a flight risk. The Court asks for clarification on legal burdens of proof.

Meeting
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Proposed Schedule

From: Ms. Moe
To: MR. COHEN

Discussion regarding the scheduling of the case.

Discussion
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Victim testimony

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe informs the court that the victim, Annie Farmer, wishes to speak under her real name.

Court testimony
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Confirmation of arraignment

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe confirms to the judge ('your Honor') that the proceeding is an arraignment on the S1 superseding indictment.

Court proceeding dialogue
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Defendant's motive for hiding and its relevance to bail.

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe responds that, irrespective of the defendant's motive, the facts demonstrate the defendant has the ability and willingness to live in hiding, which is relevant to the court's bail determination.

Court hearing dialogue
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Bail/Detention Argument

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Argument that the defendant poses an extreme flight risk, has significant financial means, has been less than candid about finances, and should be detained pending trial.

Meeting
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Discovery of files from a previous investigation

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe explains that F.B.I. files from a previous investigation of Jeffrey Epstein in Florida have been shipped to the New York F.B.I. office to be imaged and scanned for a comprehensive review.

Court hearing dialogue
2021-04-01
Communication Source

Detention Findings

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Moe

Judge confirms the government is not seeking findings regarding 'danger to the community' for pretrial detention.

Courtroom dialogue
2020-12-10
Communication Source

Discovery Status

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Moe

Request for status update regarding discovery production and constitutional obligations.

Court proceeding
2020-12-10
Communication Source

Bail/Detention arguments regarding flight risk

From: Ms. Moe
To: THE COURT

Discussion of defendant's ability to live off the grid, use fake names, and evade detection.

Court hearing / oral argument
2020-12-10
Communication Source

Relevance of victim statements in bail analysis

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Moe

The Judge asks the government to clarify if victim statements should be considered in the 3142 (bail) analysis.

Court proceeding
2020-12-10
Communication Source

Arraignment on S1 superseding indictment

From: THE COURT
To: Ms. Moe

The judge confirms with Ms. Moe that the proceeding is an arraignment on the S1 superseding indictment and then asks her to explain the difference between the S1 and the original indictment.

Court dialogue
2020-12-10
Communication Source

Government's reply on the nature of its case presentation

From: Ms. Moe
To: ["The Court"]

Ms. Moe addresses the court, refuting the idea that the government's presentation is about 'spins' or 'throwing dirt.' She asserts that their case is based on facts detailed in a grand jury indictment, including allegations of trafficking underage girls and the defendant's conduct in hiding.

Court hearing statement
2020-12-10
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search