Ms. Maxwell
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Dr. Loftus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Juror No. 50
|
Adversarial defendant vs juror |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Accuser-3
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-3
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Adversarial defendant vs prosecutor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
LARRY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Accomplice victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed co-conspirators
|
Alleged co conspirators |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Speaker (Judge)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Assistance travel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Security Guard
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Implied co conspirator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
other alleged co-conspirators
|
Alleged criminal conspiracy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Adam Mueller
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
John
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional supervisory disputed |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Defendant victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell's lawyers
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal hearing | A detention hearing held by the district court where the government argued Ms. Maxwell was a flig... | district court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Judge Nathan denied motion to modify criminal protective order. | District Court | View |
| N/A | Alleged crime | An alleged conspiracy that Ms. Maxwell is accused of being a member of. The document outlines the... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trip | The alleged transportation of Jane in interstate commerce for the purpose of illegal sexual activ... | interstate / across state l... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Maxwell moved to consolidate appeals. | Appellate Court | View |
| N/A | Conspiracy | The Indictment charged a conspiracy between Jeffrey Epstein and Ms. Maxwell during a discrete tim... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | The document discusses the government's burden of proof at Ms. Maxwell's upcoming trial. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Change in travel pattern | Ms. Maxwell began spending less time flying on Mr. Epstein's planes. | Mr. Epstein's planes | View |
| N/A | Arrest | Arrest of Ms. Maxwell. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Initial bail hearing for Ms. Maxwell. | Court | View |
| N/A | Alleged crime | The document describes the third element of 'Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Ac... | Across state lines | View |
| N/A | Recruitment | The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, recruited Virginia, which set a recruitment scheme in motion. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A judge overrules objections made by the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, to paragraphs 79 and 81 of a doc... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | The criminal trial of Ms. Maxwell, where she is the defendant. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ongoing civil litigation between Ms. Maxwell and many of the government's potential witnesses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Arrest | Ms. Maxwell's arrest, which occurred prior to the date of this document. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A criminal case involving Ms. Maxwell where the government insists on the secrecy of discovery ma... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Ms. Maxwell's prosecution, which she argues was barred by a non-prosecution agreement (NPA). | District Court | View |
| N/A | Visit | Mr. Epstein would visit the Palm Beach house, sometimes without Ms. Maxwell and sometimes bringin... | Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal act | Transportation of an individual (Jane) across state lines for the purpose of illegal sexual activ... | across state lines | View |
| N/A | Grand jury investigation | The government conducted a grand jury investigation and issued subpoenas without notifying Ms. Ma... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | A flight for Jane to return to Palm Beach, allegedly arranged by Ms. Maxwell. | From New York to Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Trip | The witness was instructed by either Mr. Epstein or Ms. Maxwell to pick up Virginia Roberts. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Visit | Virginia brought her boyfriend to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home. Ms. Maxwell told the witness... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home | View |
| N/A | Visit | Towards the end of the witness's stay, Virginia brought two other unidentified girls to Mr. Epste... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach home | View |
EFTA00032686.pdf
An email dated April 9, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team regarding a new discovery production. The prosecution offers to send the files via FTP to the lawyers and notes that a CD with PDF-converted files (originally Excel) will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell to review.
EFTA00025508.pdf
This document is a series of emails from October 2020 concerning discovery production in the 'US v. Maxwell' case. The correspondence details the delivery and pickup of hard drives, the sending of Ms. Maxwell's drive to the MDC, and the scheduling of a prison visit for Ms. Maxwell to review a secure laptop. The emails involve legal teams from the Southern District of New York, Cohen Gresser, and HMFLAW, discussing logistical arrangements for evidence exchange and client access.
EFTA00025147.pdf
This document is an email dated October 28, 2021, from Nicole Simmons of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. to Judge Nathan's chambers in the Southern District of New York. It serves as a transmittal for the filing of 'Ms. Maxwell's Reply In Support of Her Motions in Limine' in the case U.S. v. Maxwell (Case No. 20 Cr. 330). The email was sent at the request of attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca.
EFTA00023478.pdf
This document is an email dated October 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Cohen, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves as a transmittal notice for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The prosecutor notes that digital files are being sent via USAfx and a physical CD is being sent to the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) for Ms. Maxwell.
EFTA00023049.pdf
This document is a 'List of Particulars' (Exhibit A), likely filed by the defense for Ghislaine Maxwell. It contains 29 specific requests demanding the government provide precise dates, locations, and details regarding allegations of sexual abuse, grooming, and interstate travel involving three minor victims between 1994 and 1997. It also requests specifics regarding perjury allegations related to depositions in 2016.
EFTA00019470.pdf
An email dated July 13, 2020, from a U.S. Pretrial Services Officer in the Southern District of New York regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The email attaches a bail report (filename: 6653181._Maxwell,_Ghislaine.pdf) and notes that Maxwell is scheduled for a remote appearance the following day. It includes strict confidentiality warnings citing Local Rule 57.1 and Title 18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1).
EFTA00015185.pdf
An email from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (including Christian Everdell and others) dated October 8, 2021. The email serves as notification for an additional discovery production in the case US v. Maxwell (20 Cr. 330) and discusses logistical arrangements for providing digital evidence to Ms. Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
EFTA00010159.pdf
This document is an email dated November 16, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell (Everdell, Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca). The email serves to notify the defense of an additional discovery production, including testifying and non-testifying witness materials, sent via USAfx. It also notes that a hard drive provided by the defense will be sent to the MDC for Ms. Maxwell's use.
DOJ-OGR-00000086.tif
This document is a legal conclusion affirming the District Court's judgment of conviction for Ms. Maxwell on June 29, 2022. It details five key holdings, including that Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement with USAO-SDFL did not prevent Maxwell's prosecution by USAOSDNY, and that the District Court's sentence for Maxwell was procedurally reasonable. The document emphasizes the gravity of Maxwell's offense and the significant harm she inflicted.
DOJ-OGR-00022841.tif
This document is an excerpt from a transcript or deposition, featuring a conversation between Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell. The discussion centers on the public perception of Jeffrey Epstein, allegations of him sexually assaulting numerous women (both juveniles and adults), and his preference for younger women, with Blanche stating his belief that younger women were abused by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00022697.tif
This document is a transcript of testimony or a proffer involving Ghislaine Maxwell, where she discusses her limited relationship with Harvey Weinstein, denying a close friendship, and her lack of knowledge regarding a social connection between Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein. She also denies any involvement of Epstein in her family's business and clarifies that her family generally disliked Epstein, though her mother got along with him.
DOJ-OGR-00022397.tif
This document is a page from a legal transcript, likely a deposition or court proceeding, where the speakers are discussing legal procedures concerning witness testimony and cross-examination. It includes a reference to a past meeting in July 2025 between Ms. Wax and Ms. Maxwell, and a current discussion involving Todd Blanche, Ghislaine Maxwell, and a Mr. Markus regarding a recent meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00008842.tif
This document is a legal correspondence or motion from Matthew A. Leish, an attorney for Daily News, L.P., requesting the unsealing of documents related to Ms. Maxwell's effort to obtain a new trial. It cites several legal precedents regarding public access to court documents, particularly in post-conviction proceedings and cases involving juror misconduct, arguing for transparency due to the strong presumption of openness and the public interest.
DOJ-OGR-00018341.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a judge instructs a jury about an upcoming witness's testimony. The judge clarifies that because the witness was over the age of consent, her alleged sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein was not illegal under the indictment, and she is not considered a victim in this case. The jury is strictly forbidden from using this testimony to convict the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, or to infer anything about the character or criminal propensity of either Epstein or Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018230.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion about legal strategy and evidence presentation. The defense counsel, Mr. Everdell, confirms to the court their request to not give a specific jury instruction regarding a photo of a minor, to avoid highlighting it. Subsequently, Ms. Comey informs the court that the parties have agreed to redact a portion of a video (Government Exhibit 296), which shows Detective Recarey reading a search warrant, before it is played for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00018229.jpg
This document is a court transcript from an afternoon session on August 10, 2022, where the jury is not present. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, withdraws a request for a limiting instruction, arguing it would be counterproductive. At the court's request, another attorney, Ms. Comey, reads the proposed instructions into the record, which were intended to guide the jury on how to interpret video and photo evidence concerning Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018204.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. The witness testifies that they never observed anyone being hurt or forced to participate in massages and that no one ever complained of such. The witness also confirms that Ms. Maxwell was a skilled and artistic photographer with professional equipment.
DOJ-OGR-00018200.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies about his role working for Mr. Epstein, stating he was a driver and was not allowed in the room when Epstein conversed with guests. He confirms driving Ms. Maxwell to massage places and being at The Breakers to find a professional masseuse for Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018196.jpg
This document is a transcript of a court cross-examination of a witness named Alessi regarding his time working for Mr. Epstein. The questioner probes Alessi about keeping secrets from Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine) concerning other women, which Alessi denies, stating Epstein never shared his personal life with him. Alessi confirms his employment ended in late 2002 and recalls meeting Virginia Roberts around 2001 or 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00018195.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Alessi. Alessi testifies that his employer, Mr. Epstein, instructed him on multiple occasions to remove pictures of Ms. Maxwell from a house before other women were present. Alessi characterizes these instructions not as a secret, but as a 'mandate' he was required to follow as an employee.
DOJ-OGR-00018194.jpg
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi is questioned about his prior testimony regarding contacting people at various clubs like The Breakers and Mar-a-Lago. The questioning then shifts to his knowledge of Mr. Epstein's visits to a Palm Beach house, specifically whether Epstein came without Ms. Maxwell or brought other women to the residence.
DOJ-OGR-00018193.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies that his job was to make phone calls to arrange appointments for Mr. Epstein based on direct instructions from Epstein, Ms. Maxwell, or office secretaries, and that he never sought out massage therapists on his own. He also confirms that most of the massage therapists came from spas or clubs.
DOJ-OGR-00018184.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning centers on establishing the date of a summer day when the witness was waiting for Ms. Maxwell. The witness's testimony shows significant uncertainty about the year, with their recollection shifting from 2001 to 2000 (a year they associate with working for 'Jeffrey' and meeting 'Virginia') and then to 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00018181.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on Alessi confirming observing Ms. Maxwell engaging in conversation with Virginia Roberts after Maxwell received a 'treatment.' There is a brief legal dispute where Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca misreading a line from a prior deposition, which Pagliuca then corrects.
DOJ-OGR-00018180.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi, who is being questioned about his prior testimony regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning focuses on an event where Alessi drove Maxwell to Mar-a-Lago, allegedly for 'some form of treatment,' and waited outside for approximately one hour.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest from estate | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $10,000,000.00 | Bequest listed as an asset | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Government/Victims | $0.00 | Restitution (Government is not seeking restitut... | View |
| N/A | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Unspecified | $0.00 | Sale of 69 Stanhope Mews and purchase of Kinner... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Purchase of a large townhouse. | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | Ms. Maxwell | $23,000,000.00 | Transfer of funds confirmed by bank statements. | View |
| 2023-06-29 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court/Government | $0.00 | Discussion regarding a court-imposed fine and M... | View |
| 2022-07-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | the government | $0.00 | Judge intends to impose a fine; amount not spec... | View |
| 2021-03-22 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Attorney Escrow A... | $0.00 | Funds for legal services presently held in atto... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Court | $0.00 | Proposed bond (amount not specified on this pag... | View |
| 2021-02-23 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Escrow | $0.00 | Money currently held in escrow for legal fees. | View |
| 2020-12-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Reported assets in support of bail application. | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A (Reporting) | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-07-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $3,800,000.00 | Assets reported by Ms. Maxwell in July 2020 | View |
| 2020-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | N/A | $22,000,000.00 | Assets reported in support of bail application. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Deal closed for leasehold property. | View |
| 1997-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Closing of the deal for property sale. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Received | Unknown | Ms. Maxwell | $0.00 | Contracts exchanged for leasehold property. | View |
| 1996-01-01 | Paid | Ms. Maxwell | Mr. and Mrs. O'Neill | $0.00 | Exchange of contracts for property sale. | View |
CorrLinks emails
Receipt of CorrLinks emails was significantly delayed and the emails were prematurely deleted by the MDC.
Legal and non-legal mail
Delivery of her mail was significantly delayed.
Upcoming flight information
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Sniper threat
A high-ranking prison guard told Ms. Maxwell that there was concern she would be shot by a sniper.
Upcoming flight information
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Legal consultation
Guards are described as feverishly writing while observing Ms. Maxwell during videoconferencing with her counsel.
Performance of duties at the residence
Ms. Maxwell provided instructions to Alessi regarding his duties at the residence, which involved tasks in various rooms and areas of the property.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via cell phone to provide information about an upcoming flight.
CorrLinks emails
Ms. Maxwell's CorrLinks emails were allegedly erased by guards.
Travel arrangement for Jane
The document mentions an incident where 'allegedly Ms. Maxwell got on the phone and somehow arranged for Jane to get back to Palm Beach'.
Non-legal personal matters
Her non-legal phone calls are monitored in real time, and information from them was used by staff to confront her about a personal matter (the death of someone close to her).
Something that happened between her move from a large apa...
The document references prior conversations between the witness (Rodgers) and Ms. Maxwell, which are the basis for a question from the attorney.
Something that happened between her move from a large apa...
The document references prior conversations between the witness (Rodgers) and Ms. Maxwell, which are the basis for a question from the attorney.
Request to stay unseal proceedings
Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Preska to stay the unseal proceedings to allow her to get permission to share confidential information from a criminal case.
Request for permission to share information
Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Nathan for permission to share information under seal with Judge Preska.
Denial of request
Judge Nathan denied Ms. Maxwell's request to share information with Judge Preska.
Denial of stay
Judge Preska denied Ms. Maxwell's request for a stay, stating there was no factual basis.
Events in Ms. Maxwell's life, including her father's deat...
The transcript details a court examination where the witness, Rodgers, is asked about conversations they had with Ms. Maxwell regarding when she moved between various apartments and a townhouse after her father's death.
Setting up massage appointments
Carolyn testified that Ms. Maxwell would call her to arrange massage appointments, which was considered important evidence for sex trafficking charges.
Household duties
Ms. Maxwell gave the witness, Juan, many instructions on how to perform his duties, including cleaning the house, serving, managing the kitchen, preparing shopping lists, and maintaining cleanliness.
Detention conditions
Ms. Maxwell filed written complaints through internal prison procedures to her unit counselor, the warden, and the regional office to seek remediation for her conditions, but to no avail.
Legal matters
The document alleges that all of Ms. Maxwell's legal emails were erased from the CorrLinks system.
Needing something
Early on, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness by beeper if she needed something.
A booklet/checklist
Mr. Alessi recalls telling Ms. Maxwell that he would not confirm or do the work required by a booklet/checklist because it was too much work on top of his daily duties.
Sniper threat
A high-ranking prison guard told Ms. Maxwell that there was concern she would be shot by a sniper.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity