Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror 50

Person
Mentions
685
Relationships
152
Events
331
Documents
332
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
152 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the defendant
Legal representative
17 Very Strong
24
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Juror defendant
12 Very Strong
8
View
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
22
View
person defendant
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
17
View
person the defendant
Juror defendant
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
12
View
organization The Court
Juror judge
10 Very Strong
7
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Juror defendant
9 Strong
5
View
person Annie Farmer
Social media interaction
9 Strong
4
View
organization The government
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Defendant juror
8 Strong
4
View
person Juror 50’s counsel
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person Juror 50's mother
Family
7
3
View
organization The Court
Judicial
7
2
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Client
7
2
View
location court
Judicial
7
3
View
person Counsel
Client
7
3
View
person second juror
Co jurors
7
3
View
person Juror 50's stepbrother
Family
7
3
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Mr. Spodek
Professional
6
2
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Juror 50 Social Media Activity Online View
N/A Trial The criminal trial of the defendant, Maxwell, which concluded prior to the events described in th... N/A View
N/A Evidentiary hearing The court ordered an evidentiary hearing to question Juror 50 about his false statements on the j... N/A View
N/A N/A Post-verdict hearing regarding Juror 50 District Court View
N/A Court ruling The District Court applied the McDonough standard and found Juror 50's testimony credible and his... District Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A Rule 33 motion was made based on a juror's alleged erroneous response during voir dire. District Court View
N/A Hearing A hearing was held where Juror 50 provided an explanation for his nondisclosure on the questionna... Court View
N/A Legal proceeding A hearing on potential juror misconduct involving the questioning of juror 50, mentioned in a foo... N/A View
N/A Questionnaire completion Juror 50 completed a questionnaire, denying any personal relationship with case participants. N/A View
N/A Investigation A potential investigation into possible juror misconduct by Juror 50, as implicated by a prior co... N/A View
N/A Jury selection Juror 50 completed a 'Jury Questionnaire' and gave testimony during voir dire as part of the jury... N/A View
N/A Proposed juror questioning The Government proposes that the Court question Juror 50 about their answers to a written questio... N/A View
N/A Trial A high-profile trial lasting thirteen days, which resulted in a guilty verdict by twelve jurors. N/A View
N/A Hearing A hearing where Juror 50 gave testimony regarding his statements in post-trial interviews. The Court View
N/A Trial The underlying legal trial where Juror 50 served. N/A View
N/A Jury selection The voir dire process where prospective jurors were questioned. The document analyzes this proces... N/A View
N/A Hearing A hearing where Juror 50's credibility was assessed, from which statements are being drawn for th... N/A View
N/A Childhood sexual abuse Juror 50 was sexually abused by his stepbrother during his childhood. N/A View
N/A Trial A trial that will hear evidence alleging sex crimes against underage girls, involving sexually su... N/A View
N/A Jury deliberation Juror 50 described the jury's deliberation process, which involved reading instructions, methodic... N/A View
N/A Hearing A hearing where Juror 50 gave sworn testimony about his ability to be an impartial juror. N/A View
N/A Jury deliberation Jury deliberations during which one juror allegedly made statements that were later reported by J... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A court is considering the admissibility of a juror's statements about another juror's comments m... N/A View
N/A Trial The trial of United States v. Maxwell, during which Juror 50 served on the jury. Court View
N/A Press interviews Post-verdict press interviews given by Juror 50, during which he did not reveal his last name. N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg

This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.

Court filing / order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg

This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Court filing (signature page / conclusion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.

Legal filing / court document (page 2 of 3)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg

This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unknown Entities Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... View
N/A Received Media outlets (im... Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... View
As Sender
122
As Recipient
28
Total
150

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: victim

Public comment on a victim's public Twitter post.

Social media comment
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Service

From: Juror 50
To: Various unnamed girls

Defense is requesting production of emails and social media content (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram).

Emails/social media
N/A
Communication Source

Juror experience

From: Juror 50
To: media

Interviews about the part his own experience as a victim of sexual abuse played in his role as a juror.

Media interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire (Questions 48 and 49)

From: Court/Attorneys
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding sexual abuse history of self, friends, or family.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Disclosure of facts

From: Juror 50
To: Press

Juror 50 disclosed facts of his sexual abuse in press interviews.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Voir Dire Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: Court/Counsel (Primary...

Juror 50 provided false answers regarding his history of abuse.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Fairness and impartiality

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Replied by rote in the affirmative regarding fairness; provided explanations for incorrect questionnaire answers.

Testimony/inquiry
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 completed a questionnaire regarding his background.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror 50 answered 'No' to questions 25, 48, and 49 incorrectly.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of questionnaire answers

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror admitted answers should have been 'Yes' but claimed he 'flew through' the form and was distracted.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Prior sexual abuse / Trial

From: Juror 50
To: media

Statements reviewed in the appeal regarding his memory and prior abuse.

Statements
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of conduct

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Testified he was distracted during questionnaire but attentive during trial.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Questions 25, 48, and 49 regarding personal history.

Legal document
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Juror 50 repeatedly made clear that he could be fair and impartial.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questioning

From: Judge Nathan
To: Juror 50

Questioning during jury selection process.

Voir dire
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Referenced as 'Juror 50's Questionnaire'

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Post-verdict statements

From: Juror 50
To: Public/Media

Referenced as 'Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict'

Public statements
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire (Question 48 and 25)

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of sexual abuse or being a victim of crime.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Bias / Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 testified that his history of sexual abuse would not affect his impartiality.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Gratitude for conviction

From: Juror 50
To: public

Social media posts expressing appreciation for statements of gratitude received for telling his personal story of abuse and convicting Ms. Maxwell.

Social media
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Annie Farmer

Thanked her for sharing her story.

Social media comment
N/A
Communication Source

Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: international media ou...

Juror 50 revealed his sexual abuse history publicly.

Interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Unsworn statements

From: Juror 50
To: Chinese-language media...

Statements made by Juror 50 to media outlets post-trial.

Media statements
N/A
Communication Source

Juror misconduct inquiry

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Statements about a second juror.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search