Juror 50
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
17
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
12
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Juror defendant |
11
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Juror judge |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
location
court
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Juror defendant |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Annie Farmer
|
Social media interaction |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Defendant juror |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Juror 50’s counsel
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50's mother
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
TODD A. SPODEK
|
Client |
7
|
2 | |
|
location
court
|
Judicial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Counsel
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
second juror
|
Co jurors |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Juror 50's stepbrother
|
Family |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
TODD A. SPODEK
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Spodek
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 gave press interviews after the verdict, stating he was a survivor of child sexual abuse. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 interview with Daily Mail. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Selection (Voir Dire) | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror 50. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Deliberations in US v. Maxwell | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jury Deliberations and Verdict | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 filling out the juror questionnaire. | Courthouse | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Juror 50. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 voir dire/questionnaire completion | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Limited Hearing | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deliberations | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial completion | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing regarding false testimony by Juror 50 | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing where Juror 50 may be a witness | The Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing on potential juror misconduct regarding Juror 50. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rule 33 Motion Ruling | District Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voir dire process where Juror 50 allegedly omitted information. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 gave interviews admitting identification with witnesses. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hearing regarding Juror 50. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50 Motion to Intervene | US District Court SDNY | View |
| N/A | N/A | Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed information. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Juror 50's experience of being sexually abused | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | The trial for which the juror is being screened, requiring attendance from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. | Courthouse | View |
| N/A | N/A | Proposed Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50 | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010322.jpg
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Vernon S. Broderick dated April 1, 2022, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government opposes the defendant's request to stay proceedings based on a Paramount Plus trailer featuring an interview with Juror 50, arguing the request is speculative and that the Court has already conducted a thorough fact-finding hearing regarding the juror.
DOJ-OGR-00010321.jpg
Attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case on April 1, 2022. The letter informs the court of a new Paramount Plus interview with 'Juror 50' that promises a 'bombshell revelation,' which may impact Maxwell's pending motion for a new trial. Sternheim requests a stay of any ruling until the defense and court can review the content of this interview.
DOJ-OGR-00010317.jpg
This legal document analyzes the conduct of Juror 50 during and after the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It highlights Juror 50's public revelation of his jury service on social media and his multiple false statements to the Court regarding his impartiality and willingness to follow instructions. The document argues that these actions demonstrate Juror 50's bias and inability to serve as an unbiased juror, providing grounds for a cause challenge.
DOJ-OGR-00010316.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror 50 intentionally provided false answers during jury selection. It highlights contradictions in his testimony regarding whether his abuser (his stepbrother) was a family member and contrasts his claim of not speaking about the abuse with his decisions to speak to international media and post on social media. The document portrays the juror's explanations as unbelievable and rehearsed, suggesting a deliberate attempt to mislead the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00010315.jpg
This is page 9 of a legal filing by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, dated March 15, 2022, regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The document argues that 'Juror 50' was biased and answered voir dire questions (specifically Question 25 and 49) incorrectly regarding his history of sexual abuse because he does not identify as a 'victim' due to his healing process. The defense argues this psychological coping mechanism prevented accurate answers and demonstrates bias, reiterating objections to the Court's limitation on questioning the juror.
DOJ-OGR-00010314.jpg
This legal document, from the law offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that 'Juror 50' demonstrated bias by providing false answers on a juror questionnaire. The filing disputes the juror's explanations for his answers—such as being rushed or no longer identifying as a victim of past abuse—as not credible, citing his own testimony and the content of the questionnaire itself as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00010313.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell's defense by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, argues that Juror 50 was biased and should have been struck from the jury. The filing asserts that the juror's failure to disclose his history of sexual abuse, coupled with his incredible explanations for false statements on a questionnaire, demonstrates a bias that his own assurances of impartiality cannot overcome. The document cites legal precedents from the Second Circuit to support the claim that juror bias must be determined from circumstances, not the juror's self-serving statements.
DOJ-OGR-00010311.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror 50 was incapable of being impartial due to his own past trauma of childhood sexual abuse, which was highly similar to that of the victims in the case. The filing cites multiple legal precedents where jurors were dismissed or new trials were granted for failing to disclose such biasing personal experiences. The document further contends that Juror 50's decision to speak to the international press after the trial to 'tell his story' demonstrates his deep identification with the victims and confirms his bias.
DOJ-OGR-00010310.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 649) from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, filed on March 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Maxwell. The text argues that 'Juror 50' demonstrated bias by lying on a questionnaire about his own history of sexual abuse, which the defense argues closely paralleled the abuse described by victims at the trial. The filing highlights that the juror was abused by a familiar person (his stepbrother), mirroring the allegations against Epstein and Maxwell, and argues he would have been struck for cause had he been honest.
DOJ-OGR-00010309.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 15, 2022, analyzes whether a juror, identified as Juror 50, gave false answers during jury selection (voir dire). Juror 50 answered "No" to a question about whether any family member had been accused of sexual abuse, but later admitted his stepbrother had been, and that his mother had reported it to the police. The court is now considering if this false statement satisfies the legal standard (the McDonough test) and would have provided Ms. Maxwell, a party in the case, with a valid reason to have the juror removed for cause.
DOJ-OGR-00010307.jpg
This is a letter dated March 15, 2022, from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues for a new trial for Maxwell, claiming that a juror, identified as 'Juror 50', provided false answers on his juror questionnaire by failing to disclose his own history of sexual abuse. The letter asserts that the juror's testimony at a subsequent hearing was not credible and that his presence on the jury was improper, warranting a retrial.
DOJ-OGR-00010305.jpg
This document is page 15 of a legal filing dated March 15, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues against the defendant's motion for a new trial, asserting that Juror 50 was fair and impartial despite disclosing past sexual abuse. The filing contends the defendant failed to meet the 'McDonough test' requirements to prove juror bias.
DOJ-OGR-00010304.jpg
This legal document is page 14 of a court filing, arguing against a defendant's motion claiming juror bias. The author contends that there is no evidence of actual bias from Juror 50, citing the juror's statements, the jury's diligent five-day deliberation, and the resulting split verdict. The document also dismisses the claim of implied bias, stating that the circumstances do not meet the narrow criteria established by the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00010303.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, argues against a defendant's motion for a new trial based on alleged juror bias. It focuses on Juror 50, who had a history of sexual abuse, and contends that despite this, the juror consistently affirmed his impartiality during voir dire on November 16, 2021, and a subsequent hearing on March 8, 2022. The filing asserts that Juror 50's testimony demonstrates he was not biased and was capable of rendering a verdict based solely on the evidence and the court's instructions.
DOJ-OGR-00010302.jpg
This legal document analyzes the credibility of Juror 50, concluding he should not be struck for cause. It argues that his prior experience with sexual abuse did not impede his ability to be a fair juror and that his subsequent press interviews were a result of naivety, not deception. The document cites the juror's own testimony and demeanor to support the claim that his failure to disclose information was an inadvertent error.
DOJ-OGR-00010300.jpg
This legal document, part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, argues that a juror, identified as Juror 50, did not deliberately lie on a questionnaire but rather made an "honest mistake." A hearing established that the juror was not biased, approached his service with an open mind, and would not have been dismissed for cause even if he had answered correctly. Therefore, the document concludes that the defendant's motion for relief based on the juror's alleged misconduct should be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00010299.jpg
This legal document argues that a juror, identified as Juror 50, should not be found to lack credibility for an inaccurate answer on a jury questionnaire. The author contends the juror's response was an honest mistake based on a reasonable interpretation of the question regarding his 'former stepbrother' and was not a deliberate attempt to get on the jury. The document cites legal precedents to support the idea that a fair, not perfect, trial is what is required, and an honest juror mistake does not invalidate the trial's outcome.
DOJ-OGR-00010298.jpg
This legal document argues that Juror 50 did not intentionally lie on a jury questionnaire when he failed to disclose childhood sexual abuse. The filing explains that the juror did not consider the unprosecuted abuse a "crime" and did not initially consider his estranged stepbrother, the abuser, to be a "family member" in the context of the questions. The document contends that a lay juror's interpretation of such questions should not be held to the strict standard of a trained lawyer.
DOJ-OGR-00010296.jpg
This legal document, filed on March 15, 2022, analyzes the testimony of Juror 50 regarding his answers on a jury questionnaire, specifically Question 48. Juror 50 explains that any inaccuracies were unintentional, attributing them to distractions and a desire to finish quickly, rather than a deliberate attempt to be selected for the jury. The document cites legal precedents to argue that the juror's credibility is not diminished, as jurors are not held to the same standards as lawyers.
DOJ-OGR-00010295.jpg
This legal document details the testimony of Juror 50 regarding an inaccurate answer he provided on a jury questionnaire. Juror 50 claims the error was an "inadvertent mistake" caused by skimming the question too quickly and being distracted by the environment in the courthouse. The document contrasts the juror's explanation with the defendant's legal argument that the juror's actions satisfy the first prong of the McDonough test for juror dishonesty.
DOJ-OGR-00010294.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on March 15, 2022. It argues against the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically addressing allegations regarding 'Juror 50' and citing the 'McDonough' test for juror misconduct. The text asserts the defendant failed to prove the juror committed a deliberate falsehood during voir dire.
DOJ-OGR-00010264.jpg
This is page 49 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. The Judge sets a schedule for simultaneous briefing due on the 15th (limited to 15 pages) and rules on the docketing of materials. The Court explicitly orders that identifying information for 'Juror 50' be redacted from submitted questions before they are docketed, while stating a previous judicial opinion will be docketed without redactions.
DOJ-OGR-00010242.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of 'Juror 50' regarding whether their personal history of sexual abuse affected their ability to be fair and impartial during the trial. Following the questioning, the Court initiates a sidebar conference where attorney Ms. Moe proposes a follow-up question.
DOJ-OGR-00010221.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It captures the beginning of an examination of a witness, identified as Juror 50, who has been duly sworn. The court instructs the witness on how to answer questions, specifically warning them not to reveal any information about jury deliberations or their personal thought processes during those deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00010220.jpg
This document contains page 5 of a court transcript from March 11, 2022, filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The transcript records the Court granting 'use immunity' to 'Juror 50' after the juror asserted their Fifth Amendment privilege. The judge explains that Juror 50 must testify truthfully and will not be prosecuted for their testimony unless they commit perjury, after which Juror 50 is called to the witness stand.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unknown Entities | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Media outlets (im... | Juror 50 | $0.00 | Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... | View |
Guidance regarding media statements
Juror 50 called the Jury Department asking for guidance due to statements he had given to media outlets, inquiring if he needed an attorney and if he could get a copy of his questionnaire.
Request for guidance regarding media statements
Juror asked for guidance regarding statements given to media and if he needed an attorney.
Request for guidance/attorney
Juror 50 asked for guidance regarding media statements and inquired if he needed an attorney.
Response to inquiry
Informed Juror 50 the Court could not provide guidance or his questionnaire.
Post-trial statements
Juror 50 stated that he was sexually abused as a minor.
Jury Service
Juror 50 discussed the questionnaire, stating he 'flew through' it and didn't recall the sexual abuse question.
Jury service and questionnaire
Reuters interviewed Juror 50 on or about January 5, 2022, where he discussed his jury service and stated he 'flew through' the questionnaire and did not recall being asked about personal experiences with sexual abuse.
Court Order
Order directing an inquiry into Juror 50.
Opportunity to be heard
Judge Nathan issued an order giving Juror 50 the opportunity to submit a brief by January 26, 2022, if he wishes to be heard on the issue of an inquiry.
Response to inquiry
Informed juror the Court could not provide guidance or access to the questionnaire.
Ghislaine Maxwell Juror Breaks Silence To The Independent...
Juror 50 stated that memories of abuse can be 'replayed like a video' and discussed the verdict.
Post-trial interview
Juror 50 discussed his experience and abuse history without using his full name.
N/A
Juror 50 thanked Farmer for sharing her story.
Comment on a post about sharing a story
Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post, calling her 'brave enough to come forward' and 'thank[ing] her for sharing her[] [story] as well.' He explained he had 'randomly seen' the post and 'felt like [he] wanted to comment.'
Post-verdict interview
Juror stated he was a survivor of child sexual abuse.
Social Media Usage
Statement regarding deleting social media due to a breakup.
Voir Dire
Juror confirmed he could decide the case based on facts and evidence.
Voir Dire
During oral voir dire, Juror 50 affirmed he could be fair and impartial and follow the Court's instructions.
Voir Dire
During oral voir dire, Juror 50 affirmed he could be fair and impartial and follow the Court's instructions.
Voir Dire
Juror 50 stated he used social media but had deleted apps due to a relationship breakup.
Voir Dire
Juror 50 stated he 'just got out of a relationship and I didn’t want to see anything regarding them'.
Jury Questionnaire
Juror 50 filled out the questionnaire, admittedly 'flying through' it.
Question 49
Juror 50 answered a question regarding his history, which the court notes he did not read closely.
Personal experience with sexual abuse
After the verdict, Juror 50 gave interviews to the media where he allegedly discussed his personal experience(s) with sexual abuse.
Juror's personal history of abuse
Following the verdict, Juror 50 gave press interviews in which he stated that he was a survivor of child sexual abuse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity