Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror 50

Person
Mentions
685
Relationships
152
Events
331
Documents
332
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
152 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the defendant
Legal representative
17 Very Strong
24
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Juror defendant
12 Very Strong
8
View
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
22
View
person defendant
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
17
View
person the defendant
Juror defendant
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
12
View
organization The Court
Juror judge
10 Very Strong
7
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Juror defendant
9 Strong
5
View
person Annie Farmer
Social media interaction
9 Strong
4
View
organization The government
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Defendant juror
8 Strong
4
View
person Juror 50’s counsel
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person Juror 50's mother
Family
7
3
View
organization The Court
Judicial
7
2
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Client
7
2
View
location court
Judicial
7
3
View
person Counsel
Client
7
3
View
person second juror
Co jurors
7
3
View
person Juror 50's stepbrother
Family
7
3
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Mr. Spodek
Professional
6
2
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Jury selection for Maxwell's trial, including a jury questionnaire where Juror 50 failed to accur... District Court View
N/A N/A Juror 50 gave press interviews after the verdict, stating he was a survivor of child sexual abuse. N/A View
N/A N/A Juror 50 interview with Daily Mail. Unknown View
N/A N/A Jury Selection (Voir Dire) Courtroom View
N/A N/A Hearing on potential juror misconduct involving Juror 50. N/A View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberations in US v. Maxwell Court View
N/A N/A Jury Deliberations and Verdict Court View
N/A N/A Juror 50 filling out the juror questionnaire. Courthouse View
N/A N/A Sexual abuse of Juror 50. Unknown View
N/A N/A Juror 50 voir dire/questionnaire completion Court View
N/A N/A Limited Hearing Court View
N/A N/A Deliberations Court View
N/A N/A Trial completion Court View
N/A N/A Hearing regarding false testimony by Juror 50 Court View
N/A N/A Hearing where Juror 50 may be a witness The Court View
N/A N/A Hearing on potential juror misconduct regarding Juror 50. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Rule 33 Motion Ruling District Court View
N/A N/A Voir dire process where Juror 50 allegedly omitted information. Courtroom View
N/A N/A Juror 50 gave interviews admitting identification with witnesses. Unknown View
N/A N/A Hearing regarding Juror 50. Court View
N/A N/A Juror 50 Motion to Intervene US District Court SDNY View
N/A N/A Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed information. Court View
N/A N/A Juror 50's experience of being sexually abused Unknown View
N/A N/A The trial for which the juror is being screened, requiring attendance from 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Courthouse View
N/A N/A Proposed Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50 Court View

DOJ-OGR-00009544.jpg

This document is Page 3 of a court filing (Document 620) from February 25, 2022, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It details the discovery that 'Juror 50' gave media interviews admitting to being a sexual abuse victim despite denying it on his juror questionnaire, leading the Defendant to file a motion for a new trial. The document also chronicles communications between Juror 50 and the SDNY Jury Department/District Executive in January 2022, where the juror sought legal guidance and access to his questionnaire.

Court filing / order
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009542.jpg

This document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's motion for a new trial based on the current record, which alleged misconduct by 'Juror 50'. However, the Court agrees to a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 provided a materially false answer on a jury questionnaire.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009539.jpg

This is the final signature page (page 3) of a court filing (Document 617) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. The US Attorney's office argues that because Juror 50 has already spoken publicly, no redactions are justified for a specific motion, which should be docketed. The document is signed by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.

Court filing (signature page / conclusion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009538.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 617) in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The text argues against the defendant's claim that 'Juror 50's' motion to intervene constitutes a discovery request, clarifying that the juror is seeking access to his own questionnaire which he swore under penalty of perjury. The filing argues that the motion is a judicial document that should not remain sealed, noting the defendant's arguments regarding privacy and potential prejudice lack merit.

Legal filing / court document (page 2 of 3)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009537.jpg

This document is a letter dated January 13, 2022, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell*. The Government argues that a motion filed by Counsel for Juror 50 to intervene and obtain jury selection materials should be filed publicly without redactions, countering the defendant's objection that it is not a judicial document. The document references a previous court order from January 12, 2022, and cites legal precedent regarding public access to judicial documents.

Legal correspondence / court filing (letter to judge)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008829.jpg

This legal letter, dated January 25, 2022, from Nathan Siegel of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, on behalf of ABC News and NBCUniversal News Group, is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York. It requests to join other news organizations in opposing the sealing of the Defendant's motion for a new trial and supporting exhibits, and specifically asks for Juror 50's motion to be unsealed, citing its relevance as a "judicial document" to the judicial process.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00008815.jpg

This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated January 12, 2022, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The order states that if a future submission from 'Juror 50' is allowed, the Court will grant the juror's legal counsel access to the ECF (Electronic Case Files) docketing system.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unknown Entities Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... View
N/A Received Media outlets (im... Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... View
As Sender
122
As Recipient
28
Total
150

Juror experience / Sexual abuse history

From: Juror 50
To: Laura Collins (Daily M...

Juror 50 disclosed his sexual abuse history and realized he may have misanswered questionnaire Question 48.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Service

From: Juror 50
To: media

Statements made by Juror 50 to the media about his jury service.

Media statements
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Screening

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Document Juror 50 is seeking a copy of.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Deliberations

From: Juror 50
To: The Independent

Discussed why the jury did not convict on count two (regarding Jane) but convicted on others.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of questionnaire answers

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Testimony regarding why he answered 'No' to questions about family abuse.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Deliberations

From: Juror 50
To: media

Statements regarding personal experiences and deliberations.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Verdict

From: Juror 50
To: Media/Public

Proclaimed the guilty verdict was 'for all the victims'.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Documents containing answers regarding prior experience with sexual assault.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Production of communications

From: The Court/Defense
To: Juror 50

Compelling production of Juror 50's communications and other information.

Subpoenas
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questions (25, 48, 49)

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of crime victimization and sexual harassment/abuse accusations.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Interview

From: Juror 50
To: Paramount Plus

Unreleased interview mentioned in a trailer.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Juror experience/questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: media

Juror 50 appeared surprised that the questionnaire asked about sexual abuse history.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Experience as a juror

From: Juror 50
To: Media/Public

Described identifying with witnesses and convincing other jurors based on personal trauma.

Interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Government witness

Juror felt compelled to contact a witness.

Contact
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Juror 50
To: Court/Counsel (Primary...

Omissions regarding personal history of abuse.

Voir dire
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Bias / Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 testified that his history of sexual abuse would not affect his impartiality.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Gratitude for conviction

From: Juror 50
To: public

Social media posts expressing appreciation for statements of gratitude received for telling his personal story of abuse and convicting Ms. Maxwell.

Social media
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Annie Farmer

Thanked her for sharing her story.

Social media comment
N/A
Communication Source

Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: international media ou...

Juror 50 revealed his sexual abuse history publicly.

Interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Unsworn statements

From: Juror 50
To: Chinese-language media...

Statements made by Juror 50 to media outlets post-trial.

Media statements
N/A
Communication Source

Juror misconduct inquiry

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Statements about a second juror.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Referenced as 'Juror 50's Questionnaire'

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Post-verdict statements

From: Juror 50
To: Public/Media

Referenced as 'Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict'

Public statements
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire (Question 48 and 25)

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of sexual abuse or being a victim of crime.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search