UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Adversarial defendant vs plaintiff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEXANDER ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. MOE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE R. COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Todd Blanche
|
Professional employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | The document pertains to an appeal (Case 20-3061) before the United States Court of Appeals for t... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, Docket #... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal deadline | Government sentencing submission due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-06 | Legal deadline | Government response due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-02 | Court proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order denying Ghislaine Maxwe... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order affirmi... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Pretrial conference | The Court discussed Dashawn Robertson's motion at length with the parties and the USPO. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Deadline | Deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT | View |
DOJ-OGR-00002962.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from the U.S. Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on April 16, 2021. The Government submits this memorandum to oppose twelve pre-trial motions filed by the defendant on January 25, 2021. The statement outlines the Government's arguments for denying the motions, asserting that they lack support in fact or law and addressing specific points such as the irrelevance of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement and the timeliness of the indictment.
DOJ-OGR-00002935.jpg
This is the cover page for the Government's Omnibus Memorandum opposing the defendant's pre-trial motions in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S1 20 Cr. 330). The document was filed on April 16, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, and lists the prosecution team led by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00004806.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell on July 1, 2021. The order lifts the temporary seal on a previous opinion regarding Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence. It also unseals a memorandum decision, an order, and hearing transcripts from a related civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, and orders Maxwell to file these documents on the public docket without redaction by July 2, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00004785.jpg
This document is an Opinion & Order filed on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The judge denies Maxwell's motion to suppress evidence obtained via a grand jury subpoena issued to Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, the law firm that represented Virginia Giuffre in a 2015 civil defamation suit against Maxwell. The document outlines the background of the civil suit, noting that Giuffre alleged defamation regarding accusations of sexual abuse by Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00004782.jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 25, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan granted the defendant's request that the Government is only required to file updates if there are material changes to Maxwell's conditions of confinement. The court noted it would take no further action absent other specific applications for relief.
DOJ-OGR-00004780.jpg
This is a court order issued on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and further orders the unsealing of documents from a related civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, including a memorandum and transcripts from hearings in March and April 2019. The parties are given a short timeframe to confer and propose redactions to these documents before they are made public.
DOJ-OGR-00004776.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 16, 2021. The order approves redactions proposed by Maxwell regarding a Government update on her confinement conditions and orders the Government to publicly file the redacted version by June 17, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00004749.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a sentencing hearing on June 15, 2021, for defendant Tiffany Days in the case United States of America v. Tiffany Days. The hearing, conducted via videoconference, begins with appearances from the government prosecutor, Nicholas Chiuchiolo, and defense counsel, Xavier R. Donaldson. The judge confirms the case details and outlines the charge to which Ms. Days has pleaded guilty—conspiracy to distribute narcotics—and begins to discuss the statutory minimum sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00004743.jpg
Mandate issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on June 7, 2021, affirming the District Court's orders denying bail to Ghislaine Maxwell. The court denied her motion for bail or temporary pretrial release. The document also notes that Maxwell's counsel raised concerns about sleep deprivation during incarceration, which the appellate court directed back to the District Court.
DOJ-OGR-00004737.jpg
This document is a Court Order filed on June 4, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's request to subpoena Boies Schiller Flexner LLP for specific items, including a victim's teenage diary, a pair of boots allegedly gifted by Epstein and Maxwell, and original photographs. The judge notes that while the victim's diary describes visiting Epstein in New York, there is no indication Maxwell is mentioned in the journal.
DOJ-OGR-00004735.jpg
This is a court order issued by District Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 2, 2021, for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order establishes a detailed disclosure and filing schedule for the prosecution and defense, setting deadlines from September to November 2021 for key pre-trial activities such as disclosing victim identities, witness lists, expert reports, and filing various motions.
DOJ-OGR-00004712.jpg
This document is a preliminary statement from a legal memorandum filed by the U.S. Government on May 25, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues that Maxwell's supplemental pre-trial motions should be denied, presenting five key reasons. These include the assertion that a non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein is irrelevant to this case, the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply, the charges are timely under the statute of limitations, and claims of prosecutorial delay are unfounded.
DOJ-OGR-00004664.jpg
This document is the cover page for a transcript of testimony given by a Special Agent (name redacted) before Federal Grand Jury 07-103 on March 18, 2008, at the U.S. Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. The case involves the United States of America vs. Jeffrey Epstein and co-defendants Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross (a/k/a Adriana Mucinska), and Nadia Marcinkova. Assistant United States Attorney A. Marie Villafana is listed as the appearing counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00014747.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. It notifies parties that a transcript for a conference held on December 29, 2021, has been filed and outlines the procedures and deadlines for requesting redactions. The document is signed by court reporter 'Speer'.
DOJ-OGR-00014678.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Filing of Official Transcript' filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330). It notifies parties that a transcript for a conference held on December 21, 2021, has been filed and outlines the seven-day deadline for requesting redactions of sensitive personal information before public release.
DOJ-OGR-00014590.jpg
This document is a page from a set of jury instructions for the criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It directs the jury on core legal principles, emphasizing that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, is entitled to a fair trial, is presumed innocent, and that the government bears the entire burden of proving her guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
DOJ-OGR-00011772.jpg
This document is a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. The notice confirms that a transcript for a conference held on November 29, 2021, has been filed by court reporter 'speer'. It outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript.
DOJ-OGR-00002842.jpg
This is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated March 26, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan orders that redactions on a letter from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP be removed unless the Government objects by March 29, 2021. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp indicating it was processed as part of a Department of Justice release.
DOJ-OGR-00002767.jpg
This document is the first page of a court order filed on March 22, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury, and summarizes the procedural history of her previous bail denials due to flight risk. The order sets up a discussion regarding Maxwell's third motion for release on bail, filed in February 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002726.jpg
This legal document is an affidavit filed by Bobbi C. Sternheim, counsel for defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Dated January 25, 2020, the affidavit certifies that the defense attempted in good faith to resolve issues with government counsel regarding a Motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures, but no agreement was reached. This filing is a procedural requirement under Local Criminal Rule 16.1.
DOJ-OGR-00020128.jpg
This is a Court Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines the charges against Maxwell (sex trafficking of minors and perjury) and addresses her renewed motion for release on bail pending trial. The judge reiterates the court's previous conclusion from July 2020 that Maxwell poses a clear flight risk and indicates that new arguments presented only solidify this view.
DOJ-OGR-00020104.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on December 23, 2020, it is a reply memorandum in support of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail. The document lists the names and contact information for her legal team from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00020102.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum signed by Philippe Jaeglé of the French Office for the International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. It explicitly clarifies that under the 1996 Bilateral Extradition Treaty and French law, France 'systematically refuses' to extradite its own nationals to the United States, noting this is a principle deviated from only within the European Union. This document is significant in the context of the Epstein case as it outlines the legal barrier that prevented the US from extraditing French associates like Jean-Luc Brunel.
DOJ-OGR-00020064.jpg
This legal document is a memorandum filed by the U.S. Government on December 18, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues against Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, stating that the court's previous decision to deny bail was correct because she remains a serious flight risk. The memorandum asserts that her new bail proposal is just a repackaging of old arguments and does not mitigate the risks posed by her extensive financial resources and foreign ties.
DOJ-OGR-00020061.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 28, 2020. It is the U.S. Government's memorandum opposing defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release in criminal case 20 Cr. 330 (AJN). The filing lists the prosecuting attorneys, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity