UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Adversarial defendant vs plaintiff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEXANDER ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. MOE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE R. COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Todd Blanche
|
Professional employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | The document pertains to an appeal (Case 20-3061) before the United States Court of Appeals for t... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, Docket #... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal deadline | Government sentencing submission due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-06 | Legal deadline | Government response due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-02 | Court proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order denying Ghislaine Maxwe... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order affirmi... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Pretrial conference | The Court discussed Dashawn Robertson's motion at length with the parties and the USPO. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Deadline | Deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019608.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal brief filed by the United States of America on October 2, 2020, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The case is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 20-3061) from a decision in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The brief lists the government's legal counsel, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz, who is set to argue the case.
DOJ-OGR-00017350.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York. It identifies the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, as well as the legal counsel appearing for both the prosecution and the defense. The case number is 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
DOJ-OGR-00017305.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, with the Honorable Alison J. Nathan presiding as District Judge. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00017279.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 21, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00013591.jpg
Court document filed on August 10, 2022, notifying parties that an official transcript for a conference held on December 9, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell has been filed. The document outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes publicly available.
DOJ-OGR-00010750.jpg
This is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan dated June 25, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a letter from the defendant regarding her access to legal materials needed for sentencing preparation at the MDC. The Court confirms with the MDC Warden that Maxwell has been given access to documents and a writing implement and orders the Government to follow up with the Warden and report back to the Court by 2:00 p.m. the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00010749.jpg
This is a court order issued on June 26, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses a motion filed by the attorney for an individual named 'Kate', which was referenced in a letter from the Defendant but had not been received by the Court. The judge orders the Government to officially docket this motion by midnight on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010748.jpg
A court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 25, 2022. The order requires the parties to submit their positions regarding a motion filed by Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein (Dkt. No. 675) by 10:00 a.m. the following day.
DOJ-OGR-00010744.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order addresses the rights of victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to be heard at sentencing. The court grants the request for three individuals, Annie Farmer, Kate, and Virginia Giuffre, to make oral statements at the sentencing, noting that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, does not object to their inclusion.
DOJ-OGR-00010737.jpg
This document is a legal motion filed on June 26, 2022, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. A victim identified as 'Jane Doe' (who testified under the pseudonym 'Kate') is requesting permission to deliver an oral victim impact statement at Maxwell's sentencing scheduled for June 28. The motion cites 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to support the inclusion of victim statements.
DOJ-OGR-00010692.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum filed on June 25, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorneys from Marsh Law Firm PLLC, on behalf of crime victims Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, are petitioning the court to allow their clients to deliver oral victim impact statements at the upcoming sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 28, 2022. The memorandum argues that the court should consider the full scope of harm caused by Maxwell's crimes, beyond the specific counts for which she was convicted.
DOJ-OGR-00010526.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 21, 2022, in the criminal case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order establishes the procedure for victims who wish to make a statement at sentencing, requiring them to submit a written statement via email to the Victim Witness Unit by noon on June 23, 2022. The Government is also ordered to inform the Defendant of any anticipated victim impact statements by 2:00 p.m. on the same day.
DOJ-OGR-00010447.jpg
This document is the title page of the Sentencing Memorandum filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell on June 15, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists the legal counsel representing Maxwell, including attorneys from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, Cohen & Gresser LLP, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman P.C. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00010447.
DOJ-OGR-00010418.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on June 15, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It lists Maxwell's defense team, including attorneys from Cohen & Gresser, the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, and Haddon, Morgan & Foreman. The filing supports Maxwell's objections to the Presentence Investigation Report.
DOJ-OGR-00010367.jpg
This legal document is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated April 29, 2022, concerning the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document, authored by Judge Alison J. Nathan, provides background on Maxwell's 2020 indictment for sex trafficking with Jeffrey Epstein, the subsequent thirteen-day trial, and the jury's guilty verdict on five of six counts. It introduces the defendant's post-trial motions, which argue for vacating some or all of her convictions.
DOJ-OGR-00010366.jpg
This is a court order issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan on April 26, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order sets a new, advanced schedule for sentencing submissions from both the prosecution and defense, following a letter from the Government. The schedule outlines several deadlines in May and June 2022, culminating in the final sentencing hearing on June 28, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00010324.jpg
This document is the first page of an Opinion & Order filed on April 1, 2022, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses the defendant's motion for a new trial based on the allegation that 'Juror 50' provided inaccurate information regarding a history of sexual abuse during jury selection. The text outlines the legal standards for impartial juries and notes that an uncommon post-trial hearing was conducted to investigate the juror's conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00010291.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on March 15, 2022, it is the government's memorandum opposing the defendant's motion for a new trial. The prosecution team is headed by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams.
DOJ-OGR-00010267.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Post-Trial Motions,' filed on March 11, 2022, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It lists the defense attorneys representing Maxwell: Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Laura A. Menninger, and Bobbi C. Sternheim, along with their respective law firms and contact information. The document bears a Department of Justice bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00010267.
DOJ-OGR-00010266.jpg
This legal document is a "Notice of Filing of Official Transcript" filed on March 11, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20 CR 330). It announces that the official transcript for a conference held on March 8, 2022, has been filed by the court reporter. The notice informs the parties that they have seven days to file a notice of intent to request redactions of personal data before the transcript is made publicly available.
DOJ-OGR-00010216.jpg
This document is an appearance list for a court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on March 8, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It details the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and lists all attorneys representing the United States, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and Juror 50. The document also includes the case number and the court reporting agency.
DOJ-OGR-00010204.jpg
This document is the cover page for an Amended Sentencing Memorandum filed on March 18, 2013, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Preet Bharara) regarding defendant David Parse. The case (S3 09 Cr. 581) involves multiple defendants including Paul Daugerdas, Donna Guerin, and Denis Field. The document also bears markings indicating it was later filed as Exhibit A-6074 in a 2020 civil case (1:20-cv-00338-AJN) on August 24, 2022.
DOJ-OGR-00010159.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case 'United States of America v. David Parse.' It records the opening of oral arguments regarding Parse's motion for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Defense attorney Paul Shechtman and prosecutors Nanette Davis and Stanley J. Okula, Jr. are present. While part of a larger batch of documents (indicated by the DOJ-OGR Bates stamp) often associated with Epstein-related releases, the text specifically concerns the trial of David Parse.
DOJ-OGR-00010158.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from a proceeding on October 12, 2012, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. David K. Parse, with Judge William H. Pauley III presiding. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, and the defense, represented by Paul Shechtman of Zuckerman Spaeder.
DOJ-OGR-00009985.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing in the case of United States of America v. Paul Daugerdas. The prosecution and defense agree to a stipulation to enter a witness report (PMD Exhibit 4) and police records (PMD 27) into evidence, avoiding the need for the witness to testify. Following the admission of this evidence, the defense rests its case, and the government proceeds by calling its next witness, Susan Brune.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity