Southern District of Florida
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Northern District of Georgia
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Northern District of Georgia prosecutors
|
Proxy |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Southern District of New York Prosecutors
|
No communication |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
SDNY
|
Professional distancing |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Jurisdictional dispute |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Southern District of New York
|
Jurisdictional separation |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
|
Collaboration |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement and investigation in Florida where victims' rights were violated. | Florida | View |
| 2007-09-24 | N/A | Execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Legal agreement | The Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement (“NPA”) with the Southern District of Flor... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Period covered by the OPR report regarding the Southern District of Florida's handling of the Jef... | Southern District of Florida | View |
EFTA00027776.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
EFTA00027072.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated October 20, 2020, serving as a cover letter for a discovery production. The production includes various materials such as FBI documents from Florida and NY, PBPD materials, and videos, listed with Bates numbers. The letter also addresses the status of data extracted from electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties, noting that privilege reviews are ongoing and that the Epstein Estate has not waived privilege.
EFTA00025355.pdf
This document is a chain of email correspondence between defense attorneys at Winston & Strawn and Assistant US Attorneys at the SDNY from July to September 2019. The correspondence concerns an investigation into a female client (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), including scheduling meetings, discussing an attorney proffer, and the defense reporting threats made against the client's husband. A critical revelation in the text is the SDNY's assertion that they possess telephone records proving the client had numerous contacts with multiple underage girls.
EFTA00024270.pdf
This document contains an FBI evidence receipt (FD-340) and a Grand Jury Subpoena issued by the Southern District of Florida in 2008. The subpoena commands a redacted individual to testify on June 3, 2008, in West Palm Beach. The return of service indicates the subpoena was served on May 29, 2008, in New York City by an FBI Special Agent, with handwritten notes clarifying a clerical error regarding the service date.
EFTA00022621.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) containing excerpts from court transcripts dated July 9 and July 15, 2019. The excerpts strongly assert that the SDNY investigation into Jeffrey Epstein was independent, initiated locally by SDNY, FBI, CBP, and NYPD, and was not coordinated with or transferred from the Department of Justice or the Southern District of Florida.
EFTA00022546.pdf
This document is a Reply Brief filed by victims Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's intervention brief regarding remedies for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims argue for the partial rescission of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed in 2007, specifically the immunity provisions, on the grounds that the agreement was illegally concealed from victims in violation of the CVRA. The brief refutes Epstein's arguments regarding due process, contract law, estoppel, and separation of powers, asserting that the NPA is unenforceable due to its illegal formation and the government's failure to confer with victims.
EFTA00022533.pdf
An email dated July 23, 2019, from an Associate U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to a redacted recipient. The email requests a call to discuss gathering information potentially relevant to the SDNY case against Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding an anticipated motion by Epstein to dismiss the case based on the 2008 Southern District of Florida (S.D.Fla.) non-prosecution agreement. The sender references attorneys in the Northern District of Georgia (N.D.Ga.) handling Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) litigation who suggested the contact.
EFTA00019238.pdf
An email chain from July 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The correspondence concerns coordinating document discovery for the recently charged Ghislaine Maxwell case, specifically revisiting materials related to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The emails mention that the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) conducted a significant document collection the previous year.
EFTA00014173.pdf
An email thread between US Attorneys (USAFLS) and the FBI discussing upcoming court dates in June 2009 regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The Assistant US Attorney expresses the belief that Epstein is in breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement due to recent legal filings by his counsel and notes that they may need to file an indictment by July 24th, 2009. The thread also mentions motions by the Palm Beach Post to unseal the agreement.
EFTA00014125.pdf
This document is a letter dated August 1, 2008, from attorney Brad Edwards to an Assistant US Attorney regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. Edwards argues for the inclusion of specific facts in a court notice, specifically that a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) barring federal charges was negotiated in secret in 2007 and withheld from victims due to a confidentiality clause until after Epstein's state plea in June 2008. Edwards also demands a full copy of the NPA, FBI interview reports of his clients, and a hearing transcript.
EFTA00013976.pdf
This document is a legal petition filed on July 7, 2008, by attorney Brad Edwards on behalf of 'Jane Doe,' a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The petition seeks to enforce Doe's rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically asserting that the US Attorney's Office failed to confer with her regarding ongoing plea negotiations with Epstein. The filing details that Epstein had already pleaded guilty to state charges on June 30, 2008, and argues that the federal government was on the verge of finalizing a plea deal without victim input.
EFTA00013926.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by attorneys for victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) in the Jeffrey Epstein case, arguing that the U.S. Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The filing details how the U.S. Attorney's Office and the FBI secretly entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with Epstein in September 2007 while misleading victims for months that the investigation was ongoing and that federal charges were still possible. The motion requests the court to order the government to produce the full Non-Prosecution Agreement and FBI interview reports, and to schedule a hearing to determine the appropriate remedy for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00013570.pdf
This document is a legal response filed on August 1, 2008, by victims of Jeffrey Epstein (Jane Doe #1 and #2) against the United States Government. The victims allege violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically that the government entered into a secret Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein in September 2007 without conferring with them and actively misled them into believing a federal investigation was ongoing. The filing requests the court to order the production of the NPA and an FBI interview report, and to schedule a hearing to determine remedies for the violation of the victims' rights.
EFTA00011501.pdf
Email correspondence from August 25, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The SDNY Public Corruption Unit chief contacts the SDFL Managing AUSA to arrange access to stored evidence boxes concerning the prior investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and co-conspirators, specifically to aid in the active prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. The SDFL confirms the materials are in a secure room in West Palm Beach and discusses logistics for scanning them, referencing a previous OPR inquiry that accessed the same files.
EFTA00011418.pdf
This document is a discovery request letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel, Cohen & Gresser LLP, to the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated October 13, 2020. The defense requests a wide range of materials including exculpatory Brady evidence, information on Minor Victims 1-3, communications regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement, and records of coordination between the government and civil attorneys representing Epstein's accusers. The letter also requests specific FBI files, unredacted reports, and evidence related to the credibility and potential financial motives of government witnesses.
EFTA00009860.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The SDNY team, specifically the Public Corruption Unit supervising the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, contacted SDFL to arrange access to physical evidence files, CDs, and cassette tapes from the prior SDFL investigation into Jeffrey Epstein stored in West Palm Beach. The correspondence discusses logistics for scanning these documents, the location of the files (including those gathered for an OPR inquiry), and the impact of COVID-19 on local vendor services.
EFTA00009550.pdf
This document is a transcript from a Federal Grand Jury session dated May 8, 2007, concerning 'Operation Leap Year'. It details the sworn testimony of an FBI agent involved in the investigation, discussing attempts to interview and subpoena an individual (referred to as Miss [REDACTED]) who frequented Jeffrey Epstein's house. The testimony reveals that Mr. Epstein paid for the attorney (Jim Eisenberg) representing this individual, who only agreed to an interview after being granted 6001 immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00000252.tif
This document discusses the legal context surrounding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell and the plea agreement made by Epstein. It highlights the government's intent to protect Epstein's associates from federal prosecution through a broad 'including but not limited to' clause, and notes the government's concerns about the strength of its case and victims' willingness to proceed to trial, referencing the OPR report.
DOJ-OGR-00000248.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing criticizing the Second Circuit's decision regarding the scope of the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It argues that the government's promise not to prosecute Epstein's co-conspirators, including four unnamed individuals, was unqualified and should be upheld, citing a Supreme Court precedent (Santobello v. New York).
DOJ-OGR-00000158.tif
This document details the resolution of a federal investigation into Epstein, culminating in a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) signed on September 24, 2007. Under the NPA, Epstein pled guilty to state charges in Florida for procurement of minors, served jail time and community control, registered as a sexual offender, and paid monetary damages to victims, in exchange for the USAO forgoing federal prosecution against him and several co-conspirators.
DOJ-OGR-00000061.tif
This document, dated April 10, 2025, is a legal filing arguing for the granting of a petition for certiorari. It highlights a legal dispute regarding the enforceability of a government promise not to prosecute Epstein's co-conspirators, specifically mentioning Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecution despite such a promise. David Oscar Markus, Counsel of Record from MARKUS/MOSS PLLC, is representing the petitioner.
DOJ-OGR-00000058.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing, discussing the interpretation of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and plea agreements. It argues that ambiguities in such agreements should be resolved against the government, citing several court cases. The document specifically contends that the NPA in question was intended to bind the Southern District of New York, contrary to a Second Circuit conclusion that suggested it only bound the Southern District of Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00000045.tif
This document details the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on the scope and limitations of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It explains how a co-conspirator clause was broadened to cover the entire United States, Epstein's 2008 Florida plea, his 2019 indictment in New York for sex trafficking, and his subsequent death, followed by Maxwell's indictment as his co-conspirator.
DOJ-OGR-00022703.tif
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or interrogation involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, and David Markus. The discussion primarily revolves around Jeffrey Epstein's legal cases, including a 2007-2009 investigation in the Southern District of Florida, his non-prosecution agreement, and Maxwell's knowledge and involvement in these matters. Maxwell denies direct knowledge of certain events, her contact with law enforcement, or direct discussions with Epstein about his legal deals.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity