Barry Krischer
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional conflict |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mike Edmondson
|
Superior subordinate |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Chief Reiter
|
Professional conflict |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Birkenfeld
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DETECTIVE RECAREY
|
Professional conflict |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accused prosecutor |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
sender
|
Professional endorsement |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Adversarial professional conflict |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers
|
Influenced by |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Detective Joe Recarey
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Adversarial professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Recarey
|
Conflict obstruction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional adversary |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Palm Beach County state attorney
|
Leader organization |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
dershowitz
|
Professional adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Conflict professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Professional different jurisdictions |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey where defense investigations into victims were ... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Krischer's office decided to delay the grand jury session for several months following a meet... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Substitution of Barry as trustee. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer sent the Epstein case to a grand jury instead of filing charges dir... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting where Barry Krischer discussed the timetable for a plea agreement and information for a c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Private meeting between Alan Dershowitz and Krischer. | Unknown (Dershowitz 'flew d... | View |
| N/A | Interviews | OPR conducted more than 60 interviews of witnesses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Convening of Grand Jury | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein entered a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Initial in-person meeting between Michael Reiter and Barry Krischer regarding the Epstein case. | Unknown (likely Florida) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors delay approval of subpoenas. | Palm Beach County State Att... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Estate plan refresh | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Substitution of Trustee | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey where Dershowitz shared investigation results t... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Obstruction of investigation process (delaying subpoenas/dodging calls). | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey regarding victim credibility. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuri... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors (Krischer/Belohlavek) obstruct investigation by ignoring calls and delaying subpoenas. | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | Communication | Jack sent a note to Barry providing Acosta's phone number and instructions regarding a follow-up ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Swearing-in ceremony of Barry Krischer | Unknown | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Barry Krischer contacted via telephone regarding Epstein. | Unspecified | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Epstein expresses his decision to stop interviewing, recommending, or vetting new hires and disav... | unknown | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Barry Krischer left the state attorney's office. | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Plea Conference | Unknown | View |
Jeffrey Epstein Part 03 of 08.pdf
This document is a compilation of FBI internal memos, administrative forms, and news clippings related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein between 2006 and 2011. It covers the FBI's monitoring of the state case, the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement, victim notification procedures, and the prosecution of Epstein's butler, Alfredo Rodriguez, for obstruction of justice. Significant portions include news articles detailing allegations by Virginia Roberts regarding Prince Andrew and the operations of the MC2 modeling agency.
Jeffrey Epstein Part 01 of 08.pdf
This document contains FBI administrative records and a significant collection of newspaper clippings regarding the 2005-2006 Palm Beach Police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It includes an FBI request to open a child prostitution case in July 2006, a redacted probable cause affidavit mentioning a houseman's testimony, and subpoenas for a Grand Jury. The bulk of the content comes from Palm Beach Post articles detailing the friction between the police and the State Attorney's office, the recruitment of underage girls by Haley Robson, and Epstein's high-profile connections.
Epstein_Part_17_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains several newspaper clippings from The Palm Beach Post in late July and early August 2006, detailing Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and indictment for soliciting prostitution. The articles cover his booking, release on bond, his attorney Jack Goldberger's claims of a 'distorted view' from police, and background information on Epstein's properties, social connections, and past legal troubles. The clippings also mention the involvement of State Attorney Barry Krischer and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter in the case.
060.pdf
This document is a response filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. (The Palm Beach Post) to an emergency petition for writ of certiorari by Jeffrey Epstein. The Post argues that the trial court correctly unsealed a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum related to Epstein's solicitation of minors, asserting that the documents were improperly sealed in the first instance and that no valid legal basis exists for their continued closure.
EFTA00027776.pdf
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
EFTA00014615.pdf
A legal opinion letter from attorney H. Dohn Williams Jr. to the U.S. Attorney's Office explaining the specific legal mechanisms Jeffrey Epstein used to avoid indefinite civil commitment under Florida's Jimmy Ryce Act. The author details how serving time in county jail rather than state prison was a deliberate loophole used to bypass the Act, a loophole that was closed in 2014. The letter asserts that 'money, powerful friends,' and the cooperation of the U.S. Attorney, State Attorney, and Sheriff's Office facilitated this unique arrangement.
EFTA00014172.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Barry Krischer discussing the confidentiality clauses of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The sender informs Krischer that Epstein's defense team (Lefkowitz, Black, Goldberger) must be notified before any disclosure, specifically regarding a request or potential lawsuit from the 'Shiny Sheet' (Palm Beach Daily News). The email also notes that the defense has failed to file the complete agreement with the Court as previously ordered.
EFTA00013921.pdf
An email chain between USAFLS officials dated May 27, 2008, discussing Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence reveals frustration regarding a potential plea deal or sentence, with one official sarcastically suggesting they 'throw him a party.' The thread references a conversation involving 'Barry' regarding a '90 days in jail' sentence.
EFTA00013860.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida dated September 17, 2009. The emails discuss media strategy in anticipation of a Palm Beach Post article about the Epstein deal. An Assistant U.S. Attorney clarifies that U.S. Attorney 'Alex' (likely Alexander Acosta) intended the prosecution to remain a state case to allow State Attorney Barry Krischer to 'save face,' while establishing minimum penalties as a 'floor' rather than a ceiling.
EFTA00013706.pdf
This document contains an email chain from November 27, 2007, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida) and Jay Lefkowitz, a lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein, with Alex Acosta CC'd. The emails discuss the selection of Aaron Podhurst and Bob Josephsberg (likely as mediators or special masters) and the government's statutory obligation under the Justice for All Act of 2004 to notify victims of the agreement with Epstein. The AUSA insists that vetting conclude immediately so that victims can be notified by November 29, 2007.
EFTA00013649.pdf
Editorial from The Palm Beach Post dated November 16, 2007, criticizing the potential plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. The article discusses Epstein's high-profile legal team (Goldberger, Dershowitz, Starr), the evidence found by police (including phone messages and a high school transcript in his trash), and the concern that his wealth is allowing him to bypass the justice system despite preying on underage girls. It notes that a previous grand jury indictment for solicitation was seen as insufficient given the age of the victims and mentions that the federal investigation had reportedly stalled the state case.
EFTA00013630.pdf
This document is an editorial from The Palm Beach Post dated November 16, 2007, criticizing the potential plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Epstein, accused of paying underage girls for sex, employed a high-profile legal team including Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr to negotiate a deal expected to result in 18 months jail time and sex offender registration, resolving charges from a 2006 indictment. The article expresses concern that Epstein's wealth is allowing him to manipulate the justice system and avoid more serious consequences.
EFTA00013530.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney dated November 26, 2007, discussing the scheduling of a plea and sentencing for the Epstein case targeted for December. The sender mentions a need to discuss 'victim notification' and notes a lack of response from individuals named Barry and Lanna.
EFTA00009229.pdf
This document is a transcript of an interview conducted by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility with R. Alexander Acosta on October 18, 2019. The interview focuses on Acosta's tenure as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and his office's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the decision to enter into a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. The transcript details discussions regarding the intake of the case, the assessment of evidence and legal issues including the petite policy, management decisions, and interactions with defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00023147.tif
This document details the internal review and communications surrounding the resolution of the Epstein case, particularly focusing on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights disagreements and varying interpretations among legal officials regarding Epstein's claims, the validity of the NPA, and the scope of federal involvement, including a reaction from Villafaña to the proposed 90-day jail term and Deputy Attorney General Filip's perspective on Epstein's arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00023116.tif
This document excerpt details the breakdown of negotiations for a federal plea agreement for Epstein by September 20, 2007, shifting focus to a state-only resolution to which the defense wanted to avoid sexual offender registration. It describes communications between Villafaña, Lefkowitz, Acosta, Lourie, and Krischer regarding proposed plea terms, sentencing, and deadlines, highlighting Villafaña's firm stance against further delays and Epstein's apparent goal to avoid sexual offender registration.
DOJ-OGR-00033217.tif
This email from Assistant U.S. Attorney Ann Marie C. Villafana to Barry Krischer, with Lanna Belohlavek in copy, discusses the failing plea negotiations for Mr. Epstein. The defense has changed their minds, only wanting to plead to state charges, and Villafana believes Epstein is hesitant about jail time and paying damages to victims. Villafana set a deadline for a non-prosecution agreement by Friday afternoon, threatening indictment by the following Tuesday if no agreement is reached, and mentions a verbal agreement with Krischer's office by Monday.
DOJ-OGR-00030523.jpg
This is the final page of a letter written by Alan Dershowitz. In the text, Dershowitz addresses an unknown recipient regarding the source of certain allegations, stating that if the source is not one of 'two women mentioned above,' he wishes to know the name to investigate further. He expresses a desire to resolve the matter. The letter is copied to Barry Krischer, Lanna Belohlavek, and Daliah Weiss. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and a 2017 public records request date.
DOJ-OGR-00030520.jpg
This is the final page of a letter from attorney Alan Dershowitz regarding unspecified allegations involving 'two women.' Dershowitz offers to investigate the claims further if the accusers are identified and copies the letter to Florida prosecutors Barry Krischer, Lanna Belohlavek, and Daliah Weiss. The document was released as part of a DOJ Public Records Request in 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00030517.jpg
This document is the final page of a letter written by Alan Dershowitz. He addresses an unnamed recipient regarding specific allegations, offering to investigate the source of claims if they do not originate from 'two women mentioned above.' The letter is copied to Barry Krischer, Lanna Belohlavek, and Daliah Weiss, and appears to be part of a larger DOJ public records release dated July 26, 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00030514.jpg
This letter, dated February 9, 2006, is from Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek to attorney Guy Fronstin. It formally invites Fronstin's client, Jeffrey Epstein, to voluntarily appear before the Palm Beach County Grand Jury on March 7, 2006, to address 'matters suggesting possible criminal conduct.' The letter explicitly states that this is not an offer of immunity, participation is voluntary, and any testimony provided by Epstein could be used against him in a future criminal prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00030469.jpg
A legal letter dated June 22, 2006, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense firm (Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss) to State Attorney Barry Krischer. The defense argues that based on recent meetings and polygraph results from expert George Slattery, there are no allegations of actual sex and the accuser claimed to be 18. The letter requests that no charges be filed or an informal agreement be reached, while simultaneously attacking the accuser's credibility by citing her online behavior and alleged changing of her age.
DOJ-OGR-00021491.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice report detailing the sources of information for an Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein case. OPR gathered records from U.S. Attorney's Offices in Florida and Georgia, as well as public records from Florida law enforcement agencies. The investigation also involved extensive interviews with subjects, and over 60 witnesses, including former high-ranking DOJ officials like Mark Filip and Alice Fisher, and communications with attorneys for Epstein's victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021469.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report detailing the decision-making process behind the failure to notify victims of Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 state plea hearing. It highlights a December 19, 2007 letter where US Attorney Acosta deferred notification responsibility to the State Attorney, citing jurisdiction issues. The text reveals internal conflicts and justifications, including fear that victim notification might cause the plea deal (NPA) to fall apart or lead to victim impeachment.
DOJ-OGR-00021309.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report detailing the internal review of the Jeffrey Epstein case in 2008. It describes how Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip and prosecutor John Roth reviewed defense appeals (initiated by Ken Starr) regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), with Filip ultimately dismissing the defense's arguments as 'ludicrous' and refusing to meet with Epstein. The text also highlights prosecutor Marie Villafaña's sarcastic and angry reaction to learning that State Attorney Barry Krischer had secretly negotiated a light 90-day jail sentence for Epstein.
Handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case
Reiter called Krischer's actions 'highly unusual' and urged him to consider disqualification from the case.
Prosecution of Epstein case
Stated that the chief prosecutor should disqualify himself and found the office's treatment of the cases 'highly unusual'.
Request for recusal / Appointment of new prosecutor
Reiter wrote a letter (Exhibit 3) hoping Krischer would realize his objectivity was insufficient and ask the governor to appoint someone else.
Disqualification from prosecution
Reiter urged Krischer to disqualify himself, calling his actions 'highly unusual'.
Epstein probe
Reiter wrote to Krischer suggesting Krischer consider if good and sufficient reason exists to require his disqualification from the prosecution of these cases.
No Subject
A letter sent to the state attorney, marked as exhibit 3, regarding the case.
Case discussions
Conversations between Michael Reiter and Barry Krischer prior to the May 1, 2006 letter.
Disqualification from the prosecution of Epstein cases
Reiter called his own actions in the Epstein case 'highly unusual' and urged Krischer to consider if 'good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases.'
Disqualification from the prosecution of Epstein cases
Reiter called his own actions in the Epstein case 'highly unusual' and urged Krischer to consider if 'good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases.'
Request for removal from case
Reiter called on Krischer to remove himself from the case; letter released to news media.
Handling of Epstein Case
Reiter called Krischer's actions 'highly unusual' and urged him to consider disqualification from the prosecution.
Epstein Investigation Status
Reiter briefs Krischer on the investigation; Krischer assures him he is taking the case seriously.
Handling of Epstein case
Bluntly critical letter regarding the handling of the case before indictment.
Handling of Epstein Case
Called Krischer's actions 'highly unusual' and urged him to consider disqualification from the prosecution.
Disqualification from prosecution
Suggesting Krischer consider if good reason exists to require his disqualification from the prosecution of these cases.
Handling of the Epstein case
Urged Krischer to disqualify himself from the prosecution; called actions 'highly unusual'.
Epstein case handling
Called Krischer's actions 'highly unusual' and urged him to consider disqualification from the prosecution.
Disqualification from prosecution of Epstein cases
Reiter called Krischer's actions in the Epstein case "highly unusual" and urged him to "consider if good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases."
Disqualification from prosecution of Epstein cases
Reiter called Krischer's actions in the Epstein case "highly unusual" and urged him to "consider if good and sufficient reason exists to require your disqualification from the prosecution of these cases."
Disqualification from the Epstein case prosecution
Reiter called Krischer's actions in the Epstein case "highly unusual" and urged him to consider if sufficient reason existed for his disqualification from the prosecution.
Request for disqualification
Suggesting Krischer consider if reason exists to require his disqualification from the prosecution
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity